戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ng about 40 days after sowing (20 days after planting).
2 ships among irrigated SoGS, weather and crop planting.
3 g less sensitive to high temperatures during planting.
4 f most rapid growth or around 20 years after planting.
5 eds are often treated with pesticides before planting.
6 ine maize (Zea mays) genotypes 8 weeks after planting.
7 and opportunities to be considered with tree planting.
8 ops that will self-destruct near the time of planting.
9 ey were inoculated onto seeds at the time of planting.
10  of growth and leaf elongation by 21 d after planting.
11 nappropriate restoration in the form of tree planting.
12 vior-several interventions even reduced tree planting.
13 ent shade-induced ESE and allow high-density planting.
14  within the biomass compared to monospecific planting.
15 xamine the drivers and impacts of salt marsh planting.
16 age which occurs approximately 6 weeks after planting.
17 ive climate change mitigation through forest planting.
18  predict the increase in carbon stocks after planting.
19 itions during the first growing season after planting.
20 n net ecosystem C stock 12 or 39 years after planting.
21 ets, FMNR needs to be complemented with tree planting.
22 imate change mitigation associated with tree planting.
23  in predicting streamflow response to forest planting.
24 des by ingestion of coated seeds during crop planting.
25 26.8% higher than it was with INF applied at planting.
26 ds from fungus, insects, and nematodes after planting.
27 ack in polyculture compared with monoculture plantings.
28 economic advantages by enabling high density plantings.
29 ferent between apple orchards and the floral plantings.
30 tly captured in the orchards than the floral plantings.
31 me horizons at planting (P), one month after planting (1MAP), and after harvesting (H) under corn (Ze
32 arex stricta, or Panicum virgatum); or mixed plantings [2 mixtures: partial (monocots only) or a comp
33 aximum concentrations occurring 4 weeks post-planting (3370 ng L(-1)).
34 e 75,478.60 tons of CO(2), the equivalent of planting 348,754 teak trees.
35         The banker plant system consisted of planting a grass species, Leersia sayanuka, adjacent to
36 ion in growth responses to nonlocal soils by planting a widespread grass of deciduous forests (Milium
37 hed concentrations in dust from treated seed planting activities.
38  inverse correlation existed between Bt corn planting and aflatoxin-related insurance claims in the U
39 Phaeozem, Cambisols and Acrisol) under maize planting and bare fallow regimes located in cold tempera
40 ties with enhanced tolerance to high-density planting and environmental stresses.
41  can be abraded from the seed coating during planting and expelled into the environment, damaging non
42 nting windows, and, subsequently, inaccurate planting and harvest scheduling can result in inconsiste
43  proposed methods, which can provide optimal planting and harvest scheduling considering deterministi
44                                         Corn planting and harvest scheduling is challenging because c
45                  Daily GDUs are required for planting and harvest scheduling, but they are unknown at
46  these two sites, and were asked to schedule planting and harvesting dates of corn hybrids under two
47 ons, such as exposure to antibiotics or crop planting and harvesting.
48  across environments can encourage efficient planting and maintenance strategies to maximize pollinat
49 s that control streamflow response to forest planting and removal.
50 owever, the drivers of success in salt marsh planting and their ecological effects are poorly underst
51 ed, which included 100 species in the floral plantings and 116 species in the apple orchards.
52 , and species assemblages in both the floral plantings and adjoining apple orchards.
53 list from pathogen-resistant hybrid chestnut plantings and the closely related native Allegheny chinq
54 formed decision making on the timing of seed planting, and fertilizer quantity and timing.
55 ductance were measured at 90 and 120 d after planting, and plant organs (leaves, culm, roots, prop ro
56 sts, destruction of crop residues, timing of planting, and use of transplants.
57 for paper production, roofing, horticultural plantings, and an emerging highly productive temperate b
58 es declined exponentially with distance from plantings, and perennial and older flower strips with hi
59 focusing on livestock, crops, soils, noncrop plantings, and water conservation benefit social (e.g.,
60 odelling with mesocosm experiments to assess planting approaches for the marsh grass Spartina alterni
61 f aflatoxin reduction resulting from Bt corn planting are about $120 million to $167 million per year
62                                       Floral plantings are promoted to foster ecological intensificat
63  carbon sequestration projects, such as tree planting, are a prominent strategy to offset carbon emis
64 80% of this treatment by 2030, over the same planting area as in 2012, total production of rice, whea
65                Even though the total soybean planting area decreased from 2005 to 2010, surprisingly,
66 lationships, breeding history and cumulative planting area of upland cotton in China, nine predominan
67  production in three major Chinese sugarcane planting areas.
68  radar images (PALSAR) in mapping paddy rice planting areas.
69                       Furthermore, a clumped planting arrangement was most effective for generating l
70                                              Planting artichoke in October suppressed the antioxidant
71  forest loss and climate change through tree planting as well as maintaining and restoring forest eco
72 es in the soil of production fields prior to planting at an average concentration of about 10 ng/g, a
73 model to predict the flowering time of field plantings at different sites and seasons in light of the
74 ) severity in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) plantings at eight locations across the central USA for
75 mentally regulated and appears 4 weeks after planting, at about the fifth-leaf stage.
76 icator is under development for use atop the planting beds.
77 ering device to deposit seeds precisely into planting beds/hills at a uniform interval along a straig
78 ect, in part, to salvage-logging and conifer planting before it reburned during the 2002 Biscuit Fire
79 ion sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task.
80 le fleet, would have to accompany urban tree planting campaigns to make them really beneficial for ur
81  importantly, we show that marsh restoration planting can drastically reduce oiled marsh erosion, and
82 erosion, and that the positive influences of planting can extend beyond the immediate impact of the s
83 ations in Australia is further compounded by planting commercially important species outside their en
84 he influence of typical variables from field planting conditions had no significant influence on the
85 emonstrate, however, that a simple change in planting configuration (placing propagules next to, rath
86       True agriculture - defined by habitual planting, cultivation, harvesting and dependence of a fa
87 d the cognitive function of farmers over the planting cycle.
88  soils with high clay contents 15 days after planting (DAP), showing increases of 61.90%, 99.04%, and
89 of control, applied from 27 to 77 days after planting (DAP).
90 ne copies were measured 12 and 28 days after planting (DAP).
91               At the field-scale, later crop planting date and more cold winter days were associated
92 practices, including crop rotation, tillage, planting date, and management of irrigation and fertiliz
93  in advance just by knowing the location and planting date.
94 3 degrees to 45.75 degrees N, with different planting dates and abiotic or biotic stresses.
95 he effect of crop adaptation (i.e., changing planting dates and varieties).
96  revealed that genotypes, weather-years, and planting dates had little influence on the post-maturity
97 rghum grown under early-, mid-, and standard planting dates in West Texas were characterized from see
98  effect of reduced rainfall by adjusting the planting dates of potatoes, their most important crop.
99  historic climate data, and then declines as planting dates shift to cooler seasons.
100 ique predictors of yield under early and mid-planting dates.
101 in weeds planted in April, compared to other planting dates.
102         Nevertheless, our results reveal how planting deciduous riparian trees along temperate headwa
103 bioenergy sorghum hybrids were grown at four planting densities (~ 20,000 to 132,000 plants/ha) under
104 ate that lac1 boosts maize yields under high planting densities.
105 eding strategies to enhance yield under high planting densities.
106 y contrasting hybrids and hybrids under high planting density and drought stress.
107 and respond to environmental stimuli such as planting density and herbivory; however, the influence o
108                           To investigate how planting density and physical objects affect root system
109  commercial and protection AR with different planting density and thinning regimes on marginal land i
110  Sensitivities are examined including higher planting density at the expense of cattle production as
111                                    Increased planting density can provide crops a competitive advanta
112                                     Reducing planting density can slow disease spread significantly i
113 re, allowing more efficient light capture as planting density has increased.
114                                    Increased planting density induced a > 2-fold increase in sorghum
115                                   Increasing planting density is a key strategy for enhancing maize y
116  can be attributed to tolerance of increased planting density(2-4).
117  controlled by interactions among plant age, planting density, and natural genetic variation in Arabi
118 llocation methodologies, improve with higher planting density, and persist if yield is reduced by hal
119 y (NUE); and evaluated the effects caused by planting density, environmental (temperature, soil textu
120 enotypes, and several traits interacted with planting density, including aboveground biomass, root-sh
121 ated an average qualified rate of 89.50% for planting depth, 84.00% for planting posture, 90% for exp
122 plant establishment, highlighting a need for planting designs that enhance short-term sediment stabil
123 changes that occur within a season with crop planting, development, and harvest.
124 ntions) or managed (sand fencing, vegetation planting, dune construction).
125 that of intact soil C stock, suggesting that planting effectively prevents further C losses due to la
126                However, large-scale mangrove planting efforts have often failed, and smaller projects
127                                76) that tree planting for climate change mitigation could sequester 2
128  SOC loss, constraining the benefits of tree planting for ecosystem C sequestration.
129 %, respectively, as a result of the delay in planting from April to July.
130 iomass or randomly selected pots) across six planting generations while assessing bacterial (16S rRNA
131                                    Moreover, planting had significant impacts on the microbial commun
132        We found that switchgrass and prairie plantings harbored significantly greater plant, methanot
133                            Multispecies tree planting has long been applied in forestry and landscape
134  that farmers who adapt to climate change by planting improved crop varieties may potentially increas
135  lead to delayed rainfall and decreased rice planting in Indonesia's main rice-growing regions, thus
136 fore we can be assured that large-scale tree planting in regions with considerable pre-existing SOC s
137 ons, with >12,000 plants across two seasonal plantings in each of two simulated local climates, Spain
138 ty in two Californian landscapes: wildflower plantings in the Central Valley and montane meadows in t
139 general, high density mesquite afforestation plantings in this dry and desert area improves soil qual
140      Furthermore, prioritizing mixed-species planting including Rhizophora spp. would maximize C accu
141  ha(-1) per year in the first 12 years after planting, increasing to ~7.99 +/- 0.95 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1)
142                                    Staggered plantings indicated that interactions likely occur at ro
143 ation and nitrification potential with maize planting, indicating that changes in the soil microbial
144 g bees increased significantly in the floral plantings, indicating potential for floral plantings to
145  FTW planting strategy (monoculture vs mixed planting) influenced removal of N and P.
146 nts were a control (open water); monoculture plantings (Iris ensata 'Rising Sun', Canna xgeneralis 'F
147                                         Tree planting is increasingly being proposed as a strategy to
148                               Extensive tree planting is widely promoted for reducing atmospheric CO(
149 anisms, allowing for rapid germination after planting, is a recurrent trait in domesticated plants, a
150                                        Thus, planting L. sayanuka did not increase the risk of planth
151 ), which is observed for multiple traits and planting locations.
152 by previous roadside measurements), roadside planting (maintained at or below head height) of selecte
153 -MS in 72 landraces harvested 8 months after planting (MAP) to clarify whether these compounds may pl
154 ould aid in the identification of virus-free planting material and development of effective managemen
155       Trade or sharing that moves infectious planting material between farms can, for vertically-tran
156              We consider the difference that planting material exchange can make to successful contro
157  interventions for sustainable production of planting material in clean seed systems and how to impro
158 plants by roguing, preferential selection of planting material, deployment of virus-free 'clean seed'
159   These strategies have exploited virus-free planting material, varietal improvement, surveillance an
160 ddle East, in some instances, in live tomato planting material.
161 ntial to increase farmers' access to healthy planting materials and reduce losses due to CBSD in Afri
162  At present, there is a paucity of resistant planting materials, and efforts to evaluate germplasm fo
163 nd severity, a lack of disease resistance in planting materials, shortages of labor, and inadequate i
164 Deforestation followed by typical plantation planting-maturation-clearance-replanting cycles is predi
165              Artificially established floral plantings may offset these losses.
166 OC accumulation is valued at $185/ton CO(2), planting Miscanthus for conversion to DMCO would be econ
167 y passive transfer of MPO-ANCA and LPS or by planting MPO(409-428) conjugated to a murine antiglomeru
168 ts from 136 studies comparing SOC stock with planting N-fixing versus non-N-fixing species.
169 tudy was conducted to examine how wildflower plantings near commercial apple orchards influenced bee
170                              In this system, planting nectar-rich flowering plants on rice bunds prov
171  25% increase in the first 5 years following planting, no notable change was observed in the soil C s
172 icantly different outcomes in terms of where planting occurs, their environmental consequences, and e
173               Over the past few decades, the planting of a large conifer forest has connected groups
174  of Cry3 corn and negatively associated with planting of Bt corn producing both a Cry3 toxin and Cry3
175 uatic and riparian predators, and widespread planting of Bt crops has unexpected ecosystem-scale cons
176 ous maize fields it is often managed through planting of Bt maize.
177                               The widespread planting of corn genetically modified to produce Bacillu
178 erile pink bollworm moths from airplanes and planting of cotton engineered to produce insecticidal pr
179 GS in irrigated lands was related to earlier planting of crops after relatively warm winters, which w
180                               The widespread planting of crops genetically engineered to produce inse
181  an accurate calendar to regulate the annual planting of crops is of critical importance.
182 nt, primarily in agricultural soils prior to planting of crops.
183 roblem fields was positively associated with planting of Cry3 corn and negatively associated with pla
184        We have initiated MAS and large-scale planting of elite dura and pisifera parents to generate
185  mass caterpillar rearing and the widespread planting of exotic milkweed, have contributed to this tr
186                                   Widespread planting of maize throughout the agricultural Midwest ma
187                                     Although planting of resistant cultivars forms the core managemen
188                   Although the selection and planting of resistant eucalypt genotypes have been the m
189 infall, as expected from climate change, and planting of rust-resistant varieties, an ongoing managem
190                                          The planting of seeds, growth of seedlings, and harvesting o
191                                   Widespread planting of such Bt crops increased concerns that their
192 tudy shows that increasing deposition by the planting of vegetation in street canyons can reduce stre
193 ci for plant biodiversity and yet widespread planting of wildflower gardens in cities to sustain poll
194                                  Crop margin plantings of Ageratum conyzoides, Tridax procumbens, Cro
195                                  Monoculture plantings of brassica were associated with the bacteria
196 ishment and persistence are improved through plantings of L. sayanuka and thereby attraction of N. mu
197 getative strategies centered on monocultural plantings of nonnative plants, largely excluding native
198 n pool, including the effect of a non-native planting on an ancient woodland population of wild cherr
199 st reducing the deleterious impacts of dense planting on product quality.
200 ance to current policies, which promote tree planting on the assumption that this will increase net e
201 to explain the impacts of forest removal and planting on water yield.
202         The impact of intentional wildflower plantings on remnant native plant diversity in urban and
203 e exposed during establishment of successive plantings on the site.
204 tive), compared with 0.54-1.72 Pg CO(2)e for planting only conservation forests, depending on species
205 nagement approach was recommended and begun: planting only disease-free nursery trees, effective psyl
206 -making around the resilience of restoration plantings or net-zero emission strategies.
207 .23; 95% CI, 2.45-34.80), and private bushes/plantings (OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.18-10.01).
208 nity structure in different time horizons at planting (P), one month after planting (1MAP), and after
209  (BFS), and the unfertilized control in five planting patterns [1 row fennel + 2 rows fenugreek inter
210 pacity (DPPH and ABTS) compared to the first planting period.
211 t drivers of variability in effectiveness of plantings: pollination services declined exponentially w
212 ate of 89.50% for planting depth, 84.00% for planting posture, 90% for exposed plant spacing, 4.51 cm
213   Both proximity to natural habitat and crop planting practices were significantly correlated with po
214  a similar level as the other non-mechanized planting practices.
215 tricate pattern of cuticle sequestration and planting, producing GRFs of 1-7 uN.
216 ry by The International Small group and Tree planting program (TIST) in Kenya.
217                     China's large-scale tree planting programs are critical for achieving its carbon
218               Several large-scale urban tree planting projects have sought to promote respiratory hea
219  We identified six plots as originating from planting, rather than natural establishment, mostly from
220  the provision and use of up-to-date dynamic planting recommendations driven by live (citizen science
221          The chronology of the sediments and planting records are well aligned, and sedDNA of exotic
222 rategy for delaying pest resistance requires planting refuges of toxin-free crops near Bt crops to pr
223 ton and drove its adaptation to the northern planting region.
224 pite this persistent risk, we find that tree planting remains a highly cost-effective carbon removal
225                        An ideotype for dense planting requires a 'smart canopy' with leaf angles at d
226  from seed coatings dissipated shortly after planting, residues did not accumulate in soil, but persi
227 nable way to control this disease is through planting resistant cultivars.
228         Recent biofuel-driven growth in corn planting results in lower landscape diversity, altering
229 sink potentials were mapped in distinct tree-planting scenarios.
230 ast attractive cultivars demonstrated that a planting scheme using the most attractive cultivars woul
231                  All QTL show sensitivity to planting season and/or simulated location in a multi-QTL
232  toxins effective against the same pest, and planting seed mixtures yielding random distributions of
233                Our results demonstrated that planting significantly (P < 0.05) increased the gene alp
234 originating from geographic regions near the planting site had high relative fitness in each site, di
235 nating in sites historically warmer than the planting site had higher average relative fitness than l
236  transferred from their native location to a planting site.
237 ences were found in average ADB damage among planting sites and seed source provenances.
238 tion, the nine genotypes were grown with two planting/sowing dates.
239                      The G and E conditions (planting/sowing season) influences the ANF's content.
240 ontrol winter annual broad-leaf weeds before planting soybean and in an early post-emergence applicat
241 cing, and 8.67% coefficient of variation for planting spacing.
242 etween hills did not appear to vary with the planting speed.
243 anagers have the option of choosing specific planting stock to produce specific types of wood for ind
244 how that inoculating the root system of tree planting stock with edible ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF) c
245 f native species, often based on non-British planting stock, have been established.
246 iopia, as a source of harvestable income and planting stock.
247  uncertainty into decision-making identifies planting strategies that diversify risk and significantl
248                  This study assessed how FTW planting strategy (monoculture vs mixed planting) influe
249           Our analysis reveals that the best planting strategy assuming a "high-emissions" future is
250  scope for mitigating risk through choice of planting strategy is relatively limited.
251 he potential GHG mitigation of a UK national planting strategy of 30,000 ha yr(-1) from 2020 to 2050,
252                                   A national planting strategy of commercial forest could mitigate 1.
253 on, providing it is coupled with a long-term planting strategy, enhanced forest productivity and effi
254 lizing these commitments requires choosing a planting strategy: How many trees should be planted, of
255 n between out-planted propagules to maximize planting success.
256 outhwestern China that has a long history of planting Tartary buckwheat.
257 ups in their engagement in a behavioral tree planting task.
258 ed network complexity was higher under maize planting than under bare fallow regimes.
259 processing the false suggestion succeeded in planting the false belief and producing avoidance of the
260  movement in the lungfish is accomplished by planting the head and then pivoting the trunk.
261                                     Prior to planting, the jars were amended with 40 mL solution cont
262          In soybean (Glycine max) commercial plantings, the identification and use of iron-efficient
263 ming ants optimize crop yield by selectively planting their crops in full sun.
264 ent of the effectiveness of different floral plantings, their characteristics and consequences for cr
265  quality, thus, this study demonstrates that planting thorny bamboo is a successful practice for the
266 ultivars 'Romolo' and 'Istar' in relation to planting time (September and October), and seed coating
267 (coated and uncoated seeds during the second planting time).
268  heads occurred in 'Romolo' during the first planting time.
269 rylands and overstate the potential for tree planting to address climate change.
270 re is rapid (as it only takes 20 d from seed planting to functional studies), suitable for analyzing
271 wed that in this region, 430 mm of seasonal (planting to harvesting) rainfall resulted in the optimum
272 tion, which involves strategies such as tree planting to maximize aboveground biomass.
273 rovide promising pathways to optimise floral plantings to more effectively contribute to ecosystem se
274 l plantings, indicating potential for floral plantings to provide additional food and nesting resourc
275        Antimethanogenic feed supplements and planting trees afforded the greatest mitigation, while r
276 SOC) must be considered to determine whether planting trees for climate change mitigation results in
277 limate change adaptation strategies, such as planting trees in urban areas, should explicitly incorpo
278 OC changes observed after sowing pastures or planting trees.
279                                 We show that planting two native tree species (Betula pubescens and P
280 ed peat in Malaysia from 3 to 12 years after planting using destructive harvests supported by non-des
281                               Restoration by planting vegetation decreased the Q(10) of SOM mineraliz
282                                              Planting vegetation may mitigate the effects of climate
283                                              Planting was carried out monthly from April to September
284      The total bacteria/total fungi ratio at planting was increased with the INF compared to the manu
285                                   Time after planting was the most important factor affecting plant s
286 aping in vacuum-planter exhaust during maize planting were measured in 25 fields in southwestern Onta
287 sorghum genotypes is similar until 6 d after planting when buds of phyB-1 arrest growth, while wild-t
288 e accurately assessed in clonally-replicated plantings where each genotype is represented by several
289 d relatives of crops, landraces, and organic plantings, whereas implications for pest resistance have
290         To achieve higher production, denser planting will be required on increasingly degraded soils
291 llenging because corn hybrids have different planting windows, and, subsequently, inaccurate planting
292 e units (GDU) of two sites and provided with planting windows, required GDUs, and harvest quantities
293 results suggested that the suitable area for planting winter rapeseed in northern China was approxima
294 CLO concentrations within leachate following planting, with maximum concentrations occurring 4 weeks
295 e that precipitation and temperatures in the planting year (2-19 years before present) affected the r
296           We find strong support for lasting planting year weather effects in restored tallgrass prai
297 hu vegetable bases with different greenhouse planting years in Nanjing, Eastern China.
298 e increased with the extension of greenhouse planting years.
299 y quadrants of aerobic media during specimen planting yielded a colonial growth pattern typical for t
300                    However, while high-light planting yielded the greatest immediate food rewards, su

 
Page Top