コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 aracteristics of facial images to predicting personality.
2 n-verbal reasoning abilities and hypersocial personality.
3 oad categories: impulsive choice, action and personality.
4 traits described in the five-factor model of personality.
5 l cognition and a characteristic hypersocial personality.
6 els will be essential in a mature science of personality.
7 ant temperament and the development of adult personality.
8 er time, often referred to as expressions of personality.
9 opulation structure with spatial clusters of personalities.
10 e" when it comes to their romantic partners' personalities?
11 phy is associated with regional variation in personality across the United States (n = 3,387,014).
12 the most frequent alternative diagnoses were personality, affective or non-schizophrenia psychotic di
13 eed dispersers, we show that an individual's personality affects its choice of seeds, as well as how
14 lassified as having congruent or incongruent personality alignment as measured by promotion or preven
15 f operative dyads (faculty and resident) had personality alignment or congruency, then resident entru
16 13 occupations, we automatically assess user personalities and visually map the personality profiles
17 depression who were matched on demographics, personality and arts experience with a further 11,248 in
18 .0% to 21.0%] vs. 11.1%), disorders of adult personality and behavior (1.2% [CI, 0.8% to 1.6%] vs. 0.
21 by environmental factors, particularly owner personality and communication style, emphasising the imp
23 vidence for stability in distinctive partner personality and have important implications for predicti
25 dy demonstrates that the association between personality and life history is favoured in some ecologi
27 g environment depends less on the director's personality and more on the proper practice of activitie
32 d strong positive correlations with multiple personality and psychological traits for the first time.
33 Search terms were combined for borderline personality and randomized trials in PubMed, PsycINFO, E
34 g-individual and genetic covariances between personality and size and growth, which are known a prior
35 the proximity between a user's self-reported personality and the automated personality judgements mad
36 hip between p and both the general factor of personality and the general factor of personality disord
38 e demonstrate that cSPS interacts with owner personality and use of aversive communication to influen
39 how their narratives challenge the surgical "personality" and forge an evolving and more open profess
42 is one of the major traits describing human personality, and a predictor of mental and physical diso
43 opulation variation in positive temperament, personality, and cognitive traits, aspects of which may
44 f eight outcomes (anthropometric, cognitive, personality, and health) for eight corresponding GPSs.
46 as a relative mismatch between owner and dog personality, and when use of "negative punishment" was r
50 ual characteristics such as intelligence and personality are complex traits sharing a largely unknown
51 hese temperament and character components of personality are jointly organized and develop in an inte
53 w exposure to metal pollution affects animal personalities, as defined by repeatable among individual
54 king a machine-learning approach, we predict personality at broad domain ([Formula: see text] = 0.37)
56 ion that individuals with socially desirable personalities benefit from authentic self-expression mor
57 is mediated through exploration/risk-taking personality, but empirical support for this remains limi
58 other species also stress the importance of personality, but this relationship remains to be investi
60 nt individual differences in behaviour (i.e. personality) can be explained in an evolutionary context
61 We also revealed individual differences in personality change over time, and showed that a few indi
62 tive dysfunction, impaired processing speed, personality change, disinhibition or stereotypy; six had
65 level of hope is often determined by innate personality characteristics and environmental factors, b
66 less gender-stereotypical beliefs about own personality characteristics, as indicated by subjective
68 oral, and self-report measures of addiction, personality, cognition, behavior, and exposure to early-
69 tus, more psychological distress, and Type D personality compared with men and women in the reference
71 ) measured the self-regulatory components of personality critical for health (i.e., the character tra
74 carry-over across spatial scales can lead to personality-dependent: (1) foraging search performance;
78 ne the extent to which individuals' Big Five personality dimensions can be predicted on the basis of
80 sorder (OR 3.3 [95% CI 2.2-4.8]), borderline personality disorder (2.9 [2.5-3.3]), anxiety (2.7 [2.5-
81 uroimaging research suggests that antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) may be linked to abnormal br
82 onal difficulties associated with borderline personality disorder (BPD) features in the domain of soc
86 lity was low for meta-analyses on borderline personality disorder and anxiety, and moderate for conve
87 Twenty-eight participants with schizotypal personality disorder enrolled in an 8-week, randomized,
91 by posttraumatic stress disorder, borderline personality disorder, and conversion disorder (mean scor
92 ntervention for individuals with schizotypal personality disorder, and guanfacine appears to be a pro
93 ia spectrum disorders, including schizotypal personality disorder, and it is the best predictor of fu
94 s formal education and those with antisocial personality disorder, anxiety disorders, depressive diso
95 ism, schizophrenia, and emotionally unstable personality disorder, conditions where symptoms include
97 , schizophrenia, mania, or bipolar disorder, personality disorder, substance use, and number of previ
98 tor of personality and the general factor of personality disorder, substantive interpretations of p,
101 n (Criterion A) of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) in the fifth edition of the
102 nal general severity criterion common to all personality disorders and conceptually independent of pe
103 s or comorbidity with affective, anxiety and personality disorders are frequent before and after the
104 ttention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and personality disorders had a higher risk of IPV against w
106 en when comorbid substance use disorders and personality disorders were present, compared to risk whe
107 osis, affective psychosis, eating disorders, personality disorders, alcohol misuse disorder, and subs
108 e application of the mentalizing approach to personality disorders, and we review studies that have e
109 iety, mood, substance use, neurological, and personality disorders, as well as suicidal behavior, mem
122 ase (MPO) are needed, given that this "split personality" enzyme kills harmful microorganisms but als
126 lly significant prediction of a wider set of personality features (all the Big Five personality trait
127 or and how this is modulated by narcissistic personality features associated with poor interpersonal
128 gnitive (neuropsychological) and temperament/personality features have received considerable attentio
129 Fifth, writers noted that odd and eccentric personality features were common in the relatives of the
132 Adolescent mental health, victimization, personality functioning, and use of support services wer
134 y the causal and constitutive relations that personality has with genes, environment, brain, mind and
139 listeners across languages form very similar personality impressions irrespective of whether the voic
143 gest that IIV should be considered alongside personality in studies of predator-prey interactions.
147 a set of causal hypotheses about the role of personality, integrating psychological and neuroscientif
148 ning to a wide range of other traits-such as personality, intelligence, attitudes, values, and well-b
149 maintain that attractiveness is a marker of personality, intelligence, trustworthiness, professional
154 e focus on a set of models that propose that personality is instantiated in the brain, distally cause
155 and brain-imaging studies suggest that human personality is the integrated expression of three major
157 l variation in behavioural phenotype, termed personality, is an important determinant of how populati
158 issues, 210 participants), psychological and personality issues (21 issues, 147 participants), burden
159 self-reported personality and the automated personality judgements made on the basis Facebook Likes
160 gests that the link between life history and personality may only emerge under certain circumstances.
162 tivation during reward feedback and that the personality measure reward dependence is correlated with
165 king a large set of clinical, cognitive, and personality measures to whole-brain resting-state functi
166 undance as two main potential drivers of the personality-mediated trade-off and emphasize that future
169 We found that similar to humans, changes in personality occur unevenly during the dogs' life course,
171 clude to pay more attention to the impact of personality on cognitive output, and a currently neglect
174 characteristics (e.g. social integration or personality) other than dominance rank may have a strong
175 tant descriptive nuance to manifestations of personality pathology, maladaptive LPF is conditional to
176 nd nonaffective cognition, mental health and personality, physical health and lifestyle choices deriv
177 tal disorders (mood, anxiety, substance use, personality, posttraumatic stress disorder, schizophreni
180 ial deprivation, socio-economic dysfunction, personality problems, and elevated rates of both psychia
181 erations, including visual goals, lifestyle, personality, profession, and hobbies, are key elements f
183 acts of Invisalign orthodontic treatment and personality profiles contribution to oral health impacts
184 e possibility of predicting multidimensional personality profiles from static facial images using ANN
188 study: (i) examined the existence of latent personality profiles, (ii) studied their gender invarian
189 s effect appears consistent across different personality profiles, countering the proposition that in
192 n how ongoing spontaneous brain activity and personality provide a predisposition for the processing
193 n are fundamental principles of contemporary personality psychology and have been shown to hold acros
194 lf-regulation coming from social psychology, personality psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.
195 view is primarily oriented within social and personality psychology, the interdisciplinary nature of
203 ls and suggests a substantial reimagining of personality research: instead of reifying statistical de
205 correlations between observed and predicted personality scores were found for conscientiousness (0.3
206 used in 5 European zoos to study the role of personality similarity in dyadic relationship quality.
208 behavioral scores revealed multidimensional personality (Sociability, Openness, Boldness, Activity)
209 ividual variabilities in functions linked to personality, social behaviors, and cognitive functions.
210 s to unfamiliar situations, shapes long-term personality, social relationships, vocational/education,
213 al explanation for population differences in personality structure in both humans and other animals a
215 eifying statistical descriptions of manifest personality structures, research should focus more on mo
218 ity and were more attracted to a prey in the personality tests became the new tool users when previou
219 ry trajectory to display more active or bold personalities than individuals following a slow trajecto
220 inventor employees all show more innovative personalities than the noninventor employees in the same
221 ered on measures of gender nonconformity and personality that reliably show male sexual orientation d
222 tial construction impairment and hypersocial personality that typify Williams syndrome, the Williams
225 and positively correlated with scores of the personality trait constraint independent of sex or age.
226 Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) is a personality trait in humans characterised by a tendency
228 a key component of behavioral inhibition, a personality trait that is a risk factor for anxiety diso
229 ' (UE) is the most common obesity-associated personality trait(8) and resembles the perceived loss of
230 o be related to an interplay of predisposing personality traits (e.g., impulsivity), and reductions i
231 d and feather metal concentrations and three personality traits (exploration behavior, territorial ag
232 c disorders.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Impulsive personality traits (IPTs) are heritable traits that are
234 role of strategic context (the "situation"), personality traits (the "person"), and their interaction
235 association studies on measures of impulsive personality traits [the short version of the UPPS-P Impu
239 ty of the multi-variate associations between personality traits and network dynamicity was assessed u
241 lap between the polygenic basis for specific personality traits and specific SMIs has been identified
242 tween individual differences in psychopathic personality traits and the behavioral patterns observed
243 d whether there is a link between individual personality traits and tool use in the ant Aphaenogaster
244 ionship between different types of impulsive personality traits and various psychiatric disorders.SIG
248 d ration) reflected boldness and exploratory personality traits derived from 3 traditional tests (ope
251 ments we asked Spanish listeners to evaluate personality traits from different instances of the Spani
252 earch becomes more popular, the inclusion of personality traits has emerged as a focal point for an e
255 s in conscientiousness, and changes in other personality traits occur before the onset of mild cognit
256 neophobia to assess specific or generalized personality traits of dairy calves deserves further work
257 Reduced EFhd2 function induces high-risk personality traits of sensation-seeking/low anxiety asso
259 did not show any effect of ALIC-NAcc-DBS on personality traits or executive functions, and no potent
260 amine the relationship between aromatase and personality traits related to self-regulation and inhibi
261 hared between schizophrenia and the Big Five personality traits using a Bayesian statistical framewor
262 of extreme task specialisation, variation in personality traits within the colony may improve divisio
263 et of personality features (all the Big Five personality traits) for both men and women using real-li
264 ng genetics), psychological (such as certain personality traits), clinical (such as comorbid psychiat
266 ubstance use, non-suicidal self-harm, sleep, personality traits, and exposure to self-harm could info
267 rabilities, substance use, cognitive traits, personality traits, and physical traits) among a subset
268 leting a survey assessing optimism, anxiety, personality traits, and sociodemographics using valid an
269 the genetic risk for psychiatric disorders, personality traits, brain imaging phenotypes and externa
270 ly associated with addiction, behavioral and personality traits, cognitive function, and educational
271 isk of AD, we examined which combinations of personality traits, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and cogni
272 myloid or tau pathology with combinations of personality traits, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and cogni
273 ocial voice space was summarized by two main personality traits, one emphasizing valence (e.g., trust
285 ers were altered between conditions, however personality type did not influence changes in movement.
286 1.02-3.81, p=0.043), and lower levels of the personality type extraversion (0.71, 0.49-1.03; p=0.068)
287 .93-3.69, p=0.081), and higher levels of the personality type intellect/openness (1.62, 1.06-2.46; p=
289 ood Scale negative and positive affect), and personality (Type D personality) were compared between p
290 ty disorders and conceptually independent of personality types or traits, and it represents maladapti
292 ternal effects can be an important source of personality variation, this varies over ontogeny of offs
295 nd positive affect), and personality (Type D personality) were compared between patients with NOCAD a
296 mountainousness as a meaningful predictor of personality when tested against a conservative set of co
298 ould have underappreciated effects on animal personalities, with implications for individual fitness
299 itat modifications shift the distribution of personalities within a population, by increasing the pro