ライフサイエンスコーパス: plant disease

1 to predicting effector targets important in plant disease.

2 Fungi are major causes of human, animal and plant disease.

3 rganism to understand the molecular basis of plant disease.

4 this class of virulence-related proteases in plant disease.

5 plays a pivotal role in the establishment of plant disease.

6 not been critically linked to resistance to plant disease.

7 cantly helped our understanding of bacterial plant disease.

8 ssisting breeders in improving resistance to plant disease.

9 ecreased use of most compounds used to treat plant disease.

10 the infection and epidemiological facets of plant disease.

11 mportant virulence determinant in animal and plant disease.

12 omycin production and the other resulting in plant disease.

13 ology as a science is to address problems of plant disease.

14 significantly modify the expression of host plant disease.

15 pment of novel strategies for the control of plant disease.

16 ncepts that promise to be useful in managing plant disease.

17 cases, are responsible for the induction of plant diseases.

18 plant pathogens that cause many devastating plant diseases.

19 ls for studying effects of climate change on plant diseases.

20 a unique niche for the biological control of plant diseases.

21 tions on seeds important in the emergence of plant diseases.

22 ced community responses in tackling emerging plant diseases.

23 ible plant species to control important crop plant diseases.

24 ractical guidance for responding to emerging plant diseases.

25 ain how this element reduced the severity of plant diseases.

26 for biomass deconstruction and biocontrol of plant diseases.

27 is also involved in a significant number of plant diseases.

28 e may be welcome additions for mitigation of plant diseases.

29 otoxins that can act as virulence factors in plant diseases.

30 s and developing new methods for controlling plant diseases.

31 nfluences the incidence and severity of many plant diseases.

32 ng developed as biological agents to control plant diseases.

33 ghts the importance of fungal endophytes for plant disease across a broad range of plant pathosystems

34 rsal of fungal spores by the wind can spread plant diseases across and even between continents and re

35 ytopathological aspects of remote sensing of plant diseases across different scales and for various p

36 etween farms can, for vertically-transmitted plant diseases, act as a significant force for dispersal

37 in plants and humans, as well as to control plant diseases, affords a rare opportunity to explore tr

38 segmentation algorithm, was used to measure plant disease after TCV inoculation.

39 sis on their implications for and effects on plant disease and disease management strategies, are sum

40 mportant commodities that are susceptible to plant disease and have been implicated in foodborne dise

41 ope, pioneered biological control of a major plant disease and introduced the term "biological contro

42 se of microbial biocontrol agents to control plant disease and no indication of an increase.

43 infection, suggesting an association between plant disease and prophage transcriptional modulation.

44 cal activities, including the suppression of plant disease and the ability to inhibit prokaryotic and

45 as an environmentally safe method to manage plant disease and to prevent frost damage.

46 Bcc have been used in biological control of plant diseases and bioremediation, while some strains ar

47 Diverse and rapidly evolving pathogens cause plant diseases and epidemics that threaten crop yield an

48 micals could help in early identification of plant diseases and has huge significance for agricultura

49 first described for its capacity to suppress plant diseases and has since been shown to be lethal to

50 th biochar-elicited suppression of soilborne plant diseases and improved plant performance are not we

51 Outbreaks of emerging plant diseases and insect pests are increasing at an ala

52 ens are of utmost importance for controlling plant diseases and mitigating the economic losses they i

53 abilities to enhance systemic resistance to plant diseases and overall plant growth.

54 Bacterial pathogens can cause multiple plant diseases and plants rely on their innate immune sy

55 arly as they apply to the spatial pattern of plant disease, and highlight some new results that empha

56 Weather affects the severity of many plant diseases, and climate change is likely to alter th

57 l growth, provide protection against various plant diseases, and interact with beneficial soil microb

58 the role of mixed phytoplasmal infections in plant diseases, and molecular/genetic phenomena that und

59 Pseudomonas syringae causes plant diseases, and the main virulence mechanism is a ty

60 uding reduced crop yields and an increase in plant diseases; and mental health disorders, such as pos

61 The origins of many plant diseases appear to be recent and associated with t

62 Epidemics of soil-borne plant disease are characterized by patchiness because of

63 Infectious plant diseases are caused by pathogenic microorganisms s

64 or facilitated my development in research on plant diseases are mentioned.

65 Plant diseases are responsible for substantial crop loss

66 Hypersensitive reactions to plant diseases are typically mediated by R genes.

67 Plant disease arises from the interaction of processes o

68 rally resolved dataset for the invasion of a plant disease, Asiatic citrus canker in urban Miami.

69 tersoaking (ptw) on onion tissue, which is a plant disease-associated trait.

70 ction, identification, and quantification of plant diseases by sensor techniques are expected to enab

71 ibute to the biological control of soilborne plant diseases by some strains of Pseudomonas fluorescen

72 During the past decade, the plant disease called scab or Fusarium head blight of whe

73 Research on invasive plant diseases can both protect crops and help manage in

74 Wildlife and plant diseases can reduce biodiversity, disrupt ecosyste

75 Auxin signaling is also known to promote plant disease caused by plant pathogens.

76 tly face the challenge of emerging human and plant diseases caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi, and o

77 promising natural product for the control of plant diseases caused by diverse Proteobacteria.

78 ontrol citrus greening and other devastating plant diseases caused by fastidious pathogens is our ina

79 and are also highly effective in controlling plant diseases caused by nematodes and fungi.

80 Plant diseases caused by pathogens and pests are a const

81 ized as important marker chemicals to detect plant diseases caused by pathogens.

82 Plant disease ( Citrus tristeza virus (CTV)) diagnostics

83 Research in the effects of climate change on plant disease continues to be limited, but some striking

84 ogens are a serious problem for seed export, plant disease control and plant quarantine.

85 Treatment for plant disease control comprised four spraying programs,

86 termine the effect of direct transmission on plant disease control directed against indirect transmis

87 These peptides have also been implicated in plant disease control for replacing conventional treatme

88 Plant disease cycles represent pathogen biology as a ser

89 which cause many of the world's most serious plant diseases, deliver proteins during plant infection

90 r other detection tasks in agriculture (e.g. plant disease detection) and beyond.

91 odel can be potentially transferred to other plant diseases detection applications.

92 al virulence proteins that are important for plant disease development have remained obscure.

93 ive compost provides an environment in which plant disease development is reduced, even in the presen

94 usarium species and has been associated with plant disease development, although its role is still no

95 Environmental conditions profoundly affect plant disease development; however, the underlying molec

96 Accurate plant disease diagnoses and rapid detection and identifi

97 Plant disease diagnostic networks have developed worldwi

98 xisting models for the fungicidal control of plant diseases do not explicitly include the dynamics of

99 ve and propagative manner and cause damaging plant diseases (e.g. Zebra chip in potatoes).

100 This finding raises new questions about plant disease ecology and plant biodiversity, and has ap

101 provides useful tools for phytopathology and plant disease ecology because the traits of both plants

102 usage, this nanotechnology could control the plant disease economically, more significantly, the foll

103 The study of plant disease epidemics at a landscape scale can be exte

104 Plant disease epidemics resulting from introductions of

105 s finding and the effect on human as well as plant disease epidemics.

106 s under future climate with implications for plant disease epidemiology and crop production.

107 nd scale, which are of central importance in plant disease epidemiology and the analysis of spatial p

108 ter understanding of fungal spore dispersal, plant disease epidemiology, and allergy.

109 s of particular importance for understanding plant disease epidemiology.

110 sample-in-result-out" diagnosis of human and plant diseases, especially in remote or resource-limited

111 Catastrophic plant disease exacerbates the current deficit of food su

112 ity of yet unrecognized targets important in plant disease, expanding the search space for off-target

113 , the bacterial pathogen responsible for the plant disease fire blight.

114 present a general epidemiological model for plant diseases, formulated to study the evolution of phe

115 Strategies to manage plant disease-from use of resistant varieties to crop ro

116 Controlling plant disease has been a struggle for humankind since th

117 Models of plant disease have now been developed to incorporate mor

118 Plant diseases have a global economic impact through the

119 actors enabling microbial pathogens to cause plant diseases have been sought with increasing efficacy

120 Vector-borne plant diseases have significant ecological and economic

121 em ecologists are now addressing the role of plant disease in ecosystem processes and the challenge o

122 ction is important as first step to manage a plant disease in greenhouses, field conditions and at th

123 Tomato spotted wilt virus is a wide-spread plant disease in the world.

124 growing body of literature on the effects of plant diseases in natural ecosystems.

125 , causes Pierce's disease of grape and other plant diseases in numerous plant species, including impo

126 ere published in the past 20 years comparing plant diseases in organic and conventional crops.

127 n biological control organisms and levels of plant diseases in overgrazed grasslands in northwestern

128 hed the first book written on the subject of plant diseases in the United States, and described a new

129 lying this tradeoff may be relevant for many plant diseases in which the amount of host resources ava

130 ont bacterial species that cause destructive plant diseases, including Huanglongbing in citrus and ze

131 cts more than 400 plant species and causes a plant disease known as white mold that produces signific

132 eptible, toxic A. inebrians can help control plant disease levels in overgrazed grasslands.

133 f these dispersal scales to assist in making plant disease management decisions, such as the timely a

134 ther studies on the development of effective plant disease management strategies.

135 individual crop insect, weed, nematode, and plant disease management.

136 la fastidiosa is the causal agent of several plant diseases, most notably Pierce's disease of grape a

137 nt in many areas, and his interests included plant diseases, mycology, forest insects, white pine bli

138 ytokinin-mediated regulatory interactions in plant disease networks.

139 Scab is an economically devastating plant disease, not only because it causes significant re

140 y be related to the acidification and severe plant disease of degraded soils.

141 Oomycetes cause devastating plant diseases of global importance, yet little is known

142 weapons by reviewing the costs and impact of plant diseases on crops, pointing out the difficulty in

143 For instance, many bacterial plant disease outbreaks occur after periods of high humi

144 To cause plant disease, pathogenic fungi can secrete effector pro

145 To cause plant diseases, pathogenic micro-organisms secrete effec

146 tance of adopting a multipronged approach to plant disease phenotyping to more fully understand the r

147 -care (POC) molecular diagnosis of human and plant diseases play an increasingly crucial role.

148 s, which can effectively visualize potential plant disease positions, and keep experts' attention on

149 of the disease cycle form the basis of many plant disease prediction models.

150 ion serve as the basis for most contemporary plant disease prediction systems.

151 I became involved in researching a number of plant disease problems and solving a few.

152 tructure of Xa21 represents a novel class of plant disease R genes encoding a putative receptor kinas

153 We further predict 82 plant disease-related transcripts that may also response

154 Effective control of plant disease remains a key challenge.

155 ecognized, either directly or indirectly, by plant disease resistance (R) gene products.

156 Plant disease resistance (R) genes confer an ability to

157 Plant disease resistance (R) genes confer race-specific

158 Plant disease resistance (R) genes control the recogniti

159 Many plant disease resistance (R) genes encode proteins predi

160 The majority of plant disease resistance (R) genes encode proteins that

161 The molecular nature of many plant disease resistance (R) genes is known; the largest

162 Durability of plant disease resistance (R) genes may be predicted if t

163 Plant disease resistance (R) genes mediate specific path

164 Plant disease resistance (R) genes that mediate recognit

165 Plant disease resistance (R) genes trigger innate immune

166 The first plant disease resistance (R) genes were identified and c

167 Active resistance to viruses is afforded by plant disease resistance (R) genes, which encode protein

168 associated with immunity is triggered when a plant disease resistance (R) protein recognizes a corres

169 similarities with the NBD-LRR superfamily of plant disease resistance (R) proteins and are predicted

170 Little is known of how plant disease resistance (R) proteins recognize pathogen

171 Plant disease resistance (R) proteins recognize potentia

172 r-triggered immunity (ETI) is activated when plant disease resistance (R) proteins recognize the pres

173 Pathogen recognition is often mediated by plant disease resistance (R) proteins that respond speci

174 bclass of RING E3 ligases that contribute to plant disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance th

175 cently demonstrated roles of mitochondria in plant disease resistance and animal apoptosis, this rapi

176 fy the impact of cruciferous phytoalexins on plant disease resistance and human health.

177 ggest that CPN1 may represent a link between plant disease resistance and plant acclimation to low-hu

178 s of signal transduction pathways leading to plant disease resistance and the accompanying hypersensi

179 ctions has focused on the molecular basis of plant disease resistance and the role of secreted effect

180 f WIPK expression and the role(s) of WIPK in plant disease resistance are unknown.

181 . a putative probenazole inducible protein), plant disease resistance as well as enzymes involved in

182 onal functions for NRT2.1 that may influence plant disease resistance by down-regulating biotic stres

183 f hypersensitive cell death and induction of plant disease resistance by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tom

184 ases (MAPKs or MPKs), play critical roles in plant disease resistance by regulating multiple defense

185 Plant disease resistance can be conferred by constitutiv

186 gene that encodes a protein with homology to plant disease resistance gene products is located in the

187 Plant disease resistance genes (R genes) are key compone

188 Plant disease resistance genes (R genes) encode proteins

189 It has been proposed that cloned plant disease resistance genes could be transferred from

190 The repetitive nature of plant disease resistance genes encoding for nucleotide-b

191 Plant disease resistance genes have been shown to be sub

192 nce genes RPS2 and RPM1 belong to a class of plant disease resistance genes that encode proteins that

193 e repeats found in animal hormone receptors, plant disease resistance genes, and genes involved in un

194 Like many other plant disease resistance genes, Arabidopsis thaliana RPS

195 nce similarities between 2 markers and known plant disease resistance genes, indicating that a resist

196 The diversity of the largest group of plant disease resistance genes, the nucleotide binding s

197 sequences of the mammalian IL-1 receptor and plant disease resistance genes.

198 de binding site-leucine rich repeat class of plant disease resistance genes.

199 4, Nod1, Nod2, and the cytosolic products of plant disease resistance genes.

200 l common themes have shaped the evolution of plant disease resistance genes.

201 es were identified with similarity to cloned plant disease resistance genes.

202 These motifs are characteristic of plant disease resistance genes.

203 Plant disease resistance governed by quantitative trait

204 A central challenge in the study of plant disease resistance has been to identify protein co

205 -transduction components that play a role in plant disease resistance have revealed remarkable simila

206 th is associated with the development of the plant disease resistance hypersensitive reaction (HR).

207 Understanding the fundamental mechanisms of plant disease resistance is of central importance to sus

208 Plant disease resistance is often conferred by genes wit

209 an unusual structure encoding three typical plant disease resistance protein domains: nucleotide-bin

210 riggered by the physical interaction between plant disease resistance protein, Pto, and the pathogen

211 of Arabidopsis thaliana expressing the RPS2 plant disease resistance protein.

212 e of the two large families of homologues of plant disease resistance proteins (R proteins) in Arabid

213 these effectors trigger innate immunity via plant disease resistance proteins as described by the "g

214 these virulence factors can be monitored by plant disease resistance proteins deployed to "guard" th

215 e-rich repeats (LRR) similar in structure to plant disease resistance proteins have been suggested as

216 tween pathogen avirulence (Avr) proteins and plant disease resistance proteins is the exception rathe

217 es (animal apoptosis regulators CED4/Apaf-1, plant disease resistance proteins, and bacterial AfsR-li

218 now provide compelling evidence that certain plant disease resistance proteins, which detect specific

219 he apoptosis regulator Apaf-1 and a class of plant disease resistance proteins.

220 novel role for a RanGAP in the function of a plant disease resistance response.

221 s are consistent with CPN1 playing a role in plant disease resistance responses, possibly as a suppre

222 Whereas the genetic requirement for NDR1 in plant disease resistance signaling has been detailed, ou

223 identified recently as a factor involved in plant disease resistance signaling, and SGT1 from barley

224 Plant disease resistance that is durable and effective a

225 may contribute both to the establishment of plant disease resistance, and to the development of cell

226 of processes including endoreduplication and plant disease resistance, but the molecular mechanism un

227 concluded that WIPK plays a positive role in plant disease resistance, possibly through accelerating

228 ive of food security, including its roles in plant disease resistance, stress tolerance, and crop yie

229 ular mechanisms underlying MAPK functions in plant disease resistance.

230 ibly other signaling molecules in regulating plant disease resistance.

231 to genes previously shown to be involved in plant disease resistance.

232 for MEKK1 kinase activity in this aspect of plant disease resistance.

233 lved in lipid metabolism and modification in plant disease resistance.

234 es thioredoxin activity in the regulation of plant disease resistance.

235 n ligase complexes and is also implicated in plant disease resistance.

236 rsensitive response to pathogen infection in plant disease resistance.

237 nd cooperative functions of SGT1 and RAR1 in plant disease resistance.

238 s now a feasible strategy for enhancement of plant disease resistance.

239 dependent and EDS1-independent components of plant disease resistance.

240 g of signal transduction pathway involved in plant disease resistance.

241 response (HR) is frequently associated with plant disease resistance.

242 , important cues during the establishment of plant disease resistance.

243 ed cell death, is frequently associated with plant disease resistance.

244 on in resistance (R) gene-mediated and basal plant disease resistance.

245 R1 gene is a positive regulator of inducible plant disease resistance.

246 mechanisms resulting in the establishment of plant disease resistance.

247 licylic acid (SA) plays an important role in plant disease resistance.

248 e (HR) is a central feature of gene-for-gene plant disease resistance.

249 hat are thought to have an important role in plant disease resistance.

250 the functional role(s) of occlusions in host plant disease resistance/susceptibility remains controve

251 Plant-disease resistance (R) genes mediate the specific

252 In plants, disease resistance is often conferred by nucleot

253 In plants, disease resistance mediated by the gene-for-gene

254 te blocks cleavage and inhibits autophagy in plants; disease resistance is also compromised.

255 BD)-leucine-rich repeat (LRR) superfamily of plant disease-resistance (R) proteins and are emerging a

256 Plant disease-resistance (R) proteins are thought to fun

257 olic proteins, termed NODs, with homology to plant disease-resistance gene products has been implicat

258 tein kinase domains, a novel structure for a plant disease-resistance gene.

259 Breeding programs based on plant disease-resistance genes are being optimized by in

260 s in the cloning and sequencing of clustered plant disease-resistance genes are providing information

261 4 family of apoptosis regulators and certain plant disease-resistance genes.

262 hich are differentially required for diverse plant disease-resistance pathways.

263 terleukin 1 receptors and MyD88 factors, and plant disease-resistance proteins recognizes a parallel

264 tor of gene expression during the onset of a plant disease-resistance response known as systemic acqu

265 Recent studies suggest that plant disease-resistance responses use multiple signalin

266 which ultimately activate one or more of the plant disease-resistance responses.

267 Nod1 and Nod2 are mammalian counterparts of plant disease-resistant gene products that may function

268 tosis regulators Apaf-1/Ced-4 and a class of plant disease-resistant gene products.

269 As it was reported for plant disease-resistant R proteins, the leucine-rich rep

270 (Zm-stm1), and three to a gene implicated in plant disease responses (Zm-hir1, Zm-hir2, and Zm-hir3).

271 And (4) Fungal endophyte effects on plant disease severity are context-dependent.

272 i (i.e. endophytes and epiphytes) can modify plant disease severity in controlled experiments.

273 g the biotic environmental factors affecting plant disease severity.

274 rse group of fungal endophytes can influence plant disease severity.

275 a, including those involved in biocontrol of plant diseases, significantly inhibit attachment and pla

276 gent themes: (1) Fungal endophyte effects on plant disease span the full spectrum from pathogen antag

277 are urgently required to protect and prevent plant diseases spreading worldwide.

278 Despite much research on biocontrol of plant diseases, success in field crops has been limited

279 Plant disease suppression is the direct result of the ac

280 mpounds from Xenorhabdus spp. can be used in plant disease suppression.

281 te immunity in plants, resulting in enhanced plant disease susceptibility.

282 Plant disease symptoms exhibit complex spatial and tempo

283 Virus infections are the cause of numerous plant disease syndromes that are generally characterized

284 Existing models of human, animal and plant disease that do incorporate participation or compl

285 Scab is an economically devastating plant disease that greatly limits grain yield and qualit

286 trade has given rise to emerging infectious plant diseases that add further insecurity and pressure.

287 Xylella fastidiosa is the causal agent of plant diseases that cause massive economic damage.

288 ia are most prominent among bacteria causing plant diseases that result in a diminution of the quanti

289 fic understanding of plant pathogens and the plant diseases they cause.

290 l level, there is a need to acknowledge that plant diseases threaten our food supplies and to devote

291 t crops is the most effective way to control plant diseases to safeguard food and feed production.

292 riculture with a focus on toxicity concerns, plant disease treatment, and genetic engineering.

293 adication of localised outbreaks of invading plant disease, using citrus canker in Florida as a case

294 tualistic root microbiota can also influence plant disease via iron.

295 His book on plant diseases was one of the first to be published in E

296 that of prior models for vector-transmitted plant diseases where the entire plant is the unit of ana

297 defect in alginate biosynthesis resulted in plant disease with >3-fold more bacteria per plant, sugg

298 Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a plant disease with serious economic and health impacts.

299 ew biosensing systems for early detection of plant diseases with high sensitivity and specificity at

300 l blast disease, one of the most destructive plant diseases worldwide.