ライフサイエンスコーパス: photopic

1 A photopic, 3 Hz flashing light increased ACh release, and

2 dard and bright-flash a-wave implicit times, photopic 30-Hz flicker and single-flash b-wave implicit

3 The photopic 30-Hz flicker ERG was delayed in all group B ey

4 These retinas produce significantly higher photopic a-wave and b-wave amplitudes than do those of R

5 area is similarly associated with age under photopic achromatic and selective S-cone conditions in p

6 The photopic analysis was based on 844 drivers, and the meso

7 nd glare sensitivity (Pelli-Robson chart for photopic and dark adaptometer for mesopic conditions), i

8 ular areas of abnormal high-density AF under photopic and dark-adapted conditions.

9 HA-1077 increased photopic and flicker ERG response amplitudes in R6/2 mic

10 ferences were observed in defocus curves for photopic and mesopic conditions (p < 0.0001).

11 lly sighted participants of both sexes under photopic and mesopic conditions in visual areas V1-V3.

12 The pupil sizes under photopic and mesopic conditions were increased respectiv

13 g, binocular contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic and mesopic conditions, and a questionnaire on

14 r and binocular uncorrected visual acuity in photopic and mesopic conditions, for far (4 m), intermed

15 Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) under both photopic and mesopic conditions.

16 Contrast sensitivity was high and similar in photopic and mesopic conditions.

17 Defocus curve testing was performed in photopic and mesopic conditions.

18 cus testing; contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic and mesopic conditions; and a questionnaire on

19 isual acuity (VA) at various distances under photopic and mesopic conditions; defocus curve, contrast

20 Photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) by Pelli-

21 Overall, the difference in photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity function betwe

22 dy is to examine whether parameters from the photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity functions (CSF

23 At baseline participants underwent photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity testing for ta

24 The photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity values of domi

25 Photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity was recorded.

26 advantage for aspheric IOLs was found under photopic and mesopic light conditions (photopic: Hedges'

27 at 66 cm with an infrared eye tracker under photopic and mesopic light levels.

28 late the light-adaptable synaptic functions (photopic and scotopic adaptation) of the biological visu

29 A- and B-wave amplitudes) or tended toward (photopic and scotopic B-wave amplitudes) a higher mean r

30 e enhancement of visual behaviors under both photopic and scotopic conditions might be due to alterat

31 CN) of the rat to retinal illumination under photopic and scotopic conditions to identify the types o

32 (pRF) modeling with moving bar stimuli under photopic and scotopic conditions to measure the effects

33 ial frequencies in the BTBR mice, under both photopic and scotopic conditions.

34 ion was altered with elevated IOP under both photopic and scotopic conditions.

35 Photopic and scotopic electroretinograms were reviewed.

36 icant neuroretinal dysfunction, with reduced photopic and scotopic ERG responses and reduced b-wave/a

37 Photopic and scotopic ERGs were recorded in R439H trypto

38 Photopic and scotopic fine matrix mapping (FMM) were per

39 ng the nasal horizontal meridian, under both photopic and scotopic levels of lighting.

40 ated firing across cell types was similar at photopic and scotopic light levels, although additional

41 The D1R-KO mice showed anomalies in photopic and scotopic maximal amplitude, whereas D2R-KO

42 Photopic and scotopic multifocal electroretinograms (mfE

43 15 had normal amplitudes, and 11 had reduced photopic and/or scotopic amplitudes at their first visit

44 aluated using electroretinography (scotopic, photopic, and pattern).

45 Images were obtained under mesopic, photopic, and pharmacologically dilated conditions.

46 Photopic AULCSF and peak log contrast sensitivity were n

47 l as a 50% improvement of the ERG amplitude (photopic b wave responses) (both P < 0.01).

48 driven scotopic a and b wave and cone-driven photopic b wave responses.

49 Photopic b-wave amplitude increased monotonically with s

50 Rp2h(-/-) scotopic a-wave and photopic b-wave amplitudes declined at 1 mo of age and c

51 pha' were present at very low levels and the photopic b-wave amplitudes were reduced by 70%.

52 n the rising phase of the ERG b-wave, larger photopic b-wave amplitudes, and increased scotopic thres

53 ce had diminished scotopic a- and b-wave and photopic b-wave amplitudes.

54 uced rod b-wave amplitudes, and extinguished photopic b-wave and flicker responses.

55 ONTx reduced the photopic b-wave and OPs.

56 An increase in photopic b-wave implicit time was observed in Tph2-KI mi

57 t and significantly delayed falling phase of photopic b-wave of electroretinogram (ERG).

58 electroretinogram recordings revealed normal photopic b-wave responses.

59 to 3 hours after MAR IgG injection, the ERG photopic b-wave was diminished, with far less effect on

60 The photopic b-wave was normal for both lines until the ONL

61 of the scotopic threshold response (STR) and photopic b-wave were observed between IOPs of 30 and 40

62 Cone ERG amplitudes (photopic b-wave) in CNGB3(-/-) mice were reduced to appr

63 characteristic of the children's and adults' photopic b-waves.

64 found that light adaptation using mesopic or photopic background lights resulted in a dramatic increa

65 ntre diameters were 5-30 deg measured with a photopic background.

66 g pulsed (3-s) spectral modulations around a photopic background.

67 ting, threshold-contrast Gabor patterns on a photopic background.

68 ns and in the presence of steady mesopic and photopic backgrounds.

69 e in goldfish increases light sensitivity at photopic backgrounds.

70 Although photopic BCVA was normative in SFD, LLVA was impaired (0

71 uenced scotopic (beta = -0.002, P = .04) and photopic (beta = -0.003, P = .02) contrast sensitivity.

72 ed with scotopic (beta = -0.25, P = .01) and photopic (beta = -0.23, P = .04) contrast sensitivity.

73 Adcy6(-/-) mice have slightly enhanced photopic but normal scotopic vision.

74 bleaching light were used, from 500 to 3000 photopic cd m(-2), and exposures were made sufficiently

75 ERGs were measured for red flashes (0.42 log photopic cd-s/m(2)) on a blue rod-saturating background

76 lenses induce myopia in C57BL/6J mice under photopic conditions (continuous light, 200 +/- 15 lux).

77 ditions (range 0.2-17.2 Hz) and higher under photopic conditions (range 0.6-40 Hz) for any given neur

78 eld stimuli were obtained under scotopic and photopic conditions and were used to categorize the CSNB

79 sitivity deficits of patients with MAR under photopic conditions are not specific to the MC pathway,

80 The similar values achieved in mesopic and photopic conditions in binocular uncorrected visual acui

81 rkinson's group under scotopic, mesopic, and photopic conditions in static pupillography, the differe

82 ion' (32 of 48, 62.5 %), which changed under photopic conditions to an on-excitation followed by a mo

83 Mean binocular uncorrected visual acuity in photopic conditions was 0.03 LogMAR for far, 0.12 for in

84 Irbp(-/-) mice are retinoid-deficient under photopic conditions, and it is possible that 11-cis-reti

85 s the light response under both scotopic and photopic conditions, but it does not eliminate it.

86 spectacle lenses induce myopia in mice under photopic conditions, during the susceptible period in po

87 Under photopic conditions, high-contrast visual acuities (HCVA

88 ays, which control vision under scotopic and photopic conditions, respectively.

89 Under photopic conditions, SCN neurones showed rhythmic electr

90 bre electrode and ganzfeld stimulation under photopic conditions, so as to extract the parameters of

91 Under photopic conditions, the contrast sensitivity values of

92 Under photopic conditions, the ON and OFF ganglion cells show

93 f pupil size under scotopic, low mesopic and photopic conditions, with a relative limitation under me

94 e of 0.133 mm motion between the mesopic and photopic conditions, with the pupil diameter changing fr

95 sin at a range of temporal frequencies under photopic conditions.

96 induced by diffusers and -25 D lenses under photopic conditions.

97 -field stimuli were obtained in scotopic and photopic conditions.

98 lved in setting background sensitivity under photopic conditions.

99 alities were detected in the Rp2(null) mice, photopic (cone) and scotopic (rod) function as measured

100 progressive dysfunction of the day vision or photopic (cone) system with preservation of night vision

101 At baseline, photopic contrast sensitivity (CS), mesopic CS, and rod

102 significantly better values were observed in photopic contrast sensitivity for high spatial frequenci

103 Results suggest that photopic contrast sensitivity testing may not help us un

104 These devices exhibit photopic contrasts up to ca. 38%, high neutrality, color

105 At a photopic corneal illuminance of 300 lx and R(f) >= 70, m

106 At a photopic corneal illuminance of 300 lx and R(f) >= 70, s

107 A significant (p < 0.001) reduction in photopic CS (logCS) was measured with the Pelli-Robson c

108 ng asymmetry in their temporal adaptation to photopic (day) and scotopic (night) conditions and that

109 Photopic distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (

110 [0.51] vs 3.6 [0.52] letters; P = .009) and photopic distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity a

111 When compared with wild-type (WT) controls: photopic electroretingraphic (ERG) responses were decrea

112 ds to mislocalization of cone opsin, loss of photopic electroretinogram (ERG) responses and loss of c

113 s, manifesting in dysfunctional scotopic and photopic electroretinogram (ERG) responses.

114 segments resulting in complete absence of a photopic electroretinogram and progressive cone degenera

115 of the human eye to record the a-wave of the photopic electroretinogram elicited in response to dim r

116 Scotopic and photopic electroretinogram responses declined progressiv

117 (-/-) mice exhibited absence of scotopic and photopic electroretinogram responses, a phenotype that r

118 d from 10.9 +/- 5.6 to 45.8 +/- 15.2 muV for photopic electroretinogram.

119 s expressing S- and M-opsins and a preserved photopic electroretinogram.

120 ell death and increased the amplitude of the photopic electroretinogram.

121 tors within the retina, and the scotopic and photopic electroretinograms (ERG) and retinal morphology

122 Scotopic and photopic electroretinograms as well as pupillary constri

123 rs, leading to abnormalities of scotopic and photopic electroretinograms with decreased b-wave amplit

124 ome preservation of cone function based upon photopic electroretinograms.

125 Consistently, the scotopic and photopic electroretinographic (ERG) responses to single-

126 nd Cetn3 resulted in attenuated scotopic and photopic electroretinography (ERG) responses in mice at

127 ated rd10 mice were examined by scotopic and photopic electroretinography and then killed for biochem

128 sed a- and b-wave amplitudes of scotopic and photopic electroretinography responses 4 months after di

129 zygous KI mice, their scotopic, maximal, and photopic electroretinography responses were comparable t

130 Better VA, greater photopic ERG 30-Hz flicker amplitudes, higher mean micro

131 ceive little influence from GCs; (3) the rat photopic ERG also reflects GC signals and may serve as a

132 37217 had no adverse effects on scotopic and photopic ERG amplitude and latency parameters at any of

133 und in cKO mice, evidenced by a reduction in photopic ERG amplitudes and loss of cone cells.

134 Scotopic and photopic ERG analysis did not reveal significant deficit

135 ange over 18-month duration, as evidenced by photopic ERG and optomotor tests.

136 Treated eyes showed photopic ERG b-wave amplitudes similar to those of the n

137 By contrast, the photopic ERG b-waves in KO mice were hardly affected at

138 The cornea-negative PhNR of the photopic ERG depends on spiking activity and is reduced

139 We report that whilst the a-wave of the photopic ERG does not alter, there are profound effects

140 The full-field, photopic ERG most closely resembles the mfERG responses

141 Photopic ERG PhNR amplitudes in MS patients are signific

142 ion; (4) TTX had dramatic effects on the rat photopic ERG that were not attributable to GC currents,

143 The photopic ERG was the most specific criterion to distingu

144 The variations in the primate photopic ERG with eccentricity are due to spike-driven o

145 TTX had dramatic effects on the photopic ERG, surpassing the effects of ONTx.

146 Photopic ERG, visual evoked potentials, IHC and cell cou

147 s loss of a spike-driven contribution to the photopic ERG.

148 The photopic ERGs showed a delay in b-wave time to peak, but

149 Bilateral, full-field scotopic and photopic ERGs were made at 1, 7, and 14 days after a sin

150 ormed 3, 7, and 14 days after injection, and photopic ERGs were performed on day 14.

151 Photopic ERGs were recorded (1.2-2.7 log cd-s/m2) after

152 Photopic ERGs were recorded to brief- (< or = 5 msec) an

153 nts with MS, and normal controls) but not in photopic ERGs.

154 All patients had severely reduced photopic ffERG responses, including those exhibiting pre

155 Both scotopic and photopic ffERG values were abnormal and affected to a si

156 All founders had abnormal scotopic and photopic ffERGs after 3 months.

157 The photopic flash electroretinogram (FERG) and visual evoke

158 Full-field photopic flash ERGs also were recorded.

159 Photopic flash ERGs were recorded differentially, with D

160 The relation between early changes in the photopic flicker electroretinogram (ERG) and photopic ps

161 Monkey photopic flicker ERGs were elicited with sine wave stimu

162 mplitudes were measured in response to 30-Hz photopic flicker stimulation before and after OAC treatm

163 -to-peak ERG amplitudes in response to 30-Hz photopic flicker stimulation.

164 omatous optic neuropathy were recruited, and photopic full-field electroretinograms (ERG) were perfor

165 The photopic full-field ERG was not significantly affected.

166 ransient pattern-reversal ERG (pERG) and the photopic full-field ERG, for detection of local GC damag

167 Photopic full-field ERGs were measured for red flashes (

168 Gaithersburg, MD); and photopic full-field flash (ff)ERG (Utas-E3000; LKC Techn

169 humans, to produce waveforms similar to the photopic full-field flash ERG.

170 Photopic full-field flash ERGs were recorded from anesth

171 stimulated area looked similar to a standard photopic, full-field ERG, with a- and b-waves and OPs.

172 reduction in scotopic function compared with photopic function.

173 Scotopic and photopic Ganzfeld ERGs were recorded from homozygous Pcd

174 ERG b-wave amplitudes were reduced (photopic > scotopic) in FeSO(4)-injected eyes compared w

175 under photopic and mesopic light conditions (photopic: Hedges' g 0.42, 95% CI 0.24-0.61 (3 cycles per

176 The lack of a photopic hill is hypothesized to result from immaturity

177 4- and 10-week-old infants did not show the photopic hill that was characteristic of the children's

178 owed a delay in b-wave time to peak, but the photopic hill, i.e. the relative variation of time to pe

179 n CSNB patients rather than showing a normal photopic hill.

180 fills a crucial role in neural adaptation to photopic illumination, but the pathway that carries cone

181 Photopic increment sensitivity in the fovea was measured

182 Photopic increment thresholds not determined by the pi-1

183 ble of driving circadian photoentrainment at photopic intensities at which they were incapable of sup

184 ON or OFF brisk-transient ganglion cells at photopic intensities, we confirmed that this overlap cau

185 mination, are thought to saturate at higher (photopic) irradiances.

186 eses to explain the tetrasensitivity at high photopic levels in the human peripheral field.

187 ts deviate from trichromatic theory; at high photopic levels, sensitivity is explained by absorptions

188 tivity improved significantly (p = 0.008) in photopic light conditions from 0.9 (0.0-1.95) to 1.35 (0

189 subjects were exposed to mesopic and indoor photopic light levels (<1000 lux), and 80.03 +/- 2.11% d

190 roximately 100 ms phototransduction delay at photopic light levels, gave a approximately 230 ms visuo

191 n the macaque monkey retina in vitro that at photopic light levels, when an identified rod input is e

192 d dopaminergic agonist treatment rescued the photopic light response deficits.

193 k, less sensitive, and operates in bright or photopic lights.

194 limit visual temporal sensitivity in bright (photopic) lights, whereas mechanisms in the inner retina

195 Mild photopic losses close to the internal edge of the ring w

196 restore retinal sensitivity at scotopic and photopic luminances.

197 eks, reducing the blind spot at scotopic and photopic luminances.

198 Photopic mfERGs were recorded with Dawson-Trick-Litzkow

199 Scotopic and photopic microperimetry (MP-1S; Nidek Technologies) was

200 itivities for each category for scotopic and photopic microperimetry.

201 Noninferiority of TFNT00 to SN60AT in mean photopic monocular BCDVA (95% upper confidence limit of

202 e coprimary effectiveness outcomes were mean photopic monocular best-corrected distance visual acuity

203 on [logMAR] margin), and superiority in mean photopic monocular DCNVA (difference of 0.42 logMAR; P <

204 P1 implicit times and N1-P1 amplitudes from photopic multifocal electroretinograms within the centra

205 ll patients showed reduced amplitudes of the photopic negative response (PhNR) (P < 0.001).

206 Consistent with previous studies, the photopic negative response (PhNR) amplitude was signific

207 and background colors that best isolate the photopic negative response (PhNR) and maximize its ampli

208 To compare the sensitivity of the photopic negative response (PhNR) from the shortwave (S)

209 es leads to an improvement in the full-field photopic negative response (PhNR) of the electroretinogr

210 ng the scotopic threshold response (STR) and photopic negative response (PhNR) of the electroretinogr

211 To determine whether the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the electroretinogr

212 ertension group, the N95 and the L&M-pathway photopic negative response (PhNR) were significantly att

213 shes on a blue background used to assess the photopic negative response (PhNR).

214 The photopic negative response of the diffuse flash electror

215 ests that the pattern electroretinogram, the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram, and

216 ERG N95 component (-70%, P = 0.007), and the photopic negative response of the ffERG (-44%, P = 0.005

217 s transient ERGs to uniform fields contained photopic negative responses (PhNR) after the b-wave and

218 vere experimental glaucoma or TTX eliminated photopic negative responses, N95, and N2; glaucoma elimi

219 hese parameters were extracted; in addition, photopic negative-response (PhNR; originating from retin

220 coma removed a cornea-negative response, the photopic-negative response (PhNR), from the ERG.

221 s visual processing in both the scotopic and photopic networks.

222 The nSTR and photopic OPs declined by 50% at IOP <61 mmHg.

223 at the negative STR component (nSTR) and the photopic OPs were the most sensitive to acute IOP elevat

224 yed overt obesity and diabetes, no scotopic, photopic, or c-wave ERG defects were present through 16

225 Repeated pupil size measures under photopic (P, 220 lx), mesopic (M, 160 lx), low mesopic (

226 lexiform layers and in both the scotopic and photopic pathways in the mammalian retina.

227 on, contrast sensitivity, scotopic function, photopic peripheral vision, mesopic peripheral vision, a

228 photopic flicker electroretinogram (ERG) and photopic psychophysical changes in retinitis pigmentosa

229 Paradoxically, raising irradiance across the photopic range increases the robustness of rod responses

230 me studies report rod activity well into the photopic range.

231 ponse kinetics as light levels rise into the photopic range.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Our ability to det

232 We found that RGC photopic receptive field (RF) center size and whole-fiel

233 mbient light levels covering the scotopic to photopic regimes.

234 Electrophysiology revealed a nonrecordable photopic response with later attenuation of the scotopic

235 we found that the temporal properties of RGC photopic responses in the RF center were accelerated, pa

236 Photopic responses were also obtained (0.97-2.72 log cd-

237 Photopic responses were near normal or supernormal from

238 As expected, photopic responses were nondetectable in patients with A

239 Photopic responses were preserved better than scotopic r

240 Electroretinography showed that scotopic and photopic responses were reduced and delayed, but were pr

241 llary atrophy, dyschromatopsia, extinguished photopic responses, and reduced scotopic responses obser

242 l numbers were reduced, as were scotopic and photopic responses.

243 resulted in markedly diminished scotopic and photopic responses.

244 ogram identified mildly reduced scotopic and photopic responses.

245 Consequently, in photopic retinae, the application of APB disrupts the ON

246 ke, light cycles showed enduring deficits in photopic retinal light responses and visual contrast sen

247 cations for signal flow in both scotopic and photopic retinal networks during visual processing and d

248 lus and physiological factors that influence photopic rod-driven responses.

249 related with the lateral extent of preserved photopic sensitivity (r=0.86) and PERG data.

250 Consistent with past reports, photopic sensitivity declined significantly with age for

251 with reticular drusen (RDR) have focused on photopic sensitivity testing but have not specifically a

252 For older subjects, photopic sensitivity was positively related to MP densit

253 Photopic sensitivity was preserved over central macular

254 acuity, demarcate areas of preserved central photopic sensitivity.

255 However, the reduced photopic signal arose only from lost inner retinal neuro

256 ponents were extracted from responses to the photopic single flash.

257 Highest estimates were for photopic single-flash a-wave and b-wave amplitudes (0.84

258 At P25, cone function was assessed with photopic single-flash and flicker ERGs.

259 Cone-driven responses to photopic single-flash or 30-Hz stimuli were nonrecordabl

260 Photopic slow-sequence mfERGs were recorded from anesthe

261 anglion cell array acuity is well-matched to photopic spatial acuity measures throughout the central

262 t the OFF-parasol array acuity is well below photopic spatial acuity, supporting the view that the P

263 -DB cells exceeds psychophysical measures of photopic spatial acuity.

264 In photopic stimulus paradigms, activity of ON- and OFF-CBC

265 frequency doubling perimetry [FDP], Humphrey photopic Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm 24-2

266 evation of IOP significantly accelerated the photopic temporal tuning of RGC center responses in both

267 For photopic testing, the mean threshold values were 16.8 dB

268 ly less-pronounced differences were seen for photopic testing.

269 gely coincident with progressive centripetal photopic threshold elevation led by worsening of rod pho

270 Photopic thresholds were normal over the fovea; threshol

271 conversion efficiency (PCE) and the average photopic transparency, compared with a conventional semi

272 circulating current declined to half at 3000 photopic trolands, and to a quarter at 20 000 photopic t

273 hotopic trolands, and to a quarter at 20 000 photopic trolands.

274 Mean photopic uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), distance

275 Additionally, an analysis performed in photopic units demonstrated that over the urban area, am

276 rrected visual acuity values were similar to photopic values.

277 displayed significantly attenuated immediate photopic vision concomitant with significantly reduced 1

278 derlying the transition between scotopic and photopic vision in mesopic lights, when both rods are co

279 input to MT+ is either weak or silent during photopic vision in S cone monochromats.

280 inding protein 1b (rlbp1b) did not eliminate photopic vision in zebrafish.

281 e bipolar cell differentiation and regulates photopic vision perception.

282 Following 30 min of light, early photopic vision was recovered, despite 11cRAL levels rem

283 Defects in immediate cone photopic vision were rescued in emixustat- or fenretinid

284 good until old age, disproportionate loss of photopic vision with frequent complaints of glare necess

285 s enabling cone vision in bright light (i.e. photopic vision) are not adequately understood.

286 e rotating gratings above -2.0 log cd m(-2) (photopic vision), and Gnat1-/- mice (threshold, -4.0 log

287 t conditions, fenretinide impaired late cone photopic vision, while the emixustat-treated zebrafish u

288 changes in cone ERG and retinal morphology, photopic vision-guided behaviour is comparable between n

289 es necessary to serve the ganglion cells for photopic vision.

290 on immediate, early, and late phases of cone photopic vision.

291 y, accentuating features that are salient to photopic vision.

292 hotoreceptors with ganglion cells to mediate photopic vision.

293 acuity, but poor contrast sensitivity during photopic vision.

294 temporal requirements of the nonphotopic or photopic visual cycles for mediating vision in bright li

295 24 months in functional variables (Humphrey photopic visual field testing using the Swedish interact

296 However, it is not clear what role the photopic visual input plays in this process and whether

297 cking response was used to test scotopic and photopic visual performance.

298 ry different from the classical scotopic and photopic visual systems.

299 ne dysfunction) was defined by the extent of photopic vs scotopic abnormality.

300 from this patient showed typ ical large slow photopic waveforms and was unchanged from recordings mad