ライフサイエンスコーパス: photography

1 ics has emerged to help return some trust in photography.

2 images on par with standard mydriatic fundus photography.

3 ocular examination, including dilated fundus photography.

4 CT, pseudocolor, and autofluorescence fundus photography.

5 objective refraction and stereoscopic fundus photography.

6 unlight exposure, and diet; underwent fundus photography.

7 xamination, intraocular pressure, and fundus photography.

8 an eye examination and digital retinal color photography.

9 SD OCT, near-infrared reflectance, and color photography.

10 and compared censusing techniques to ground photography.

11 and chronic, underwent OCTA and color fundus photography.

12 mated visual field testing; and fundus color photography.

13 digital dermoscopy in addition to total-body photography.

14 , satellite observations, and digital repeat photography.

15 applanation tonometry, gonioscopy and fundus photography.

16 y (OCT), fundus autofluorescence, and fundus photography.

17 for the presence or absence of AMD by fundus photography.

18 Presence or absence of AMD by fundus photography.

19 he standard method, 7-field mydriatic fundus photography.

20 f eyes when hemorrhage was present on fundus photography.

21 posterior segments, lens grading and fundus photography.

22 tical coherence tomography (OCT), and fundus photography.

23 nular deep retinal whitening on color fundus photography.

24 ed a mean 1.50x the area captured by montage photography.

25 mplished via the examination of recreational photography.

26 ted off and mounted on microscope slides for photography.

27 when hemorrhage was present on DFE or fundus photography.

28 using single-Maddox rod, and 43 using fundus photography.

29 iological scans and WHO criteria for medical photography.

30 e, including vision, refraction, and retinal photography.

31 strated a CMR sign on ultra-widefield fundus photography.

32 CMR sign detected on ultra-widefield fundus photography.

33 AMD severity was determined by color fundus photography.

34 tivity for visualizing RPD than color fundus photography.

35 s. 3.3%), and urgent referrals due to fundus photography (1.8% vs. 1.1%).

36 %), refraction (9.9%), B-scan (8.7%), fundus photography (8.0%) were the most commonly performed diag

37 vs. 4.4%), nonurgent referrals due to fundus photography (9.3% vs. 3.3%), and urgent referrals due to

38 Time-lapse microscopic-photography allows in-depth phenotyping of microorganism

39 Compared with color fundus photography alone, FA may improve the sensitivity of dia

40 AMD than can be detected using color fundus photography alone.

41 lopathy Staging system based on color fundus photography and a masked grader.

42 field fundus imaging, including color fundus photography and angiography, was performed using standar

43 ent an examination under anesthesia in which photography and AS-OCT were performed.

44 ng were analyzed against conventional fundus photography and clinical examination.

45 The revolution in low-cost consumer photography and computation provides fertile opportunity

46 n electrochemical potential using high-speed photography and digital image correlation.

47 tabases were performed in January 2013 using photography and digital imaging, standardization, and me

48 canopy greenness derived from digital repeat photography and disentangled the effects of radiation, t

49 e assessed by masked grading of color fundus photography and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Stu

50 resolution landcover map derived from aerial photography and eddy covariance.

51 ete ophthalmic evaluation, with fundus color photography and enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain o

52 ere analyzed for hemorrhage on DFE or fundus photography and exudative activity on SD OCT.

53 Color fundus photography and fluorescein angiography (FA) images were

54 Masked readers graded scar and GA on fundus photography and fluorescein angiography and graded SHRM

55 ere evaluated on a monthly basis with fundus photography and fluorescein angiography before and after

56 atrophy (MA) in HARBOR analyzed color fundus photography and fluorescein angiography image data.

57 status using standard 7-field stereo fundus photography and fluorescein angiography, respectively.

58 ted by repeated ophthalmoscopy, color fundus photography and fluorescein fundus angiography, before a

59 Subjects completed retinal photography and had vCDR determined in both eyes, with v

60 Aerial photography and high resolution satellites can capture s

61 of technologies including conventional color photography and hyperspectral imaging.

62 All eyes had stereoscopic optic disc photography and in vivo LC imaging using enhanced depth

63 Fundus photography and indirect ophthalmoscopy.

64 ge increased while the utilization of fundus photography and IVFA has declined.

65 Fundus photography and macular spectral-domain optical coherenc

66 esolved phenotyping of roots in vivo by both photography and microscopy.

67 Anatomic outcomes were assessed with fundus photography and OCT for up to 12 months of follow-up.

68 nd then correlate these findings with fundus photography and OCT to determine a critical period for r

69 intracranial hypertension (IIH) using fundus photography and OCT.

70 multimodal retinal imaging, including fundus photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

71 ind and might allow the model to accommodate photography and painting.

72 An intercomparison between the aerial photography and satellite remote sensing demonstrated th

73 All patients were imaged with color photography and SD OCT, and some were imaged with autofl

74 ically confirmed RAH were imaged with fundus photography and SD OCT.

75 had longitudinal follow-up with both fundus photography and SD OCT.

76 These patients had all undergone fundus photography and spectral-domain optical coherence tomogr

77 istics that indicated AMD revealed by fundus photography and trained raters.

78 d ciliary body cysts with high-quality color photography and ultrasound biomicroscopy.

79 Clinical records, including fundus photography and ultrasound results, were reviewed retros

80 Ultrawide-field fundus photography and UWF FA were obtained at baseline and 3 m

81 structure-function relationship using fundus photography and visual field sensitivity are examined.

82 hone fundus photography, nonmydriatic fundus photography, and 7-field mydriatic fundus photography fo

83 velopment of optical systems for microscopy, photography, and computer vision.

84 intraocular pressure (IOP) tonometry, fundus photography, and electroretinography were performed over

85 s determined by clinical examination, fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography.

86 oherence tomography, wide-field color fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography.

87 , optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus photography, and functional testing including fundus-con

88 as evaluated by clinical examination, fundus photography, and fundus autofluorescence imaging, and vi

89 cluded logMAR visual acuity, digital retinal photography, and grading of images at Moorfields Eye Hos

90 ve systemic and ocular examinations, retinal photography, and laboratory investigations for all parti

91 ed with Placido-ring topography, Scheimpflug photography, and OCT on the day of their surgery.

92 ndirect ophthalmoscopy, digital color fundus photography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

93 Fundus autofluorescence, fundus color photography, and spectral-domain OCT were conducted and

94 Case notes, digital fundus photography, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomog

95 ved eye exams, dilation and 40-degree fundus photography, and teleconsultation with an ophthalmologis

96 volved technician eye exams, optional fundus photography, and teleconsultation with an ophthalmologis

97 ion was mapped with infrared image and color photography, and the characteristics of the retina and o

98 pth measured by high-magnification slit lamp photography, and the management of the cases described i

99 g laser ophthalmoscopy, nonmydriatic digital photography, and tonometry on 429 participants.

100 blue-light autofluorescence imaging, fundus photography, and widefield pseudocolor and autofluoresce

101 Smartphone and nonmydriatic fundus photography are each able to detect DR and sight-threate

102 with evidence of hemorrhage on DFE or fundus photography at 3 months and no evidence of SD-exudative

103 c examination, and stereoscopic color fundus photography at baseline and annual study visits over 5 y

104 ing, ophthalmoscopic examination, and fundus photography at baseline and annual visits.

105 ed by vital microscopy combined with digital photography at specified times.

106 rosis Risk in Communities) underwent retinal photography at visit 3 (1993-1995).

107 went OCTA imaging and ultra-widefield fundus photography at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital

108 infrared reflectance (NIR), and color fundus photography, at baseline and every follow-up visit.

109 tions included eye examination, color fundus photography, autofluorescence imaging, spectral-domain o

110 imaging with B-scan ultrasonography, fundus photography, autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography (

111 view and multimodal imaging including fundus photography, autofluorescence, infrared reflectance, ult

112 Of the 55 eyes with fundus photography available at 2 years, 33 (60.0%) had central

113 An automated, photography-based system could provide an archival and h

114 rehensive history, slitlamp examination, and photography before excision biopsy.

115 Advances in smartphone photography (both quality and image transmission) may im

116 Patients underwent photography by all 3 modalities, and photographs were ev

117 Parent-operated smartphone photography can accurately be used as a method to provid

118 Results suggest that recreational photography can be used in combination with the fusion o

119 Multidimensional photography can capture optical fields beyond the capabi

120 ealthy maculas as determined by color fundus photography (CFP) and a validated grading system, we scr

121 participants underwent OCT and color fundus photography (CFP) at baseline and were then reviewed at

122 acTel 2 eyes without pigment on color fundus photography (CFP) at presentation were studied over a me

123 ssion of atrophy should include color fundus photography (CFP), confocal fundus autofluorescence (FAF

124 to compare these with standard color fundus photography (CFP).

125 phic atrophy (GA) as defined on color fundus photography (CFP).

126 ndus autofluorescence (FAF) and color fundus photography (CFP).

127 Case notes and retinal imaging (color fundus photography [CFP], spectral-domain [SD] optical coherenc

128 ries of canopy greenness from repeat digital photography, citizen science data from the USA National

129 itivity and specificity of smartphone fundus photography, compared with 7-field mydriatic fundus phot

130 pearance of geographic atrophy (GA) on color photography (CP) is preceded by specific features on spe

131 Compressed ultrafast photography (CUP), a computational imaging technique, is

132 ere, we report compressed ultrafast spectral photography (CUSP), which attains several new records in

133 goscelis adeliae) population based on aerial photography data.

134 Fundus photography decreased from 14.6% in 2012 to 11.7% in 201

135 Photography detected retinal changes in 11 of 12 patient

136 Addition of FA to color fundus photography did not affect intergrader agreement signifi

137 Success of photography did not differ between right and left eye.

138 d visual acuity, biomicroscopy, color fundus photography, electroretinography analysis, and visual-ev

139 (CMOS) technology revolutionized high-speed photography, enabling acquisition rates of up to 10(7) f

140 dynamics imaged by STS compressed ultrafast photography, enabling imaging at up to trillions of fram

141 her odds of an AMD diagnosis based on fundus photography evaluation compared with those not self-repo

142 Patients received optic disc photography every 3 months and VF testing every 4 months

143 apparent lesion on color and red-free fundus photography, FAF, or SD OCT.

144 higher proportion of referrals due to fundus photography findings (11.3% vs. 4.4%), nonurgent referra

145 tion by an ophthalmologist because of fundus photography findings and urgency of referral (urgently i

146 increased odds of being referred because of photography findings compared with standard care (odds r

147 estimate the odds of referral due to fundus photography findings compared with standard care.

148 almologic examination including color fundus photography, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiograp

149 nation, including visual acuity (VA), fundus photography, fluorescein angiography (FA), fundus autofl

150 es imaging equipment, including color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography (FA), OCT, and PAM,

151 RC received details and images (color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and OCT) for all i

152 based on clinical examination, color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and optical cohere

153 All patients had multimodal imaging (fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, autofluorescence,

154 Multimethod imaging comprised color photography, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluores

155 dus images for each patient, including color photography, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluores

156 t imaging techniques, including color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluores

157 e imaging with various combinations of color photography, fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green

158 h-resolution digital color imaging, red-free photography, fluorescein angiography, near-infrared refl

159 ultimodal imaging findings, including fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, spectral-domain op

160 l participants underwent nonmydriatic fundus photography followed by automated retinal image analysis

161 ith FECD underwent retroillumination corneal photography, followed by determination of the distributi

162 or 2 diabetes underwent nonmydriatic fundus photography for a diabetic retinopathy screening examina

163 n uveitis, OCT is more sensitive than fundus photography for identification of ERM.

164 ormation exists regarding the role of mosaic photography for ROP telemedicine diagnosis.

165 miological studies rely on monoscopic fundus photography for the detection of clinically significant

166 itivity and specificity of smartphone fundus photography for the detection of vision-threatening DR w

167 us photography, and 7-field mydriatic fundus photography for their abilities to detect and grade diab

168 aphy, compared with 7-field mydriatic fundus photography, for the detection of any DR were 50% (95% c

169 ound using electroretinography (ERG), fundus photography (FP), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA),

170 luding Humphrey visual field testing, fundus photography (FP), OCT, fluorescein angiogram (FA), and f

171 underwent visual field (VF) testing, fundus photography (FP), other ocular imaging (OOI), or none of

172 tellite imagery from 1973 onwards and aerial photography from 1947 onwards.

173 rected visual acuity, ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, full-field electroretinography (ffERG), Gol

174 ted ophthalmologic examination, color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, spec

175 almic examination together with color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and spectral

176 visual acuity (BCVA), ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein

177 imaging including color and red-free fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), near-infrare

178 uding full-field electroretinography, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, and optica

179 characterized clinically by wide-field color photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, and spectr

180 copy, dilated fundus examination, wide-field photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, sedated el

181 including spectral-domain OCT, color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, visual fie

182 cluded bilateral color fundus and optic disc photography, fundus autofluorescence, automated perimetr

183 Ultra-widefield imaging included pseudocolor photography, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiog

184 testing of the retina included color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, intravenous fluore

185 of case notes, retinal imaging (color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, OCT), electrophysi

186 consistent across studies using color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, or OCT (P = 0.35-0

187 ants underwent dilated stereo-digital fundus photography graded according to the International Classi

188 From fundus photography grading, the cause of poor vision appeared t

189 xaminations, automated perimetry, and fundus photography grading.

190 Nonmydriatic ocular fundus photography has notable advantages over direct ophthalmo

191 Color fundus photography have been extensively used to explore the li

192 inflammation was evaluated by using digital photography, histologic analysis, and flow cytometry.

193 d adults were similar between UAV and ground photography, however the UAV detected up to 52.4% more c

194 ed to be normal based on conventional fundus photography, IIN is postulated to arise from abnormal co

195 ask of identifying and localizing objects in photography images.

196 imal mydriasis, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and photography, imaging of the anterior capsule and zonules

197 e visualized with corresponding color fundus photography in only 38 eyes (4% of total eyes).

198 orn screening via wide-angle digital retinal photography in the Newborn Eye Screen Test study.

199 acuity, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and fundus photography, including fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and

200 All subjects underwent color fundus photography, infrared reflectance, red-free reflectance,

201 modalities: color and red-free fundus camera photography; infrared reflectance scanning laser ophthal

202 No statistically significant effect of photography instructions on concordance was detected (gr

203 were blinded to whether parents had received photography instructions.

204 Retinal fundus photography is a safe imaging technique used for capturi

205 Nonmydriatic ocular fundus photography is more sensitive than direct ophthalmoscopy

206 is involves 3D imaging, 2D imaging by fundus photography is usually used in screening settings, resul

207 ant c.61C>G, a clinical examination, corneal photography, IVCM, light microscopy, and immunohistochem

208 he following fundus features on color fundus photography: large soft drusen, reticular pseudodrusen (

209 cluded a full ophthalmic examination, fundus photography, macular spectral-domain optical coherence t

210 OCT had a good agreement with the fundus photography method.

211 CSME by the following 2 stereoscopic fundus photography (method 1) and dilated biomicroscopy in comb

212 is was a prospective, comparative study of 3 photography modalities.

213 indirect ophthalmoscopy (n = 44) and fundus photography (n = 29).

214 Patients underwent color fundus photography, near-infrared (NIR) imaging, fundus autoflu

215 Patients underwent color fundus photography, near-infrared reflectance (NIR), spectral-d

216 sive multimodal imaging that included fundus photography, near-infrared reflectance, blue autofluores

217 d the ability of UWFI vs nonmydriatic fundus photography (NMFP) to detect nondiabetic retinal finding

218 We compared smartphone fundus photography, nonmydriatic fundus photography, and 7-fiel

219 Fundus photography, OCT, fluorescein angiography (FA), and OCT

220 Selected eyes were imaged with fundus photography, OCT, OCT angiography, indocyanine green ang

221 acular edema, as well as stereoscopic fundus photography of 7 standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retin

222 eye examinations, including detailed retinal photography of both eyes.

223 el predictions and (ii) using repeat digital photography of forest canopies that observe and integrat

224 f AMD is based mainly on studies using color photography of the central retina, where early and poten

225 essment and retinal imaging including fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), convent

226 We recorded fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), intrave

227 disc examination, visual fields, stereo disc photography, optical coherence tomography, and measureme

228 c nerve imaging-particularly retinal digital photography, optical coherence tomography, and MRI techn

229 follow-up, the animal eyes underwent fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, and multifoca

230 Clinical investigations included fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, fundus autofl

231 2)/year), assessed primarily by color fundus photography or fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging.

232 ase was determined by ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, or SD OCT.

233 e commonly with IR-SLO imaging than in color photography (P = .014) and ribbon pseudodrusen were seen

234 ost-LASIK change in MRx and both Scheimpflug photography (P = 0.714) and OCT (P = 0.216).

235 Disc-fovea angle determined by fundus photography (P-DFA) is considered the gold standard for

236 n, conjunctival ultraviolet autofluorescence photography, participant questionnaire.

237 ciduous forest model based on repeat digital photography performed comparably to the upscaled species

238 ght onto a 2D image sensor, multidimensional photography resolves the scene along with other informat

239 Addition of FA to color fundus photography resulted in a significant improvement in sen

240 ng clinical classification of AMD with color photography, RPD were seen in 2.4% of eyes with no AMD o

241 Autofluorescence and fundus photography showed a lower positive (40%-60%) and negati

242 pa statistic, addition of FA to color fundus photography significantly improved intergrader agreement

243 ed to lift off heated surfaces by high speed photography similar to the Leidenfrost effect in hot, vo

244 ical coherence tomography (OCT) and slitlamp photography (SLP) with fluorescein staining.

245 ing stereo-polarimetric compressed ultrafast photography (SP-CUP) to record light-speed high-dimensio

246 Here, we employed fundus photography, spectral domain optical coherence tomograph

247 uation was performed, including BCVA, fundus photography, spectral-domain OCT, and fundus autofluores

248 were tested every 3 months with color fundus photography, spectral-domain OCT, and slit-lamp biomicro

249 examination, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundus photography, spectral-domain OCT, autofluorescence imagi

250 Review of ophthalmic studies (fundus photography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomograph

251 of ocular findings and imaging using fundus photography, SS-OCT, and SS-OCTA were performed.

252 al imaging, including ultra-widefield fundus photography, structural OCT, near-infrared reflectance,

253 ity were obtained as standard of care in our photography studio.

254 atient satisfaction questionnaires, clinical photography, subjective clinical improvement, light micr

255 Photography success was classified as "complete" if both

256 ocated at near-surface layers (undetected by photography techniques) were unveiled in detail by LF BS

257 andards for specific-use cases in total body photography, teledermatology, and dermoscopy are describ

258 an intermediate imaging modality (blockface photography) that bridges the gap between MRI and histol

259 ng modalities were variable: on color fundus photography these included localized pigmentary changes

260 itation, we propose tunable multidimensional photography through active optical mapping.

261 uorescence emission is detected using simple photography through an orange filter.

262 rior segment OCT (AS-OCT) and slit-lamp (SL) photography to image the crystalline lens in DS, compare

263 We utilized time-resolved photography to measure cavitation bubble dynamics genera

264 We used high-speed photography to observe thousands of dry-dispersed spores

265 le with diabetes aged 12 or over for retinal photography to screen for the presence of diabetic retin

266 Indirect ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, ultrasonography, and ultrasonic biomicrosco

267 Indirect ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, ultrasonography, and ultrasonic biomicrosco

268 omplete ophthalmic examination, color fundus photography (used for AMD staging), and spectral-domain

269 All participants underwent color fundus photography, used for AMD diagnosis and staging, accordi

270 means of a 3-mm OCTA scan and 7-field fundus photography using the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scal

271 creening examination and nonmydriatic fundus photography via the Intelligent Retinal Imaging System (

272 sual acuity and objective refraction, fundus photography, visual field perimetry, and optical coheren

273 ic macular edema (DME) from monocular fundus photography vs optical coherence tomography (OCT) centra

274 graders in detecting CMV retinitis on fundus photography was 30.2% (95% CI, 10.5%-52.4%), and mean sp

275 Conjunctival UV autofluorescence (CUVAF) photography was developed to detect and characterize pre

276 Serial photography was performed at each 3-month follow-up visi

277 ions and Complications (EDIC) study, retinal photography was performed at intervals of 6 months to 4

278 analysis of patient medical records and skin photography was performed; 104 adult patients with TSC w

279 Retinal photography was taken at diabetes annual screening and i

280 nd levator function were measured and facial photography was taken before, 1 month, and at least 6 mo

281 plete success, but in only 6% initial fundus photography was unsuccessful, indicating its value in as

282 and in 13 (6%; 95%CI, 3-10) patients fundus photography was unsuccessful.

283 to quantify choroidal thickness, and fundus photography was used to classify eyes into categories us

284 Time-lapse photography was used to reconstruct the wheat root morph

285 0), respectively, and of nonmydriatic fundus photography were 54% (95% CI, 40-67) and 99% (95% CI, 98

286 7), respectively, and of nonmydriatic fundus photography were 81% (95% CI, 75-86) and 94% (95% CI, 92

287 ectroretinograms (retinal imaging and fundus photography were collected and analyzed when available).

288 n of DR for both smartphone and nonmydriatic photography were determined by comparison with the stand

289 Dilated fundus examination and fundus photography were evaluated for hemorrhage, and spectral-

290 ein angiography (UWFA) with associated color photography were identified.

291 Visual acuity data and fundus photography were obtained in a clinical trial environmen

292 and glycemic control at the time of initial photography were unassociated with complete success.

293 , fluorescein angiography, as well as fundus photography, were also recorded.

294 , including ophthalmic ultrasound and fundus photography, were performed according to a standard prot

295 - and post-event satellite images and aerial photography, which demonstrate that the primary landslid

296 ine screening typically use monocular fundus photography, while treatment of DME uses OCT CST.

297 Here, by combining high-speed photography with high-precision laser profilometry, we i

298 le-field 45-degree nonmydriatic color fundus photography with referral thresholds of severe nonprolif

299 Nonmydriatic fundus photography with remote interpretation by an expert.

300 Retinal photography with the camera used in this study was not h