ライフサイエンスコーパス: planktonic

1 The ubiquity of planktonic algae throughout the sediment profile suggest

2 nment these symbioses occur with unicellular planktonic algae.

3 diments are thought to originate mainly from planktonic, ammonia-oxidizing Thaumarchaeota, the basis

4 cantly earlier eradication of NTHI from both planktonic and adherent populations in the middle ear, d

5 t selective forces determine survival in the planktonic and benthic life stages, but traits establish

6 Sphenodiscidae) co-occur with well-preserved planktonic and benthic organisms at the type locality of

7 Here we analysed the taxonomic diversity of planktonic and benthic protist communities collected in

8 mpatible basic amino acid L-arginine against planktonic and biofilm bacteria both in vitro and in viv

9 eed, a comparative transcriptome analysis of planktonic and biofilm cells reveals that the biofilm ci

10 ing the Wohl-Aue reaction, that targets both planktonic and biofilm cells.

11 by MexGHI-OpmD in P. aeruginosa strain PA14 planktonic and biofilm cells.

12 ated N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) solution against planktonic and biofilm forms of different multidrug resi

13 to increased lrgAB promoter activity during planktonic and biofilm growth and a change in biofilm mo

14 eudomonas aeruginosa, the transition between planktonic and biofilm lifestyles is modulated by the in

15 cteria is a mechanism to increase fitness in planktonic and biofilm lifestyles.

16 ndida species and filamentous fungi in their planktonic and biofilm phenotype.

17 results demonstrate that targeting both the planktonic and biofilm stages with the pentavalent vacci

18 Assays were performed using planktonic and biofilm-forming cells of Pseudomonas aeru

19 anscriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) analyses of planktonic and biofilm-grown pneumococci showed that met

20 kinetics and efficacy of antibiotics against planktonic and lawn biofilm bacteria.

21 rt term rate of elution and activity against planktonic and lawn biofilms.

22 te to chronic infections, the second type is planktonic and produces the toxins that contribute to ac

23 regulatory player in the transition between planktonic and sedentary biofilm-associated bacterial li

24 and AlgR repress CRISPR-Cas activity during planktonic and surface-associated growth(5).

25 robiological and imaging evaluations on both planktonic and surface-attached bacteria provided new in

26 The natural habitats of planktonic and swimming microorganisms, from algae in th

27 es to quantitatively compare PGs produced in planktonic- and biofilm-cultured Pseudomonas aeruginosa

28 Membrane lipids of marine planktonic archaea have provided unique insights into ar

29 Here we show that membrane lipids of marine planktonic archaea reliably record both the carbon isoto

30 h diversity of metabolism and taxonomy among planktonic archaea.

31 We extend the known inventory of planktonic archaeal lipids to include numerous unsaturat

32 Pa-MAP 1.9 was active against Gram-negative planktonic bacteria and biofilms, without being cytotoxi

33 hibiting agents that target rapidly-dividing planktonic bacteria but not metabolically dormant biofil

34 ulsion compositions were capable of reducing planktonic bacteria by >4 logs and biofilm bacteria by 1

35 SscL is required by planktonic bacteria for S signal chemotaxis.

36 We propose that some free-living planktonic bacteria have traded their ability to stick t

37 ccharide exhibit protective activity against planktonic bacteria in acute infection models.

38 In paper scaffolds, planktonic bacteria migrate through liquid-filled pores,

39 mparison of RNA profile of root attached and planktonic bacteria revealed extensive metabolic adaptat

40 When HA is present, planktonic bacteria survive and colonize AgNP-laden glas

41 Such blooms can trigger secondary blooms of planktonic bacteria that consist of swift successions of

42 rcome these limitations we use the growth of planktonic bacteria to assess the retention time of deep

43 Unlike individual, free-floating planktonic bacteria, biofilms are surface-attached commu

44 hydrophobic cell surface than that of other planktonic bacteria.

45 ) have shown rapid and potent effect against planktonic bacteria.

46 persed bacteria were compared with avirulent planktonic bacteria.

47 a precursor to biofilm formation, only when planktonic bacterial inoculum concentrations are less th

48 Surface ocean waters are dominated by planktonic bacterial lineages with highly reduced genome

49 Current planktonic-based antimicrobial susceptibility testing la

50 fected biofilm production and replication of planktonic BCG, whereas ethR affected only phenotypes li

51 era eDNA down to 30 cm and observed that the planktonic/benthic amplicon ratio changed with depth.

52 film-adapted clones were less resistant than planktonic but more fit in the absence of drug.

53 ylon-3 polymers with potent activity against planktonic C. albicans and excellent C. albicans versus

54 ot, responsible for the great extinctions of planktonic calcifiers and ammonites at the end of the Cr

55 s to quantify the effect of acidification on planktonic calcifying organisms has relied on laboratory

56 e carboys with nitrate or ammonium, tracking planktonic carbon fixation, DOM production, DOM composit

57 udy, we analyzed multicellular-aggregate and planktonic-cell subpopulations that coexist when S. Typh

58 ococcus aureus, achieving 2 log reduction of planktonic cells after 5 days of incubation.

59 tic environments, V. cholerae exists both as planktonic cells and as biofilms, which are held togethe

60 onas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii (planktonic cells and biofilms) when aBL was illuminated

61 e compared the transcriptomes of biofilm and planktonic cells and identified that the gene for sigma(

62 multiscale behavioral dataset of nonadherent planktonic cells and organisms.

63 have growth and colonization advantages over planktonic cells both in vitro and in vivo.

64 Increased type three secretion synthesis in planktonic cells correlated with enhanced invasion of a

65 reas ethR affected only phenotypes linked to planktonic cells despite its downregulation at the inter

66 also reduced its antibiotic activity against planktonic cells due to a reduced cell permeability and

67 r phenotype similar to wild-type biofilm and planktonic cells exposed to the TORC1 pathway inhibitor

68 IAV, febrile-range temperature, or ATP, and planktonic cells grown at 37 degrees C.

69 eristic gene expression of biofilms, whereas planktonic cells had enhanced expression of numerous vir

70 freely diffusible, and so of little value to planktonic cells in aqueous environments.

71 populations has been extensively studied for planktonic cells in well-agitated liquid culture, in whi

72 rom samples derived from biofilm, as well as planktonic cells of the opportunistic human pathogen Pse

73 eslundii, and Lactobacillus acidophilus), in planktonic cells or biofilms.

74 omoters of many biofilm-related genes in the planktonic cells than during biofilm growth, whereas the

75 rmation of microbial biofilms enables single planktonic cells to assume a multicellular mode of growt

76 ilms is a developmental process initiated by planktonic cells transitioning to the surface, which com

77 ved better, and the competitive advantage of planktonic cells was lost.

78 ite and xenotime preferentially occur inside planktonic cells where they preserve spheroidal masses o

79 gically, the enrichment consisted largely of planktonic cells with an average characteristic diameter

80 chromosome replication to the same extent as planktonic cells with obstructed pilus activity.

81 en staining, growth curve and replication of planktonic cells), we found that BCG0642c affected biofi

82 s were more susceptible to phagocytosis than planktonic cells, which corresponded with the decreased

83 but significantly fewer than in response to planktonic cells.

84 37 when compared with results obtained using planktonic cells.

85 ilms and their susceptibility to invasion by planktonic cells.

86 to the level comparable to exponential-phase planktonic cells.

87 more resistant to antibiotics than unadhered planktonic cells.

88 e-deletion mutants cultivated as biofilm and planktonic cells.

89 of a fraction of the biofilm population and planktonic cells.

90 higher antibiotic tolerance than free-living planktonic cells.

91 erties distinct from those of free-floating (planktonic) cells.

92 These planktonic ciliates are not able to attach to the ice.

93 upon S. aureus-P. aeruginosa interactions in planktonic co-culture and mixed species biofilms in vitr

94 Planktonic communities are shaped through a balance of l

95 These results suggest that marine planktonic communities may keep pace with climate change

96 The biogeographic response of oceanic planktonic communities to climatic change has a large in

97 ry production by making N(2) bioavailable to planktonic communities, in the process influencing atmos

98 regions of the oceans and play key roles in planktonic communities.

99 petition is a major force structuring marine planktonic communities.

100 of simultaneous DON additions and warming on planktonic community metabolism in the Baltic Sea, the l

101 By sampling larvae from the planktonic community, less effort is required to obtain

102 pe and DeltaaglB strains, are modified under planktonic conditions in an AglB-dependent manner by the

103 Similar tests were also conducted under planktonic conditions to discern how interspecies compet

104 s under both laboratory and simulated marine planktonic conditions.

105 We sequenced DNA from complex sediment and planktonic consortia from an aquifer adjacent to the Col

106 Daphnia is a major planktonic consumer influencing seasonal plankton dynami

107 ee dimensions the motion of flow tracers and planktonic copepods swimming freely at several intensiti

108 osing potential hazards to organisms such as planktonic crustaceans.

109 egative and Gram-positive wound pathogens in planktonic culture and, crucially, that this activity is

110 Planktonic culture of S. aureus was exposed to antibioti

111 S rRNA gene copies L(-1) in the bioflocs and planktonic culture, respectively.

112 wn in numerous different growth states (e.g. planktonic cultures and highly robust biofilm cultures)

113 nstrating that ME kills >99% of S. mutans in planktonic cultures, 8 enamel slabs were harvested from

114 Compared to eDNA production of planktonic cultures, eDNA production in 5- and 24-h biof

115 the mixture can explain the activity against planktonic cultures, garlic has no activity against biof

116 In planktonic cultures, the regulation of important toxins,

117 ore strongly in response to autoinducer than planktonic cultures.

118 between biofilm and stationary growth-phase planktonic cultures.

119 pb, were upregulated in biofilms compared to planktonic cultures.

120 onstrates that vitamin B12 is synthesized by planktonic cyanobacteria as pseudocobalamin, a form not

121 Marine planktonic cyanobacteria contributed to the widespread o

122 This study shows that marine planktonic cyanobacteria evolved from benthic marine and

123 t of the Proterozoic (2,500-542 Mya), marine planktonic cyanobacteria evolved towards the end of the

124 events that led to the appearance of marine planktonic cyanobacteria.

125 onary steps involved in the origin of marine planktonic cyanobacteria.

126 relative rates of evolution in neustonic and planktonic daphniids.

127 y proxy, established using the signal of the planktonic-derived aerosol methanesulfonic acid, which i

128 exhibited significant changes compared with planktonic-derived PG, including amino acid substitution

129 larval retention in the nearshore region in planktonic-developing species.

130 Within marine gastropods, species with planktonic development had similar average plastic respo

131 w that viral infection of the bloom-forming, planktonic diatom Chaetoceros socialis induces the mass

132 Using the marine planktonic diatom Pseudo-nitzschia multistriata, we inve

133 sira (with 96%-99% identity), a cosmopolitan planktonic diatom.

134 rovide a new estimate of diversity of marine planktonic diatoms at 4,748 operational taxonomic units

135 odel with a multi-generational case study of planktonic disease.

136 therefore potentially favouring species with planktonic-dispersing larva and weakening the strength o

137 For example, species with planktonic-dispersing larvae and deposit-feeding trophic

138 We find that planktonic duration increased with latitude, confirming

139 er, while tropical species have the shortest planktonic durations, realized dispersal distances were

140 driven by moderate current speed and longer planktonic durations.

141 ast currents overwhelmed the effect of short planktonic durations.

142 im that the potential impact of the sympagic planktonic ecosystem on aerosol composition has been ove

143 Those environmental changes may modify the planktonic ecosystem with changes from lower to upper tr

144 , likely reflecting the higher proportion of planktonic eDNA in the DNA burial flux.

145 How this planktonic eDNA is delivered on the seafloor and preserv

146 Our study shows that the planktonic eDNA preserved in marine sediments has the po

147 " hydroperoxides that in the dark inactivate planktonic Escherichia coli (E. coli).

148 edators to decrease, a cascading effect on a planktonic estuarine food web would be seen.

149 potential use of uns-AELs as biomarkers for planktonic Euryarchaeota.

150 gnificance of the near-field flow in shaping planktonic feeding modes, and it suggests that organisms

151 accumulated mercury and methylmercury to the planktonic food chain and finally to fish.

152 bioaccumulation near the base of benthic and planktonic food chains.

153 rue in dynamic coastal marine systems, where planktonic food resources are diffuse and must be either

154 Our initial case has been limited to planktonic foraminfera via Aze & others' important macro

155 Below 10 cm, the relative proportion of planktonic foraminifera amplicons rocketed, likely refle

156 span a range that includes estimates of the planktonic foraminifera and of the warmer half of the be

157 We detected planktonic foraminifera eDNA down to 30 cm and observed

158 s showed a congruent pattern indicating that planktonic foraminifera eDNA is deposited without substa

159 e (delta(11)B) composition of well preserved planktonic foraminifera from the Tanzania Drilling Proje

160 n Mg/Ca ratios in a sub-thermocline dwelling planktonic foraminifera in an Eastern Equatorial Atlanti

161 lcification and may account for the observed planktonic foraminifera shell mass increase during glaci

162 cific sites using measurements of individual planktonic foraminifera shells.

163 Iodine to calcium ratios (I/Ca) in recent planktonic foraminifera suggest that values less than ap

164 T-scans of selected equatorial Pacific Ocean planktonic foraminifera, have revealed that all modern s

165 fossil record of Cenozoic Era macroperforate planktonic foraminifera, we assess the evidence for alte

166 r comparisons of ice-rafted debris and polar planktonic foraminifera--abrupt transitions to stadial c

167 ods, abundant benthic foraminifera, and rare planktonic foraminifera.

168 n equatorial Pacific (EEP) using benthic and planktonic foraminiferal (14)C.

169 The relative proportion of planktonic foraminiferal amplicons remained low from the

170 Here we compile and analyze planktonic foraminiferal size-specific stable carbon and

171 be enhanced in the absence of H3VCTG in the planktonic form of growth resulting in enhanced transcri

172 l hydrocarbons than that by the community of planktonic free-living bacteria.

173 LyeTxI and LyeTxI/betaCD was determined for planktonic Gram-negative periodontopathogens.

174 to tropicalization of the diversity of most planktonic groups in temperate and polar regions.

175 We show a decline of diversity for most planktonic groups toward the poles, mainly driven by dec

176 nsional V. cholerae colonization patterns of planktonic-grown and biofilm-grown cells.

177 are formed, are able to markedly outcompete planktonic-grown cells in the infant mouse.

178 s of biofilm-grown cells differ from that of planktonic-grown cells.

179 t ml1, ml2, ml3 and ml5 are expressed during planktonic growth and in biofilms.

180 roteins expressed in vitro under biofilm and planktonic growth conditions.

181 Although inactive during planktonic growth in urine, T1F expression occurs when U

182 Planktonic growth kinetics and the susceptibility to ant

183 yamine spermidine is not required for normal planktonic growth of Bacillus subtilis but is essential

184 enables biofilm formation and suppresses the planktonic growth of S. elongatus.

185 ables the transition from the biofilm to the planktonic growth state in response to various cues.

186 r to mediate the transition of bacteria from planktonic growth to sessile lifestyle as well as biofil

187 t revealed the influence of HadD(Mtb) on the planktonic growth, colony morphology and biofilm structu

188 ndent activation of LytR was observed during planktonic growth, with acetyl phosphate acting as a pho

189 ibit biofilm formation through inhibition of planktonic growth.

190 A down-core planktonic I/Ca record from south of the Antarctic Polar

191 uted to differences in the cell density, the planktonic inoculum concentration or the surface-area-to

192 n-regulation of reproductive investment in a planktonic key organism causing inappropriately increase

193 Most reef fishes begin life as planktonic larvae before settling to the reef, metamorph

194 ographic connectivity in marine species with planktonic larvae can be surprisingly limited, even in t

195 earshore currents promoting the retention of planktonic larvae in the vicinity of natal sites.

196 ely simple and assumes that the dispersal of planktonic larvae is passive, we find that oceanography

197 plications for the transport and survival of planktonic larvae of marine organisms.

198 particularly interesting system for studying planktonic larval dispersal, as the hydrodynamic regime

199 connectivity due to potential reductions in planktonic larval duration (PLD) associated with ocean w

200 tebrates in the ocean begin their lives with planktonic larval phases that are critical for dispersal

201 ariability due to their high adult motility, planktonic larval stages, and low dependence on benthic

202 ulate the circulation pathways that disperse planktonic life stages.

203 elps V. fischeri transition from a dispersed planktonic lifestyle to a robust aggregate on the surfac

204 In many pathogens, the transition from a planktonic lifestyle to collaborative, sessile biofilms

205 cate that miniaturization and migration to a planktonic lifestyle were secondary.

206 ing distinct virulence pathways, promoting a planktonic lifestyle, reducing cytotoxicity to human epi

207 le cells egress from the biofilm to resume a planktonic lifestyle.

208 acteria switch only intermittently to motile planktonic lifestyles under favorable conditions.

209 titutes one of the most abundant and diverse planktonic lineages [1].

210 contributed to the evolution of unicellular planktonic lineages during the middle of the Mesoprotero

211 ents a potential barrier to the transport of planktonic lionfish eggs and larvae across the Straits o

212 of these compounds exhibit activity against planktonic M. abscessus and M. tuberculosis as well as a

213 y unsteady 3-dimensional system, such as the planktonic marine environment, is a difficult task for n

214 In contrast to biogeographical patterns of planktonic marine microbial communities, host traits eme

215 w ecosystem properties affect variability in planktonic MeHg concentrations, we develop a model for M

216 e structure, function, and biodiversity of a planktonic metacommunity was altered after five years of

217 In this study, we investigated the planktonic MGII associated with particles and in free-li

218 Planktonic microbial communities in the ocean are typica

219 sed biotic interactions are ubiquitous among planktonic microbial communities worldwide.

220 In marine systems, planktonic microbial community structure is mainly drive

221 these traits in mediating the responses of a planktonic microbial community to nutrient enrichment in

222 ted these with a metagenomic analysis of the planktonic microbial community.

223 iurnally oscillating behaviors among diverse planktonic microbial species regardless of habitat, sugg

224 We propose that marine planktonic microeukaryote assemblages incorporate dynami

225 rsity from a global perspective, focusing on planktonic microorganisms.

226 re effective in suppressing E. coli in these planktonic mixed cultures, even though PEf1 reached high

227 ngle yeast cells and hyphal filaments in the planktonic mode of growth.

228 perse from the biofilm and transition to the planktonic mode of growth.

229 effect on bacterial growth was tested using planktonic monocultures and multibacterial biofilms.

230 The swimming speeds of planktonic mutant MotAB-driven cells was reduced, and ov

231 a domesticator-domesticate relationship with planktonic mysid shrimps (Mysidium integrum).

232 Herein, planktonic Nitrospira spp. cultures closely related to C

233 Here we show that upon encounter with planktonic (non-biofilm) C. glabrata, human neutrophils

234 y colonize a host, lactobacilli appear to be planktonic, opportunistic settlers that can gather and m

235 he greatest antimicrobial efficacies against planktonic or biofilm bacteria.

236 ions, as biocidal formulations against both planktonic or biofilm bacteria.

237 cells regardless of whether the cells are in planktonic or biofilm growth mode.

238 Facilitation of electron transfer from the planktonic organism to the anode by endogenous redox-act

239 ecosystems more than 75% of individual macro-planktonic organisms are categorized as able to emit lig

240 ly increased expression of the nuclease from planktonic organisms compared to those in the biofilm ph

241 Less attention has been given to EET by planktonic organisms in oxic environments where extracel

242 onds and lakes, which are being colonized by planktonic organisms such as the water flea Daphnia.

243 The ocean is home to myriad small planktonic organisms that underpin the functioning of ma

244 st of the ocean heat, but also nutrients and planktonic organisms toward the Arctic Ocean.

245 Interactions among microscopic planktonic organisms underpin the functioning of open oc

246 ive oxygen species (ROS) when presented with planktonic organisms, and pharmacologic inhibition of NA

247 etely blocks NET release to both biofilm and planktonic organisms.

248 dominant sheath-water bacteria confirm their planktonic origin, whilst proteomic analyses of the shea

249 anaerobiosis-induced alginate production by planktonic PAO1 requires the diguanylate cyclase (DGC) S

250 when infected with biofilm-grown rather than planktonic PAO1; Scnn1b-Tg mice also cleared infections

251 re spatially distributed between biofilm and planktonic phases of the reactor.

252 ds to separation of UPEC into low-expression planktonic populations and high-expression sessile popul

253 Planktonic populations experienced selective sweeps of m

254 ce mechanisms are shared between biofilm and planktonic populations.

255 ibiotics was required to eradicate remaining planktonic populations.

256 ic respiration rates faster than it will for planktonic primary production.

257 one to avoid interrupting a key link between planktonic production and top predators.

258 Unicellular, planktonic, prokaryotic and eukaryotic photoautotrophs (

259 Marine planktonic protists are critical components of ocean eco

260 Although planktonic protozoans are likely to interact with disper

261 The thecosomes are a group of planktonic pteropods with thin, 1 mm-sized aragonitic sh

262 velopment, and by comparing them to multiple planktonic reference states, we identify patterns of gen

263 e atoll, with predatory fishes showing equal planktonic reliance between inner and outer edge reefs.

264 that warming of the Baltic Sea will enhance planktonic respiration rates faster than it will for pla

265 were generated by tongue biofilm compared to planktonic salivary bacteria.

266 microbial community dynamics and function in planktonic samples collected along an approximately 700

267 ed between samples within a sink (biofilm vs planktonic samples) and between sink types (HCP vs. PR).

268 d 18S rRNA gene sequences, recovered from 29 planktonic shotgun metagenomic datasets.

269 s and have properties distinct from those of planktonic, single-celled bacteria.

270 es on the spatial distribution of non-motile planktonic species and particulate drifters.

271 years of weekly samples encompassing c. 250 planktonic species from three trophic levels, sampled in

272 sess the robustness of projections of marine planktonic species under climate change.

273 , aggregated bacteria than for fast-growing, planktonic species.

274 Therefore, DVU2956 maintains SRB in the planktonic state and reduces H(2) S formation.

275 ed cell viability under fluoride in both the planktonic state and single-/dual-species biofilms.

276 As the planktonic state is considered to be more vulnerable to

277 vidual behavior and exist in the free-living planktonic state or to engage in collective behavior and

278 yochloris marina shifts its lifestyle from a planktonic state under white light to an immobilized sta

279 are in the form of biofilms rather than the planktonic state, and at concentrations of physiologic r

280 ible to antibiotics than are bacteria in the planktonic state, biofilm-associated infections pose a m

281 e predicted(5) collapse of northern Atlantic planktonic stocks in response to a weakened Atlantic Mer

282 nty-first century, the long-term response of planktonic stocks to climate forcing is unknown.

283 imum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in all planktonic strains.

284 Many planktonic suspension feeders are attached to particles

285 ation of the EET processes operating in this planktonic system assists in understanding the means and

286 ealed large amounts of sequences assigned to planktonic taxa.

287 In similar planktonic tests with more competing soil bacteria speci

288 ther bacteria, including the transition from planktonic to biofilm growth.

289 ions in bacteria, including transitions from planktonic to biofilm lifestyles, virulence, motility, a

290 The phenotypic transition from a planktonic to biofilm state is regulated by the activity

291 were able to map critical nodes that govern planktonic to biofilm transition and identify 8 new regu

292 acidic pH experienced during the shift from planktonic to host-associated lifestyles.

293 ral reef-fishes, the movement of larvae from planktonic to reef environments (recruitment) represents

294 nt role in regulating the transition between planktonic to sessile cell states as a response to stres

295 sa biofilms, by enabling the switch from the planktonic to the biofilm mode of growth and by facilita

296 development by enabling the switch from the planktonic to the biofilm mode of growth, and by facilit

297 signaling to change gene expression from the planktonic to the biofilm phenotype.

298 eralding the first appearance of both marine planktonic unicellular nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria and

299 In this study, a planktonic upregulated antigen was combined with the qua

300 PNAG was present in both pellicle and planktonic wild-type B. subtilis cells and in strains wi