ライフサイエンスコーパス: plant DNA

1 in a sample in comparison to the endogenous plant DNA.

2 o the cell nucleus and integrate it into the plant DNA.

3 C5DNA methyltransferase homologs in various plant DNAs.

4 Iron increases ferritin synthesis, targeting plant DNA and animal mRNA.

5 relies on plant transformation to manipulate plant DNA and gene expression for novel product biosynth

6 Using the plant DNA barcode markers rbcL and matK, we have assembl

7 nger sequencing to generate large amounts of plant DNA barcodes and build more comprehensive barcode

8 papaya, Zea mays and Capsicum annuum) using plant DNA barcodes trnL and psbA-trnH.

9 Using plant DNA barcoding regions (trnL and rpoC) coupled with

10 This prompted us to use plant DNA barcoding to identify plants that field-caught

11 uidic Enrichment Barcoding (MEBarcoding) for plant DNA Barcoding, a cost-effective method for high-th

12 s a protein with similarity to mammalian and plant DNA binding proteins.

13 Currently, the Plant DNA C-values database (Release 6.0, Dec. 2012) con

14 Currently, the Plant DNA C-values database contains data for 8510 speci

15 e been recently updated and/or extended: the Plant DNA C-values database, and GSAD, the Genome Size i

16 This study aimed to investigate whether the plant DNA damage levels and DNA damage response (DDR) ar

17 into both the physiological significance of plant DNA damage responses and the mechanisms which main

18 In plants, DNA damage accumulated in the embryo of seeds is

19 However, it is unclear whether plant DNA demethylases can promote the transposition of

20 d a copy of hsp26 (marked with a fragment of plant DNA designated pt), we have identified domains tha

21 ation, they may function in the recycling of plant DNA during late stages of PCD when the integrity o

22 r an entire guild of insect herbivores using plant DNA extracted from insect gut contents.

23 we captured homologous sequences of vascular plant DNA extracted from reservoir sediments by using a

24 Plant DNA flanking the insertion site was cloned and use

25 cing technologies now permit the analyses of plant DNA from fossil samples (ancient plant DNA, plant

26 po and pattern of mitochondrial gene loss in plants, DNAs from 280 genera of flowering plants were su

27 ant beta-tubulin gene family as a target for plant DNA identification.

28 nt dynamic interplay between geminivirus and plant DNA in evolution.

29 al soil horizons provides a higher amount of plant DNA in lake sediments than deep horizons, bare soi

30 mutant Arabidopsis and rice, analyzed T-DNA/plant DNA junction sequences, and (for Arabidopsis) meas

31 T-DNA/plant DNA junctions from these transformed rice and Arab

32 in the Arabidopsis genome by analyzing T-DNA/plant DNA junctions generated under non-selective condit

33 We introduce PlantCaduceus, a plant DNA LM that learns evolutionary conservation patte

34 and their causes, as determined from ancient plant DNA metabarcoding in sediment cores (sedaDNA) from

35 of their adaptation are key to understanding plant DNA methylation and the divergent evolution of pol

36 In plants, DNA methylation is prevalent not only in a CG di

37 In plants, DNA methylation patterns are faithfully inherite

38 In plants, DNA methylation widely occurs in the CG, CHG, an

39 In plants, DNA methylation, histone modifications, and RNA

40 Plant DNA methyltransferase 1 (MET1) is responsible for

41 INS REARRANGED METHYLTRANSFERASE 2 (DRM2), a plant DNA methyltransferase responsible for establishing

42 raveling complex sugar signaling networks in plants, DNA microarray analysis was used to determine th

43 es of plant DNA from fossil samples (ancient plant DNA, plant aDNA), and thus enable the molecular re

44 We summarize our understanding of long-term plant DNA preservation and the characteristics of degrad

45 pe RFP sequence, implying the involvement of plant DNA repair machinery.

46 ess, established a specific role for TAF1 in plant DNA repair processes.

47 ng plants will be useful tools in dissecting plant DNA repair processes.

48 e critical role of their N-terminal tails in plant DNA repair.

49 Plant DNA-repair machinery predominantly uses non-homolo

50 Based on these observations, initiation of plant DNA replication shows some similarity to, but is a

51 In fbl17 mutant plants, DNA replication is severely impaired and endorep

52 The sensor was tested using real animal and plant DNA samples in which the hydrolysis of T and C cou

53 The resulting transgenic locus may have plant DNA separating the transgenic sequences.

54 In a sample of 40 G. tabacina plants, DNA sequence variation at one homoeologous histo

55 However, plant DNA sequences that encode proteins with similarity

56 ctors (ZFP TFs) that minimize the use of non-plant DNA sequences.

57 effects' by, or 'readthrough' from, flanking plant DNA sequences.

58 d the possibility that non-target reads from plant DNA sequencing can serve as phenotyping proxies fo

59 The method relies on the fact that plant DNA should not be present in readily detectable am

60 See1 is required for the reactivation of plant DNA synthesis, which is crucial for tumor progress

61 In this study, a plant DNA virus was used to explore the constraints impo

62 substitution rates, the first reported for a plant DNA virus, are in line with those estimated previo

63 The plant DNA viruses also exhibit diversity, but the source

64 In this article, features of plant DNA viruses are discussed in relation to gene sile

65 explanation for why relatively few types of plant DNA viruses have evolved: they would have had to o

66 Plant DNA viruses-- both the ssDNA geminiviruses and the

67 ng Epstein-Barr virus, as well as animal and plant DNA, which may have derived from a recent meal.