ライフサイエンスコーパス: perioral

1 using small, tactile stimuli applied to the perioral and forelimb regions at a rate of 0.5 Hz.

2 pear choreiform and that are associated with perioral and periorbital myokymia.

3 lets makes the medical procedures around the perioral area vulnerable to the spread of the disease.

4 omplex neural representations also exist for perioral exploration, a finely tuned skill requiring the

5 nsory representation, likely associated with perioral exploration, where cross-signal integration is

6 cortex that was devoted to representing the perioral hairs and the snout and also that neurons withi

7 ry domain and the enlarged representation of perioral hairs as they relate to the specialized life st

8 the actifier was developed and used to evoke perioral motor unit activity during non-nutritive suck i

9 This speech task involved the recruitment of perioral motor units against an elastic load.

10 In contrast, perioral movements that did not tactually stimulate this

11 ehavior in macaque monkeys, finding that the perioral muscles innervated by the facial nucleus are rh

12 ral lateral subnucleus, which innervated the perioral musculature.

13 ules on the leg and foot in case 1 and small perioral papules in case 2.

14 eatures, such as periorbital, perinasal, and perioral patches, and the correlation of DSM-based predi

15 nto the rat temporomandibular joint (TMJ) or perioral (PO) skin to produce inflammation in deep or cu

16 tologic trend for the early component of the perioral reflex (R1) was discovered in the context of sp

17 genital region, and 78 (43%) in the oral and perioral region.

18 with tactile stimulation of lip and whisker (perioral) regions.

19 nd later (Ft=1.0 N) components of the evoked perioral response was found at the two force thresholds.

20 esthetic improvement of intraoral mucosa and perioral skin tissues.

21 ns in that (1) all representations were from perioral structures, (2) the reorganized map maintained

22 ng the acquisition of sensory information by perioral structures.

23 CS responses to motor cortex stimulation or perioral tactile stimulation was used to measure the eff

24 the possibility of an overrepresentation of perioral tics in this group of highly achieving young vo

25 a turbid water environment, and the largest perioral vibrissae can also grasp and manipulate objects

26 In addition, the largest perioral vibrissae, which are used for grasping, have ex