ライフサイエンスコーパス: person-to-person

1 rees of separation (from person to person to person to person).

2 experience of pain varies considerably from person to person.

3 iors and the way these behaviors spread from person to person.

4 ly hantavirus known to be transmissible from person to person.

5 ve and time-consuming, and results vary from person to person.

6 potential side effects, which can vary from person to person.

7 and branches representing transmission from person to person.

8 ease 2019 (COVID-19), is readily transmitted person to person.

9 of delayed rewards is discounted varies from person to person.

10 -y period in healthy persons but varied from person to person.

11 if they are able to spread efficiently from person to person.

12 t judgments and behaviors can propagate from person to person.

13 wealthy countries and is mainly spread from person to person.

14 tine, evades host immunity, and spreads from person to person.

15 fatality ratio, and potential to spread from person to person.

16 process, and its yield is less variable from person to person.

17 are known to be transmitted via the air from person to person.

18 ccurred during winter months and were spread person-to-person.

19 the only hantavirus known to be transmitted person-to-person.

20 t progeny that are fit for transmission from person to person?

21 hand, our tastes also vary dramatically from person to person:(5-8) what one of us finds beautiful, a

22 s largely driven by direct transmission from person to person, although it is well-recognized that Vi

23 uld be a route of transmission of HHV-8 from person to person, although other routes cannot be ruled

24 , hepatitis A may have been transmitted from person to person among methamphetamine users through the

25 ) and is the only hantavirus shown to spread person to person and cause a highly lethal HPS-like dise

26 terminants that uniquely permit it to spread person to person and cause highly lethal HPS in immunoco

27 ove from cell to cell, tissue to tissue, and person to person and even across species.

28 As exposome and interactome vary from person to person and influence disease process, each dis

29 coevolved with humans to be transmitted from person to person and to persistently colonize the stomac

30 ssion of respiratory pathogens may be due to person-to-person and environmental contributions.

31 5 outbreaks with a known transmission route, person-to-person and food-borne transmissions were repor

32 een less fit, have not been transmitted from person to person, and have retained susceptibility to za

33 they all share the ability to transmit from person to person, and their human transmissibility is in

34 evolutionary drivers causing variation from person to person are not clear.

35 nse to statin treatment can vary widely from person to person as a result of inherited traits (genoty

36 xplore how social media can be used to study person-to-person communication about health and health c

37 reaks were most commonly transmitted through person-to-person contact (n = 23 812; 62%) and contamina

38 Furthermore, person-to-person contact and the proliferation of the us

39 o explicitly model the trade-offs that drive person-to-person contact decisions.

40 Person-to-person contact is important for the transmissi

41 ndividuals adapted their daily movements and person-to-person contact patterns over time in response

42 e the most frequently reported settings, and person-to-person contact was the most common mode of tra

43 To evaluate the impact of continuous person-to-person contact within families on an individua

44 as rotavirus infectious intestinal disease: person-to-person contact.

45 ns by aerosolized excreta or, in rare cases, person-to-person contact.

46 Person-to-person contacts drive human disease dynamics.

47 s, we find that individuals continue to keep person-to-person contacts low.

48 seases that explicitly considers patterns of person-to-person contacts within a community.

49 and more predictable routines, also reducing person-to-person contacts.

50 suggested that 1) transmission directly from person to person contributed 10% (95% confidence interva

51 a vaccine offers can vary significantly from person to person due to differences in immune systems, b

52 o dopaminergic drugs vary substantially from person to person due to individual-, drug- and disease-r

53 ce that these mutations are transmitted from person to person either directly or through a common env

54 Treatment goals vary from person to person, emphasising the need for personalised

55 A outbreaks since 2016 have primarily spread person-to-person, especially among at-risk groups.

56 ricin intoxication is not transmittable from person to person, even a single ricin molecule can lead

57 We considered illness to result from person-to-person H3N2v transmission if swine contact was

58 We identified limited person-to-person H3N2v virus transmission, but found no

59 ic environmental sources or transmitted from person to person has not been determined.

60 However, >90% of the person-to-person HCV RNA level variability was not expla

61 Using longitudinal data (n = 994) from the Person to Person Health Interview Study, fielded in 2019

62 ing 2016-2020, the United States experienced person-to-person hepatitis A outbreaks that are unpreced

63 The model suggests that the considerable person-to-person heterogeneity in SARS-CoV-2 infections

64 This person-to-person heterogeneity means that the same viral

65 These findings indicate that person-to-person heterogeneity of antigen recognition, r

66 success relies on airborne transmission from person to person; however, the viral properties governin

67 nderstanding of how information spreads from person to person in real-world social networks.

68 show that cooperative behavior spreads from person-to-person in all versions of the game, but that i

69 demonstrate how policies can help limit the person-to-person interactions that are essential to infe

70 Person-to-person interactions, or 'contacts', facilitate

71 oV-2 is transmitted primarily through close, person-to-person interactions.

72 uantifying influenza transmissibility at the person-to-person level during that most lethal of pandem

73 are common in patients with CF, but neither person-to-person nor nosocomial acquisition explained th

74 They are transmitted either by stool from person to person or through contaminated water or food b

75 Person-to-person or hospital-based epidemiologic links w

76 tion rates reported in studies investigating person-to-person outbreaks ranged from 41.6% to 84.8%.

77 sical distancing policies-designed to reduce person-to-person pathogenic spread - have risen to recen

78 ease inhibitor mutations suggests a risk for person-to-person propagation.

79 ir interactions in the network of real-world person-to-person proximity measured via Bluetooth, as we

80 There was evidence of person-to-person spread and transmission of VTEC O157 in

81 tion, highlighting a potential reservoir for person-to-person spread and vaccine escape.

82 Preventing person-to-person spread is central to halting the epidem

83 ity can prevent invasive disease, control of person-to-person spread is probably dependent on immunit

84 Prior studies suggest that person-to-person spread may be an important pathway for

85 The duration of treatment to stop person-to-person spread of drug-resistant tuberculosis i

86 ive analysis of the nature and extent of the person-to-person spread of obesity as a possible factor

87 We examined the extent of the person-to-person spread of smoking behavior and the exte

88 Transmission of measles is dependent on person-to-person spread through respiratory droplets or

89 impacts of interventions to control COVID-19 person-to-person spread treated as natural experiments o

90 In an outbreak where person-to-person spread was thought to predominate, six

91 disease prevalence was low, suggesting that person-to-person spread, not waterborne spread, is proba

92 s equipment should be undertaken to minimize person-to-person spread.

93 ection from a common environmental source or person-to-person spread.

94 -fatality rate and a concerning capacity for person-to-person spread.

95 sity of exposure that cannot be explained by person-to-person spread.

96 s to synthesize evidence about potential for person-to-person spread.

97 The data rule out the possibility of person-to-person strain transmission among these patient

98 The extent of heart disease varies from person to person, suggesting that genetic background is

99 he composition of the microbiome varies from person to person, the microbiome may contribute to the f

100 eads up to three degrees of separation (from person to person to person to person).

101 tive and uncooperative behaviors spread from person to person to person.

102 known about the dynamics of the virus during person-to-person to transmission or whether multiple dis

103 is similar across individuals, there is vast person-to-person topographic variability.

104 Rapid person-to-person transfer of viruses such as SARS-CoV-2

105 ed infection risk to competitors, via direct person to person transmission, or possibly via the surfa

106 Most outbreaks were spread via person-to-person transmission (90.4%), and 75% occurred

107 Household person-to-person transmission and eating barbequed food

108 ylogenetic clustering in Mab is explained by person-to-person transmission and inform our understandi

109 oses such as examination of the potential of person-to-person transmission and recurrent infections b

110 nclude social transmission (particularly via person-to-person transmission and the media), perception

111 Person-to-person transmission appears higher than for cl

112 found no evidence of health care-associated person-to-person transmission between these patients.

113 infections originate from a common source or person-to-person transmission but that infection from in

114 hey can help avert outbreaks by interrupting person-to-person transmission chains.

115 nalysis showed a small number of cases where person-to-person transmission could not be excluded, it

116 tly known, but there is growing concern that person-to-person transmission could occur.

117 d lower instances of respiratory illness and person-to-person transmission during human outbreaks tha

118 ta alone provide only limited information on person-to-person transmission dynamics.

119 arcinica outbreak to document the source and person-to-person transmission epidemiologically and mole

120 avirus pulmonary syndrome and to reconstruct person-to-person transmission events.

121 literature challenges the current theory of person-to-person transmission for several mycobacterial

122 npasteurised dairy products, suggesting that person-to-person transmission had occurred.

123 mary mucosal entry site following horizontal person-to-person transmission have remained ill defined.

124 e causative agent of COVID-19, has displayed person-to-person transmission in a variety of indoor sit

125 oducing CRE clusters have been attributed to person-to-person transmission in health care facilities.

126 total of 21 of the 23 cases were acquired by person-to-person transmission in hemodialysis units, int

127 ot been possible to assess the importance of person-to-person transmission in the epidemiology of PCP

128 den settings and a renewed focus on reducing person-to-person transmission in these communities is ne

129 Within households, the probability of person-to-person transmission increased with age, from 1

130 ame subspecies within families suggests that person-to-person transmission is a major source of Crypt

131 Person-to-person transmission is a potential pathway of

132 Person-to-person transmission is central to seasonal and

133 are rare but may have pandemic potential if person-to-person transmission is efficient.

134 Understanding the dynamics of person-to-person transmission is key to designing effect

135 ing reporting in real-time in settings where person-to-person transmission is the main driver of the

136 ted the virus mutation rate, determined that person-to-person transmission is typically associated wi

137 Person-to-person transmission is very rare.

138 e illness outbreaks, indicating that limited person-to-person transmission likely occurred.

139 lates of S. maltophilia and A. xylosoxidans, person-to-person transmission may occur, there are not a

140 Person-to-person transmission occurs via direct contact

141 y from Japan, point to the potential role of person-to-person transmission of an infectious agent.

142 From November 2018 through February 2019, person-to-person transmission of Andes virus (ANDV) hant

143 idemiologic, and clinical characteristics of person-to-person transmission of ANDV is crucial to desi

144 t case-control study to define the extent of person-to-person transmission of cryptosporidiosis withi

145 ould explain its preferential use by HIV for person-to-person transmission of disease.

146 Because person-to-person transmission of E. coli O157:H7 is not

147 We identified 15 cases of possible person-to-person transmission of H3N2v.

148 ative strain (Epilink/96) in the first known person-to-person transmission of hantavirus pulmonary sy

149 ect evidence is available about the risk for person-to-person transmission of HeV, but animals infect

150 This suggests that person-to-person transmission of M. abscessus among CF p

151 Conflicting data exist on person-to-person transmission of MABC within and across

152 Person-to-person transmission of MERS-CoV can occur in h

153 Although there is evidence of person-to-person transmission of Middle East respiratory

154 There is substantial evidence demonstrating person-to-person transmission of NiVB, and some evidence

155 This investigation documents person-to-person transmission of Norwalk virus among pla

156 We describe the first confirmed person-to-person transmission of oseltamivir-resistant p

157 butions of treatment-related acquisition and person-to-person transmission of resistance to incident

158 g for both treatment-related acquisition and person-to-person transmission of resistance.

159 Person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 occurred bet

160 andemic, based on its potential as a site of person-to-person transmission of the virus as well as a

161 tbreak response, which allowed for prolonged person-to-person transmission of the virus.

162 t, reflecting the host-adapted lifestyle and person-to-person transmission of this species and differ

163 Person-to-person transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jak

164 d generate misleading results when examining person-to-person transmission regarding this organism.

165 The authors estimated a low probability of person-to-person transmission relative to comparable est

166 serve constrained pathogenic evolution while person-to-person transmission remains indirect, but post

167 Interventions to control person-to-person transmission should aim to reduce expos

168 ytopenia syndrome cases provided evidence of person-to-person transmission through blood contact to t

169 The reports of its person-to-person transmission through close contacts hav

170 These findings may explain person-to-person transmission via skin contact.

171 n the analysis was stratified by study year, person-to-person transmission was an independent risk fa

172 Person-to-person transmission was at the heart of a hosp

173 lover from a zoonotic reservoir and possible person-to-person transmission were identified.

174 es into the human population was followed by person-to-person transmission with little accumulation o

175 ugh four decades, and the potential to trace person-to-person transmission within a hospital environm

176 ighly prevalent factor associated with rapid person-to-person transmission within communities.

177 tment of nondiarrheal infection to interrupt person-to-person transmission within the home may be ess

178 bone marrow transplant unit was followed by person-to-person transmission within the unit rather tha

179 h virus disease is a bat-borne zoonosis with person-to-person transmission, a case-fatality rate of 3

180 To estimate the risk of person-to-person transmission, a retrospective cohort st

181 rain isolates, including those isolated from person-to-person transmission, and also highlighted how

182 product switch at the health care facility, person-to-person transmission, and laboratory error.

183 Because of high case fatality proportions, person-to-person transmission, and potential use in biot

184 fectivity and mortality, their potential for person-to-person transmission, and the limited availabil

185 ah virus cases identified, 82 were caused by person-to-person transmission, corresponding to a reprod

186 y, indicating the importance of in-household person-to-person transmission, likely via saliva.

187 onths, and >90% of outbreak costs are due to person-to-person transmission, offering insights into wh

188 exposure, temporal or geographic clustering, person-to-person transmission, or an association with re

189 With a low infection dose in addition to person-to-person transmission, STEC infections are easil

190 arios in which a biological agent capable of person-to-person transmission, such as smallpox, is inte

191 e responsible for infections associated with person-to-person transmission, we conducted a cohort sur

192 very country in the world with extraordinary person-to-person transmission.

193 ance, incidence of nosocomial infection, and person-to-person transmission.

194 an cause outbreaks of invasive infection via person-to-person transmission.

195 ence under an epidemiological model to trace person-to-person transmission.

196 at estimated for wild-type poliovirus during person-to-person transmission.

197 control assessment, revealed no evidence of person-to-person transmission.

198 n by both ongoing resistance acquisition and person-to-person transmission.

199 g of genetic distances for interpretation of person-to-person transmission.

200 ributes to within-individual fitness but not person-to-person transmission.

201 side of Alaska, and there was no evidence of person-to-person transmission.

202 ikely attributable to health care-associated person-to-person transmission.

203 ead of influenza viruses relies on efficient person-to-person transmission.

204 ediary mammalian species, but no evidence of person-to-person transmission.

205 lones (DCCs) has suggested the potential for person-to-person transmission.

206 tients, including identification of possible person-to-person transmission.

207 likely acquired the organisms through direct person-to-person transmission.

208 ne and other animals and to assess potential person-to-person transmission.

209 ylaxis may be necessary to prevent sustained person-to-person transmission.

210 exposure, including 2 clusters of suspected person-to-person transmission.

211 ve phenotype, and the capacity for sustained person-to-person transmission.

212 found no evidence of efficient or sustained person-to-person transmission.

213 scales consistent with the spatial scale of person-to-person transmission.

214 influenza viruses rarely result in sustained person-to-person transmission; however, the potential fo

215 ortant implications for tracing zoonotic and person-to-person transmissions.

216 Widespread outbreaks of person-to-person transmitted hepatitis A virus (HAV), pa

217 Ventilation and filtration reduce person-to-person transport of 1 um particles (ERBV(1)) b

218 immune, making the spread of infection from person to person unlikely and protecting those without i

219 of critical importance that we know how much person-to-person variability affects the results, in ord

220 Small sample sizes combined with high person-to-person variability can make it difficult to de

221 To test the hypothesis that person-to-person variability in blood levels of hepatiti

222 morphism may also play a significant role in person-to-person variability in metastasis frequency, ra

223 We found substantial person-to-person variability in mutation replacement rat

224 Why this happens, and why there is so much person-to-person variability in these changes, is not kn

225 There is a large person-to-person variability in ultrafiltration volume w

226 There is a large person-to-person variability in ultrafiltration with per

227 However, <6% of person-to-person variance was explained by the factors e

228 his LTL tracking stems from the inability of person-to-person variation in age-dependent LTL shorteni

229 Significant person-to-person variation in infectious virus shedding

230 e cell disease; (3) clinical implications of person-to-person variation in the distribution of HbF am

231 ty, highly distinct genetic architecture and person-to-person variation.

232 piratory activity per participant, with high person-to-person variation.

233 r hypothesis; however, there are significant person-to-person variations in the initial abundance of

234 uggest that sporadic CJD is transmitted from person to person via blood transfusion, but this evidenc

235 e in the environment and be transferred from person to person via fomites contaminated with oropharyn

236 To make the physics of person-to-person virus transmission from emitted droplet

237 r pylori infection and exposures relevant to person-to-person, waterborne, foodborne, and zoonotic tr