ライフサイエンスコーパス: photorefractive keratectomy

1 linking (CXL), penetrating keratoplasty, and photorefractive keratectomy.

2 rning to surface ablation techniques such as photorefractive keratectomy.

3 ed intraoperatively from subjects undergoing photorefractive keratectomy.

4 ty and safety of the procedure compared with photorefractive keratectomy.

5 vantages of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.

6 re obtained from healthy patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy.

7 thickness, and subepithelial haze following photorefractive keratectomy.

8 ions, laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy and conductive keratoplasty

9 Photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomile

10 lasty and epikeratophakia, and more recently photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomile

11 e is one of the most common complications of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomile

12 s one of the most common complications after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomile

13 In the past decade, photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomile

14 hed data from ongoing studies in the area of photorefractive keratectomy and laser-assisted in-situ k

15 With a recent change in Air Force policy, photorefractive keratectomy and laser-assisted in-situ k

16 tomileusis, laser epithelial keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy, and refractive intraocular

17 Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy are safe and effective resul

18 followed by laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy (bioptics) provides another

19 Photorefractive keratectomy continues to be the most com

20 ic surgical uses, is now widely employed for photorefractive keratectomy corrections of greater than

21 Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy creates a nonvascular wound

22 ocedure with intracorneal ring segments, and photorefractive keratectomy for ectasia, corneal edema,

23 res such as phototherapeutic keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy has grown over the last deca

24 uch as laser epithelial keratomileusis), and photorefractive keratectomy have now been established as

25 Laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy have proven to be much more

26 ults and the theoretical elastic response of photorefractive keratectomy in eyes with asymmetrical co

27 potential of troglitazone in a cat model of photorefractive keratectomy-induced corneal injury.

28 tromal corneal ring segment implantation and photorefractive keratectomy, is a promising therapeutic

29 cades after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy may be similar, and yet the

30 Wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy offers better acuity and les

31 hich the epithelium is absent, such as after photorefractive keratectomy or chemical burn.

32 t, relaxing incisions, wedge resections, and photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileu

33 t reports on the use of contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy or laser-assisted in situ ke

34 he overall risk of retinal disease following photorefractive keratectomy or laser-assisted in situ ke

35 Which technique (photorefractive keratectomy or laser-assisted in-situ ke

36 ce ablation using the excimer laser, such as photorefractive keratectomy or laser-assisted subepithel

37 ation of surface ablation procedures such as photorefractive keratectomy or phototherapeutic keratect

38 corneal examinations of a normal human and a photorefractive keratectomy patient are presented to dem

39 Photorefractive keratectomy, previously problematic for

40 Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in-situ kera

41 lcohol is used for epithelial removal during photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser subepithelia

42 in clinical outcome, safety, and efficacy of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser-assisted in

43 0.972; I(2) = 20%), and versus the group of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser-assisted sub

44 -assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) are common surgical te

45 went laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) between January 2000 a

46 went laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) between July 1, 2014,

47 Laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) can otherwise successf

48 accuracy, efficacy, stability, and safety of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) enhancement using the

49 mmetric offset (AO) centration strategies in photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in patients with myopi

50 detectable in the regenerating stroma after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in rabbit or in cornea

51 Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is the most widely per

52 asured wavefront error (WFE) data from a cat photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) model.

53 nical features of patients who had undergone photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) more than once.

54 aphy), refraction, and type of ablation-e.g. Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) or Laser assisted in-s

55 arried out by performing an alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) procedure with applica

56 Haze in the rabbit cornea was produced with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using excimer laser.

57 Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was performed using an

58 isted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), 1 used photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), 1 used refractive len

59 ty for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and small incision le

60 ein was immunolocalized in rat corneas after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and the presence of C

61 more likely to be older, be female, have had photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), have completed a preo

62 low myopia who are considering conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), in patients with thin

63 s in eyes with previous LASIK, excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), or radial keratotomy

64 tatively after traditional epithelial scrape-photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), transepithelial PRK,

65 error after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

66 es and was re-treated with topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

67 y sensation in patients undergoing LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

68 of laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

69 ter laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

70 (CXL) and 32 control patients who underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

71 profile is superior for patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

72 er in situ keratomileusis (LASIK; n = 19) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK; n = 11).

73 brosis after excimer laser surface ablation (photorefractive keratectomy [PRK]).

74 ced warpage, pellucid marginal degeneration, photorefractive keratectomy, radial keratotomy, and pene

75 Analysis of sub-basal nerve density after photorefractive keratectomy reported that the nerve dens

76 To assess transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) in terms of corneal e

77 the efficacy of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) in terms of postopera

78 leusis (FS-LASIK, n = 58) or transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK, n = 55).

79 atism, and mixed astigmatism Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) is a modality of

80 tromal fibroblasts (pHCSFs) and in vivo in a photorefractive keratectomy-treated rabbit model of corn

81 imation in challenging eyes with prior LASIK/photorefractive keratectomy was most accurately predicte

82 after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy were enrolled.

83 in situ keratomileusis (femto-LASIK), and to photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C (PRK) under

84 echanical stability and associated safety of photorefractive keratectomy with the visual results and

85 rior myopic laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy, with no need for preoperati