ライフサイエンスコーパス: periorbital

1 visual and somatosensory stimuli as well as periorbital airpuffs used for training.

2 ut not control, mice of both sexes developed periorbital allodynia following inhalational umbellulone

3 Repeated SDs also produced bilateral periorbital allodynia that lasted 4 days and resolved wi

4 Sumatriptan prevented periorbital allodynia when administered immediately afte

5 rated in this region could be activated from periorbital and central electrodes.

6 han two weeks was observed, characterized by periorbital and cutaneous mechanical allodynia/hyperalge

7 of mechanical and thermal pain thresholds of periorbital and forearm skin areas in the absence of, an

8 Stimulation at the C1 level evoked periorbital and frontal pain in 6 of 6 patients with mig

9 Periorbital and hind paw sensory thresholds were measure

10 End points, including periorbital and hindpaw mechanical allodynia, mouse grim

11 lan can be made for patients presenting with periorbital and ocular surface disease.

12 ivity (4/5, 80% for whole face; 3/5, 60% for periorbital and perinasal regions) and specificity (45/5

13 ofibromas (PNs) involving the eyelid, orbit, periorbital, and facial structures (orbital-periorbital

14 restricted to the head, often affecting the periorbital area and the eye, and intensifies when intra

15 ds (ie, overall, forehead, glabella, lateral periorbital area, lips, and marionette lines), with scor

16 nsion, and the role of chemical peels in the periorbital area, upper face, and forehead.

17 plastic surgeons for the rejuvenation of the periorbital area.

18 8 (2.81) g, Day 7: 3.34 (2.22) g, P < 0.001; periorbital baseline: 6.13 (2.07) g, Day 7: 2.35 (1.91)

19 use of oral vismodegib to treat orbital and periorbital BCC tumor volume.

20 the effect of oral vismodegib on orbital and periorbital BCC.

21 There were 2 cases of periorbital cellulitis, one in each treatment group.

22 is a complication approximately as common as periorbital cellulitis.

23 Systemic olcegepant completely blocked periorbital cutaneous allodynia induced by supradural CG

24 Periorbital cutaneous allodynia served as a surrogate of

25 facilitation of cortical responses evoked by periorbital cutaneous receptive field stimulation.

26 y with presence of telangiectasias), and (3) periorbital (e.g., superior sulcus hollowing, proptosis,

27 nts were lid (11.8% study, 1.1% control) and periorbital edema (12.9%, 1.1%).

28 e most frequent adverse events observed were periorbital edema (69%), anemia (55%), diarrhea (45%), t

29 most common ocular manifestation, comprising periorbital edema (n = 83, 40.7%), orbital myositis (n =

30 rlier resolution of inflammation in terms of periorbital edema (P = .002 at day 7), conjunctival chem

31 Examination revealed marked periorbital edema and hematoma, ptosis, ocular movements

32 ed as persons presenting with myalgia and/or periorbital edema and Trichinella-specific immunoglobuli

33 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Periorbital edema is a common problem that deserves scru

34 ospect of triaging, diagnosing, and treating periorbital edema less daunting.

35 decontamination, but 5 patients developed a periorbital edema, 2 experienced radiating neuropathic p

36 individuals characterized by fever, myalgia, periorbital edema, and fatigue.

37 ated with elevated intraocular pressure from periorbital edema, direct compression on the eye, and in

38 sent to the clinician with similar findings: periorbital edema, erythema, proptosis, and pain.

39 hyperthyroidism, resulting in exophthalmos, periorbital edema, pain, double vision, optic neuropathy

40 sures and fundus findings of 4 patients with periorbital edema.

41 he scientific literature of notable cases of periorbital edema.

42 l), conjunctival injection and chemosis, and periorbital edema.

43 due to the observed presence of substantial periorbital edema.

44 change in hair color, nausea, dysgeusia, and periorbital edema; adverse events rarely led to disconti

45 tensities and 3 durations of airpuff (AP) or periorbital electrical stimulation (ES) were monitored b

46 conditioning-specific reflex modification to periorbital electrical stimulation and airpuff.

47 nse using a 100-ms tone, a 700-ms trace, and periorbital electrical stimulation or airpuff.

48 activated levator motoneurons revealed that periorbital electrical stimulation produced bilateral, l

49 unpaired (control) presentations of tone and periorbital electrical stimulation, were used to assess

50 Periorbital electromyography (EMG) and 22 kHz ultrasonic

51 r erythema (n = 18), lip hyperemia (n = 17), periorbital erythema and edema (n = 7), strawberry tongu

52 an inhibitory surround receptive field from periorbital facial skin.

53 ing cosmetically significant alopecia (30%), periorbital hyperpigmentation (30%), deep rhytides on th

54 flammatory hyperpigmentation (7126 [14.8%]), periorbital hyperpigmentation (7076 [14.7%]), vitiligo (

55 ction of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tested for periorbital hypersensitivity and grimacing.

56 Neutralizing PN attenuated stress-induced periorbital hypersensitivity and priming to SNP, with no

57 RP) to the rat dura mater produces cutaneous periorbital hypersensitivity.

58 A febrile 2-year-old male presented with periorbital inflammation and exudative retinal detachmen

59 Periorbital injuries were not included.

60 aimed to perform segmentation in orbital and periorbital lesions.

61 ecial place in the evaluation of orbital and periorbital lesions.

62 Ocular involvement is uncommon, and periorbital manifestations are exceedingly rare.

63 tem capable of automating static and dynamic periorbital measurements.

64 A single SD produced bilateral periorbital mechanical allodynia that developed within 1

65 /RAMP1 on surrounding Schwann cells to evoke periorbital mechanical allodynia.

66 dently generated orofacial and headache-like periorbital mechanical hypersensitivity after administra

67 Periorbital mechanical hypersensitivity was reversed by

68 raised ICP, olcegepant prevented changes in periorbital mechanical thresholds.

69 rm and that are associated with perioral and periorbital myokymia.

70 presentation and management of patients with periorbital necrotizing fasciitis (PONF) through an obse

71 ynamic and sensory responses to percutaneous periorbital noxious stimuli recorded in S1 and insular o

72 Three of the five serious adverse events-periorbital oedema (one [4%]), lupus erythematosus (one

73 Five serious adverse events (periorbital oedema, lupus erythematosus [occurring twice

74 kull base and continued through extracranial periorbital, olfactory, nasopharyngeal and hard palate l

75 ion diminished the neuronal firing evoked by periorbital or meningeal electrical stimulation; this in

76 (WDR) cells sensitive to stimulation of the periorbital or meningeal region were performed in male W

77 Patients with no periorbital or ocular injuries and/or those who did not

78 -year old man presented with blepharoptosis, periorbital pain, decreased vision and limbal ischemia.

79 All presented with facial and/or periorbital pain.

80 eptive and nonreceptive tissues, we compared periorbital pathway and target tissue phenotypes prior t

81 lities of localized facial features, such as periorbital, perinasal, and perioral patches, and the co

82 periorbital, and facial structures (orbital-periorbital plexiform neurofibroma [OPPN]) can result in

83 ggest that systemic adiposity extends to the periorbital region and highlight the relevance of consid

84 ministration induced mechanical allodynia in periorbital region and paw as well as impaired social be

85 Knowledge of the orbital and periorbital region may be the last frontier of human ana

86 s true when analysing the whole face, or the periorbital region or the perinasal region alone.

87 Superficial biopsies of the right periorbital region were performed, which revealed extens

88 e face and perinasal regions; 40/58, 69% for periorbital region).

89 nign tumor that infrequently presents in the periorbital region.

90 s, and lymphatic drainage of the orbital and periorbital region.

91 er anatomic understanding of the orbital and periorbital region.

92 mportant in addressing facial rhytids in the periorbital region.

93 NF is rarely found in the orbit and periorbital regions, with only a few case studies report

94 upper blepharoplasty provides comprehensive periorbital rejuvenation, addressing lateral brow ptosis

95 cial vibrissae but was also present in other periorbital sensorial vibrissae.

96 Regions of periorbital sheath containing sympathetic nerves had few

97 Periorbital sheath devoid of sympathetic nerves containe

98 The periorbital sheath serves as a major pathway for sympath

99 inal nerve, the orbital vasculature, and the periorbital sheath.

100 only short distances and end blindly in the periorbital sheath.

101 paired trials of a tone coterminating with a periorbital shock (conditioning) or trials in which thes

102 Using the same periorbital shock as both the CS and US in a US-US condi

103 eyeblink (EB) conditioning, using tones and periorbital shock as the conditioned and unconditioned s

104 siderably greater in the group that received periorbital shock as the US.

105 e experiments were performed in which either periorbital shock or a corneal airpuff served as the unc

106 t conditioned stimulus (CS) and a unilateral periorbital shock unconditioned stimulus (US).

107 tone conditioned stimulus (CS) paired with a periorbital shock unconditioned stimulus (US; presented

108 eived either 50% or 25% reinforcement with a periorbital shock unconditioned stimulus.

109 timulus (CS) and one of three co-terminating periorbital shock US.

110 y be high (i.e., during exposure to aversive periorbital shock), other structures (such as amygdala)

111 ctrum of ocular pathologies including eyelid/periorbital skin lesions, blepharoconjunctivitis, and ke

112 ntracranial pain is accompanied by increased periorbital skin sensitivity.

113 s in the anterior 2/3 of the cranium and the periorbital skin.

114 lds to mechanical and thermal stimulation of periorbital skin.

115 both, leading to collapse of the lip, cheek, periorbital soft tissues, and palatal competence present

116 presented with explicitly unpaired tone and periorbital stimulation stimuli.

117 tone conditioned stimulus was paired with a periorbital stimulation unconditioned stimulus (750-ms d

118 tone conditioned stimulus was paired with a periorbital stimulation unconditioned stimulus (750-ms d

119 one conditioned stimulus (CS), light CS, and periorbital stimulation unconditioned stimulus (US), rat

120 npaired presentations of the auditory CS and periorbital stimulation unconditioned stimulus (US).

121 th a reinforcing unconditioned stimulus like periorbital stimulation, the unconditioned stimulus prom

122 e motoneurons in response to blink-producing periorbital stimuli.

123 All patients had periorbital swelling at presentation.

124 s 24 months, with nasal symptoms, proptosis, periorbital swelling, and pain being the most common pre

125 partment with a 1-week history of left-sided periorbital swelling, erythema, and pain.

126 Exposure keratopathy occurred after severe periorbital thermal injuries and followed a predictable

127 the ocular surface for patients with severe periorbital thermal injuries and resultant exposure kera

128 tive patients (16 eyes) who sustained severe periorbital thermal injuries during combat missions in I

129 t option for these difficult cases of severe periorbital thermal injuries.

130 Mild fullness was seen in the periorbital tissues without any redness or fluctuance an

131 cleral wall and to fix it to the surrounding periorbital tissues.

132 onal results in the treatment of orbital and periorbital trauma.

133 We measured periorbital von Frey and grimace responses in both model