戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  phoria level (adapted phoria minus baseline phoria).
2 ixation task was independent of the baseline phoria.
3  is defined as adapted phoria minus baseline phoria.
4 ed phoria, and baseline phoria and change in phoria.
5 ctional activity (p = 0.002) and the rate of phoria adaptation and medial cuneus functional activity
6                                  The rate of phoria adaptation and vergence facility were significant
7 d vertical vergence, as reflecting so-called phoria adaptation for torsional alignment.
8            For the slow fusional system, the phoria adaptation magnitude and rate, and the medial cun
9 ence effort and is assessed by measuring the phoria adaptation magnitude and rate.
10            Vergence facility and the rate of phoria adaptation may have potential clinical utility in
11 a adaptation where the magnitude and rate of phoria adaptation were measured.
12  a 5-minute sustained fixation task to evoke phoria adaptation where the magnitude and rate of phoria
13 nce facility, net change in the magnitude of phoria adaptation, and the rate of phoria adaptation.
14                  Possible mechanisms include phoria adaptation, the prolonged fusional effort itself,
15 nitude of phoria adaptation, and the rate of phoria adaptation.
16                                      Adapted phoria and baseline phoria were also significantly corre
17 o, baseline and adapted phoria, and baseline phoria and change in phoria.
18  was to investigate the relationship between phoria and the dynamics of vergence eye movements as des
19 ted to study the interactions among baseline phoria and vergence peak velocity ratio, adapted phoria
20 ia and vergence peak velocity ratio, adapted phoria and vergence peak velocity ratio, baseline and ad
21                                              Phoria and vergence step responses were recorded.
22 ular misalignment and differentiated between phorias and tropias.
23 tion, in addition to differentiating between phorias and tropias.
24 ce peak velocity ratio, baseline and adapted phoria, and baseline phoria and change in phoria.
25  survey (CISS), near point convergence, near phoria, and positive fusional vergence will be taken at
26 ients (0.5%, n = 2/438) due to decompensated phorias, and 1 patient (0.5%, n = 1/438) due to a fibrot
27 l to or less than 8(Delta) at distance and a phoria at near without diplopia.
28 se (by an open field of view autorefractor), phoria (by cover test), reading distance, and hours of n
29                            Distance and near phoria difference measured by cover test has similar eff
30 differences were shown for the difference in phoria from distance to near measured by the cover test
31 e correlated with aligning prism (associated phoria) in a normal clinical population.
32                                The change in phoria induced by the vergence steps or a sustained fixa
33 ely not a response to stimulus motion, but a phoria initiated by the absence of a disparity signal.
34                      These data support that phoria is a factor in the asymmetry between peak velocit
35 a factor in the amount of change observed in phoria level (adapted phoria minus baseline phoria).
36 convergence and divergence and that baseline phoria level is not a factor in the amount of change obs
37 ia measurement; adapted phoria, which is the phoria measured after a visual task; and change in phori
38 essed: baseline phoria, which is the initial phoria measurement; adapted phoria, which is the phoria
39  of change observed in phoria level (adapted phoria minus baseline phoria).
40 hange in phoria, which is defined as adapted phoria minus baseline phoria.
41 ye trials and were correlated to the average phoria of each subject.
42 ophoria at near; (2) exodeviation (tropia or phoria) of at least 15 prism diopters (PD) at distance o
43 h the prisms, there was a change in vertical phoria (prism adaptation) ranging from 1.6 to 3.3.
44  the ability to modify disparity vergence or phoria was correlated to PALs adaptation.
45                                              Phoria was modified in two experiments: vergence steps l
46                  Adapted phoria and baseline phoria were also significantly correlated.
47                            Three measures of phoria were assessed: baseline phoria, which is the init
48                         Baseline and adapted phoria were significantly correlated to vergence peak ve
49  measured after a visual task; and change in phoria, which is defined as adapted phoria minus baselin
50                   It measures the associated phoria, which is the "aligning prism" needed to nullify
51 e measures of phoria were assessed: baseline phoria, which is the initial phoria measurement; adapted
52 h is the initial phoria measurement; adapted phoria, which is the phoria measured after a visual task
53 ombining the difference in distance and near phoria with positive fusional vergence at both distance
54 omotor models of vergence should incorporate phoria within the design.