ライフサイエンスコーパス: physical therapy

1 , massage therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy).

2 oid injections (38% vs. 20%), and 19% needed physical therapy.

3 g, home hazard modification, and exercise or physical therapy.

4 gth before and after 2 weeks of conventional physical therapy.

5 delayed until he completed several weeks of physical therapy.

6 of obstetric risk factors, and pelvic-floor physical therapy.

7 18 to 60 years of age, who were referred to physical therapy.

8 s of individuals with knee osteoarthritis to physical therapy.

9 de oral medications, injections, bracing, or physical therapy.

10 nt for acute sciatica, including referral to physical therapy.

11 y for 3 months, where he underwent intensive physical therapy.

12 e interval, 5.0 to 32.6), a finding favoring physical therapy.

13 to routine care interventions, such as chest physical therapy.

14 propofol, could blunt the responses to chest physical therapy.

15 nt received two successive sessions of chest physical therapy.

16 added to a regimen of antibiotics and chest physical therapy.

17 namic and metabolic stresses caused by chest physical therapy.

18 apy is activity modification, analgesia, and physical therapy.

19 roidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and physical therapy.

20 id analgesics, trigger-point injections, and physical therapy.

21 eniscectomy or 16 sessions of exercise-based physical therapy.

22 onses of mechanically ventilated patients to physical therapy.

23 and extent of soft tissue injuries prior to physical therapy.

24 after the stroke onset, aside from rest and physical therapy.

25 tion (NMES) are common interventions used in physical therapy.

26 ive a glucocorticoid injection or to undergo physical therapy.

27 Guidelines recommend delaying referrals for physical therapy.

28 subacromial CSI versus 6 sessions of manual physical therapy.

29 e series of patients with ICUAW who received physical therapy.

30 curred at 1 center with patients referred to physical therapy.

31 d muscle relaxants) (P< 0.001) and used less physical therapy (0.2 percent vs. 2.6 percent, P<0.05).

32 than 0.50 in 6 of 10 professions, including physical therapy (0.33).

33 Chi, 167 points [95% CI, 145 to 190 points]; physical therapy, 143 points [CI, 119 to 167 points]).

34 ized patients received 6 weeks of outpatient physical therapy 2 or 3 times per week through 1 of 2 in

35 (2 times per week for 12 weeks) or standard physical therapy (2 times per week for 6 weeks, followed

36 y (16% vs. 35%, p < .0001) and initiation of physical therapy (28% vs. 42%, p < .0001) compared with

37 age in other nonpharmacologic pain care like physical therapy (39.2%; 99% CI, 38.9%-39.5% vs 29.3%; 9

38 vitamins and herbs (62.6%), and movement and physical therapies (59.2%) and predicted (P <.001) by se

39 had physical vulnerability that may require physical therapy aiming to improve functioning, one-tent

40 rticipants in the study who were assigned to physical therapy alone (30%) had undergone surgery, and

41 er, 30% of the patients who were assigned to physical therapy alone underwent surgery within 6 months

42 Physical therapy also had significantly greater improvem

43 to weekly acupuncture versus usual care (eg, physical therapy, analgesia, and/or anti-inflammatory dr

44 on with non-pharmacological methods, such as physical therapies and psychological treatments in appro

45 s with low back pain, the McKenzie method of physical therapy and chiropractic manipulation had simil

46 delines, a stepwise approach of pelvic floor physical therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy as we

47 categories of approved treatment options are physical therapy and exercise (which have been known to

48 ly assigned to 6 months of either supervised physical therapy and exercise training (n = 46) or home

49 al physical therapy (ICT-C) and conventional physical therapy and gait training (CPT-G) on abnormal s

50 Physical therapy and glucocorticoid injections are initi

51 Both physical therapy and intraarticular injections of glucoc

52 d power density of insonation are within the physical therapy and medical imaging windows; thus the a

53 s considerable variability surrounding early physical therapy and mobilization goals for patients wit

54 iderations when applying a strategy of early physical therapy and mobilization to this distinctive pa

55 First-line treatments are physical therapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug

56 Physical therapy and NSAIDs are first-line treatments, b

57 Center-level utilization of physical therapy and occupational therapy among critical

58 Studies pertaining to physical therapy and rehabilitation in trauma patients w

59 es, nutritional deficiencies and the role of physical therapy and rehabilitation, are under recognize

60 Using keywords critical care and physical therapy and related synonyms, randomized contro

61 A combination of manual physical therapy and supervised exercise yields function

62 ed and include a combination of medications, physical therapy and surgery.

63 ome-based intervention program that included physical therapy and that focused primarily on improving

64 havioral interventions, such as pelvic floor physical therapy and timed voiding, as well as pharmacol

65 The USPSTF recommends exercise or physical therapy and vitamin D supplementation to preven

66 Formal physical therapy and, in most severe cases, inpatient re

67 s were involved in active rehabilitation and physical therapy and, ultimately, were ambulatory on ext

68 were no significant differences between the physical-therapy and chiropractic groups and no signific

69 r passive range of motion, 5.0 (3.0-8.0) for physical therapy, and 3.0 (1.0-5.0) for progressive resi

70 d to safely allow for active rehabilitation, physical therapy, and ambulation of patients being manag

71 laims, and extracted claims for medications, physical therapy, and healthcare visits for the 6 months

72 ludes conservative management based on rest, physical therapy, and oral non-steroid anti-inflammatory

73 ieticians, social services, occupational and physical therapy, and pharmacy.

74 arge, consisting of passive range of motion, physical therapy, and progressive resistance exercise.

75 therapy, rehabilitation, physical activity, physical therapy, and randomized controlled trial.

76 1); and outpatient specialty care, including physical therapy (AOR = 3.5, p < 0.001) and ophthalmolog

77 nistration of minocycline and by the type of physical therapy applied reached statistical significanc

78 ve is to evaluate the effect of a multimodal physical therapy approach in reducing upper limb (UL) ly

79 Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) and physical therapy are used to treat patients with the sho

80 echanical ventilation and who were receiving physical therapy as prescribed by facility staff.

81 four reviews were published concerning using physical therapy as treatment, and two reviews reported

82 ion outcomes, and expand access to automated physical therapy assessment tools.

83 lity Scale were collected during the initial physical therapy assessment, at ICU discharge, and prior

84 licks" was only collected during the initial physical therapy assessment.

85 ean difference in QALY significantly favored physical therapy at 1 year (0.076; 95% CI, 0.02-0.126; P

86 e reported benefit from both psychiatric and physical therapy-based interventions.

87 may include medication, nerve blocks, active physical therapy, behavioural interventions, and assista

88 This can be achieved by physical therapy, bracing, soft tissue releases for join

89 ch is needed to support meaningful shifts in physical therapy care in line with the best practice rec

90 ve single interventions include exercise and physical therapy, cataract surgery, and medication reduc

91 acked other nonpharmacologic treatments (eg, physical therapy, chiropractic care), pharmacologic trea

92 primary care visit to the McKenzie method of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, or a minima

93 On average, patients not undergoing surgery, physical therapy, chiropractic manipulative therapy, or

94 ated to waiting, which involved, waiting for physical therapy clearance, physician orders, risks to d

95 and November 2005 in an academic outpatient physical therapy clinic.

96 e balance disorders clinic and in outpatient physical therapy clinics in the United States included 4

97 sample of patients seen in primary care and physical therapy clinics with a radiographically confirm

98 cline), a neurotrophic agent (LM11A-31), and physical therapy consisting of assisted exercise with or

99 r rhDNase treatment are independent of chest physical therapy (CPT).

100 Standard physical therapy delivered in a ventilator weaning facil

101 ter, 3-arm randomized controlled trial in 15 physical therapy departments.

102 ted in actions related to collaborating with physical therapy, determining the appropriateness of act

103 Physical therapy did not improve respiratory function.

104 mong adults with painful hip osteoarthritis, physical therapy did not result in greater improvement i

105 dopa in addition to routine occupational and physical therapy does not seem to improve walking after

106 The issues of nutrition, physical therapy, drive line care, and readiness to tran

107 Neither physical therapy duration nor specific forms of exercise

108 f co-careldopa plus routine occupational and physical therapy during early rehabilitation after strok

109 tal length of stay in survivors who received physical therapy during intensive care unit treatment co

110 overy and months of progressive mobility and physical therapy during medical leave from work.

111 Significant variability exists in physical therapy early mobilization practice.

112 mation (HPE) has become an essential tool in physical therapy, enabling automated movement analysis a

113 110 participants randomly assigned to early physical therapy (EPT) were provided 1 education session

114 ning, role preparation, and practice; use of physical therapy equipment to increase the exposure dist

115 ired to determine whether shortening time to physical therapy evaluation and treatment in a cardiotho

116 arch was to examine variables that influence physical therapy evaluation and treatment in the intensi

117 Time to first physical therapy evaluation in the intensive care unit a

118 gression model determined that time to first physical therapy evaluation, Charlson Comorbidity Index

119 ts with ICUAW who did not receive structured physical therapy, evidence suggested those who receive p

120 numerous lymphedema treatments, integrating physical therapy for breast cancer-related lymphedema (B

121 upport early and adapted management, such as physical therapy for CBVL and cochlear implantation stra

122 Exercise and referral to physical therapy for exercise are discussed differently

123 ons about general exercises, and referral to physical therapy for exercise.

124 There is limited evidence supporting use of physical therapy for hip osteoarthritis.

125 is widely available, one-to-one conservative physical therapy for men who are incontinent after prost

126 ogram to allow for active rehabilitation and physical therapy for patients requiring life support wit

127 copic partial meniscectomy vs exercise-based physical therapy for patients with degenerative meniscal

128 Referral from primary care to physical therapy for recent-onset sciatica improved disa

129 e was a significant positive effect favoring physical therapy for the critically ill to improve the q

130 The median days of delivery of physical therapy for the usual care group was 1.0 (IQR,

131 complications include use of analgesics and physical therapy for treatment of avascular necrosis, an

132 ressant or anti-inflammatory prescribing and physical therapy generally did not contribute to increas

133 r time in the PPT and FSQ scores favored the physical therapy group (P =.003 and P =.01, respectively

134 s a trend toward less severe symptoms in the physical therapy group (P=0.06).

135 The manual physical therapy group used less 1-year SIS-related heal

136 bility after 3 months (mean ODI score: early physical therapy group, 41.3 [95% CI, 38.7 to 44.0] at b

137 coid injection group and 107.1+/-42.4 in the physical therapy group.

138 surgery group and 25.1 (17.8) points in the physical therapy group.

139 cocorticoid injection group and $2131 in the physical therapy group.

140 group and 18.5 (95% CI, 15.6 to 21.5) in the physical-therapy group (mean difference, 2.4 points; 95%

141 od, the mean costs of care were $437 for the physical-therapy group, $429 for the chiropractic group,

142 to orientation and mobility training and/or physical therapy (>50% in the severe groups).

143 ith osteoarthritis of the knee who underwent physical therapy had less pain and functional disability

144 tainability of the increased ankle ROM after physical therapy has ended or if VLU reoccurrences are p

145 vidence of arterial compression and for whom physical therapy has failed should receive surgery to al

146 ting knee osteoarthritis with analgesics and physical therapy has not been shown to alter the natural

147 , and enhance [ICE] care model that combines physical therapy, health coach counseling, and consultat

148 With this exercise approach, physical therapy helps with learning through instruction

149 he effects of ICT combined with conventional physical therapy (ICT-C) and conventional physical thera

150 Conventional physical therapy ignores underlying neural changes with

151 ed in response to the early mobilization and physical therapy in immobilized ICU patients.

152 de the intensity and type of nutritional and physical therapy in individual liver transplant candidat

153 approaches have to be seen in the context of physical therapy in order to maximize functional outcome

154 ome was the proportion of patients receiving physical therapy in patients surviving to hospital disch

155 Physical therapy in the ICU appears to confer significan

156 5% confidence interval 0.16, 0.59) following physical therapy in the ICU.

157 present review, we will focus on the role of physical therapy in the management of vestibular symptom

158 Physical therapy in the preoperative period can improve

159 cts similar to those of a standard course of physical therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

160 There was greater use of postoperative physical therapy in the VLP group (56 [72%] vs 44 [54%];

161 lar matrix scaffolds have been combined with physical therapy in VML-injured patients, resulting in m

162 , home exercise plus text messages plus sham physical therapy (in-clinic sham manual therapy and sham

163 care) as well as motor training (massage and physical therapy) in a gestational age (GA) appropriate

164 ion session and then referred for 4 weeks of physical therapy, including exercise and manual therapy.

165 nonvolitional, objective measurements, that physical therapy increases muscle strength in this popul

166 ess this problem, it has not been shown that physical therapy initiated in the intensive care unit of

167 oration, interdisciplinary therapy, massage, physical therapies (interferential therapy, low-level la

168 a hip fracture, a multicomponent home-based physical therapy intervention compared with an active co

169 y-weight support in treadmill stepping, is a physical therapy intervention used to improve recovery o

170 s of this protocol in combination with other physical therapy interventions for functional recovery a

171 Advances in physical therapy interventions include new methods to st

172 s and providers were unblinded, and specific physical therapy interventions responsible for effects c

173 s suggest a combinatorial effect of drug and physical therapy interventions that was not evident by u

174 ses on a program of standardized nursing and physical therapy interventions to prevent delirium in th

175 Physical therapy interventions using adaptation techniqu

176 peripheral vestibular disorders benefit from physical therapy interventions.

177 In 16 RCTs evaluating exercise or physical therapy, interventions reduced falling (risk ra

178 Referral to physical therapy is appropriate, because physical therap

179 Physical therapy is routinely recommended for knee pain

180 Physical therapy is standard care for mechanically venti

181 toms can be managed, not cured, with complex physical therapy, low-level laser therapy, pharmacothera

182 These results suggest that physical therapy may be beneficial in Parkinson's diseas

183 hat, although the initial cost of delivering physical therapy may be higher than an initial course of

184 y provides a potential explanation as to why physical therapy may often be ineffective.

185 ing data indicating that swallow therapy and physical therapy may prevent or ameliorate long-term fun

186 ercentage of days on which patients received physical therapy mediated 90.1% of the intervention effe

187 The areas of acupuncture and pelvic floor physical therapy/myofascial release have received increa

188 Early physical therapy (n = 108) consisted of 4 physical thera

189 assing multimodal prehabilitation-comprising physical therapy, nutritional measures, and psychologica

190 approach to patient care, involving nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and respiratory

191 missions for FNDs had low rates of inpatient physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech and langu

192 onmechanically ventilated patients receiving physical therapy/occupational therapy (48% vs 26%; p </=

193 Physical therapy/occupational therapy involvement in mob

194 Physical therapy/occupational therapy involvement in mob

195 The prevalence of physical therapy/occupational therapy-provided mobility

196 ring for acute respiratory failure patients, physical therapy/occupational therapy-provided mobility

197 as conducted by way of flyers, physician and physical therapy offices, advertisements, and media inte

198 rence for treatment can be substantial, with physical therapy often being more expensive at the outse

199 Further physical therapy or anterior scalene block was not consi

200 Physical therapy or chiropractic manipulation was provid

201 The frequency of physical therapy or early mobilization of patients in th

202 t studies with small sample sizes, that used physical therapy or exercise for patients with open or h

203 ver, little is known regarding the effect of physical therapy or exercise on healing and quality of l

204 Physical therapy or exercise that targets ankle joint mo

205 Physical therapy or glucocorticoid injection.

206 ries who remain symptomatic despite adequate physical therapy or if the PCL deficiency is part of a m

207 isions about initiating ambulation to either physical therapy or medicine.

208 in the ICU, ranging from 81% utilization of physical therapy or occupational therapy services among

209 ose, 6,040 (35%) were not charged for either physical therapy or occupational therapy services.

210 meniscal tear and knee pain, the addition of physical therapy or text messages to encourage adherence

211 ed 351 patients to surgery and postoperative physical therapy or to a standardized physical-therapy r

212 were referred for ophthalmologic screening, physical therapy, or nursing input and a diagnosis of JI

213 The point prevalence of physical therapy- or occupational therapy-provided mobil

214 The primary outcome was prevalence of physical therapy- or occupational therapy-provided mobil

215 ain-following conservative treatment such as physical therapy, oral medications, and lumbar spine inj

216 ggests the need for further investigation on physical therapy-oriented exercise on wound healing and

217 ectrolyte repletion (p < .01), initiation of physical therapy (p < .05), and documentation of restrai

218 %; P = .03); 39.5% vs 50% needed respiratory physical therapy (P = .35).

219 The efficacy and optimization of poststroke physical therapy paradigms is challenged in part by a la

220 Champions from each profession-nursing, physical therapy, physician, and respiratory care-were i

221 nts such as posture adjustment, acupuncture, physical therapy, physiotherapy, yoga, and chiropractic

222 for this group comprised 60-min conventional physical therapy plus 30-min robot-assisted training, 7

223 ull extension) plus nonoperative management (physical therapy plus medications as required) compared

224 e not sufficient to determine which specific physical therapy program should be recommended, physicia

225 of 152), methotrexate (49 [32%] of 152), and physical therapy programs (all patients).

226 Various exercise and physical therapy programs have been evaluated in clinica

227 To review studies of various physical therapy programs in ankylosing spondylitis and

228 Recent data have shown that physical therapy programs, judiciously used, in combinat

229 hesis that 2 weeks of standard, conventional physical therapy provided at a ventilator weaning facili

230 ieve high levels of muscle activation during physical therapy provides a potential explanation as to

231 d nonpharmacologic pain therapies, including physical therapy (PT) and chiropractic care.

232 The primary outcome was delivery of physical therapy (PT) and/or occupational therapy (OT) d

233 litation intervention and 469 (88%) required physical therapy (PT) and/or occupational therapy (OT).

234 In GAPcare patients receive pharmacy and physical therapy (PT) consultation to reduce modifiable

235 Group-based physical therapy (PT) for knee osteoarthritis is an effe

236 ht to determine the utilization of inpatient physical therapy (PT) for patients recovering from criti

237 targeting psychosocial factors compared with physical therapy (PT) for primary care patients with low

238 Associations of physical therapy (PT) interventions before or after TKR

239 Systematic literature review of physical therapy (PT) interventions for community-dwelli

240 LBP), but its comparative effectiveness with physical therapy (PT) is unknown.

241 ical need to identify interventions, such as physical therapy (PT), to mitigate the risk of falls ove

242 is preservation of physical function through physical therapy (PT).

243 Repeat cross-sectional imaging and physical therapy referrals were also less common in the

244 rative physical therapy or to a standardized physical-therapy regimen (with the option to cross over

245 irment is often not prioritized in the acute physical therapy rehabilitation phase.

246 sted vestibular retraining with conventional physical therapy rehabilitation techniques.

247 clinical trial after 5 years, exercise-based physical therapy remained noninferior to arthroscopic pa

248 cological therapy of ankylosing spondylitis, physical therapy remains an essential part of the manage

249 Among adults with recent-onset LBP, early physical therapy resulted in statistically significant i

250 U and hospital beds, neurologic studies, and physical therapy services.

251 More Protocol patients received at least one physical therapy session than did Usual Care (80% vs. 47

252 ly physical therapy (n = 108) consisted of 4 physical therapy sessions.

253 Physical therapy should therefore be the preferred treat

254 Using analysis of covariance, early physical therapy showed improvement relative to usual ca

255 Treatment consists of orthotics, physical therapy, spasticity reduction treatment and sur

256 ic pain medications, chronic opioid therapy, physical therapy, spinal manipulation, and multidiscipli

257 ropathic pain, opioids, and cannabinoids, to physical therapy strategies and preventive assistive dev

258 Because physical therapies such as continuous passive motion yie

259 me exercise plus text messages plus standard physical therapy (supervised strengthening, functional,

260 impetus for nonpharmacological cognitive and physical therapies that can effectively target the highl

261 ved with combinations of pharmacological and physical therapies that maximize cortical reorganization

262 anism of action of interventions employed in physical therapy that can improve our understanding of h

263 using a mobility protocol initiated earlier physical therapy that was feasible, safe, did not increa

264 Behavioral therapy, including pelvic floor physical therapy, timed voiding (voiding at specific int

265 1.8 degrees ], P =.01), with shorter time in physical therapy to achieve effective joint range of mot

266 Despite the theoretical advantages of physical therapy to address this problem, it has not bee

267 tissue engineering, orthopaedic surgery and physical therapy to improve recovery outcomes following

268 merged as a viable means to relay supervised physical therapy to patients' homes, thereby increasing

269 the important considerations when providing physical therapy to these patients in the ICU setting.

270 lectrical stimulation, pharmacologic agents, physical therapy training programs) may all share a comm

271 arlson Comorbidity Index score, mean days of physical therapy treatment and mechanical ventilation we

272 care unit and the hospital, and mean days of physical therapy treatment associated with hospital leng

273 factors may influence the responsiveness to physical therapy treatment for individuals with knee ost

274 d not provide any additional benefits in the physical therapy treatment of neck disorders.

275 In patients who had at least 7 days of physical therapy treatment prior to hospital discharge (

276 research related to the mode of delivery of physical therapy treatment, and (3) identify characteris

277 baseline these subjects had not responded to physical therapy treatments for at least 6 weeks, and we

278 Formal physical therapy under the supervision of a physical the

279 Physical therapy versus glucocorticoid injection for ost

280 e criteria after step 2 went on to in-person physical therapy visits (step 3).

281 With the exception of physical therapy visits in 1999, patients with RA in man

282 ng facility admissions, primary care visits, physical therapy visits, occupational therapy visits, an

283 Mean change (SD) in FSQ score for physical therapy was +5.2 (5.4) points (95% CI, 3.5-6.9)

284 Mean change (SD) in PPT score for physical therapy was +6.5 (5.5) points (95% confidence i

285 me exercise plus text messages plus standard physical therapy was 2.5 points (98.3% CI, -1.3 to 6.2);

286 me exercise plus text messages plus standard physical therapy was 2.5 points (98.3% CI, -1.4 to 6.5).

287 A course of physical therapy was cost-effective compared with a cour

288 in addition to routine NHS occupational and physical therapy was done at 51 UK NHS acute inpatient s

289 Physical therapy was initiated, with no improvement afte

290 Physical therapy was reported by 84% respondents, with 4

291 Physical therapy was the more cost-effective interventio

292 Physical therapy was universally covered, while only 2 s

293 ystolic blood pressure associated with chest physical therapy were attenuated with the low dose and s

294 Patients' responses to 2 weeks of physical therapy were poor; on average, quadriceps twitc

295 The usual care group received weekday physical therapy when ordered by the clinical team.

296 two shoulders were successfully treated with physical therapy, whereas 28 eventually required surgery

297 Physical therapies with surgical removal and irradiation

298 ), a postural therapy approach that combines physical therapy with building self-efficacy and self-ma

299 We conducted a randomized trial to compare physical therapy with glucocorticoid injection in the pr

300 Observation and physical therapy, with or without bracing, is usually an