戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1               The mechanisms responsible for photosynthetic acclimation are not well understood, effe
2                    While much is known about photosynthetic acclimation in Arabidopsis, to date there
3 raits to elucidate the mechanisms underlying photosynthetic acclimation to elevated temperature and c
4 sphere models (TBMs), to quantify and assess photosynthetic acclimation to light in natural environme
5                 By updating a TBM to include photosynthetic acclimation, successfully reproducing the
6                                              Photosynthetic acclimation, the ability to adjust the co
7  the biomass of all primary producers, their photosynthetic activity accounts for roughly half of the
8             In contrast, seasonal decline of photosynthetic activity and cessation of radial tree gro
9           We show that the seasonal onset of photosynthetic activity as determined by PRI time series
10 r results reveal the importance of embryonic photosynthetic activity for normal adult plant growth, d
11 acological approaches to show that embryonic photosynthetic activity is necessary for normal skoto- a
12 ell cycle activation and re-establishment of photosynthetic activity observed in response to resupply
13 of concept, we propose herein to monitor the photosynthetic activity of a cyanobacterium (Anabaena fl
14 ns and isotopic composition to variations in photosynthetic activity of aquatic micro-organisms is cr
15 he warmest site due to persistent vegetation photosynthetic activity throughout the winter.
16 s to monitor and model seasonal variation in photosynthetic activity using color-based vegetation ind
17  withstand cold temperatures relies on their photosynthetic activity.
18                                    The green photosynthetic algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii was immob
19  both quantitative label-free proteomics and photosynthetic analysis by gas exchange, chlorophyll flu
20                             Incorporation of photosynthetic and hydraulic traits in 'next-generation'
21                             CGEP homologs of photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic bacteria lack the C
22           Accelerating induction would boost photosynthetic and resource-use efficiencies.
23 r, an electron transfer cupredoxin domain of photosynthetic and respiratory complexes and, recently,
24 refore tightly regulate electron fluxes from photosynthetic and respiratory complexes.
25 cit after during the grain filling period on photosynthetic and water-use efficiencies at the leaf an
26                Conformational changes of the photosynthetic antenna complexes activate dissipation by
27 ccompanied by a strong reorganization of the photosynthetic apparatus and changes in the lipid homeos
28 that reactive oxygen species produced by the photosynthetic apparatus help activate the highly conser
29                                          The photosynthetic apparatus must be able to withstand light
30 nd functional seasonal rearrangements of the photosynthetic apparatus occur.
31         PSI is an essential component of the photosynthetic apparatus of oxygenic photosynthesis.
32 Activase in imparting thermotolerance to the photosynthetic apparatus under high temperature.
33  de-greening and impair the formation of the photosynthetic apparatus.
34              Synergistic improvement in leaf photosynthetic area and rate is essential for enhancing
35 dequate K nutrition simultaneously increases photosynthetic area and rate, thus enhancing crop yield.
36  leaf, and the mechanisms behind this unique photosynthetic arrangement remain largely unknown.
37 work for efficient utilization in artificial photosynthetic assemblies.
38  mumol C m(-2) s(-1) increase in the maximum photosynthetic assimilation rate (A(max)), with cropland
39  relaxation (in the dark) for whole cells of photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides lacking
40 y locked with reaction centres from a purple photosynthetic bacterium, producing macromolecular chime
41                                  While novel photosynthetic based systems have been introduced, furth
42  be reflected in intraspecific variations in photosynthetic behavior.
43                                              Photosynthetic biochemical limitation parameters (i.e.,
44  specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf N but not photosynthetic biochemistry.
45                                   The hybrid photosynthetic biomaterials are produced with a 3D biopr
46 en together, N deposition will enhance gross photosynthetic C gain of the terrestrial plants while in
47 r woody bodies, which connect their elevated photosynthetic canopies with the essential belowground a
48                          We measured growth, photosynthetic capacities and membrane lipidome variatio
49 matal physiology was a prerequisite for high photosynthetic capacities in vascular plants and a key d
50             All strains maintained efficient photosynthetic capacities over their different temperatu
51 osporangiate ferns, achieving unusually high photosynthetic capacities through amphibious lifestyles
52 landscapes is partially attributable to high photosynthetic capacities.
53                              Changing canopy photosynthetic capacity (A(max)) was the primary cause o
54                                              Photosynthetic capacity (maximum rates of Rubisco carbox
55 ed to the need to maintain long-term average photosynthetic capacity (V(cmax) ) so that available env
56                                          The photosynthetic capacity and anatomical characteristics o
57 cation scheme to model changes in leaf-level photosynthetic capacity as a function of leaf biochemica
58 ry can be used to predict the acclimation of photosynthetic capacity based on the assumption that pla
59                                     Improved photosynthetic capacity in HL grown plants is paralleled
60 proach to modelling temperature responses of photosynthetic capacity in large scale modelling efforts
61         Long-lived leaves with lower maximum photosynthetic capacity maximised simulated NCE under as
62                     This is due to a reduced photosynthetic capacity of cgl160 kea3 mutants, as these
63 ) is an essential leaf trait determining the photosynthetic capacity of plants.
64 ance mechanism where the maintenance of high photosynthetic capacity under extreme warming is assiste
65 sed salinity, the estimated g(m) and maximum photosynthetic capacity were both reduced, whereas the m
66  at maturation, life span and the decline in photosynthetic capacity with age.
67 cking the Se SSU showed delayed growth, poor photosynthetic capacity, and significantly reduced Rubis
68 ciated with daytime respiration but not with photosynthetic capacity, highlighting a role for the non
69             This complexity often results in photosynthetic capacity, rather than realized photosynth
70 phosphorus (P) ratios are expected to impact photosynthetic capacity, that is, maximum gross primary
71 nd for short-lived leaves and higher maximum photosynthetic capacity.
72             Breviolum minutum exhibited high photosynthetic carbon assimilation per cell and transloc
73 leading to increased leaf temperature, lower photosynthetic carbon assimilation rate, and growth inhi
74 cteria contribute roughly half of the global photosynthetic carbon assimilation.
75 ane (CH(4) ) emissions and can offset summer photosynthetic carbon dioxide (CO(2) ) uptake.
76 de inverse correlations between the apparent photosynthetic carbon dioxide (CO(2)) compensation point
77 even as stomatal conductance (g(s) ) and net photosynthetic carbon fixation (P(n) ) declined.
78 f enzyme activities that are not involved in photosynthetic carbon fixation in C(3) plants to photosy
79 e protein shell and plays essential roles in photosynthetic carbon fixation.
80 sts between the rates of CO(2) diffusion and photosynthetic carbon fixation.
81 a opens the possibility of using prokaryotic photosynthetic cells in biotechnological applications.
82 nergistically by spontaneously enclosing the photosynthetic cells within a shell of bacterial cells u
83 ular electron transfer processes of Nature's photosynthetic center.
84                          The balance between photosynthetic chain events (PSII photochemical yield, q
85 otocurrent and fluorescence signals from the photosynthetic chain.
86 osynthesis, is overlaid on non-instantaneous photosynthetic changes resulting from the acclimation of
87 ive phase change (VPC), on morphological and photosynthetic changes.
88  show that diversity in hydraulic traits and photosynthetic characteristics is more related to local
89 rminant of crop productivity and any gain in photosynthetic CO(2) assimilation per unit of leaf area
90 hpr1-1 plants remained smaller and had lower photosynthetic CO(2) assimilation rates.
91                                              Photosynthetic CO(2) fixation in plants is limited by th
92                                          The photosynthetic CO(2) fixing enzyme ribulose 1,5-bisphosp
93 iochemical and diffusive limitations to leaf photosynthetic CO(2) uptake under steady state and fluct
94           To test this hypothesis, we extend photosynthetic co-ordination theory to predict the accli
95            We hence demonstrate that loss of photosynthetic competence and enhanced production of car
96 nce, with increased grain yield and enhanced photosynthetic competence.
97 aracterization of the mobility of individual photosynthetic complexes in grana membranes establishes
98    Plants regulate the macro-organization of photosynthetic complexes within the thylakoid membrane t
99 to our knowledge, of rotational diffusion of photosynthetic complexes.
100 esis, or indeed future studies of artificial photosynthetic complexes.
101 oidetes and Proteobacteria); is populated by photosynthetic Cyanobacteria exhibiting heterotrophic nu
102 cnidarian hosts rely on symbiosis with their photosynthetic dinoflagellate partners (family Symbiodin
103 l, resulting in corresponding differences in photosynthetic efficiency and non-photochemical quenchin
104                  Substantial improvements in photosynthetic efficiency have been achieved by reducing
105 ant overlooked breeding targets for improved photosynthetic efficiency in cassava.
106 ng opportunity for selection of greater crop photosynthetic efficiency in this key food crop.
107                                              Photosynthetic efficiency was most indicative of the exp
108   Using a suite of physiological parameters (photosynthetic efficiency, coral whitening, chlorophyll
109                                  To maximize photosynthetic efficiency, plants have evolved a capacit
110 n Revolution, could be realized by improving photosynthetic efficiency.
111 prove CO(2) flux and, thus, to increase leaf photosynthetic efficiency.
112 D(P)H and ferredoxin (Fdx), thereby coupling photosynthetic electron transfer to energy-transforming
113  important roles in short-term regulation of photosynthetic electron transfer, and during state trans
114 ns in managing peripheral electron flow from photosynthetic electron transfer, findings that reveal d
115  emission models predict a tight coupling to photosynthetic electron transport (ETR) as a function of
116                              Analysis of the photosynthetic electron transport demonstrated an inhibi
117               Due to the non-functional PSI, photosynthetic electron transport is blocked, which, in
118                                           In photosynthetic electron transport, large multiprotein co
119  times faster than the rate-limiting step in photosynthetic electron transport.
120  reinhardtii reduces NO into N(2)O using the photosynthetic electron transport.
121 ts activation of the CBB cycle and redirects photosynthetic electrons to H(2)ase.
122                                     However, photosynthetic enhancement from spring warming was parti
123 ined to certain animal taxa, and absent from photosynthetic eukaryotes.
124 andard hydrogen electrode), similar to other photosynthetic Fds, although it had lower thermostabilit
125 w no fractionation due to non-discriminating photosynthetic fixation of HCO(3)(-) in the high pH and
126                        Euglena gracilis is a photosynthetic flagellate possessing chlorophyte-derived
127 ing between plasmon cavity modes and excited photosynthetic fluorescence from Chlorella demonstrated
128  whole-tree iWUE, with the caveats that post-photosynthetic fractionations and intrinsic variability
129 .5 +/- 0.7 per mille, presumably due to post-photosynthetic fractionations.
130 s intriguing possibilities for regulation of photosynthetic function.
131  that is currently unparalleled in any other photosynthetic genus.
132                             By contrast, the photosynthetic green alga Chlamydomonas can grow more th
133 specific eukaryotic lineages, including many photosynthetic groups.
134 alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is capable of photosynthetic H(2) production.
135 biosensor was developed for the detection of photosynthetic herbicides in river water.
136                               The ability of photosynthetic hosts to shape bacterial associates throu
137                                              Photosynthetic induction describes the transient increas
138 enetic variation in NPQ relaxation rates and photosynthetic induction in parental lines of a soybean
139                                              Photosynthetic induction was slower in the Rca-alpha onl
140 tantial variation was found in the speeds of photosynthetic induction, attributable to Rubisco activa
141   Transitions from low to high light require photosynthetic induction, including the activation of Ru
142                                              Photosynthetic 'least-cost' theory posits that the optim
143 ide a robust method for the incorporation of photosynthetic light acclimation in future models.
144                                         Such photosynthetic light acclimation is not typically incorp
145 anism is the state transition that regulates photosynthetic light harvesting and electron transfer.
146                                              Photosynthetic light harvesting and reaction centre prot
147 he slug Elysia timida induces changes to the photosynthetic light reactions of the chloroplasts it st
148 xplained not only by the saturating shape of photosynthetic light response curves but also by plant a
149                                              Photosynthetic light-harvesting complexes (LHCs) of high
150 n and mechanistic function of these beats in photosynthetic light-harvesting has been extensively deb
151 eater H(2) O supply, alleviating biophysical photosynthetic limitation when soil water is scarce.
152  temperatures on bright winter days puts the photosynthetic machinery in great risk of oxidative dama
153  we have analyzed seasonal adjustment of the photosynthetic machinery of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris
154              In this study, we harnessed the photosynthetic machinery of the fast-growing cyanobacter
155  relevance of diatoms, many aspects of their photosynthetic machinery remain poorly understood.
156 -photochemical fluorescence quenching of the photosynthetic machinery.
157                                  Proteins in photosynthetic membranes can organize into patterned arr
158 r to land plants, proteins genes involved in photosynthetic metabolism have lower synonymous and nons
159                         Nonetheless, primary photosynthetic metabolism is highly integrated with defe
160 ucidating the ensemble of proteins that link photosynthetic metabolism with stomatal movement, and th
161 production both directly, by impacting their photosynthetic metabolism, and indirectly by modifying t
162  ecosystem-planetary model, we find that pre-photosynthetic methane-cycling microbial ecosystems are
163                                              Photosynthetic microalgae not only perform fixation of c
164            Phytoplankton are the unicellular photosynthetic microbes that form the base of aquatic ec
165 vironmentally benign approach to dispersible photosynthetic microbial micro-reactors comprising segre
166 -factorial experimental system and the model photosynthetic microorganism Scenedesmus obliquus to cap
167 ion of electron donor-acceptor in artificial photosynthetic models raises the possibility of applying
168 (A(max) , maximum photosynthesis rate; PNUE, photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency).
169 is over the 3-d period, demonstrated by high photosynthetic O(2) and CO(2) fluxes and effective yield
170                                              Photosynthetic O(2) evolution is catalyzed by the Mn(4)C
171  CO(2)-concentrating mechanism that improves photosynthetic operating efficiency under conditions of
172 ers nanomaterials with biochemicals to plant photosynthetic organelles (chloroplasts) using a guiding
173 s to tune levels of UmuD might reflect how a photosynthetic organism responds to multiple environment
174   However, mechanisms of N(2)O production by photosynthetic organisms are poorly described.
175                                              Photosynthetic organisms developed nonphotochemical quen
176                                         Many photosynthetic organisms employ a CO(2) concentrating me
177                Flamholz and Shih explain how photosynthetic organisms on earth have evolved carbon di
178                                              Photosynthetic organisms regulate their responses to man
179                  As one of the single-celled photosynthetic organisms that inhabit marine, aquatic an
180 piration is an essential process in oxygenic photosynthetic organisms triggered by the oxygenase acti
181 the experimental conditions (redox mediator, photosynthetic organisms, and so on) to find the best el
182 of investigation into the diversity of these photosynthetic organisms, including the discovery of new
183                                In eukaryotic photosynthetic organisms, the conversion of solar into c
184 tation energy to the reaction center (RC) in photosynthetic organisms.
185 molecular light-harvesting assemblies within photosynthetic organisms.
186 pecificities of phage Fds relate to those of photosynthetic organisms.
187 ficient light harvest and photoprotection in photosynthetic organisms.
188 ts on CO(2) diffusion and other processes in photosynthetic organisms.
189 m carbonate cystoliths are spread among most photosynthetic organisms.
190 ncy, and the resulting absorption spectra of photosynthetic organisms.
191 s and their determination based on different photosynthetic organs are discussed with a major focus o
192  g(m) , which comprises the re-adjustment of photosynthetic parameters and a model describing the var
193                         The insensitivity of photosynthetic parameters to warming contrasts with many
194 ight intensity and correlated these with key photosynthetic parameters.
195 idence that polyketides support this unusual photosynthetic partnership.
196 as a model plant to better understand the C4 photosynthetic pathway in major crops.
197 acter evolution models, we evaluated whether photosynthetic pathway or growth condition influenced Si
198 cells accumulate different components of the photosynthetic pathway.
199 ce of belowground buds, but was unrelated to photosynthetic pathway.
200 ishes a role for VPC in leaf composition and photosynthetic performance across diverse species and en
201     This experiment investigated the growth, photosynthetic performance and bioelectricity generation
202 es with high SLA were associated with better photosynthetic performance at low light levels.
203 ng antenna, however, may not exhibit optimal photosynthetic performance in low or fluctuating light e
204 loroplast proteome, pigment composition, and photosynthetic performance were significantly affected i
205                                          The photosynthetic performance, as measured using pulse ampl
206  light-harvesting antenna sizes for enhanced photosynthetic performance.
207 ions of inorganic carbon (C(i) ) to maintain photosynthetic performance.
208 o changes in light, increasing with incoming photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) until the leav
209 nm or orange 622 nm LED wavelengths at total photosynthetic photon flux density of 300 mumol m(-2) s(
210 es in the canopy conductance to water vapor, photosynthetic photon flux density, vapor pressure defic
211 icated genes preferentially retained include photosynthetic, photorespiration, and lipid metabolic ge
212  of gene transcript-abundance regulation and photosynthetic physiology indicated that C(4) and CAM co
213 is study, fluorescence-activated cell sorted photosynthetic picoeukayote (PPE) populations and single
214 een chromophores was recently reported for a photosynthetic pigment-protein complex (Nature Commmun,
215 in the two-dimensional electronic spectra of photosynthetic pigment-protein complexes over a decade a
216 green lineage of oxygenic organisms by their photosynthetic pigments and light-harvesting complex (Lh
217 nt high levels of glycogen and a decrease in photosynthetic pigments and protein content when nitroge
218 en, and affects the synthesis of protein and photosynthetic pigments as well as amino acid pools.
219 riacylglycerides, and leads to a decrease in photosynthetic pigments, proteins, and free amino acids.
220 potentially opens a synthetic path to native photosynthetic pigments.
221                                         C(4) photosynthetic plants have evolved from C(3) ancestors a
222 n unexplored potential for breeding improved photosynthetic potential in our major crops.
223 ately reproduce seasonal variation in canopy photosynthetic potential, and suggest that incorporating
224                         eCO(2) increased the photosynthetic process and pigment contents, which conse
225                                          The photosynthetic process is not only affected by the tempe
226 changes in algae oxygen evolution during the photosynthetic process.
227              Leaf biomass determined overall photosynthetic production.
228 intra- and interannual variability of forest photosynthetic productivity remains a key objective in g
229 iofuels, the demands currently made on plant photosynthetic productivity will continue to increase.
230 greens by keeping stomata open and providing photosynthetic products for microorganisms.
231 axis through the stomatal opening and toward photosynthetic products within the leaf tissue.
232                    Cyanobacteria, a group of photosynthetic prokaryotes, are attractive hosts for bio
233                                         Leaf photosynthetic properties, for example the maximum carbo
234 t biogenesis describes the transition of non-photosynthetic proplastids to photosynthetically active
235  Thylakoid membranes in chloroplasts contain photosynthetic protein complexes that convert light ener
236 , Pluronic F127, to fabricate a self-healing photosynthetic protein photoelectrochemical cell that op
237 edlings results from reduced accumulation of photosynthetic proteins and appears to be caused by a re
238 o-bioelectrochemical cells that are based on photosynthetic proteins are drawing increased attention
239                                      Natural photosynthetic proteins can convert solar energy into el
240 tichromophore arrays as inspired by natural, photosynthetic proteins.
241 inhibition and a momentary downregulation of photosynthetic quantum yield.
242 d the lowest stomatal conductance (g(s)) and photosynthetic rate (A), but also maintained the highest
243                                  The maximum photosynthetic rate at 2,000 umol m(-2) s(-1) photosynth
244                                              Photosynthetic rate correlated with trunk diameter and p
245             The best predictor of leaf level photosynthetic rate is the porosity of the leaf surface,
246  TLA, N addition significantly enhanced leaf photosynthetic rate per area (A(area) , +12.6%), stomata
247 l) , inducing a decrease in leaf area before photosynthetic rate reduction.
248 adjustments in both stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate to environmental conditions - are di
249 tments in both leaf stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate to environmental conditions.
250 in leaf area occurs earlier than that in the photosynthetic rate under potassium (K) deficiency stres
251                                              Photosynthetic rate, however, remained high after the la
252 sol on CO(2) transport, further reducing the photosynthetic rate.
253 n dispute, representing such effects on leaf photosynthetic rates (A) continues to draw research atte
254 hotosynthetic capacity, rather than realized photosynthetic rates being used to assess natural variat
255 tosynthesis (T(optA) ) increased and maximum photosynthetic rates declined in warm-grown seedlings, b
256        Diffuse radiation generally increases photosynthetic rates if total radiation is kept constant
257  prerequisites for the evolution of enhanced photosynthetic rates in this group.
258 , the large number of factors that influence photosynthetic rates often makes it difficult to measure
259  higher leaf nitrogen and phosphorus, faster photosynthetic rates, and shorter leaf life span compare
260 ong the only land plants to match angiosperm photosynthetic rates.
261 ad reduced Pi accumulation, plant growth and photosynthetic rates.
262 ates of F(soil), which were mostly driven by photosynthetic rates.
263 e bacteriopheophytin (H(B)) in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (RC).
264 cceptor moieties in the design of artificial photosynthetic reaction centers.
265 erve light-induced structural changes in the photosynthetic reaction centre of Blastochloris viridis
266 special pair of chlorophyll molecules of the photosynthetic reaction centre that are photo-oxidized b
267 med our understanding about the evolution of photosynthetic reaction centres and the evolution of Cya
268                                              Photosynthetic reaction centres harvest the energy conte
269 through the mesophyll and supply of CO(2) to photosynthetic reactions.
270 s these protein complexes to finely tune the photosynthetic reactions.
271 nd the Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle for photosynthetic reductants and 2) inactivation of H(2)ase
272  topology lays the foundation for dissecting photosynthetic regulation at the level of single protein
273 orporates process knowledge by introducing a photosynthetic response based on the light-use efficienc
274         A mechanistic understanding of plant photosynthetic response is needed to reliably predict ch
275 change observations are combined to test the photosynthetic response to moderate drought in four geno
276 g been known as a micronutrient for oxygenic photosynthetic resulting from its role an essential cofa
277 plants transport Suc through the phloem from photosynthetic source tissues to storage tissues.
278 s and quantifies the phenotypic variation in photosynthetic, stomatal, and morphological traits in up
279  to prevent photoirradiation damage to their photosynthetic surfaces.
280 and controlling PCET reactions in artificial photosynthetic systems and other energy conversion proce
281  very efficient and fast ET to mimic natural photosynthetic systems.
282 ecular identities of the various pigments in photosynthetic systems.
283  studies of photoprotective conformations in photosynthetic systems.
284 l (MGDG) is the most abundant lipid in plant photosynthetic thylakoid membranes, but its impact on th
285 verse guilds of symbiotic fungi found in the photosynthetic tissues of every plant lineage, but it is
286  co-evolution between stomatal, vascular and photosynthetic tissues.
287 to elevation for both predicted and observed photosynthetic traits and primary production.
288  convergent nutrient exchange, whereas other photosynthetic traits linked to functioning of photosymb
289 ination with multiple datasets of C(3) plant photosynthetic traits to elucidate the mechanisms underl
290                                         Leaf photosynthetic traits underpin the rate of production of
291 ric accounted for any additional variance in photosynthetic traits.
292 erge as a consequence of the optimisation of photosynthetic traits.
293 roduced the vast majority of the community's photosynthetic transcripts despite being outnumbered by
294 bundance patterns during the drought-induced photosynthetic transitions in P. oleracea.
295 ying these changes, and the implications for photosynthetic uptake, have not been fully elucidated.
296 nvironment is that where the summed costs of photosynthetic water and nutrient acquisition/use are mi
297  that at an early stage of evolution, before photosynthetic water oxidation became prominent, light-d
298 rticles to finally yield today's catalyst of photosynthetic water oxidation.
299                                              Photosynthetic water-use efficiency (WUE) describes the
300 ectrochemical system that mimics the natural photosynthetic Z-scheme.

 
Page Top