戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ement to conventional tumor measurements via physical examination.
2 ion on the patient's history and perform the physical examination.
3 ospitalized, and proptosis was identified at physical examination.
4 orphyria, and a complete medical history and physical examination.
5 used medical history was followed by a brief physical examination.
6 cellulitis is based primarily on history and physical examination.
7 ions can be diagnosed from clinical data and physical examination.
8 e, had a blood sample drawn, and underwent a physical examination.
9 randparents, were eligible for interview and physical examination.
10    2094 (70%) individuals were available for physical examination.
11 ar-old schoolchildren eligible for a routine physical examination.
12 ttained a >/=50% reduction in spleen size by physical examination.
13 measured at 3 months corrected age after the physical examination.
14 tion in the skin and subcutaneous tissues on physical examination.
15 rness but no evidence of peritoneal signs at physical examination.
16  hernias are symptomatic but not palpable on physical examination.
17 at had been made on the basis of history and physical examination.
18  be symptomatic or incidentally found on the physical examination.
19           The abdomen was soft and tender at physical examination.
20 mmarized survey responses but not for NHANES physical examination.
21 therapeutic laparotomy did so based on their physical examination.
22  begins with obtaining a medical history and physical examination.
23 ts, and tumor, that may not be identified on physical examination.
24 nical laboratory tests, medical history, and physical examination.
25 ation of cardiovascular disease suspected on physical examination.
26 according to the presence of HNs at baseline physical examination.
27 d questionnaire, which was supplemented with physical examination.
28 pain, swelling, or skin lesions was noted at physical examination.
29  lip/palate, and clubfoot) was determined by physical examination.
30 ith chronic diseases-does not always require physical examination.
31 nerve and retina are essential parts of most physical examinations.
32  lesions prior to dental clinics and routine physical examinations.
33 ugh interview, structured questionnaires and physical examinations.
34  outcome, fistula healing, was determined by physical examination 6, 12, and 24 weeks later; healing
35 airment not identified in routine history or physical examination, ability to predict severe treatmen
36 nd are associated with respiratory symptoms, physical examination abnormalities, and physiologic decr
37 was a CA based on physician review of infant physical examinations according to the Antiretroviral Pr
38 f meticulous analyses of patient history and physical examination, advantages and disadvantages of di
39                      Second, the history and physical examination alone contribute 73% to 94% of the
40 amination is more sensitive than history and physical examination alone in identifying those potentia
41 n most patients by medical record review and physical examination, along with confirmation by a duple
42 amily members underwent a verbal head-to-toe physical examination and answered questions about barrie
43                                              Physical examination and appropriate laboratory tests le
44 two TCSs > 1 year postchemotherapy underwent physical examination and completed a questionnaire.
45                                              Physical examination and CT scan findings were evaluated
46  close contacts from the outbreak to undergo physical examination and culturally adapted versions of
47 While the diagnosis can be based on history, physical examination and Doppler ultrasound, the necessi
48                                   Based upon physical examination and dynamic ultrasonographic findin
49                    Routine laboratory tests, physical examination and echocardiography data were coll
50 14 elements, including all components of the physical examination and follow-up as well as most compo
51       A clinical surveillance protocol using physical examination and frequent biochemical and imagin
52                           Tumour assessment (physical examination and imaging scans) was investigator
53     Furthermore, a detailed medical history, physical examination and imaging studies are needed to e
54                                              Physical examination and laboratory testing are usually
55 ultrasonography of the breast in addition to physical examination and mammography.
56 mbines personal interviews with standardized physical examination and measurements via mobile examina
57 age, gender, medical history, smoking habit, physical examination and results of imaging, endoscopic
58 every 2 weeks and malaria episodes by weekly physical examination and self-referral for 7 months.
59   Acute toxicity was monitored through daily physical examination and serum tests until 3 d after rad
60                                         Many physical examination and simple laboratory tests increas
61 llow (M.D.M.) performed history taking and a physical examination and subsequently recommended radiog
62 t age 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, they underwent physical examinations and a skin prick test (SPT).
63                                              Physical examinations and oral glucose tolerance tests w
64 ) had central cord syndrome found on initial physical examination, and 1 (0.2%) had a symptomatic uns
65                                 The history, physical examination, and 12-lead ECG are each critical
66 e evaluated by using a health questionnaire, physical examination, and 12-lead ECG.
67    Other assessments included vital signs, a physical examination, and 12-lead electrocardiograph.
68                            Clinical history, physical examination, and 3 sputum samples were obtained
69   They delivered a semen sample, underwent a physical examination, and answered a questionnaire compr
70 ample, had a blood sample drawn, underwent a physical examination, and answered a questionnaire inclu
71                       Comprehensive history, physical examination, and assessment of functional capac
72                             Medical history, physical examination, and carcinoembryonic antigen testi
73                A detailed history, full-body physical examination, and clinical photographs of cutane
74 senting with AFP underwent clinical history, physical examination, and clinical specimen collection t
75 B infection were collected by questionnaire, physical examination, and determination of serum 25-hydr
76 s were prospectively evaluated with history, physical examination, and ECG (interpreted with the 2010
77  emergency departments, the initial history, physical examination, and electrocardiogram alone did no
78              Ophthalmic examination, general physical examination, and exome sequencing guided by hom
79                              Questionnaires, physical examination, and eye examination including SD-O
80  40 to 69 years old received questionnaires, physical examination, and eye examination, including mac
81 ts' homes through structured questionnaires, physical examination, and fasting blood samples, which w
82 ecognize the importance of a proper history, physical examination, and general knowledge of the lumba
83 focus on anatomic location, patient history, physical examination, and imaging.
84 atening conditions, then to use the history, physical examination, and laboratory findings to identif
85 d and then explores features in the history, physical examination, and laboratory studies, which can
86 ailable), clinical results (medical history, physical examination, and laboratory test results), and
87 rse event reporting, ophthalmic examination, physical examination, and laboratory testing.
88                             Regular history, physical examination, and mammography are recommended fo
89            RECOMMENDATIONS: Regular history, physical examination, and mammography are recommended fo
90                  A thorough history, focused physical examination, and proper imaging studies are cru
91  self-report, medical history questionnaire, physical examination, and readiness assessment-to ascert
92 ith a symptom screen, medical history, brief physical examination, and readiness questionnaire to dis
93 evaluation with a cancer-related history and physical examination, and should be screened for new pri
94 luding response to fluid repletion, history, physical examination, and urine dipstick examination.
95                                   Histories, physical examinations, and clinical data were reviewed.
96  at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively with physical examination, ankle brachial index, duplex, and
97     An accurate medical history and directed physical examination are essential in diagnosis of male
98                    The patient's history and physical examination are the foundation of evaluating a
99 were collected by means of questionnaire and physical examination at 13, 24, and 36 months of age.
100 ality and Morbidity in HF) with an available physical examination at baseline.
101                                              Physical examination at the time of admission revealed s
102                                              Physical examination at the time of admission was noncon
103                                            A physical examination-based diagnostic algorithm was effe
104 tal outlet dysfunction should be excluded by physical examination because this condition occurs in ap
105    Participants were interviewed and given a physical examination before Filariasis Test Strip and Wb
106     The contemporary prognostic value of the physical examination- beyond traditional risk factors in
107 derwent accurate medical history collection, physical examination, biochemical blood tests, hormone l
108                 Each visit included history, physical examination, blood tests for renal, lipid, gluc
109                                           On physical examination, both testes were present in the sc
110 (2) standardized photographic assessment and physical examination by a health professional who has re
111 n congenital anomalies, and (3) standardized physical examination by a trained dysmorphologist (combi
112 re assessed using the NRS grading system and physical examination by board-certified dermatologists.
113  with a palpable mass detected during yearly physical examination by her primary care physician.
114  after parents' interview, infants underwent physical examination by pediatricians not aware of the r
115 iagnostic challenges, a thorough history and physical examination combined with minimally invasive te
116 mbination of typical findings in history and physical examination, combined with a positive modified
117 luded temperament, knowledge and competency, physical examination, communication abilities, and mindf
118  resident's clinical skills (history taking, physical examination, communication, and SP-global score
119  more likely to present with anal lesions on physical examination compared with patients without dysp
120  thereafter, using carcinoembryonic antigen, physical examination, computed tomography, and colonosco
121                                              Physical examination confirmed an apple-sized, irreducib
122 , clinical symptoms are mild, but a thorough physical examination could have helped diagnose the synd
123 cacy, with 18 patients (66.7%) responding by physical examination criteria and laboratory studies, an
124  the significance of different features from physical examination data as well as to learn the contri
125 rring more information about the patterns of physical examination data than common classification met
126            Based on extrapolations of NHANES physical examination data to all ages, we estimated that
127                                The men had a physical examination, delivered a semen sample, and had
128                                              Physical examination demonstrated a fixed, firm pelvic m
129 f pocket cardiac ultrasound as an adjunct to physical examination demonstrated to improve diagnostic
130                                              Physical examination did not reveal any neurologic abnor
131                              The history and physical examination do not distinguish sufficiently bet
132                  However, if the history and physical examination do not suggest a clear cause, a ste
133 d preperitoneal and subcutaneous fat mass by physical examinations, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry,
134                                              Physical examinations (e.g., weight) and questionnaires
135 010, all subjects underwent medical history, physical examination, ECGs, and echocardiograms.
136 ily members across 4 generations by history, physical examination, electrocardiography, and echocardi
137 ded a detailed medical history and underwent physical examination, electrocardiography, quality of li
138                A careful patient history and physical examination, electroencephalography, and brain
139  are kind, respectful, and thorough with the physical examination; empathetic about the emotional dif
140                                   Subsequent physical examinations excluded individuals based on body
141 nced trauma requiring a directed history and physical examination, facilitated by an interpreter if n
142 hypermobility or symptomatic joint laxity on physical examination facilitates optimal management and
143                         Baseline history and physical examination, fasting metabolic and lipid panels
144        We collected data on medical history, physical examinations, fasting laboratory test results,
145                             Absence of any 1 physical examination feature (eg, fever or hypotension)
146                  Combinations of history and physical examination features in clinical decision rules
147                                           At physical examination ( Fig 1 ), there was generalized pe
148 rted accuracy characteristics for individual physical examination findings (bacterial vaginosis, homo
149                                              Physical examination findings and routine laboratory val
150 as measured by both improvement in objective physical examination findings and the patients' reported
151 ortant to identify the clinical symptoms and physical examination findings associated with pneumonia
152                                              Physical examination findings at presentation were nonco
153  were calculated for individual symptoms and physical examination findings for the diagnosis of pneum
154 atically review the accuracy of symptoms and physical examination findings in identifying children wi
155                    The clinical symptoms and physical examination findings in patients with this synd
156 mation (6.4%) and dural ectasia (42.6%); and physical examination findings of a mild connective tissu
157 LR+ 111; 95% CI, 12-1028; n = 6885), and the physical examination findings of cervical motion tendern
158                              The presence of physical examination findings suggestive of skull fractu
159                                          The physical examination findings that best predicted a diff
160          We found no data on the accuracy of physical examination findings to predict bladder outlet
161 en self-reported verbal responses and visual physical examination findings was 94.6%.
162              Besides bilateral clubbing, the physical examination findings were normal.
163          Otherwise, cardiovascular and other physical examination findings were normal.
164                                              Physical examination findings were unremarkable except f
165                                      General physical examination findings were unremarkable, excludi
166                                  The general physical examination findings were unremarkable, with a
167 t cycle, his pertinent laboratory values and physical examination findings were unremarkable.
168                                              Physical examination findings were unremarkable.
169                                      General physical examination findings were unremarkable.
170                                      General physical examination findings were within normal limits.
171 ), patient symptoms at initial presentation, physical examination findings, anal Papanicolaou (Pap) s
172 nd prospectively collected data on symptoms, physical examination findings, and laboratory results.
173 yroid disorders are common, and attention to physical examination findings, combined with selected la
174 he scalp in the absence of any other unusual physical examination findings.
175 tients included were subjected to a detailed physical examination following which MRI was carried out
176 hylaxis: basal serum tryptase determination, physical examination for cutaneous mastocytosis lesions,
177 ment of medical history and performance of a physical examination for signs and symptoms of infection
178 s' Central Clinics and received routine free physical examinations from 1989 through 1992.
179 using validated methods, questionnaires, and physical examinations, from 2004 through 2008.
180                           At the time of the physical examination, he was 5 feet 11 inches tall and w
181 tonitis, hemodynamic instability, unreliable physical examination, head and spinal cord injury with a
182                                              Physical examination highlighted fever, increasing jaund
183 ular findings, including those obtained from physical examination, imaging, and functional assessment
184           We sought to summarize accuracy of physical examination, imaging, and Laboratory Risk Indic
185 s patient history and subjective findings at physical examination in a large case series to validate
186                 Diagnostic accuracy of CT vs physical examination in determining the need for therape
187 ce imaging (MRI) studies of patients who had physical examination in orthopaedic, neurology, neurosur
188 diovascular risk factors (via interviews and physical examinations) in 1987-1989.
189               Other items in the history and physical examination, in isolation or in combination, ap
190            Mandatory annual preparticipation physical examinations included blood pressure, body mass
191         95 % of patients had >/=1 finding on physical examination including a visible tumor, palpable
192 reening based on their medical history and a physical examination including laboratory assessment and
193                            Thus, history and physical examination including regional lymph nodes, edu
194 ble and accurate estimation of liver size by physical examination is an important aspect of the clini
195 y low Alvarado scores and leukocytosis, when physical examination is confusing.
196 ve shown that adding an ECG to a history and physical examination is more sensitive than history and
197 146/88, her body mass index is 29.7, and her physical examination is normal.
198 e pelvic examination is a common part of the physical examination, it is unclear whether performing s
199                      The prognostic value of physical examination, its relation to quality of life, a
200 articipants from the Americas with available physical examination (jugular venous distention, rales,
201                                   History or physical examination, laboratory analysis, physical fitn
202 formation from a patient's clinical history, physical examination, laboratory data, and imaging.
203  were studied to identify EMD, as defined by physical examination, laboratory findings, and imaging r
204  diagnosed by medical history, cognitive and physical examination, laboratory testing, and brain imag
205                             Routine history, physical examination, laboratory testing, electrocardiog
206 nal bleeding that evaluated patient history, physical examination, laboratory values, and sonography
207                                     During a physical examination, left-sided leukocoria was detected
208    In addition to characteristic findings on physical examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) e
209                   Initial stage was based on physical examination, mammography, ultrasound, and breas
210                                              Physical examination may help identify the etiology of d
211                        A patient history and physical examination may identify features more consiste
212 m infants had a blunted cortisol response to physical examination (mean difference 0.38 mug/dL, p=0.0
213                                              Physical examination misses up to one-third of ventral h
214        Participants completed a neurological physical examination (NPx) and electrophysiological test
215 cohort study using repeated measurements and physical examinations of 11652 men and 12684 women in Tr
216                The impact of CT findings and physical examination on the decision to operate was anal
217 gical postgraduates and physicians conducted physical examinations on all eligible participants in sa
218 revisited the surveyed households to perform physical examinations on all household members, used as
219 stead, response is only assessed post hoc by physical examination or imaging methods.
220 pine CT, and no evidence of bodily injury at physical examination or on initial plain radiographs.
221 cies were noted in healthcare professionals' physical examination, prescription of oral rehydration s
222 eful evaluation of concomitant symptoms, the physical examination, pulmonary function testing and art
223 n of the echocardiogram with the history and physical examination, recognition of discordant data wit
224                                              Physical examination records of 110,300 anonymous patien
225                                              Physical examination revealed a distended abdomen with t
226                                              Physical examination revealed a painful lesion with foca
227                                              Physical examination revealed a palpable lesion, 15 mm i
228                                              Physical examination revealed a palpable mass in the epi
229                                              Physical examination revealed a palpable nontender mass
230                                              Physical examination revealed a skin-colored mass protru
231                                              Physical examination revealed a temperature of 38.1 degr
232                                              Physical examination revealed decreased axial muscle ton
233                                              Physical examination revealed dysarthria, dysmetria, and
234                                              Physical examination revealed he was afebrile and had no
235                                            A physical examination revealed her muscle tone and streng
236                                              Physical examination revealed icterus sclera with abdomi
237                                              Physical examination revealed jaundice and mild right up
238                                              Physical examination revealed mild bilateral ptosis, red
239                                              Physical examination revealed mucosal pallor, point tend
240                                              Physical examination revealed purulent conjunctivitis of
241                                              Physical examination revealed reduced respiratory sounds
242      His temperature was 38.1 degrees C, and physical examination revealed several small fluctuant ma
243                                              Physical examination revealed tenderness over the left t
244                                          Her physical examination revealed tense ascites and abdomina
245 l preservation, computed tomography (CT) and physical examination revealed this specimen has five pat
246                                              Physical examination revealed well-healed VATS scars in
247                                              Physical examination reveals a 1.5 cm mass in the upper
248                                              Physical examination reveals neither palpable breast mas
249 sments, electrocardiograms, vital signs, and physical examination; secondary measures included change
250                                           At physical examination, she had a temperature of 38.4 degr
251                                              Physical examinations should be performed every 3 to 6 m
252                                              Physical examination showed no syndromic features or phy
253                                              Physical examination showed rash and cheilitis or conjun
254                                         When physical examination shows delayed relaxation, and there
255                                           Of physical examination signs, pooled sensitivity and speci
256 aracteristics, parent-reported symptoms, and physical examination signs.
257 vely studied 47 subjects with FMD, including physical examination, spine magnetic resonance imaging,
258                    Data on clinical history, physical examination, spirometry, asthma control test, a
259                                              Physical examination techniques may be useful in diagnos
260 om retrieved articles, previous reviews, and physical examination textbooks for studies that evaluate
261            The Nepal study included a visual physical examination that confirmed the validity of the
262 can be as simple as performing a history and physical examination that includes orthostatic vital sig
263  or vestibular disorders are mostly based on physical examinations that cannot provide information ab
264                                           On physical examination, the abdomen was mildly distended w
265 d one of them developed recurrent seizure.On physical examination, the child showed marked head lag a
266                                           At physical examination, the injured finger was swollen and
267                                           At physical examination, the patient had a grade II/IV rumb
268 piratory distress and hypoxemia (2C), use of physical examination therapeutic endpoints such as capil
269 illip classification was more sensitive than physical examination to identify patients at risk for in
270 sk assessment requires a focused history and physical examination to identify signs and symptoms of i
271  perform comprehensive medical histories and physical examinations to minimize diagnostic error and i
272                         We recorded history, physical examination, vaginoscopy, serial tissue biopsie
273 d with its use, including the absence of the physical examination, variation in state practice and li
274 y assessments included adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, vital signs, laboratory parameter
275 n of abdominal stab wound management, serial physical examination was able to discriminate between pa
276                           The key finding at physical examination was delayed relaxation after repeti
277 survival status was assessed by phone but no physical examination was done), leaving 2036 patients in
278                                On admission, physical examination was normal, but she had complained
279                                              Physical examination was normal.
280                     He was afebrile, and the physical examination was notable for minor swelling of t
281                                            A physical examination was remarkable for a palpable mass
282                                          His physical examination was remarkable for bulky cervical a
283                                            A physical examination was remarkable for slightly asymmet
284           The presence of lymphadenopathy on physical examination was the most useful sign (LR, 3.1;
285   A chest radiograph obtained at the time of physical examination was unchanged from baseline.
286                                              Physical examination was unrevealing, and the patient ha
287                    In a step towards virtual physical examinations, we developed and report for the f
288           The sensitivity and specificity of physical examination were 100.0% and 98.7%, respectively
289    The clinician's initial considerations at physical examination were compared with the US findings.
290               Initial laboratory work-up and physical examination were inconclusive.
291                  The laboratory findings and physical examination were normal.
292                                  Findings on physical examination were not predictive of fluid respon
293 roup A, the puncture sites designated at the physical examination were reconsidered in 39 (23.8%) of
294 ehold exposures, diet, clinical history, and physical examinations were assessed yearly; levels of sp
295                                              Physical examination, with a focus on gait and posture,
296 es on a thorough medical history and focused physical examination, with attention to other conditions
297 irst polio vaccinations, who were healthy on physical examination, with no obvious medical conditions
298 s detected by questionnaire and standardized physical examination within 1 month after occlusion.
299 onally, each patient underwent postoperative physical examination within 3 days of surgery to check f
300                                              Physical examination without relevant findings.

 
Page Top