ライフサイエンスコーパス: penalty

1 d chemical effects without imposing a weight penalty.

2 as standard cgMLST, with minimal performance penalty.

3 change that is offset by a greater entropic penalty.

4 phase change comes with a slow time response penalty.

5 hing for temporal patterns by applying a lag penalty.

6 our method performs better than using LASSO penalty.

7 ur method is still comparable to using LASSO penalty.

8 attractions while maintaining small entropic penalty.

9 gmax would experience severe photosynthetic penalty.

10 bserved among hospitals subject to financial penalty.

11 patients after induction has no known dnDSA penalty.

12 g-phase without incurring a permanent growth-penalty.

13 ls (55 of 1186) would receive the maximum 3% penalty.

14 559 of 1186) were projected to be assessed a penalty.

15 terior probabilities as a function of the L2 penalty.

16 ckground loss of KEA3 causes a strong growth penalty.

17 enthalpy change overcoming a small entropic penalty.

18 ding group-based taxes, subsidies, and fixed penalties.

19 tcome at hospitals that incurred readmission penalties.

20 76 more hospitals being eligible to receive penalties.

21 spitals, enforced by economic incentives and penalties.

22 f lignin exhibit collapsed vessels and yield penalties.

23 ng metrics that determine Medicare financial penalties.

24 17.4%, and 15.7% at hospitals not subject to penalties.

25 ewer small and rural hospitals would receive penalties.

26 complementarity while minimizing desolvation penalties.

27 , and received minimal mean (SD) readmission penalties (0.08% [0.12%]; P < .001 for comparison with r

28 1, and received higher mean (SD) readmission penalties (0.41% [0.28%] vs 0.29% [0.37%]; P < .001); 16

29 odel, and therefore destined for a financial penalty, 6/25 (24%) were reclassified as nonoutliers for

30 o enable scaling to continue without a power penalty, a different transistor mechanism is required to

31 We predict that the free energy penalty against the cubic ice interface should decrease

32 etermined differences in FY2017 HACRP scores/penalties among hospitals managing the highest decile of

33 -smoothness of the elastic and structural TV penalties, an efficient algorithm with the Nesterov's sm

34 ted using a utility function and generalized penalty analysis.

35 ely, at hospitals later subject to financial penalties and 18.7%, 24.2%, 17.4%, and 15.7% at hospital

36 lly at risk owing to impending reimbursement penalties and policy changes.

37 This study compared monetary penalties and rewards among safety net vs non-safety net

38 artners, although clinical audits, financial penalties and rewards to efficient maternity centres cou

39 ated was the association between readmission penalties and the calculated excess combined outcome rat

40 ncrease the number of hospitals eligible for penalties and would substantially increase the penalties

41 optimization models in how they quantify the penalty and how well they predict stomatal responses to

42 We implement both the L1 penalty and minimax concave penalty for variable selecti

43 parate associations from cues to rewards (or penalties) and infer which index (i.e. latent state) is

44 is designed (i.e., the external rewards and penalties) and on how the group operates.

45 nalty), low-performance (>/=0.50% and <0.99% penalty), and lowest-performance (>/=0.99% penalty) grou

46 nalty), low-performance (>/=0.50% and <0.99% penalty), and lowest-performance (>/=0.99% penalty) grou

47 ithin nine categories including prescribing, penalties, and others.

48 y impede quality assessment, anticipation of penalties, and quality improvement.

49 We introduce a novel SCCA model with a new penalty, and develop an efficient optimization algorithm

50 ants, banning abortion, supporting the death penalty, and protecting gun rights and you will know.

51 Our work indicates that conformational penalties are a major determinant of protein-DNA recogni

52 A number of non-convex penalties are proposed to reduce the estimation bias in

53 NPs is induced by the conformational entropy penalty arising from local perturbations of grafted and

54 policy was positive, with two supply and one penalty articles being the exceptions.

55 yocardial infarction, as well as readmission penalties (as percent of Medicare Diagnosis Group paymen

56 Due to the energy penalties associated with interfaces between coexisting

57 to the sites of growth, reduces the entropic penalty associated with colocalizing precursors and grow

58 We further show that the fitness penalty associated with excess gene copy number is not t

59 nucleoprotein filament and that the entropic penalty associated with restricting ssDNA flexibility is

60 e-binding free energy to reduce the entropic penalty associated with the subsequent chemical transfor

61 digital-signal-processing with <1.5 dB power penalties at a bit-error-rate of 2 x 10(-3).

62 1) at 260 K) but also by a large free energy penalty at the ice-vapor interface (89.7 +/- 12.8 J mol(

63 ed in this paper reveal that the interaction penalty at the interfaces plays a coupling effect betwee

64 for hospitals in the highest-performance (0% penalty), average-performance (>0% and <0.50% penalty),

65 for hospitals in the highest-performance (0% penalty), average-performance (>0% and <0.50% penalty),

66 spitals in such areas receive bonuses or pay penalties based on Medicare spending per hip- or knee-re

67 51/Y137H did not exhibit significant fitness penalties based on mycelial growth and spore germination

68 It would also increase the disparity in penalties between safety-net hospitals and other hospita

69 lution results in a short-term developmental penalty but has no significant impact upon appressorium

70 n of binding free energy to pay the entropic penalty but rather reflects how a preorganized active si

71 Separation of sparsity penalties by edge type is essential for accurate network

72 must correctly weight potential rewards and penalties by the probabilities of receiving them.

73 WUE was enhanced without a growth penalty by modulating abscisic acid (ABA) responses eith

74 Our results show that conformational penalties can be major determinants of RNA-ligand bindin

75 Predominantly, XT induced Q-penalty can be suppressed to be less than 1 dB up-to -11

76 US hospitals with complete data, readmission penalties closely tracked excess readmissions (r = 0.81;

77 es in atmospheric CO(2) (ie, carbon nutrient penalty, CO(2) fertilisation, and climate effects on pro

78 ents at hospitals later subject to financial penalties compared with those at nonpenalized hospitals

79 n born was associated with a long-term death penalty compared with being born in the host country.

80 Both AR + OMR and AR + FMR carry a survival penalty compared with the general population, but AR + F

81 ounds do not always encounter larger entropy penalty, compared with other more rigid binders, and hig

82 Concern has been expressed that HACRP penalties could adversely affect minority-serving hospit

83 These transgenic lines showed no biomass penalty despite a 10% reduction in Klason lignin content

84 Increases in HACRP penalties did not follow the same stepwise increase, ins

85 h operative volume, in contrast, reduced the penalty difference, +6.6 percentage-points.

86 ifically, these SCCA methods with non-convex penalties discover a strong association between the APOE

87 Current Medicare financial penalties do not meet the goals of aligning incentives a

88 Specifically, inclusion of the well distance penalty does not degrade the fit to the observations, in

89 ly report binding to Q7 without an energetic penalty due to the conjugated fluorophore.

90 assembly reactivity swing and minimal burnup penalty due to the self-shielding effect.

91 We examined associations between readmission penalties, ERRAGG, EMRAGG, and ECORAGG.

92 e results show that the receipt of financial penalties - even when uncoupled to performance - can pre

93 available to them--whether they would incur penalties (excess readmission ratio >1) for readmissions

94 parse-group lasso and Integrative LASSO with Penalty Factors (IPF-lasso).

95 Complexes formed with a smaller entropic penalty feature circular dichroism spectra consistent wi

96 We also show that imposing separate sparsity penalties for edges connecting different types of variab

97 US hospitals receive financial penalties for excess risk-standardized 30-day readmissio

98 were associated with fewer bonuses and more penalties for high-risk practices.

99 may impact Medicare reimbursement because of penalties for hospital-acquired conditions.

100 icare and Medicaid Services have implemented penalties for hospitals with above-average readmission r

101 ation of substantial insurance reimbursement penalties for hospitals with elevated rates.

102 impose severe burdens of interpretation and penalties for multiple testing.

103 In fiscal year 2014, financial penalties for one-third of US hospitals would have been

104 dverse events and hospitals facing financial penalties for readmission, there has never been a greate

105 reduce readmissions, including the financial penalties for readmissions under the ACA.

106 ted changes in practice and Medicare payment penalties for rehospitalization may have confounded the

107 hospital-wide measure would have on average penalties for safety-net hospitals (i.e., hospitals that

108 nalties and would substantially increase the penalties for safety-net hospitals.

109 To determine how penalties for US hospitals would change if policy equall

110 cale, high-stakes policy change that removed penalties for wrong answers on the national college entr

111 A key question is whether imposing penalties for wrong answers on these examinations deters

112 r effective pollution control policies but a penalty for a region with a deterioration in PM2.5 pollu

113 ow the x-axis may represent a binding energy penalty for a residue or a negative weight output from a

114 free energy change and a pseudo-free energy penalty for bimolecular pairing of nucleotides that are

115 IMP1 reflects a large conformational entropy penalty for binding.

116 oms of vandetanib, resulting in an energetic penalty for burying polar groups.

117 J/mol), with a larger than expected entropic penalty for CO2 adsorption (Deltasads = -204 +/- 4 J/mol

118 penalty for variable selection and Laplacian penalty for coefficient smoothing.

119 y barriers within the interlayer, creating a penalty for compounds with positive charge spread over a

120 mational rigidity, which in turn reduces the penalty for conformational entropy.

121 ms unrelated to immigration (e.g., the death penalty for convicted murderers).

122 of least squares, are modified by imposing a penalty for each explanatory variable used.

123 en the layers, which leads to a small energy penalty for layer sliding parallel to the van der Waals

124 s negative cooperativity through an entropic penalty for ligand binding.

125 surface more negative, while decreasing the penalty for lipid headgroup desolvation.

126 extreme flight costs mean that the energetic penalty for multiple landing attempts is high.

127 the Fermi level, which leads to a low energy penalty for oxygen vacancy formation, high ion mobility,

128 rriers within the interlayer, decreasing the penalty for quaternary amine sorption.

129 , was replaced by molecular hydrogen without penalty for the achievable hyperpolarization.

130 that closely matches the activation entropy penalty for the uncatalyzed reaction in water, whereas t

131 The electrostatic penalty for this close proximity is compensated by attra

132 conditions even when mixotrophs experience a penalty for using a generalist trophic strategy, due to

133 ment both the L1 penalty and minimax concave penalty for variable selection and Laplacian penalty for

134 stakeholders who face substantial financial penalties from readmissions pay-for-performance (P4P) me

135 The most skilled models are those with a penalty function based on stress-induced hydraulic failu

136 work, we construct a fabrication constraint penalty function for level set geometry representations

137 This analytical penalty function limits both the gap size and boundary c

138 sing a new model that has a hydraulics-based penalty function that meets all seven criteria and demon

139 Specifically, we propose a novel cross-trait penalty function with the Lasso and the minimax concave

140 hey calculate the corresponding penalty (the penalty function).

141 strained to the X-ray data via a generalized penalty function, identifies an anatase-like structure a

142 First, we compare their penalty functions against seven criteria that ensure a u

143 on models with better predictive skills have penalty functions that meet our seven criteria and use f

144 methods were modified to allow for different penalty functions.

145 d approach, 61% of SNHs were assigned to the penalty group versus 50% of non-SNHs.

146 ng for SES, 51% of SNHs were assigned to the penalty group.

147 % penalty), and lowest-performance (>/=0.99% penalty) groups.

148 % penalty), and lowest-performance (>/=0.99% penalty) groups.

149 anuary 1, 2008, and June 30, 2015, from 2214 penalty hospitals and 1283 nonpenalty hospitals.

150 For penalty hospitals, readmission rates for target conditio

151 mic parameters, including the helix reversal penalty (HRP) and the mismatch penalty (MMP).

152 oportionately bear the burden of readmission penalties if expanded to include cardiac surgery.

153 The thermodynamic penalty imposed by differences in isomerization for the

154 of variance was used to compare readmission penalties in hospitals with concordant (both ratios >1 o

155 irm the simulated results, with even smaller penalties in performance, largely due to improved heat d

156 n tuning the XB acceptor, due to desolvation penalties in protic solvents, as shown for a tetraquinuc

157 est that the approach for assessing hospital penalties in the HAC Reduction Program merits reconsider

158 o investigate the role of DNA conformational penalties in transcription factor-DNA recognition.

159 We incorporate this penalty in a fully automated optical design flow using a

160 tics to improve water use efficiency without penalty in carbon fixation.

161 gical abundance, there is little free energy penalty in forming co-oligomers, suggesting that the for

162 er reduction of ABO antibodies experience no penalty in graft and patient survival versus ABO-compati

163 enoid content in the seeds and no detectable penalty in morphology or yield.

164 correlates of response inhibition to avoid a penalty in relation to both problem drinking and SP, as

165 respect to hexagonal ice not only by a small penalty in the bulk free energy (3.6 +/- 1.5 J mol(-1) a

166 E2 revealed that a relatively high energetic penalty in the flap of the 22-bound BACE2 structure may

167 g over-fitting, and the total variation (TV) penalty in the model can effectively utilize the structu

168 The elastic penalty in the model is introduced for the sparse soluti

169 e number of hospitals that were eligible for penalties, in that they met a volume threshold of 25 adm

170 We show the 'switching penalty' incurred by parasitoids leads to stable coexist

171 The l 0 -norm penalty is a perfect sparsity-inducing tool which, howev

172 These results suggest a growth penalty is associated with respiring insoluble electron

173 th an 80% BC removal efficiency and <1% fuel penalty is climate beneficial.

174 This estimate for efficiency penalty is significantly higher than literature values a

175 Furthermore, an l(0) penalty is used to yield a sparse solution which selects

176 Measuring these "conformational penalties" is, however, challenging because bound RNA co

177 A network cost adjustment (penalty) is proposed to allow phylogenetic trees and sof

178 s and affine gap and quality-scaled mismatch penalties, it can implement the scoring functions of com

179 me resembles situations in sports, such as a penalty kick in soccer, service in tennis, the strike zo

180 P70s that can bind the TCR but that entropic penalties lead to a 200-fold decrease in binding rate by

181 s not strong enough to overcome the entropic penalty, leading to the formation of only partially fold

182 This study describes financial penalties levied on pharmaceutical companies for illegal

183 ating the most severe low temperature NO (x) penalty, light-duty diesel NO (x) emissions are likely t

184 enalty), average-performance (>0% and <0.50% penalty), low-performance (>/=0.50% and <0.99% penalty),

185 enalty), average-performance (>0% and <0.50% penalty), low-performance (>/=0.50% and <0.99% penalty),

186 In addition, adaptive penalties may be used to favor models that include inter

187 ospitals' narrow profit margins, readmission penalties may have a profound impact on these hospitals'

188 Using minimax concave penalty (MCP) and smoothly clipped absolute deviation (S

189 e Lasso, the Elastic Net and Minimax Concave Penalty (MCP) regression.

190 ction with the Lasso and the minimax concave penalty (MCP) to incorporate the shared genetic effects

191 The hospital-wide measure would increase penalties (mean [+/-SE] Medicare payment reductions acro

192 elix reversal penalty (HRP) and the mismatch penalty (MMP).

193 e recovery of sparse networks based on an l1-penalty model.

194 trategies, we identify over- and undersupply penalties of commodities as primary contributions to rec

195 In contrast to a recent report, the yield penalty of ccr1 mutants was not caused by ferulic acid a

196 ation between space filling and the entropic penalty of chain extension.

197 tal centre to overcome the inherent entropic penalty of cyclization.

198 ailable at any one time avoided the entropic penalty of fixing side chain conformations, which likely

199 This suggests that the entropic penalty of ordering the larger SLI is too high, allowing

200 additional assumptions regarding the energy penalty of pore penetration are included.

201 mour spatial structure amplifies the fitness penalty of resistant cells, and identifies their relativ

202 tion maximizes the carbon gain relative to a penalty of stomatal opening.

203 pass grafting readmissions with a 3% maximum penalty of total Medicare revenue.

204 he previous iteration, the agent adjusts the penalty of unsatisfied constraints and re-casts the give

205 educed recalcitrance but often exhibit yield penalties, offsetting their gains in fermentable sugar y

206 constraints in turn pose strong free-energy penalties on forming different tertiary contacts.

207 Care Act in March of 2010, placed financial penalties on hospitals with higher than expected rates o

208 table hospitalizations by imposing financial penalties on hospitals with higher-than-expected 30-day

209 ate change affecting productivity and carbon penalties on nutrient content.

210 on self but importantly, also, a regulatory penalty on nonself surfaces, yielding a selectivity fact

211 Our method uses a redescending penalty on the quasi-likelihood function, and thus has s

212 esponds to a higher barrier because a steric penalty on the stereoelectronically favorable cis-TS neg

213 wed a single locus insertion without a yield penalty or altered grain quality.

214 n improvement caused by the magnitude of the penalty or by different levels of health improvement in

215 ey-press action that caused either financial penalty or demonstrably painful electric shock to their

216 would result in a short-term female fitness penalty, or at least lower realised fitness, potentially

217 re categorised as supply, demand, incentive, penalty, or combination (i.e., at least two of the prece

218 However, the [Formula: see text]-norm penalty over-penalizes large coefficients and may incurs

219 i-stacking/pi-cation interaction, and steric penalties paid by competing pathways.

220 e analytic approach (Lasso-AL) to select the penalty parameter for type-1-error control, residual boo

221 The grid search for the penalty parameter is realized by warm starts.

222 zation, feature shrinkage is controlled by a penalty parameter lambda.

223 P4P measures for SDH, hospitals may receive penalties partially related to patient SDH factors beyon

224 The percentage receiving a negative (penalty) payment adjustment was 2.8% for system-affiliat

225 MIPS payment adjustment, including negative (penalty) payment adjustment, positive payment adjustment

226 scopy and analyzed in terms of a free energy penalty per "incorrect" amine enantiomer incorporated, a

227 In addition, a constant energetic penalty per rotor of approximately 5-6 kJ mol(-1) was ob

228 NADES-extraction is a green procedure with 2 penalty points in the EcoScale.

229 t in diverse wheat backgrounds without yield penalty, providing a solution for Fusarium resistance br

230 Our regularizations (penalties) render features learned in hidden layers of t

231 zed O-O single bonds that explain the energy penalty required to reduce the material upon discharge.

232 s stabilization comes with a severe entropic penalty, requiring the two species in the precise alignm

233 to bind ligand but with substantial entropic penalty, resulting in total higher free energy and reduc

234 The carbon nutrient penalty results in decreases in the global availability

235 ting hospitals to those at the highest known penalty-risk (more residents-to-beds, more severe), abso

236 an predicted by the PAPR (pentagon-adjacency penalty rule), (iii) the changes in regioisomer stabilit

237 selection method, named Stable Edge-specific Penalty Selection (StEPS).

238 optimization problem and propose an adaptive penalty selection method to avoid the sensitivity to the

239 e, we seek to bridge this divide by using a "penalty shot" task in which pairs of monkeys competed ag

240 Last, financial incentives and penalties should be developed or more actively reinforce

241 functional genomics, besides using sparsity penalty so that one can get biologically meaningful and

242 pital's potentially preventable readmissions penalty status (ie, change in whether a hospital exceede

243 ing the EDAC measure would change hospitals' penalty status for 3 conditions targeted by the HRRP.

244 , adjustment for SDH resulted in a change in penalty status for 3 hospitals within the 15-day window

245 Under the HRRP, the penalty status of 769 (27.0%) of 2845 hospitals for hear

246 Risk adjustment for SDH changed hospitals' penalty status on a readmissions-based P4P measure.

247 Exposure: Hospital penalty status or target condition under the HRRP.

248 trends in readmission rates by condition and penalty status.

249 nontarget conditions, stratified by hospital penalty status.

250 DeltaH but at the cost of a larger entropic penalty TDeltaS stemming from tighter binding.

251 re independent screening and minimax concave penalty techniques for variable selection, with the Sobe

252 re independent screening and minimax concave penalty techniques, we use a joint significance test for

253 Q.Clear reconstruction, the decrease in the penalty term (beta) increased the contrast recovery coef

254 ion that balances a data fitting term with a penalty term that encourages solutions with few haplotyp

255 st absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalty term.

256 nting for pairwise distance restraints using penalty terms in the scoring function is computationally

257 (ii) It infers position-specific gap penalties that favor insertions or deletions (indels) wi

258 tes hot-spot burial, yielding high energetic penalties that must be offset via complementary electros

259 It uses an L2 type of penalty that allows the method to handle extremely large

260 porates three novel elements: a new gene set penalty that includes non-linear penalization of multipl

261 desolvation was associated with an energetic penalty that was compensated for by the favorable electr

262 ,trans (gt) conformation to avoid the energy penalty that would arise from imposing the gg conformati

263 e is in how they calculate the corresponding penalty (the penalty function).

264 f diverting flights only if there is no fuel penalty, thereby avoiding additional long-lived CO(2) em

265 The receipt of financial rewards or penalties - though task-irrelevant - may exert an obliga

266 he 15-day window (2 were no longer above the penalty threshold and 1 was newly penalized) and 5 hospi

267 he 30-day window (3 were no longer above the penalty threshold and 2 were newly penalized).

268 e, change in whether a hospital exceeded the penalty threshold) using an observed-to-expected potenti

269 y preventable readmissions ratio of 1.0 as a penalty threshold.

270 ion after AMI has been a target of financial penalties through Medicare.

271 thod for finding gene sets that minimize the penalty, through a combination of heuristic Monte Carlo

272 tial and temporal effects allow crucial time penalties to be eliminated in guided soliton propagation

273 ets of covariates while applying independent penalties to each.

274 ategies is often associated with substantial penalties to fitness, making the resulting products unde

275 Omics data are then used to assign penalties to genes, interactions and pathways.

276 ive programs that link financial rewards and penalties to hospital performance on quality indicators

277 f risk adjusting for SDH on readmissions P4P penalties to hospitals is not well understood.

278 Affordable Care Act (ACA), applies financial penalties to hospitals that have higher-than-expected re

279 participants were more willing to take time penalties to receive feedback on trials with increasing

280 caid Services recently implemented financial penalties to reduce hospital readmissions for select con

281 e and outcomes for patients with ID, fear of penalties to transplant centers for poor outcomes, and s

282 nce Screening (ISIS) method with elastic net penalty to DNA methylation levels at 484,548 CpG markers

283 ic signaling, although representing a costly penalty to group members, is one effective form of commu

284 method, which uses a generalized fused lasso penalty to jointly estimate multiple pairs of canonical

285 mixed-effects models with the adaptive LASSO penalty to longitudinal data from 718 elderly men in the

286 d use the colored de Bruijn graph, with some penalty to runtime, allowing it to be applied in much la

287 nt model that includes financial rewards and penalties (two-sided risk).

288 and practically entails a substantial energy penalty, typically necessitating the operation of energy

289 for-service patients at hospitals subject to penalties under the HRRP had greater reductions in readm

290 cool roofs could outweigh small air-quality penalties, UV reflectance standards for cool roofing mat

291 Consumer growth penalty was driven by not only P imbalance between troph

292 water molecule with a high GIST displacement penalty was observed to stay in place.

293 ns, i.e., a "low temperature NO (x) emission penalty" was identified.

294 ror insensitive by a novel Hamiltonian extra penalty weight adjustment that enlarges the gap and subs

295 Projected readmission penalties were compared across quintiles.

296 was being implemented (2010-2012) and after penalties were initiated (2012-2014).

297 Hospital penalties were projected according to the Hospital Readm

298 tend to experience the greatest educational penalties when exposed to hotter early-life conditions a

299 se-mix both accentuated disparities in HACRP penalties when limiting hospitals to those at the highes

300 obstructions, and assess crosstalk and power penalty when data is transmitted.

301 tion is their exceptionally high desolvation penalty, which can equally reduce binding affinity.

302 udinal phenotypes by incorporating the fused penalty, which requires that the differences between two