ライフサイエンスコーパス: photorefractive

1 This is the largest photorefractive 3D display to date (4 x 4 inches in size

2 ing PbS nanocrystals into a newly formulated photorefractive composite based on molecular triphenyldi

3 laser-heated region and are detected using a photorefractive crystal-based interferometer.

4 combination-limited hologram decay time in a photorefractive crystal.

5 in organic solar cells, photodetectors, and photorefractive devices are discussed.

6 light-emitting diodes, solar cells, sensors, photorefractive devices, and many others.

7 ic temperatures by suppressing the prominent photorefractive effect that limits cryogenic performance

8 atures no signal degradation, no presence of photorefractive effects, and stable operation at high op

9 esponse time occurs with little sacrifice in photorefractive efficiency, with internal diffraction ef

10 followed by laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy (bioptics) provides another

11 Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in-situ kera

12 lcohol is used for epithelial removal during photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser subepithelia

13 in clinical outcome, safety, and efficacy of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser-assisted in

14 0.972; I(2) = 20%), and versus the group of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser-assisted sub

15 -assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) are common surgical te

16 went laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) between January 2000 a

17 went laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) between July 1, 2014,

18 Laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) can otherwise successf

19 accuracy, efficacy, stability, and safety of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) enhancement using the

20 mmetric offset (AO) centration strategies in photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in patients with myopi

21 detectable in the regenerating stroma after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in rabbit or in cornea

22 Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is the most widely per

23 asured wavefront error (WFE) data from a cat photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) model.

24 nical features of patients who had undergone photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) more than once.

25 aphy), refraction, and type of ablation-e.g. Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) or Laser assisted in-s

26 arried out by performing an alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) procedure with applica

27 Haze in the rabbit cornea was produced with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using excimer laser.

28 Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was performed using an

29 isted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), 1 used photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), 1 used refractive len

30 ty for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and small incision le

31 ein was immunolocalized in rat corneas after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and the presence of C

32 more likely to be older, be female, have had photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), have completed a preo

33 low myopia who are considering conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), in patients with thin

34 s in eyes with previous LASIK, excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), or radial keratotomy

35 tatively after traditional epithelial scrape-photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), transepithelial PRK,

36 (CXL) and 32 control patients who underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

37 profile is superior for patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

38 error after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

39 es and was re-treated with topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

40 y sensation in patients undergoing LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

41 of laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

42 ter laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

43 er in situ keratomileusis (LASIK; n = 19) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK; n = 11).

44 To assess transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) in terms of corneal e

45 the efficacy of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) in terms of postopera

46 leusis (FS-LASIK, n = 58) or transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK, n = 55).

47 atism, and mixed astigmatism Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) is a modality of

48 brosis after excimer laser surface ablation (photorefractive keratectomy [PRK]).

49 ions, laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy and conductive keratoplasty

50 Photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomile

51 lasty and epikeratophakia, and more recently photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomile

52 e is one of the most common complications of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomile

53 s one of the most common complications after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomile

54 In the past decade, photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomile

55 hed data from ongoing studies in the area of photorefractive keratectomy and laser-assisted in-situ k

56 With a recent change in Air Force policy, photorefractive keratectomy and laser-assisted in-situ k

57 Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy are safe and effective resul

58 Photorefractive keratectomy continues to be the most com

59 ic surgical uses, is now widely employed for photorefractive keratectomy corrections of greater than

60 Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy creates a nonvascular wound

61 ocedure with intracorneal ring segments, and photorefractive keratectomy for ectasia, corneal edema,

62 res such as phototherapeutic keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy has grown over the last deca

63 uch as laser epithelial keratomileusis), and photorefractive keratectomy have now been established as

64 Laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy have proven to be much more

65 ults and the theoretical elastic response of photorefractive keratectomy in eyes with asymmetrical co

66 cades after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy may be similar, and yet the

67 Wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy offers better acuity and les

68 hich the epithelium is absent, such as after photorefractive keratectomy or chemical burn.

69 t, relaxing incisions, wedge resections, and photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileu

70 t reports on the use of contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy or laser-assisted in situ ke

71 he overall risk of retinal disease following photorefractive keratectomy or laser-assisted in situ ke

72 Which technique (photorefractive keratectomy or laser-assisted in-situ ke

73 ce ablation using the excimer laser, such as photorefractive keratectomy or laser-assisted subepithel

74 ation of surface ablation procedures such as photorefractive keratectomy or phototherapeutic keratect

75 corneal examinations of a normal human and a photorefractive keratectomy patient are presented to dem

76 Analysis of sub-basal nerve density after photorefractive keratectomy reported that the nerve dens

77 imation in challenging eyes with prior LASIK/photorefractive keratectomy was most accurately predicte

78 after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy were enrolled.

79 in situ keratomileusis (femto-LASIK), and to photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C (PRK) under

80 echanical stability and associated safety of photorefractive keratectomy with the visual results and

81 tomileusis, laser epithelial keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy, and refractive intraocular

82 tromal corneal ring segment implantation and photorefractive keratectomy, is a promising therapeutic

83 Photorefractive keratectomy, previously problematic for

84 ced warpage, pellucid marginal degeneration, photorefractive keratectomy, radial keratotomy, and pene

85 rior myopic laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy, with no need for preoperati

86 potential of troglitazone in a cat model of photorefractive keratectomy-induced corneal injury.

87 tromal fibroblasts (pHCSFs) and in vivo in a photorefractive keratectomy-treated rabbit model of corn

88 linking (CXL), penetrating keratoplasty, and photorefractive keratectomy.

89 ed intraoperatively from subjects undergoing photorefractive keratectomy.

90 rning to surface ablation techniques such as photorefractive keratectomy.

91 ty and safety of the procedure compared with photorefractive keratectomy.

92 vantages of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.

93 re obtained from healthy patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy.

94 thickness, and subepithelial haze following photorefractive keratectomy.

95 Before and after photorefractive keratometry (PRK), subjects who had plat

96 self-trapped to form dark solitons in a host photorefractive medium.

97 ion rate has enabled the characterization of photorefractive polymer (PRP) in a previously inaccessib

98 a holographic stereographic technique and a photorefractive polymer material as the recording medium

99 Extensive study of photorefractive polymeric composites photosensitized wit

100 Photorefractive polymers are dynamic holographic recordi

101 To be suitable for 3D displays, photorefractive polymers need to have nearly 100% diffra

102 Photorefractive polymers with high diffraction efficienc

103 an updatable holographic 3D display based on photorefractive polymers with such properties, capable o

104 The performance of amorphous organic photorefractive (PR) materials in applications such as o

105 Nerve fibers in the cornea are disrupted by photorefractive procedures.

106 and subsequently leads to a reduction in the photorefractive response time.

107 l polarons are identified as the responsible photorefractive species.

108 ients with a history of radial keratotomy or photorefractive surgery.