ライフサイエンスコーパス: peripheral vision

1 portant properties of how faces are coded in peripheral vision.

2 eye and a coverage of several cm to restore peripheral vision.

3 statistics explain attentional phenomena via peripheral vision.

4 ision, missing patches of vision, and little peripheral vision.

5 ar vision, vision-related mental health, and peripheral vision.

6 retable in terms of perceptual processes and peripheral vision.

7 ly decreases in areas typically representing peripheral vision.

8 y visual areas (V1, V2, and V3) connected to peripheral vision.

9 ight blindness, and 56% (14/25) with loss of peripheral vision.

10 ld defects specifically affecting central or peripheral vision.

11 severely limited in clutter, particularly in peripheral vision.

12 re proposed as treatments for PDR that spare peripheral vision.

13 de field of view, involving both central and peripheral vision.

14 n-specific role difficulties and general and peripheral vision.

15 stic explanation for orientation crowding in peripheral vision.

16 primary factor limiting shape perception in peripheral vision.

17 al vision and a dependence on low-resolution peripheral vision.

18 the GVF the measure of choice for changes in peripheral vision.

19 least "some" difficulty with tasks requiring peripheral vision.

20 i may provide an objective measure of VA and peripheral vision.

21 tory targets using a laser pointer guided by peripheral vision.

22 ng, emotional distress, general lighting, or peripheral vision.

23 a selective loss of chromatic sensitivity in peripheral vision.

24 o an increase in reading speed in central or peripheral vision.

25 gested as an explanation for slow reading in peripheral vision.

26 t a different location, within the region of peripheral vision.

27 function of eccentricity and polar angle in peripheral vision.

28 ankers' separation and flankers' contrast in peripheral vision.

29 8 for all subscales (P < 0.0001), except for peripheral vision (0.46; P = 0.0003), which also exhibit

30 erogeneity: Q = 6.9331, p = 0.0741), reduced peripheral vision (-0.82 [CI: -1.32, -0.33]) (non-signif

31 te integration of the target and flankers in peripheral vision [1, 2].

32 rstanding of object recognition breakdown in peripheral vision [2].

33 outcomes: (1) reading and seeing detail, (2) peripheral vision, (3) darkness and glare, (4) household

34 ), color vision (90 vs. 97; P < 0.0001), and peripheral vision (85 vs. 91; P = 0.0496).

35 al environments and the fundamental limit on peripheral vision, affecting identification within many

36 motional distress, general dim lighting, and peripheral vision), all with good internal consistency (

37 ept in terms of (a) the known limitations of peripheral vision and (b) a proper assessment of task co

38 onnaire (NEI-VFQ) was administered to assess peripheral vision and driving difficulties sub-scores.

39 veal a complex pattern of visual deficits in peripheral vision and indicate a significant role of att

40 Besides the fundus appearance restricted peripheral vision and scotopic electroretinogram confirm

41 rsonal knowledge and deeply held values, use peripheral vision and subsidiary awareness to become awa

42 chromatic and selective S-cone conditions in peripheral vision and whether any association relates to

43 rized by late-onset night blindness, loss of peripheral vision, and diminished or absent electroretin

44 tional distress, mobility, extreme lighting, peripheral vision, and general dim lighting.

45 y-of-life measures increased for general and peripheral vision, and near and distance activities, imp

46 unction, photopic peripheral vision, mesopic peripheral vision, and photosensitivity.

47 Given that both attention and peripheral vision are unsettled fields, we argue that re

48 rize glaucomatous damage in both central and peripheral vision, as they jointly affect an individual'

49 ffectively enhances object discrimination in peripheral vision at the goal of the intended saccade.

50 lties (beta = 0.04; R2 = 0.20; P = .01), and peripheral vision (beta = 0.03; R2 = 0.17; P = .03).

51 driving (beta = 0.05; R2 = 0.24; P < .001), peripheral vision (beta = 0.03; R2 = 0.18; P = .02), and

52 ther reading speed can be improved in normal peripheral vision by increasing the letter spacing.

53 hat central retinal damage leads to enhanced peripheral vision by sensitizing the visual system for m

54 le classes of object recognition failures in peripheral vision can be accounted for by a single mecha

55 Impaired peripheral vision can persist in late disease stages.

56 ed stage of the disease, severely restricted peripheral vision causing poor mobility and decline in q

57 However, attention remains essential beyond peripheral vision constraints, as it is a resource-limit

58 iously unknown dichotomy between central and peripheral vision could support accurate analysis of att

59 ifference, 16.3; 95% CI, 0.9-31.7; P = .04), peripheral vision (difference, 11.6; 95% CI, 0.8-22.4; P

60 , interphalangeal joint stiffness, decreased peripheral vision, diminished tactile sensation, and hal

61 (RP) in which there are prominent night and peripheral vision disturbances.

62 ll, general vision, distance activities, and peripheral vision domains of theVFQ-25 (partial correlat

63 ibutor to the restoration of both foveal and peripheral vision during fixation.

64 e measures are needed to estimate changes in peripheral vision during future treatment clinical trial

65 esults therefore highlight the importance of peripheral vision during trans-saccadic processing in bu

66 owhide" stimuli were presented 15 degrees in peripheral vision, either in isolation or surrounded by

67 aired individuals often seem to underutilize peripheral vision, even in absence of obvious peripheral

68 ns that afflict the fovea and thus use their peripheral vision exclusively, the signature properties

69 rse severity ratings for the symptom "little peripheral vision" explained the most variance in VF dam

70 The presence of eyes in peripheral vision fails to activate the eye cells.

71 Recent research on peripheral vision has led to a paradigm-shifting conclus

72 ntion" is ill-defined and the constraints of peripheral vision have been overlooked.

73 In primates, foveal and peripheral vision have distinct neural architectures and

74 e well-known decline in visual resolution in peripheral vision; however, the main bottleneck for read

75 visual processing speed, visual search, and peripheral vision in driving, especially among patients

76 rosthetic central vision and their remaining peripheral vision in the implanted eye and in the fellow

77 f complaint of acute decrease in central and peripheral vision in the right eye.

78 of focus for resolution acuity measured for peripheral vision indicates that spatial resolution is l

79 ease is localized to the macula, leaving the peripheral vision intact.

80 tolerance of these place tags in foveal, and peripheral vision is about half the separation of the fe

81 tleneck for reading or object recognition in peripheral vision is crowding.

82 Peripheral vision is described as vision outside the cen

83 Our ability to recognize objects in peripheral vision is fundamentally limited by crowding,

84 Peripheral vision is fundamentally limited by the spacin

85 Peripheral vision is fundamentally limited not by the vi

86 Our ability to recognize objects in peripheral vision is impaired when other objects are nea

87 Since the low-resolution peripheral vision is retained in such conditions, restor

88 s in severe visual impairment, although some peripheral vision is retained.

89 The model also explains deficits of peripheral vision known as crowding, and provides a quan

90 aire except the subscales "ocular pain" and "peripheral vision." Lesion size was measured from fundus

91 target to protect cone-mediated central and peripheral vision loss in patients with retinitis pigeme

92 ver, PRP can damage the retina, resulting in peripheral vision loss or worsening diabetic macular ede

93 vioral alterations emerging after central or peripheral vision loss suggest that cerebral reorganizat

94 isorder characterized by night blindness and peripheral vision loss, and in many cases leads to blind

95 ntionally, glaucoma has been associated with peripheral vision loss, and thus, relatively little atte

96 ented with 1 year of progressive, bilateral, peripheral vision loss, photopsias, and nyctalopia.

97 f people, compensatory recruitment of spared peripheral vision may give rise to cortical thickening.

98 ast sensitivity, scotopic function, photopic peripheral vision, mesopic peripheral vision, and photos

99 of cloudy vision, severity of having little peripheral vision, missing patches, 1 eye having better

100 ses to replace the concept of attention with peripheral vision models, such as the Texture Tiling Mod

101 e of this study was to examine the impact of peripheral vision on emmetropization.

102 depressed inferonasal vision with preserved peripheral vision on the left eye.

103 Peripheral vision, on the other hand is rather inefficie

104 , 95% CI = 2.0-41.7), but less frequent poor peripheral vision (OR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.06-0.7), differe

105 9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.89), peripheral vision (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.86), walking

106 ior when seeking to understand the role that peripheral vision plays in various tasks.

107 tional methods may have inadvertently probed peripheral vision rather than attention.

108 ifically, an emphasis on central vision over peripheral vision results in pupil constriction, and thi

109 sion," "distance activities," "dependency," "peripheral vision," "self-image," "daily living," and "d

110 These results indicate that peripheral vision should be considered when assessing th

111 Patient-reported outcomes on peripheral vision showed a pooled score estimate of 95.1

112 exhibited change blindness to projections in peripheral vision, suggesting that perception of shape p

113 Visual acuity and peripheral vision testing were frequently relied on (per

114 onid), providing them with as much, or more, peripheral "vision" than the vespertilionids, but ensoni

115 Compared to peripheral vision, the fovea displays decreased sensitiv

116 the association of choroidal thickness and "peripheral vision." The strongest association was the LL

117 However, in peripheral vision this single-cone input to the receptiv

118 our vision that retains chromatic quality in peripheral vision, thus supporting the cone-selective hy

119 Experts are able to use peripheral vision very efficiently.

120 nce activities, mental health, and color and peripheral vision, with an overall adjusted mean differe