ライフサイエンスコーパス: perforator

1 an delineate the perfusion bed of the septal perforators and can predict the infarct size that follow

2 aging can be used to accurately localize IEA perforators and to select the optimal perforator to be h

3 ted by high surgical risk, unsuitable septal perforators, and heart block requiring permanent pacemak

4 Up to four of the largest perforators arising from the IEA on each side of the umb

5 ex) was selectively injected into the septal perforator arteries during simultaneous transthoracic im

6 The anatomy and distribution of the septal perforator arteries were examined.

7 ry, 20%; posterior cerebral artery, 15%; and perforator arteries, 5%.

8 following alcohol injection into the septal perforator artery in order to induce an MI in 51 patient

9 septal ablation are dependent on the septal perforator artery supplying the area of the contact betw

10 Activation mapping from within a perforator branch within the interventricular septum is

11 or distal to the origin of the main pontine perforator branches over 15 seconds, or endovascular tre

12 ntrolled infarction in a proximal LAD septal perforator caused RBBB or LBBB.

13 B is, and occlusion of a proximal LAD septal perforator causes RBBB.

14 of self" following deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction in an attem

15 ring mastectomy and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction in patients with b

16 porcine models, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) was used in two and the superior epiga

17 t" on the basis of an optimal combination of perforator features: diameter, intramuscular course, and

18 tissue, pedicled TRAM/midabdominal TRAM, and perforator flap.

19 rtery perforator, or inferior gluteal artery perforator flap; or both neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemot

20 Perforator infarction did not occur.

21 linical and computed tomographic evidence of perforator infarction.

22 l perforators with the mean diameters of the perforators labeled as the best.

23 One of the marked perforators on each side was labeled "the best" on the b

24 a latissimus dorsi, superior gluteal artery perforator, or inferior gluteal artery perforator flap;

25 Patterns of perforator reflux were linked to clinical severity of CV

26 ed in two and the superior epigastric artery perforator (SEAP) in two.

27 ze IEA perforators and to select the optimal perforator to be harvested for DIEP flap reconstructive

28 icular annular vein in 15 cases and a septal perforator vein in 45 cases.

29 e mapping of the vascular beds of the septal perforators was successfully attained in all patients by

30 rse, and distance from the umbilicus of each perforator were recorded.

31 Thirty-three perforators were harvested intraoperatively, and all of

32 Twenty-eight (85%) of these 33 perforators were labeled as the best at MR imaging.

33 At surgery, 122 perforators were localized, and 118 (97%) of these perfo

34 at ASA is limited by the route of the septal perforators, whereas myectomy is not.

35 Thirty perforators with a mean diameter of 1.4 mm (range, 1.0-1

36 an in the LAD or RCA and there are no septal perforators with intramuscular courses like in the proxi

37 as used to compare the mean diameters of all perforators with the mean diameters of the perforators l

38 ators were localized, and 118 (97%) of these perforators-with a mean diameter of 1.1 mm (range, 0.8-1