ライフサイエンスコーパス: physical performance

1 nting or delaying the age-related decline in physical performance.

2 ium supplementation affects elderly people's physical performance.

3 Low social contact was not associated with physical performance.

4 keletal muscle adaptation and improvement of physical performance.

5 w, oxygen and nutrient delivery and improved physical performance.

6 e of associations of IGF-II, or IGFBP-3 with physical performance.

7 expression, affecting energy production and physical performance.

8 does a more comprehensive summary measure of physical performance.

9 se and carbohydrate supplementation improves physical performance.

10 ional issues, such as emotional distress and physical performance.

11 dysphoria, myalgia, and impaired mental and physical performance.

12 everal measures of higher-level function and physical performance.

13 an are the relations of either of these with physical performance.

14 silience and functions, and boost mental and physical performance.

15 tory-disease risk, and reduces cognitive and physical performance.

16 plored correlations between serum levels and physical performance.

17 circulating levels would be associated with physical performance.

18 c deletion of Piezo1 in adult mice depressed physical performance.

19 l care had conversations about functional or physical performance.

20 terial's microstructure-the design space-and physical performance.

21 ry less oxygen to skeletal muscle and impair physical performance.

22 tween dietary intake of these B vitamins and physical performance.

23 n the transfer from mental practice to overt physical performance.

24 the association between vitamin D status and physical performance.

25 ere body composition, handgrip strength, and physical performance.

26 levance for the improvement of cognitive and physical performances.

27 Among older patients with impaired physical performance 1 month after myocardial infarction

28 Surgeons perceived improvements in physical performance (57%) and mental focus (38%); 87% o

29 ith negative changes in body composition and physical performance according to the principle of train

30 au Functional Health Scale, and questions on physical performance, adapted from Nagi, as well as info

31 of their air sensitivity and depreciation of physical performance after chemical processing.

32 nvestigation was to characterize and compare physical performance among CCSs and a group of siblings

33 The 25(OH)D thresholds were 70-80 nmol/L for physical performance and 55-70 nmol/L for strength.

34 I used super learning in the Study of Physical Performance and Age-Related Changes in Sonomans

35 mimetic amine, ephedrine, is used to augment physical performance and as a weight loss aid, but littl

36 ex neurodegenerative process that may affect physical performance and cognition.

37 rmine the temporal relationship between poor physical performance and cognitive dysfunction.

38 The novel ketone diet, therefore, improved physical performance and cognitive function in rats, and

39 ments in iron status and improve measures of physical performance and cognitive status in female sold

40 Exercise training enhances physical performance and confers health benefits, largel

41 ng cross-sectional relationship between poor physical performance and dementia in people 90 years and

42 h fat and lean mass, accompanied by improved physical performance and glucoregulation, and greater me

43 ial step in understanding their chemical and physical performance and in exploring their potential ap

44 her ACE inhibitors also prevent reduction in physical performance and in muscle strength in older wom

45 increased risk for functional limitations in physical performance and in participation in activities

46 icient to regulate whole-body metabolism and physical performance and is a novel target for the treat

47 een mealtime protein-intake distribution and physical performance and its 3-y decline in community-dw

48 Anemia is also prognostic for diminished physical performance and loss of mobility in people 65 y

49 te self-reported functioning for measures of physical performance and omit weight loss or substitute

50 fat mass negatively impacts some domains of physical performance and overall functioning, while lean

51 iosensors could lead to useful insights into physical performance and overall physiological status, h

52 muscle mitochondrial oxidative capacity with physical performance and perceived cancer-related psycho

53 drial respiration provides energy to support physical performance and physiological well-being, where

54 patients according to the patients' overall physical performance and preference.

55 with Stage I COPD experience improvements in physical performance and quality of life as a result of

56 rogram managed by dialysis staff may improve physical performance and quality of life in patients on

57 al muscle provides a mechanism for enhancing physical performance and resistance to fatigue by augmen

58 relative measures of fat and lean mass with physical performance and self-reported functional limita

59 Although physical performance and strength declined over 4 years

60 The 25(OH)D threshold for physical performance and strength was determined, and bo

61 ongitudinal associations between 25(OH)D and physical performance and strength were examined, in men

62 serum 25(OH)D was measured in 1998-1999, and physical performance and strength were measured at basel

63 older adults and are associated with poorer physical performance and strength, but results from long

64 ant concentrations correlate positively with physical performance and strength.

65 CAPP score captured a wide range of physical performance and was correlated with self-report

66 definition of frailty that includes measured physical performance and weight loss in a cross-sectiona

67 tes Il-6 and myostatin expression, governing physical performance and whole-body metabolism.

68 ts (low muscle mass, quadriceps strength and physical performance) and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD),

69 d with smaller myofiber diameter, diminished physical performance, and an increase in PAX7 positive s

70 een linked to sleep disorders, cognitive and physical performance, and chronic disease.

71 lean mass, handgrip strength, leg strength, physical performance, and circulating metabolic and rena

72 WOMAC pain subscale scores (P = 0.126), physical performance, and depressive symptoms did not di

73 ficits in skeletal muscle mass, strength and physical performance, and examine the associations of th

74 eline data in 1993-1994 on body composition, physical performance, and functional limitation.

75 ul interpersonal interactions are related to physical performance, and highlight additional considera

76 dest improvements in measures of disability, physical performance, and pain from participating in eit

77 Echocardiographic, biochemical, physical performance, and quality-of-life data were coll

78 m that affects maternal and child mortality, physical performance, and referral to health-care profes

79 Deficits in quadriceps muscle strength and physical performance are common in LTx candidates and fu

80 Depressive symptoms and physical performance are inversely associated, but it is

81 Claims that growth hormone enhances physical performance are not supported by the scientific

82 We measured physical performance as secondary outcomes (four-step st

83 igh-composition measures with disability and physical performance, as measured with the Health Assess

84 In older adults, measurements of physical performance assess physical function and associ

85 D, resembling physiologic aging, but whether physical performance associates with clinical outcome in

86 The main study outcomes included change in physical performance at 6 months, assessed by the 6-minu

87 ticipants with 25(OH)D <50 nmol/L had poorer physical performance at baseline and at 2- and 4-year fo

88 iated with better knee extensor strength and physical performance at T4 in both sexes and less physic

89 Few physical performance batteries exist that appropriately

90 5% confidence interval 1.09-1.25), and Short Physical Performance Battery <10 (hazard ratio = 1.45, 9

91 ts at every outpatient visit using the Short Physical Performance Battery (0 = impaired to 12 = robus

92 and a significant time effect for the Short Physical Performance Battery (p = 0.013), timed up-and-g

93 treat, was mobility measured with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) 4 months after surge

94 erformance-based measures included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Short Portable S

95 erformance-based measures included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Short Portable S

96 Valued Life Activities (VLAs), and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) instruments, were ex

97 n and women aged 70 to 89 years with a Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score of 9 or less b

98 tcomes were ventilator days, ICU days, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, 36-item Short

99 The short physical performance battery (SPPB) test is an objective

100 ith D/AO had worse performances on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) than their counterpa

101 lic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Montreal Cognitive

102 erable Elders Survey (VES-13), and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).

103 the Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).

104 he primary outcome was a change in the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB); secondary outcomes

105 Objective PF was assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB, timed 4-m walk, chai

106 n function at 6 months measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB; range 0-12, higher s

107 comes were mobility (performance-based Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB]; continuous version;

108 2 measures of physical functioning (a Short Physical Performance Battery and a 4-meter test of usual

109 ortality risk was similar for the full short physical performance battery and walking speed alone, in

110 least-squares mean ( SE) score on the Short Physical Performance Battery at 3 months was 8.3 0.2 in

111 d as a loss of at least 1 point in the Short Physical Performance Battery during the 3-year follow-up

112 letal mass / Body Mass Index), and the Short Physical Performance Battery for muscle strength and per

113 limitations, defined as a score on the Short Physical Performance Battery of 9 or below, but were abl

114 .03 seconds in chair stands, and -0.16 Short Physical Performance Battery points.

115 43%) had physical function impairment (Short Physical Performance Battery score <=10), and 6% (4%, 9%

116 (PR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.44-5.10) and low Short Physical Performance Battery score (PR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.

117 After adjustment for baseline Short Physical Performance Battery score and other baseline ch

118 justment for potential confounders and Short Physical Performance Battery score at baseline (beta = .

119 was significantly associated with the Short Physical Performance Battery score at follow-up after ad

120 The mean decline in the Short Physical Performance Battery score was 1.1 point.

121 asures included the 6-min walk and the Short Physical Performance Battery score.

122 d (FEV(1)), was associated with poorer Short Physical Performance Battery scores and less distance wa

123 uality of life but did not improve the short physical performance battery scores of PAD participants

124 Neither exercise group improved its short physical performance battery scores.

125 adults aged >/=70 years completed the Short Physical Performance Battery test (SPPB) test and assess

126 % CI 4.64 to 35.55, p < 0.001) for the Short Physical Performance Battery when adjusting for confound

127 omes were objective physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery) and depressive symptoms (P

128 subscale scores, physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery), and depressive symptoms (

129 easures included physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery), loneliness (modified UCLA

130 ed measures: lower extremity function (Short Physical Performance Battery), submaximal exercise perfo

131 sts (LFI, Fried Frailty Phenotype, and Short Physical Performance Battery).

132 Primary measures included a short physical performance battery, a test of walking speed, a

133 Questionnaire, EQ visual analog scale, short physical performance battery, and clinical frailty scale

134 analog scale, physical performance by short physical performance battery, and frailty by the clinica

135 ere compared: Fried, Fried+, Rockwood, Short Physical Performance Battery, Bern, Columbia, and the Es

136 A domains of disability, malnutrition, Short Physical Performance Battery, frailty, and number of def

137 was assessed by handgrip strength, the Short Physical Performance Battery, timed up and go, a 6-min w

138 battery, Zubrod, and hand grip; 6 mo: short physical performance battery, Zubrod) and health-related

139 icantly lower physical function (3 mo: short physical performance battery, Zubrod, and hand grip; 6 m

140 imilar in magnitude for models using a Short Physical Performance Battery.

141 d for older age and lower score on the Short Physical Performance Battery.

142 ption, 6-minute walk distance, and the Short Physical Performance Battery.

143 gth, and physical performance with the Short Physical Performance Battery.

144 xtremity function was defined with the Short Physical Performance Battery; the frailty syndrome was d

145 Follow-up physical function (short physical performance battery; Zubrod; hand grip strength

146 vitamin C was significantly associated with physical performance (beta = 0.029, P = 0.04).

147 Outcome measures included physical performance, body composition, bone mineral den

148 Aerobic training not only improves physical performance but also contributes to changes in

149 s of muscle power are major factors limiting physical performance but little is known about the molec

150 h GABA and L-AABA appear to be indicative of physical performance, but in opposite directions, we exa

151 Magnesium deficiency is associated with poor physical performance, but no trials are available on how

152 have been used throughout history to enhance physical performance, but scientific scrutiny with contr

153 ance was measured by a free-recall test, and physical performance by power output on an indoor rowing

154 d quality of life by EQ visual analog scale, physical performance by short physical performance batte

155 action of habitat features, sensory cues and physical performance capabilities affect prey escape per

156 annually between 0.7% and 2.2% and objective physical performance capacity (standing up from a chair,

157 a detrimental effect of a vegetarian diet on physical performance capacity, especially when carbohydr

158 of insulin were weakly associated with worse physical performance (CaPS and Boyd Orr combined: get-up

159 f exercise on bone health, body composition, physical performance, cardiometabolic risk, fatigue, and

160 cal performance at T4 in both sexes and less physical performance decline in women.

161 for assessing the likelihood and severity of physical performance decrement for a given task as well

162 al step for revealing the many mechanisms of physical performance decrement, but accurate predictive

163 in pulmonary function improvements, QoL and physical performance (DeltaFEV(1)%, 5.5 vs. 39.5; DeltaI

164 bution and adjusted for potential covariates.Physical performance deteriorated over 3 y with muscle s

165 ly CKD patients are associated with impaired physical performance, disability, poorer quality of life

166 tion may prove to be beneficial for mood and physical performance during the training period.

167 Physical performance emerges from complex interactions a

168 holesterol/triglycerides, glycaemic control, physical performance, enhanced post insulin receptor pat

169 ults and athletes due to their cognitive and physical performance-enhancing effects.

170 existed between vitamin D concentration and physical performance except for single-leg stands.

171 tion, there was no dose-effect relation with physical performance except for single-leg stands.

172 ne, and related alkaloids have not benefited physical performance except when combined with caffeine.

173 gative associations in the whole cohort with physical performance [fast gait speed, 6 min walk test (

174 r levels of inflammatory markers, and better physical performance/functioning and sleep quality.

175 e these measures at week 36 and impairments, physical performance, global change, psychological statu

176 Physical activity and physical performance have been linked to fall risk in th

177 sociation functional class, quality of life, physical performance, hospitalization, and event-free su

178 , lowers body weight and adiposity, improves physical performance, improves glucose tolerance, and al

179 essive symptoms, functional limitations, and physical performance in a high-risk older population wit

180 Poor physical performance in all measures was significantly a

181 Decline in physical performance in an 8-y follow-up period was anal

182 tioxidants with skeletal muscle strength and physical performance in elderly persons.

183 tribute to better knee extensor strength and physical performance in generally well-functioning older

184 n between iron deficiency without anemia and physical performance in healthy active women aged 19-36

185 f oral magnesium supplementation can improve physical performance in healthy elderly women.

186 e supplementation for 12 wk seems to improve physical performance in healthy elderly women.

187 (HIIT) is a time-efficient way of improving physical performance in healthy subjects and in patients

188 g test are frequently used tools to evaluate physical performance in heart failure (HF), but they do

189 /AO is associated with a stronger decline in physical performance in males but not in females.

190 ression of NURR1 in skeletal muscle enhances physical performance in mice.

191 Muscle strength and physical performance in old age might be related to the

192 in middle-age were associated with improved physical performance in old age, but estimates were impr

193 iated with improved, and insulin with worse, physical performance in old age.

194 SNPs may be associated with a key measure of physical performance in older adults.

195 endicular lean body mass (aLBM) and improves physical performance in older individuals who have had r

196 tudy reveals clear effects of time-of-day on physical performance in Olympic athletes.

197 were strongly associated with disability and physical performance in RA patients, with RA disease fea

198 Vitamin D adequacy has been associated with physical performance in the elderly.

199 pacity for lipogenesis in muscle to preserve physical performance in the setting of disrupted metabol

200 s of insulin, IGF-I, IGF-II and IGFBP-3 with physical performance in the UK-based Caerphilly Prospect

201 eath rate, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), physical performance in three tests and cognitive functi

202 ial-encoded MOTS-c can significantly enhance physical performance in young (2 mo.), middle-age (12 mo

203 physiological effects of poor iron status on physical performance, including work productivity, volun

204 icipants with poor higher-level function and physical performance increased substantially across the

205 ly onset of age-related weight loss, reduced physical performance, increased frailty, and reduced lif

206 its of calorie restriction, such as improved physical performance, increased insulin sensitivity, and

207 olic blood pressure, nonvertebral fractures, physical performance, infection rates, or cognitive func

208 vant beneficial effects on body composition, physical performance, insulin sensitivity, or quality of

209 Physical performance is a central component of health.

210 Physical performance is compromised in mice which lack e

211 le of protein intake and its distribution on physical performance is warranted, as are intervention s

212 ction also increase the risk of developing a physical performance limitation.

213 participation restrictions that result from physical performance limitations among childhood cancer

214 Physical performance limitations are one of the potentia

215 Our review showed that physical performance limitations are prevalent among chi

216 In summary, monitoring of physical performance limitations in an aging cohort of c

217 ortant and will help determine the impact of physical performance limitations on morbidity, mortality

218 ly published from the CCSS cohort related to physical performance limitations were reviewed and the r

219 Therapies that can increase muscle mass and physical performance may be a promising option; however,

220 bjects performed the Get Up and Go test as a physical performance measure of function and completed t

221 association between depressive symptoms and physical performance measured using gait speed is bidire

222 The instrument design is described, and its physical performance measurements are presented.

223 Conclusion: The physical performance measurements validated the system d

224 t a GA including standardized functional and physical performance measures and had 1 clinical encount

225 Future studies should examine whether physical performance measures can further improve predic

226 Physical performance measures were compared in regressio

227 Odds of dementia in relation to the physical performance measures were estimated by logistic

228 The independent variables were physical performance measures, including 4-m walk, 5 cha

229 Physical performance measures, such as gait speed, might

230 easures plus little or no difficulty on five physical performance measures.

231 Deficits in quadriceps strength (n = 27) and physical performance (n = 24) were more common than musc

232 der (n = 307) and those with poorer baseline physical performance (n = 328) had better changes in exe

233 This increase in physical performance occurs in both young and adult mice

234 ive symptoms predicted subsequent decline in physical performance (odds ratio for decline, 1.03; 95%

235 The aim of this study was to assess the physical performance of a new PET/CT system, the Discove

236 airplane cabins could impair oxygenation and physical performance of caregivers.

237 In summary, impaired physical performance of the lower extremities is common

238 The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical performance of the Vereos whole-body PET/CT sys

239 is method remains a challenge to balance the physical performances of the bioinks for high-fidelity b

240 Muscle wasting and diminished physical performance often accompany CKD, resembling phy

241 the Vision, to study the impact of improved physical performance on clinical performance.

242 ntation on appendicular lean mass, strength, physical performance or MyoPS in older adults at risk of

243 uestionnaire results revealed no significant physical performance or psychological embodiment differe

244 associated with a faster rate of decline in physical performance or strength.

245 depressive symptoms, functional limitations, physical performance, or any of the secondary outcomes.

246 position, blood pressure, energy metabolism, physical performance, or quality of life and sleep betwe

247 mptoms were predictive of greater decline in physical performance over 4 years (odds ratio for declin

248 s with low 25(OH)D concentrations had poorer physical performance over 4 years of follow-up, but low

249 mechanisms in the body, resulting in varying physical performance over the day.

250 , different aspects of social isolation, and physical performance over time.

251 Higher levels of physical performance persisted over 2 years among high-i

252 metabolism, blood pressure, plasma markers, physical performance, quality of life, and quality of sl

253 ollowing herbs are currently used to enhance physical performance regardless of scientific evidence o

254 ss, but the relation of this distribution to physical performance remains unknown.We examined the rel

255 le simultaneously allowing for the increased physical performance required for migration.

256 on (beta = 0.566, P = 0.003) and the summary physical performance score (beta = 0.044, P = 0.008).

257 Caregiving intensity status and physical performance score (sum of quartiles of walking

258 Odds ratios for every unit decrease in physical performance score were 2.1 for 4-m walk, 2.1 fo

259 Secondary outcomes included changes in physical performance, self-reported physical functioning

260 Measures included physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery

261 ere WOMAC function and pain subscale scores, physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery

262 utcomes, resource utilization, and long-term physical performance status and survival were compared a

263 ome measures were total scores on a modified Physical Performance Test (PPT), the Functional Status Q

264 The primary outcome was the change in Physical Performance Test score from baseline to 6 month

265 The Physical Performance Test score increased more in the co

266 substantial, but unique, clustering of each physical performance test to a single factor-frailty.

267 Each physical performance test was significantly associated w

268 Linear regression associated each physical performance test with frailty.

269 ntention-to-treat analysis, the score on the Physical Performance Test, in which higher scores indica

270 come was the change in score on the modified Physical Performance Test.

271 rvention) by using the Barthel index and the Physical Performance Test.

272 ance analysis (BIA) offers an alternative to physical performance testing.

273 ty, exhaustion, and shrinking-as measured by physical performance tests and questionnaires.

274 Physical performance tests included an assessment of sta

275 c test, longitudinal circadian analysis, and physical performance tests to characterize relevant slee

276 Tests of treatment effect on physical performance tests were done at a pre-specified

277 all other tests of treatment effect (except physical performance tests) were done at a two-sided alp

278 ge models were significantly correlated with physical performance tests.

279 ed the interrelatedness of frailty and the 5 physical performance tests.

280 from a group of 69 nonanemic women and given physical-performance tests, including determinations of

281 6 subscales, activities of daily living, and physical performance than did those assigned to usual in

282 -intensity caregivers maintained the highest physical performance throughout follow-up.

283 ce using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and physical performance using the Continuous Scale Physical

284 ility to perform activities of daily living, physical performance, utilization of health services, an

285 How mechanical stress affects physical performance via tendons is not fully understood

286 Physical performance was assessed by handgrip strength,

287 Physical performance was assessed by match analysis in 1

288 Physical performance was assessed by walking speed and g

289 Physical performance was assessed on the basis of walkin

290 Physical performance was compared on reconstructed SPECT

291 Physical performance was evaluated by means of a 6-min w

292 Furthermore, the decrease in physical performance was greater than the decrease in me

293 Physical performance was measured using the get-up and g

294 n activities of daily living, cognition, and physical performance were worse than their male counterp

295 t were longitudinally associated with poorer physical performance when accounting for both time-invar

296 Physical performance, which was measured yearly, was gro

297 Declining physical performance with age and disease is an importan

298 d the relation between physical activity and physical performance with incident falls in the Osteopor

299 espiratory muscle and handgrip strength, and physical performance with the Short Physical Performance

300 Biomarkers that identify declining physical performance would be useful in predicting treat