戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ues mainly reflect the low frequency of true penicillin allergy.
2 ephalosporin use in patients with a recorded penicillin allergy.
3 m to have a DA, and the most common label is penicillin allergy.
4 of patients with an unsubstantiated label of penicillin allergy.
5 plex (MHC) I gene HLA-B in the occurrence of penicillin allergy.
6  be very safe in patients with no history of penicillin allergy.
7 porin antibiotics among inpatients reporting penicillin allergy.
8  testing is safe and effective in ruling out penicillin allergy.
9  used, even in individuals with a history of penicillin allergy.
10 tandings about the characteristics of a true penicillin allergy.
11 rting 2315 antibiotic allergies, 1225 with a penicillin allergy.
12 was used (600 mg per dose) for patients with penicillin allergy.
13  allergy assessment following self-report of penicillin allergy.
14 of-care risk assessment for adults reporting penicillin allergies.
15 ck sufficient resources to address inpatient penicillin allergies.
16 areness on the implications of self-reported penicillin allergies.
17 %; I2 = 54.3%) than for those with confirmed penicillin allergy (3.0%; 95% CrI, 0.01%-17.0%; I2 = 88.
18 at the site) were used among patients with a penicillin allergy; after removal of the alert, administ
19 of cephalosporin use before and after an EHR penicillin allergy alert was removed in 1 of the study r
20 icillin may allow clinicians to exclude true penicillin allergy, allowing these patients to receive p
21 e aimed to determine the optimal approach to penicillin allergies among medical inpatients.
22 study examines a clinical decision model for penicillin allergies among pediatric patients; the model
23 paring clinical history to the skin test for penicillin allergy among patients with and without a pos
24 vancomycin prophylaxis for those with severe penicillin allergies and antibiotic-resistant organisms.
25 clude identification of HLA associations for penicillin allergy and a microRNA biomarker/mechanism fo
26 ded for use only in patients with a label of penicillin allergy and does not apply to other beta-lact
27 ed studies conducted in patients reporting a penicillin allergy and in whom skin tests and/or specifi
28                   Participants with reported penicillin allergy answered an expert-developed question
29                                              Penicillin allergies are associated with inferior patien
30                                              Penicillin allergies are frequently mislabeled, which ma
31          Surgical patients labeled as having penicillin allergy are less likely to prophylactically r
32 ed as penicillin allergic, most diagnoses of penicillin allergy are made in childhood and relate to e
33       The majority of patients with reported penicillin allergy are not allergic when tested or chall
34 0% to 20% of patients reporting a history of penicillin allergy are truly allergic when assessed by s
35     Fewer than 5% of patients labeled with a penicillin allergy are truly allergic.
36  not detail the epidemiology or aetiology of penicillin allergy, as this is covered extensively in th
37  (93%) agreed on the safety/effectiveness of penicillin allergy assessment in STI clinics.
38 pital emergency department, a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy assessment via medical records review
39 cribing of cephalosporins to patients with a penicillin allergy at 1 of the 2 sites, 58 228 courses o
40 ation or dispensing among patients without a penicillin allergy at the same site and patients at the
41 osporin use among patients with or without a penicillin allergy at the site that removed the warning
42 erococcus (VRE) in patients with and without penicillin "allergy" at hospital admission.
43                                   Cases with penicillin "allergy" averaged 0.59 (9.9%; 95% CI, 0.47-0
44                                Evaluation of penicillin allergy before deciding not to use penicillin
45 algorithm to define which patients reporting penicillin allergy can be safely treated at STI clinics
46 y transmitted infection (STI) clinics report penicillin allergies, complicating treatment for syphili
47  approach, 67% of participants with reported penicillin allergy could safely receive first-line treat
48                             Operationalizing penicillin allergy de-labeling as an aspect of ASP has b
49                             Operationalizing penicillin allergy de-labeling into a new arm of antimic
50           With no standard method to capture penicillin allergy de-labeling prevalence across populat
51 lations, we developed and validated a simple penicillin allergy de-labeling prevalence measure from e
52 bels, and current approaches and barriers to penicillin allergy de-labeling.
53 cient model for a non-allergy-specialist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling (PADL) service has not b
54 e identified from proactive or opportunistic penicillin allergy de-labelling in this study.
55                                          The penicillin allergy de-labelling pathway cost was >= 4-fo
56 rgy or immunology, but who wish to develop a penicillin allergy de-labelling service for their patien
57 in challenges might support the expansion of penicillin allergy delabeling efforts, the perceived ris
58 icts the global population who could undergo penicillin allergy delabeling.
59 out proceeding formal skin testing to tackle penicillin allergy efficiently within complex healthcare
60 At the same time, there is great promise for penicillin allergy evaluation and de-labeling as an indi
61 t challenges are safe for incorporation into penicillin allergy evaluation efforts across age groups
62 estionnaire can safely identify patients for penicillin allergy evaluation in STI clinics by PST or G
63                        Clinicians performing penicillin allergy evaluation need to identify what meth
64 ed trial to assess feasibility and safety of penicillin allergy evaluations in STI clinics.
65  [CI], 1.5-2.5), while absence of history of penicillin allergy had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.
66                                   History of penicillin allergy had a positive likelihood ratio of 1.
67 amycin, which is often used in patients with penicillin allergy, had the highest rate of fatal (2.9/m
68  the diagnosis of patients with a history of penicillin allergy has also been included.
69 e findings suggest that most patients with a penicillin allergy history may safely receive cefazolin.
70                              Subjects with a penicillin "allergy" history are exposed to significantl
71                              Subjects with a penicillin "allergy" history spend significantly more ti
72                                            A penicillin "allergy" history, although often inaccurate,
73 fficacy of inpatient delabeling for low-risk penicillin allergies in hospitalized inpatients.
74 uated internal medicine inpatients reporting penicillin allergy in 3 periods: (1) standard of care (S
75     The exception is patients with confirmed penicillin allergy in whom additional care is warranted.
76          Currently, the rate of IgE-mediated penicillin allergies is decreasing, potentially due to a
77                                 A documented penicillin allergy is associated with increased morbidit
78 llin allergy testing in patients reporting a penicillin allergy is cost-saving.
79                                     Having a penicillin allergy label associates with a higher risk f
80 -based narrative review of the literature of penicillin allergy label carriage, the adverse effects o
81           The standard of care to remove the penicillin allergy label in adults is specialized testin
82                                  Addition of penicillin allergy label in the electronic medical recor
83                                     Having a penicillin allergy label is associated with the use of l
84                                            A penicillin allergy label, in particular, is associated w
85 moting widespread testing of patients with a penicillin allergy label.
86 afe procedure to facilitate the removal of a penicillin allergy label.
87  impact of 2 strategies for a patient with a penicillin allergy label: (1) perform diagnostic testing
88                           Studies describing penicillin allergy labeling in the pediatric outpatient
89 s penicillin allergic, but the prevalence of penicillin allergy labeling ranged from 0.9% to 10.2% ac
90  cohort study of more than 330 000 children, penicillin allergy labeling was common and varied widely
91 the fidelity of and outcomes associated with penicillin allergy-labeling in children is warranted.
92                                              Penicillin allergy labels (PALs) are associated with num
93                          Removing inaccurate penicillin allergy labels (PALs) can reduce unnecessary
94                               Data regarding Penicillin allergy labels (PALs) from India and Sri Lank
95                                              Penicillin allergy labels are highly prevalent, largely
96                                              Penicillin allergy labels directly impact antimicrobial
97                                              Penicillin allergy labels influence clinical decision-ma
98 tiatives to reduce the burden and impacts of penicillin allergy labels on antibiotic prescribing.
99 lergy label carriage, the adverse effects of penicillin allergy labels, and current approaches and ba
100 gs raise questions regarding the validity of penicillin allergy labels.
101                                              Penicillin allergy management is further compromised by
102 ll-appreciated that patients with documented penicillin allergies often receive broader-spectrum anti
103 ing 1) a medical error (failure to check for penicillin allergy or inadequate monitoring of antiepile
104 med and Medline, search terms used included "penicillin allergy" or "penicillin hypersensitivity" alo
105 erminants, provide an explicit definition of penicillin allergy, or list the specific criteria necess
106 oximately 90-99% of patients with a label of penicillin allergy (PenA) are not allergic when comprehe
107 ents with and without a positive history for penicillin allergy, positive and negative likelihood rat
108  a prospective, multicenter cohort inpatient penicillin allergy program, we identify the key targets
109                                     Reported penicillin allergy rarely reflects penicillin intoleranc
110  of commonly reported drug allergies such as penicillin allergy remains largely unknown.
111 ntified in 44 participants with a history of penicillin allergy, resulting in a dual allergy meta-ana
112                 Failure to address inpatient penicillin allergies results in more broad-spectrum anti
113                 Genome-wide meta-analysis of penicillin allergy revealed two loci, including one loca
114 as suggested various models of incorporating penicillin allergy screening and testing by different he
115 r patients solely with a family history of a penicillin allergy, symptoms of pruritus without rash, o
116 tic review was to identify whether inpatient penicillin allergy testing affected clinical outcomes du
117                                              Penicillin allergy testing has been shown to significant
118          This study aimed to project whether penicillin allergy testing in patients reporting a penic
119                                    Inpatient penicillin allergy testing is safe and effective in ruli
120                                    Inpatient penicillin allergy testing led to a change in antibiotic
121                                              Penicillin allergy testing results in delabeling most al
122 rgies through a detailed allergy history and penicillin allergy testing should be a vital component o
123                                    Inpatient penicillin allergy testing was associated with decreased
124                                              Penicillin allergy testing was cost-saving in all decisi
125                                              Penicillin allergy testing was projected to be cost-savi
126 documented penicillin allergy that underwent penicillin allergy testing were included.
127 spective was adopted, considering costs with penicillin allergy tests, and with hospital bed-days/out
128 assessed the genetic predictors of a delayed penicillin allergy that cover the HLA loci.
129               Inpatients having a documented penicillin allergy that underwent penicillin allergy tes
130        Given the public health importance of penicillin allergy, this Review provides a global update
131 es a strong case that the debunking of false penicillin allergies through a detailed allergy history
132 ble cases) unique hospitalized subjects with penicillin "allergy" to 2 unique discharge diagnosis cat
133                                 IgE-mediated penicillin allergy wanes over time, with 80% of patients
134  to avoid cephalosporin use in patients with penicillin allergies was associated with increased admin
135                             The frequency of penicillin allergy was 4.4% (95% CrI, 0%-23.0%; I2 = 75%
136                                              Penicillin allergy was confirmed in 16 participants with
137 cillin challenge in patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy was noninferior compared with standar
138                  Concomitant medications and penicillin allergy were more frequent among the older pa
139     Patients 18 years of age with a low-risk penicillin allergy were offered a single-dose oral penic
140              Nonetheless, >90% do not have a penicillin allergy when evaluated.
141 how worse outcomes in patients with reported penicillin allergies who receive non-beta-lactam antibio
142 ved for studies of patients with unconfirmed penicillin allergy who had been exposed to perioperative
143 Patients with a concerning history of type I penicillin allergy who have a compelling need for a drug
144  study of 380 adult patients with a reported penicillin allergy who received antibiotics at a communi
145                   Patients with a documented penicillin allergy who require penicillin should be test

 
Page Top