ライフサイエンスコーパス: penetrating keratoplasty

1 nt procedures to minimize adverse effects of penetrating keratoplasty.

2 is, resulting in increased graft survival in penetrating keratoplasty.

3 d with corneal perforation, both requiring a penetrating keratoplasty.

4 d at 3 months, but only 2 patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty.

5 of endothelial damage, patients may require penetrating keratoplasty.

6 onjunctival injection in mice that underwent penetrating keratoplasty.

7 s are available to treat ametropia following penetrating keratoplasty.

8 ompared with conventional blade trephination penetrating keratoplasty.

9 K can be successfully used while waiting for penetrating keratoplasty.

10 of complications seen in procedures such as penetrating keratoplasty.

11 proved safety profile compared with standard penetrating keratoplasty.

12 ucoma refractory to medical management after penetrating keratoplasty.

13 rs after cataract surgery and 21 years after penetrating keratoplasty.

14 comes, or are potentially an alternative for penetrating keratoplasty.

15 ormal eyes and eyes that have undergone post-penetrating keratoplasty.

16 success rate for clear corneal grafts after penetrating keratoplasty.

17 elial syndrome, vitreoretinal disorders, and penetrating keratoplasty.

18 und healing following refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty.

19 fractive keratectomy, radial keratotomy, and penetrating keratoplasty.

20 have undergone corneal refractive surgery or penetrating keratoplasty.

21 concerns regarding the safety and success of penetrating keratoplasty.

22 f visual acuity which should be treated with penetrating keratoplasty.

23 s that may reduce the need for a therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

24 nsider other therapeutic approaches, such as penetrating keratoplasty.

25 neal perforation or the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

26 and rapid allograft rejection after corneal penetrating keratoplasty.

27 rogressive corneal melt required therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

28 anaged accordingly and only 1 patient needed penetrating keratoplasty.

29 h pneumatic descemetopexy and a few ended in penetrating keratoplasty.

30 D decay is reduced when compared to standard penetrating keratoplasty.

31 No eyes required subsequent penetrating keratoplasty.

32 ndothelial cell keratoplasty (DSAEK) or even penetrating keratoplasty.

33 t corneal neovascularization after high-risk penetrating keratoplasty.

34 was effective for performing laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty.

35 e chronic phase, and 1 patient who underwent penetrating keratoplasty.

36 lamellar keratoplasty have begun to supplant penetrating keratoplasty.

37 rier only) implants at the time of high-risk penetrating keratoplasty.

38 luded corneal perforation and/or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

39 tial value in predicting graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty.

40 entially decreasing or delaying the need for penetrating keratoplasty.

41 th more invasive surgery such as lamellar or penetrating keratoplasty.

42 ies and 54.8% subsequently requiring optical penetrating keratoplasties.

43 Twelve patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty 1 month after CXL (group A) and

44 Thirty-eight eyes of 38 patients with penetrating keratoplasty (15 eyes with corneal graft rej

45 ommon indication for KPro surgery was failed penetrating keratoplasties (22 eyes, 81.5%).

46 p A) and the remaining 12 patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty 3 months after CXL (group B).

47 Two patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty 3 months after inadequate visua

48 with previous glaucoma surgery, 7 eyes post-penetrating keratoplasty, 4 eyes post-Descemet stripping

49 Twenty-four eyes of 22 patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty: 4 had granular dystrophy, 12 h

50 nal corneal transplantation register, 13 920 penetrating keratoplasties, 858 deep anterior lamellar k

51 All cases of infectious keratitis following penetrating keratoplasty admitted to the Royal Victorian

52 e sequencing of glaucoma surgery relative to penetrating keratoplasty affects the outcome.

53 rwent femto-LASIK for the management of post-penetrating keratoplasty ametropia.

54 er RB-PDAT, with 22.5% requiring therapeutic penetrating keratoplasties and 54.8% subsequently requir

55 eft a total of 18 endophthalmitis events, 21 penetrating keratoplasties and 81 eyes with vision loss

56 Four patients underwent subsequent penetrating keratoplasty and 3 underwent repeat DSAEK.

57 Penetrating keratoplasty and keratoprosthesis implantati

58 cally reduce postoperative astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty and lead to improved, functiona

59 endothelial cell loss in the long term after penetrating keratoplasty and to predict when cell densit

60 : 13.5% required tarsorrhaphy, 5.8% required penetrating keratoplasty, and 1 eye was enucleated.

61 ed tarsorrhaphy, 6 patients (15.4%) required penetrating keratoplasty, and 1 patient required enuclea

62 he implantation of an intraocular lens after penetrating keratoplasty, and long-term results of penet

63 uch as corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL), penetrating keratoplasty, and photorefractive keratectom

64 size; corneal perforation and/or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty; and time to re-epithelializati

65 on of donor and recipient corneas for use in penetrating keratoplasty, anterior-lamellar keratoplasty

66 Endothelial transplantation has supplanted penetrating keratoplasty as the procedure of choice for

67 Penetrating keratoplasty as well as disease targeted lam

68 undergoing combined cataract extraction and penetrating keratoplasty as well as patients with a hist

69 ears of age or younger who underwent primary penetrating keratoplasty at Department of Ophthalmology,

70 We performed a penetrating keratoplasty at the left eye.

71 nts diagnosed with microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty at the National Taiwan Universi

72 ears of age or younger who underwent primary penetrating keratoplasty at Wills Eye Hospital Cornea Se

73 l techniques differ from those used in adult penetrating keratoplasty because of the reduced ocular r

74 dergone an average of 2.2+/-1.2 (range, 1-8) penetrating keratoplasties before keratoprosthesis impla

75 and other anterior segment-related (eg, post-penetrating keratoplasty), bleb-associated, glaucoma dra

76 measures included perforation or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty by 90 days.

77 Penetrating keratoplasty can commonly restore vision in

78 etropia and astigmatism following successful penetrating keratoplasty can seriously impact a patient'

79 from 32 keratoconus cases, 27 postoperative penetrating keratoplasty cases, and 29 postoperative con

80 s probably due to surgical trauma and, after penetrating keratoplasty, cell-mediated rejection and ot

81 creased hazard of perforation or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty compared with placebo after con

82 During penetrating keratoplasty, concomitant intraoperative pro

83 The corneal stroma in persons undergoing penetrating keratoplasty contained amyloid.

84 may need other approaches, such as sutures, penetrating keratoplasty, corneal rings, and pinhole imp

85 Penetrating keratoplasty (date range, 1992-2013), ALK (d

86 onfocal microscopy that was performed before penetrating keratoplasty demonstrated an acellular zone

87 to estimate the incidence of CET, including penetrating keratoplasty, Descemet stripping endothelial

88 ive treatment for patients with conventional penetrating keratoplasty failure, especially with approp

89 onor age is not a factor in survival of most penetrating keratoplasties for endothelial disease.

90 donor age is not an important factor in most penetrating keratoplasties for endothelial disease.

91 nts aged at least 17 years receiving a first penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus, Fuchs' endothe

92 measured in 30 eyes at least two years after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic indications

93 After penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, g

94 d the resultant corneal scarring may require penetrating keratoplasty for visual rehabilitation.

95 ver, 3 months later, the patient underwent a penetrating keratoplasty for visual rehabilitation.

96 lood leukocytes were obtained at the time of penetrating keratoplasty from three patients who had und

97 he visual and refractive advantages of large penetrating keratoplasty grafts with the high survival r

98 grafts with the high survival rate of small penetrating keratoplasty grafts.

99 corneal surgery, particularly full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty, has been performed since the i

100 d FECD, defined by a need for endothelial or penetrating keratoplasty, has not been investigated.

101 d to remain optically clear following murine penetrating keratoplasty; however, gamma irradiation red

102 CI, 1.05-11.22), and number of prior failed penetrating keratoplasties (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.18-2.28)

103 netrating keratoplasty (NR PK) and high-risk penetrating keratoplasty (HR PK).

104 Best corrected visual acuity 1 year prior to penetrating keratoplasty in 15 eyes (nine patients) rang

105 data from 953 CLEK subjects who did not have penetrating keratoplasty in either eye at baseline and w

106 Penetrating keratoplasty in infants and young children i

107 Sixteen rabbits underwent allogenic penetrating keratoplasty in one eye.

108 th frequent complaints of glare necessitates penetrating keratoplasty in the majority of patients ove

109 Although pediatric penetrating keratoplasty is challenging, successful tran

110 Endothelial cell density at 6 months after penetrating keratoplasty is predictive of graft failure,

111 omes for the correction of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty, laser-assisted in-situ keratom

112 Infectious keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty leads to a high graft failure r

113 Similarly to penetrating keratoplasty, microkeratome-assisted mushroo

114 KPro exchange (n = 8), penetrating keratoplasty (n = 1), or evisceration (n = 2

115 included post-cataract surgery (n = 6), post-penetrating keratoplasty (n = 2), and post-trabeculectom

116 taract surgery (n = 4), and occurrence after penetrating keratoplasty (n = 2).

117 injection in mice that underwent normal risk penetrating keratoplasty (NR PK) and high-risk penetrati

118 e likely to perforate or require therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (odds ratio: 6.27; 95% CI: 2.73

119 y to have perforation or require therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (odds ratio=0.42; 95% CI, 0.22

120 Documents related to penetrating keratoplasty only have been decreased, where

121 red thirty-nine eyes (96 corneal grafts post penetrating keratoplasty or Descemet stripping automated

122 y, is a promising therapeutic alternative to penetrating keratoplasty or lamellar keratoplasty that i

123 rticipants with a history of glaucoma before penetrating keratoplasty, particularly with prior glauco

124 n February 2020, the patient decided to have penetrating keratoplasty performed at the University Eye

125 All penetrating keratoplasties (PK) performed at the Singapo

126 ng endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) (51%), 84 penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (46%), and 4 keratoprosthe

127 djusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; P < 0.001), penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (adjusted HR, 1.12 vs. ALK

128 Patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (n = 142, 39.2%), anterior

129 allowed us to avoid corneal perforation and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) a chaud.

130 tive was to compare the surgical outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and Boston type 1 keratopr

131 istory of corneal blindness caused by failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and inability to accuratel

132 intraoperative perforation and conversion to penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and the percentage of pati

133 rapidly replacing traditional full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for endothelial disease.

134 utomated-endothelial-keratoplasty (DSAEK) or penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for endothelial dysfunctio

135 tomated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for Fuchs endothelial dyst

136 ve eyes with unsatisfactory vision following penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for keratoconus (n = 79),

137 Surgical technique was penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in 1209 cases, anterior la

138 Endothelial rejection was reported following penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in 13% of children (10% in

139 eyes of 25 children who underwent AGV after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in 22 eyes and Descemet's

140 helial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and conventional penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in Asian eyes.

141 A total of 24.1% were converted to penetrating keratoplasty (PK) intraoperatively.

142 Other outcomes included comparisons to penetrating keratoplasty (PK) published results and comp

143 Penetrating keratoplasty (PK) ranks among the oldest and

144 cipients (n = 13,644) undergoing their first penetrating keratoplasty (PK) registered on the United K

145 nd neovascularization, the patient underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK) with combination of interr

146 and secondary outcome was considered need to penetrating keratoplasty (PK)).

147 Forty-four eyes (41.9%) underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK), 37 (35.2%) underwent ante

148 omated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and penetrating keratoplasty (PK), and in a control group th

149 hy (PBK), or keratoconus who had undergone a penetrating keratoplasty (PK), endothelial keratoplasty

150 mplications leading to late graft failure in penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

151 on of the cannula and required conversion to penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

152 2 eyes (2/540; 0.37%) that were converted to penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

153 (ORA) in non keratoconic patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

154 elial graft decompensation following primary penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

155 rmining factors of microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

156 e risk of rejection and failure after failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

157 option for eyes that are not candidates for penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

158 ected by severe keratoconus and submitted to penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

159 including endothelial keratoplasty (EK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK); amphotericin B, voriconaz

160 th endothelial keratoplasty [DSEK], 30 eyes; penetrating keratoplasty [PK], 10 eyes) for Fuchs' dystr

161 h KPro are compared with those of eyes after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) as well as control eyes.

162 e the preferred surgical procedure replacing penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for corneal endothelial d

163 y patients who had undergone a first DALK or penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for keratoconus.

164 To report a patient with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) graft endothelial failure

165 and/or perforation necessitating therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) or evisceration.

166 nking (CXL) and conventional management with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) when indicated in managin

167 enable vitreoretinal surgery, followed by a penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) which can restore corneal

168 Twenty-three eyes underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) with an average of 2.0 +/

169 advancements have led to the replacement of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) with the more selective d

170 intraocular lens implantation combined with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).

171 on during cataract surgery in patients after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).

172 The most common primary transplant was penetrating keratoplasty (PKP, 50.3%), followed by Desce

173 used to seal 4.1-mm central lacerations and penetrating keratoplasties (PKPs) in enucleated porcine

174 s is lower after DSEK compared with standard penetrating keratoplasty, possibly because wound healing

175 utcomes of patients that underwent pediatric penetrating keratoplasty (PPK) for herpes simplex virus

176 umber of comorbid conditions including prior penetrating keratoplasty, prior glaucoma surgery, iridoc

177 Patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty received ciprofloxacin 0.3% or

178 In contrast to penetrating keratoplasty, rejection following DSAEK is a

179 taract surgery, endothelial keratoplasty, or penetrating keratoplasty, respectively.

180 nt can be surgically inserted at the time of penetrating keratoplasties, since the implant achieves t

181 lanted after complicated cataract surgery or penetrating keratoplasty, they are indicated in several

182 ents, selective keratoplasties have replaced penetrating keratoplasty to treat corneal decompensation

183 ly over the past decade, from full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty towards lamellar keratoplasty t

184 d of perforation or the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK) in the early-steroid arm

185 neal perforation or the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK) within 3 months.

186 al perforation (CP), the rate of therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK), or both; and microbiolog

187 ation and/or the need to undergo therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK).

188 perforation, and/or the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK).

189 ze or both; rate of perforation; therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK); and other adverse events

190 The only eye that required penetrating keratoplasty was an early intervention belie

191 a (122 eyes, group 2), and in cases in which penetrating keratoplasty was associated with vitrectomy

192 corneal neovascularization developing after penetrating keratoplasty was found between treatment gro

193 Conversion to penetrating keratoplasty was necessary in 1 case (1.1%).

194 No conversion to penetrating keratoplasty was necessary.

195 Penetrating keratoplasty was offered to 5 patients when

196 Penetrating keratoplasty was performed in 8 of the 11 ey

197 Orthotopic penetrating keratoplasty was performed using irradiated

198 A corneal dystrophy was diagnosed and penetrating keratoplasty was recommended but the patient

199 Penetrating keratoplasty was reported in 20 of 37 (54%)

200 Full-thickness penetrating keratoplasties were performed in normal mice

201 Multiple therapeutic penetrating keratoplasties were required to eradicate th

202 f corneal neovascularization occurring after penetrating keratoplasty were evaluated in a substudy (L

203 ieving visual results comparable to those of penetrating keratoplasty, while sparing a healthy endoth

204 ating keratoplasty, and long-term results of penetrating keratoplasty with glaucoma drainage tube imp