コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 follow-up visits for 6 months (all by their pharmacist).
2 tioners (ie, physicians, allergists, nurses, pharmacists).
3 research nurse, a physician, and a clinical pharmacist.
4 identity to the masked staff by an unmasked pharmacist.
5 personnel remained blinded except the local pharmacist.
6 greater; blinding was known only to the site pharmacist.
7 a drug accountability auditor, and the site pharmacist.
8 However, PEFR data were not provided to the pharmacist.
9 ed random numbers were provided by the study pharmacist.
10 e treatment assignment, except for the study pharmacist.
11 elayed to primary teams and tracked by local pharmacists.
12 nurses, 30 school first aiders, 30 community pharmacists.
13 d skin and soft tissue infections with local pharmacists.
14 purchasing patterns and alert physicians and pharmacists.
15 professors and its repeated use in training pharmacists.
16 itals should consider employing clinical ICU pharmacists.
17 rding to the absence or presence of clinical pharmacists.
18 comprising infectious disease physicians and pharmacists.
19 y American Society of Hypertension-certified pharmacists.
20 dermatologists, clinical immunologists, and pharmacists.
21 d skin and soft tissue infections with local pharmacists.
22 ced practice providers (10.5%; n = 263), and pharmacists (2.1%; n = 52), reflecting a 1.6% response r
23 -8.12 mm Hg (-10.23 to -6.01, I(2)=57%) for pharmacists, -4.67 mm Hg (-7.09 to -2.24, I(2)=0%) for d
24 s after initiation of the program, 24 of 302 pharmacists (7.9%), 35 of 302 prescribers (11.6%), and 5
26 mple opportunities to implement the program, pharmacists accessed patient-specific data only about ha
30 ith emergency contraception from a community pharmacist, along with an invitation to a sexual and rep
36 nt education; (3) collaborative care between pharmacist and primary care provider/cardiologist; and (
38 delineate the activities of a critical care pharmacist and the scope of pharmacy services within the
39 care interventions recommended by a clinical pharmacist and to specifically examine cost savings (or
40 y American Society of Hypertension-certified pharmacists and demonstrated efficacy in a 6-month clust
43 ription through its evaluation by practicing pharmacists and pharmacy professors and its repeated use
44 An online survey was conducted among 201 pharmacists and pharmacy technicians from an existing pa
45 ip was delivered using in-person coaching by pharmacists and physicians three to five times weekly, a
46 dialysis establish dosing guidelines for all pharmacists and physicians to follow to provide consiste
47 tegrated care models between community-based pharmacists and primary medical providers may identify a
48 Patients and all study personnel, except for pharmacists and statisticians, were masked to treatment
49 ere reviewed for references to critical care pharmacists and their role on the multiprofessional crit
50 er study site staff (except for the unmasked pharmacist), and patients were masked to pembrolizumab v
51 isted of a primary care general internist, a pharmacist, and a nurse or other certified diabetes educ
53 onent intervention, often led by an oncology pharmacist, and also included patient education and regu
54 en the treating elder care physician and the pharmacist, and implementation of medication changes.
57 cal microbiologists, infectious disease (ID) pharmacists, and infectious disease physicians represent
58 d medication education, regular follow-up by pharmacists, and medications dispensed in time-specific
59 participants, care teams, outcome assessors, pharmacists, and members of the trial management group w
60 of no greater than 1:2, adding critical care pharmacists, and providing dedicated respiratory therapi
61 ors, registered dietitians, epidemiologists, pharmacists, and public health experts, continuously sea
63 ists, pharmaceutical scientists, physicians, pharmacists, and regulatory specialists to explore strat
64 e practitioner, physician assistant, nurses, pharmacists, and student members of the Society of Criti
65 (3) a shared review by the physician and the pharmacist; and (4) a daily, rounding-based, in-person a
66 ced-practice providers and medical trainees; pharmacists; and translational and basic science researc
67 e intervention arm will visit with the study pharmacist approximately 1 week post-hospital discharge.
68 In the UK, doctors, dentists, coroners, and pharmacists are allowed to report through the yellow car
73 ized skills characterizing the critical care pharmacist as clinician, educator, researcher, and manag
74 d skills that characterize the critical care pharmacist as clinician, educator, researcher, and manag
78 he prospective cohort were identified by the pharmacist at the patient's first clinic visit (1.1 erro
83 Group assignment was not masked from study pharmacists, but allocation was concealed from participa
84 were faxed to the antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist by noon each day in order to evaluate empiric
85 an off-site team: a nurse care manager and a pharmacist by telephone, and a psychologist and a psychi
87 opriate use of antibiotics and what role the pharmacist can play in ensuring the optimal use of infec
90 vascular care, including the use of clinical pharmacists, can efficiently deliver high-quality care.
92 ved home BP monitoring and Web training plus pharmacist care had a greater net reduction in systolic
94 ng and secure patient Web site training plus pharmacist care management delivered through Web communi
96 atients were randomized to usual care (usual pharmacist care with no specific intervention) or interv
99 including nurses, case managers, physicians, pharmacists, case workers, dietitians, physical therapis
100 fectious disease specialists (physicians and pharmacists), clinical microbiologists, and infection co
101 of this study was to evaluate if a physician/pharmacist collaborative model would be implemented as d
103 ssisted medication reconciliation, inpatient pharmacist counseling, low-literacy adherence aids, and
105 zed trial of CVD risk reduction by community pharmacists, demonstrating a significant reduction in ri
106 ian assistants, nurses, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, dentists, dental hygienists, occupational t
107 The sensitivity and specificity of clinical pharmacists diagnosing AF using pulse palpation was 76.9
108 es, nurse prescribers, Physician Assistants, pharmacists, dieticians, and physical or occupational th
109 e 24-wk study period, the pediatric clinical pharmacist documented all interventions that occurred du
112 fied included appropriate patient selection, pharmacist-driven patient education, and pharmacist-led
113 versus MALDI-TOF MS combined with real-time, pharmacist-driven, antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) inter
115 ne way to ensure enough doctors, nurses, and pharmacists during the COVID-19 pandemic: Enable graduat
118 ansplant coordinator, psychologist, clinical pharmacist], electronic reminder and support systems (eg
121 computer alert appeared on the screen to the pharmacist entering the order, who could then consult th
124 rovided information and met with a community pharmacist for scheduled visits at baseline, 3, 6, 9, an
127 es were defined as having at least a partial pharmacist full-time equivalent specifically devoted to
128 reaction assay, with physician education and pharmacist guidance, did not significantly reduce excess
134 physicians, infectious disease specialists, pharmacists, hospital administrators, and government ent
135 ludes an infectious disease specialist and a pharmacist in addition to the burn surgeon is highly rec
137 ations address the role of the critical care pharmacist in patient and medication safety, clinical qu
138 e average time spent per day by the clinical pharmacist in the pediatric intensive care unit was 0.73
141 This essay describes the role of community pharmacists in implementing the system and distributing
142 nsmission among drug-using patients and that pharmacists in most states have a clear or reasonable le
145 to support the potential role of nurses and pharmacists in the effective management of chronic pain.
146 atient characteristics, presence of clinical pharmacists in the ICU (odds ratio [OR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0
147 tation of protocols and presence of clinical pharmacists in the ICU, and close collaboration between
148 We suggest broader adoption for the role of pharmacists in the provision of penicillin skin testing.
149 igators (two physicians, two nurses, and one pharmacist) in adult ICU patient encounters (n = 192).
150 makers should consider an expanded role for pharmacists, including prescribing, to address the burde
151 alert sent to the covering provider and unit pharmacist indicating new acute kidney injury) or usual
152 re characterized as collectivist (input from pharmacists, infectious disease, and medical microbiolog
154 is study was to document the impact of daily pharmacist interventions on clinical outcomes of intensi
155 d by 5.3% (CI, 2.6% to 7.6%; P < 0.001), and pharmacist interventions to prevent error were reduced b
156 y readmission rate to the study institution, pharmacist interventions to prevent error, drug-drug int
159 sk for medication errors and that transplant pharmacist involvement leads to improved safety through
164 on, pharmacist-driven patient education, and pharmacist-led adverse event and adherence monitoring.
165 tise can achieve substantial returns through pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship programmes and
166 mprehensive hospital-based ASP that included pharmacist-led audit and feedback on institutional AMR.
167 mprehensive hospital-based ASP that included pharmacist-led audit-and-feedback on institutional AMR.
170 To determine the effectiveness and harms of pharmacist-led chronic disease management for community-
171 tates and of any design reported outcomes of pharmacist-led chronic disease management versus a compa
174 nd medical record extraction compared with a pharmacist-led comprehensive medication assessment.
175 ultivariable adjustment, association between pharmacist-led education and dabigatran adherence was no
176 patient selection was performed at 31 sites, pharmacist-led education was provided at 30 sites, and p
178 feedback for at-risk patients (control) or a pharmacist-led information technology intervention (PINC
179 tensification of Medications intervention, a pharmacist-led intervention combining elements found in
180 County barbershops were assigned to either a pharmacist-led intervention or an active control group.
181 ntervention comprises 4 main components: (1) pharmacist-led medication reconciliation and tailoring;
182 , 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25), and provision of pharmacist-led monitoring (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.11-1.41)
184 a community hospital emergency department, a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy assessment via medical
189 t, and formally review interventions made by pharmacists, locum arrangements, and the workload of jun
192 practitioners and physician assistants, and pharmacist members of four national critical care societ
193 8 countries among experts including hospital pharmacists, microbiologists, and infectious disease spe
194 laboratory staff were masked, but the study pharmacist (MK), vaccine administrator, and study statis
195 ce to the active drug; the study physicians, pharmacists, monitors, and patients remained masked duri
197 rviews were conducted with doctors (n = 10), pharmacists (n = 10), and nurses and midwives (n = 19) i
200 ntervention included: real-time MALDI-TOF MS pharmacist notification and prospective AMS provider fee
201 dres of health-care professionals, including pharmacists, nurses, and community health workers, to me
202 sults immediately to the pharmacy and alerts pharmacists of potential interventions, and (ii) the edu
203 negatively associated with the presence of a pharmacist on-site (odds ratio 0.66 [0.56-0.78], p<0.000
204 intervention by infectious disease clinical pharmacists on the basis of the results of tests for mec
205 Patients, trial investigators and staff, pharmacists or dispensers, laboratory staff (with the ex
206 her and when, during their interactions with pharmacists or salespeople, the discounts specified in S
208 systematic medication titration by doctors, pharmacists, or patients; education; or lifestyle counse
210 ocation was not masked to general practices, pharmacists, patients, or researchers who visited practi
212 ounds that included a respiratory therapist, pharmacist, physician and nurse; and protocol use as hav
217 ents pertaining to the TIRF REMS, surveys of pharmacists, prescribers, and patients reflected general
221 n = 64, mean rate 3.0 per patient); however, pharmacists prevented 119 of these errors (1.9 errors pe
225 lthcare professionals (e.g. doctors, nurses, pharmacists, radiographers etc.) and others involved in
228 k, were reviewed, with 7934 interventions by pharmacists recorded for the five targeted measures, sug
231 asked to treatment assignment apart from the pharmacist responsible for preparing the study treatment
234 actionable, patient-level feedback; and (3) pharmacists reviewing individual at-risk patients, and i
235 vides background information on the clinical pharmacist's role, training, certification, and potentia
236 usion, we have found evidence that community pharmacists, school first aiders and primary care nurses
239 ce, patients received standardized HIV nurse/pharmacist support, which included nurse visits and tele
240 was sourced from a panel survey of hospital pharmacists, surgeons, and theatre nurses who are involv
241 % to -0.53%, I2 91.0%, n = 13, p < 0.001) in pharmacist task-sharing studies, and -0.27% (-0.50% to -
242 ded telephone nurse care managers, telephone pharmacists, telepsychologists, and telepsychiatrists.
243 ceutical care were more satisfied with their pharmacist than the usual care group (P =.03) and the PE
244 ped by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America,
246 pment, supplies and personnel, and dedicated pharmacist time for blood culture review and of making i
247 r an initial telephone visit with a nurse or pharmacist to guide follow-up or an initial in-person cl
248 ment packs with sequential allocation by the pharmacist to receive 56 days of treatment with standard
250 utions may enhance the preparation of future pharmacists to contribute to effective antimicrobial ste
251 efforts to overcome these barriers, allowing pharmacists to deliver high-quality patient care to the
252 SMASH comprised (1) training of clinical pharmacists to deliver the intervention; (2) a web-based
254 d 1998, of educational outreach by community pharmacists to influence physician prescribing in Englan
255 hthalmologists should work with insurers and pharmacists to prevent such discontinuation of use as ge
256 ed that a formal, consistent intervention by pharmacists to promote adherence to our institution's se
257 he feasibility of GP practice-based clinical pharmacists to screen the over-65s for AF, using digital
264 stewardship program (ASP) physicians and/or pharmacists used a standardized survey to collect data o
265 Furthermore, diagnosis of AF by the clinical pharmacist using an SLECG was more sensitive and more sp
266 ts were randomly assigned (1:1) by the trial pharmacist, using previously generated treatment allocat
268 iety, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists vancomycin consensus guidelines committee.
269 cipation in these programs by physicians and pharmacists varies by state, and funding for continuatio
270 xt allocation was obtained by the study site pharmacist via an interactive voice-response system.
271 intervention continued with fewer in-person pharmacist visits to test whether the intervention effec
272 An infectious disease and/or critical care pharmacist was contacted with the microarray assay resul
273 fection studied, the involvement of clinical pharmacists was evaluated in 8,927-54,042 patients from
274 AF screening performed by GP practice-based pharmacists was feasible, economically viable, and posit
275 suggest that team-based care using clinical pharmacists was implemented in diverse primary care offi
278 ity rates in ICUs that did not have clinical pharmacists were higher by 23.6% (p < 0.001, 386 extra d
283 ants who received treatment and the research pharmacist who implemented the randomisation and provide
284 to the treatment assignment, except for the pharmacist who prepared the ISIS-APO(a)Rx or placebo.
285 to treatment assignment, except for the site pharmacist who prepared the study drug but had no intera
286 ed using a web-based application by the site pharmacist who then masked the solution for infusion.
287 e BP telemonitors and transmitted BP data to pharmacists who adjusted antihypertensive therapy accord
289 ntion group, barbers promoted follow-up with pharmacists who prescribed BP medication under a collabo
291 ted a survey of the instructions provided by pharmacists, who play an important role in educating pat
293 ealth professionals that includes a clinical pharmacist with expertise in optimal and comprehensive m
295 ed HIV Care Model integrated community-based pharmacists with HIV medical providers and required them
296 armaceutical care program (n = 447) provided pharmacists with recent patient-specific clinical data (
298 Recent increases in the number of clinical pharmacists within primary care makes them ideally place
300 m within the long-term care facility and the pharmacists' work activity system outside the facility.