戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 comes after a second IVIg course in GBS with poor prognosis.
2  that, unlike acute postinfectious GN, has a poor prognosis.
3 ncer aggressiveness, therapy resistance, and poor prognosis.
4 reatment, and the phenotypes associated with poor prognosis.
5 ers), are common and often associated with a poor prognosis.
6 orrelated with known mesenchymal markers and poor prognosis.
7 t failure or arrhythmia is associated with a poor prognosis.
8 al lung with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis.
9 , characterized by its aggressive course and poor prognosis.
10 smus GBS Outcome Score at week 1 predicted a poor prognosis.
11 me may contribute to disease progression and poor prognosis.
12 the invasive phenotype are associated with a poor prognosis.
13 is a brain tumour with high invasiveness and poor prognosis.
14 tive breast cancer, which is associated with poor prognosis.
15 ted with heightened metastatic potential and poor prognosis.
16 sed in many cancers and this correlates with poor prognosis.
17 ession signature, which were associated with poor prognosis.
18 MLR and NLR were found to be associated with poor prognosis.
19 t a distinct molecular cohort with uniformly poor prognosis.
20 es distant metastases and is correlated with poor prognosis.
21 gnancies, T-cell lymphomas have an extremely poor prognosis.
22 n the link between high collagen density and poor prognosis.
23      High GBP2 expression is associated with poor prognosis.
24 PH) after PEA remains a major determinant of poor prognosis.
25 route itself did not demarcate patients with poor prognosis.
26 growth pattern, it is associated with a very poor prognosis.
27 treatment of ER+ patients (n = 68) predicted poor prognosis.
28 has historically been associated with a very poor prognosis.
29 tures result in its universal recurrence and poor prognosis.
30 te myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor prognosis.
31 ely 3% of gastrointestinal malignancies with poor prognosis.
32 ll carcinomas (RCCs) and carries a decidedly poor prognosis.
33 confers PARPi resistance and correlates with poor prognosis.
34   Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) has a very poor prognosis.
35 rosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor therapy have a poor prognosis.
36 targeted by hormonal therapies, resulting in poor prognosis.
37 or gene correlate with high-risk disease and poor prognosis.
38 ently detected in recurrent BC patients with poor prognosis.
39 SCC) and lung (LUSC), and is associated with poor prognosis.
40 /STING in human dMMR cancers correlates with poor prognosis.
41 ase-2019 (COVID-19) and is associated with a poor prognosis.
42 ns showed non-significant tendencies towards poor prognosis.
43 nt epithelial tumor of the biliary tree with poor prognosis.
44 is the most frequent primary bone tumor with poor prognosis.
45 2 level and is significantly associated with poor prognosis.
46  as peritoneal carcinomatosis and has a very poor prognosis.
47 ARMS) is an aggressive pediatric cancer with poor prognosis.
48 dvanced colorectal cancer (CRC) have still a poor prognosis.
49 DNMT1, and UHRF1 in HCCs in association with poor prognosis.
50  relatively common cutaneous neoplasm with a poor prognosis.
51 ated signaling was linked to CMS4 tumors and poor prognosis.
52 s (IPF) is a progressive lung disease with a poor prognosis.
53  central nervous system malignancy and has a poor prognosis.
54 n sub-Saharan Africa, KS continues to have a poor prognosis.
55  bone, resulting in pathologic fractures and poor prognosis.
56 ts a new therapeutic option in patients with poor prognosis.
57 resent in 10% of patients, and indicative of poor prognosis.
58 the MYCN oncogene is closely associated with poor prognosis.
59 ared helpful to identify the patients with a poor prognosis.
60 ute myocardial infarction is associated with poor prognosis.
61  Neuroblastoma is a paediatric cancer with a poor prognosis.
62 ss epithelial cancers and is associated with poor prognosis.
63 gressive central nervous system tumor with a poor prognosis.
64 tients, and this increase is associated with poor prognosis.
65 cally aggressive malignancy with a uniformly poor prognosis.
66 reased alpha-fetoprotein concentrations have poor prognosis.
67  species (ROS), downregulated mitophagy, and poor prognosis.
68 ion of MSL3, ZNF691 and VPS45 was related to poor prognosis.
69 ed by cholangiocytic differentiation and has poor prognosis.
70 cytes from melanoma patients correlated with poor prognosis.
71  is a biomarker for pancreatic cancer with a poor prognosis.
72  identify del17p-carrying NDMM patients with poor prognosis.
73 disease with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis.
74      SaO was not an independent predictor of poor prognosis.
75  with tumorigenesis, tumor size and predicts poor prognosis.
76 associated with high infiltration leading to poor prognosis.
77 faster progression to metastatic disease and poor prognosis.
78 orrelates with refractoriness to therapy and poor prognosis.
79  and correlate with tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis.
80  leading to elevated PCa cancer stemness and poor prognosis.
81  in the disease process and has an extremely poor prognosis.
82 hly associated with advanced tumor grade and poor prognosis.
83 apsed after stem-cell transplantation have a poor prognosis.
84 tween elevated MDA-9 and bone metastasis and poor prognosis.
85 eased cancer cell migration, metastasis, and poor prognosis.
86 h intratumoral CD8+ T cell infiltration, but poor prognosis.
87  of protein expression, were associated with poor prognosis.
88 rapy, and long-term complications leading to poor prognosis.
89 ression of RAC1 and RAC2 was associated with poor prognosis.
90 ar carcinomas characterized by comparatively poor prognosis.
91 f a subset of HCC patients with a relatively poor prognosis.
92 portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) carries a poor prognosis.
93 LC, and their lower level is associated with poor prognosis.
94 D in the kidney allograft is associated with poor prognosis.
95 clinical challenge that generally portends a poor prognosis.
96 embrane oxygenation has been associated with poor prognosis.
97 , TNBC is challenging to treat and carries a poor prognosis.
98 IV who have haematological malignancies with poor prognosis.
99 state cancer progression and correlates with poor prognosis.
100 tes strongly with elevated CD73 activity and poor prognosis.
101 roups associated with DNA repair defects and poor prognosis.
102 scale [mRS]), and phenotypes associated with poor prognosis.
103 nce of 3%-7% progressing to ARF, a marker of poor prognosis.
104 rexpressed in human OS and correlates with a poor prognosis.
105 errations show significant associations with poor prognosis.
106 tion of Ezh2, similar to ACC patients with a poor prognosis.
107 f leptomeningeal metastases is indicative of poor prognosis.
108 ntially expressed genes that correlated with poor prognosis.
109 ancer with steadily increasing incidence and poor prognosis.
110 odialysis (ESRD-HD) and aortic stenosis have poor prognosis.
111 eloid leukemia (AML) and are associated with poor prognosis.
112 ogression, which is significantly related to poor prognosis.
113 ssociated with a high rate of recurrence and poor prognosis.
114 (LUSC) is a highly metastatic disease with a poor prognosis.
115 in the majority of cancers, often conferring poor prognosis.
116 er aneuploidy are frequently associated with poor prognosis.
117 sm, invasive and metastatic progression, and poor prognosis.
118 cluster, NOTCH1 mutation was associated with poor prognosis.
119 and is associated with drug resistance and a poor prognosis(1).
120 c embryonal brain tumours with a universally poor prognosis(1).
121 though advanced bladder cancer overall has a poor prognosis, a subset of patients demonstrate durable
122 een associated with treatment resistance and poor prognosis across many cancer types.
123 art failure (HF) is a global pandemic with a poor prognosis after hospitalization.
124  whereas R(up) <60% identified patients with poor prognosis after PEA.
125 eading cause of cancer death worldwide, with poor prognosis and a high rate of recurrence despite ear
126 oliferative and locally invasive cancer with poor prognosis and a high recurrence rate.
127 creased tolerance to antineoplastic therapy, poor prognosis and accelerated death, with no approved t
128 oach for patients with multiple myeloma with poor prognosis and advanced disease stage.
129 ias and T-cell lymphomas (TCLs) still have a poor prognosis and an inadequate response to current the
130  is a chronic and progressive condition with poor prognosis and diagnosis is largely clinical.
131  Liver cancers are highly heterogeneous with poor prognosis and drug response.
132 s constitutes a novel targeted therapy for a poor prognosis and frequently chemoresistant group of pa
133                  Cachexia is associated with poor prognosis and high mortality and frequently occurs
134 h intratumoral nerve density correlates with poor prognosis and high recurrence across multiple solid
135 ymphocytic leukemia, this is associated with poor prognosis and increased chemotaxis; in B-cell acute
136 psis-related hospitalizations is a marker of poor prognosis and increased mortality.
137                Sarcopenia is associated with poor prognosis and increased mortality.
138                    Grade 4 glioma or GBM has poor prognosis and is the most aggressive grade of gliom
139 s with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options.
140    Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has a poor prognosis and limited treatment options.
141 mary pediatric malignancy of the bone having poor prognosis and long-term survival rates of less than
142 DLBCL), and the existence of a subgroup with poor prognosis and phenotypic proximity to Burkitt lymph
143  p53- and PTEN-deficiency is associated with poor prognosis and poor response to anticancer therapies
144 P4K3 in human lung cancer is associated with poor prognosis and recurrence, however, the role of GLK
145 ous cell carcinoma (SCC) and associated with poor prognosis and survival.
146 nes, which have been shown to correlate with poor prognosis and the development of sepsis-related seq
147 nt pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has an overall poor prognosis and unsatisfactory treatment options.
148  RNF4 protein and mRNA levels correlate with poor prognosis and with resistance to MAPK inhibitors.
149  decreased in breast cancer, correlates with poor prognosis, and appears to be driven by adenosine th
150 es has been associated with drug resistance, poor prognosis, and disease relapse in many tumor types.
151 eased metastatic potential and cell seeding, poor prognosis, and enhanced recruitment of tumor-associ
152 noma (HCC) is difficult to detect, carries a poor prognosis, and is one of few cancers with an increa
153           High levels of CD97 correlate with poor prognosis, and silencing of CD97 reduces disease ag
154 ine carcinomas (ANECs) are rare lesions with poor prognosis, and the molecular etiology is only parti
155 tinal large B-cell lymphoma (rrPMBCL) have a poor prognosis, and their treatment represents an urgent
156 ated macrophages (TAMs) were associated with poor prognosis, and we established the inflammatory role
157  to reduce the incidence of breast cancer of poor prognosis; and 4) hybrid effectiveness-implementati
158           Unique genetic characteristics and poor prognosis are found in female patients with lung ca
159                Bone osteogenic sarcoma has a poor prognosis as the exact cell of origin and the signa
160 tivity and tamoxifen agonism, explaining the poor prognosis associated with neurofibromin loss in end
161 astasizes to the omentum contributing to the poor prognosis associated with ovarian cancer.
162  and may be used to identify subjects with a poor prognosis at the time of hospitalization.
163                                Additionally, poor-prognosis basal-like and luminal B tumors are furth
164 3, Axl, and Mertk) are often correlated with poor prognosis because of their capacities to sustain an
165                        These patients have a poor prognosis because they do not respond well to estab
166 it had significant positive correlation with poor prognosis beyond five years in both postmenopausal
167 -cell lymphoma, angiogenesis correlates with poor prognosis, but attempts to target established proan
168 cardial infarction (AMI) have an exceedingly poor prognosis, but it is unknown to what extent guideli
169 en associated with cancer aggressiveness and poor prognosis by triggering proangiogenic and antiapopt
170 ith minimisation factors of surgical centre, poor prognosis cancer, and previous adjuvant treatment w
171         Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a poor-prognosis cancer type with rapidly rising incidence
172 ted with detection of a higher proportion of poor-prognosis cancers than was digital mammography.
173 orithm separates patients into favorable and poor prognosis cohorts, where higher TILs scores were as
174 igher for the ROS signature, which predicted poor prognosis, compared with nonsmokers.
175 ndings illustrate that CRC patients may have poor prognosis despite high CD8+ T cell infiltration and
176 diagnosed with advanced HIV infection have a poor prognosis despite initiation of combined antiretrov
177                Metastatic melanoma carries a poor prognosis despite modern systemic therapies.
178 (30%) underwent vitrectomy, and 5 (50%) with poor prognosis did not undergo vitreoretinal surgery.
179 mes that effectively doubles the size of the poor-prognosis, double-hit group.
180 ple negative breast cancer (TNBC), which has poor prognosis due to frequent metastasis.
181 women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) have poor prognosis due to increased rates of metastasis.
182     However, patients with KIRC usually have poor prognosis due to limited biomarkers for early detec
183 may be used in practice to define those with poor prognosis during treatment.
184 stic of many tumor types and correlates with poor prognosis, especially in melanomas.
185 phoma (PEL) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis even under chemotherapy.
186 hibits a triple-negative phenotype and has a poor prognosis, even with traditional chemical and anti-
187 atopoietic stem cell (HSC) quiescence, and a poor prognosis for acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
188 ermore, a high expression of SFRP1 predicted poor prognosis for ampullary adenocarcinoma patients.
189  coupled with p-Akt up-regulation predicts a poor prognosis for HCC.
190 pression of GABPB1-AS1 was correlated with a poor prognosis for HPV16-positive CC patients.
191  was associated with tumor progression and a poor prognosis for patients with glioma.
192 90% of solid tumors and is associated with a poor prognosis for patients.
193 en for cancer cells in the brain and confers poor prognosis for the patient.
194 ike tyrosine kinase 3 gene (FLT3-ITD) have a poor prognosis, frequently relapse, and die as a result
195 neic hematopoietic cell transplantation have poor prognosis, highlighting an unmet therapeutic need.
196 patients with cancer and are associated with poor prognosis; however, their role in transplantation i
197         NMO was previously associated with a poor prognosis; however, treatment with steroids and pla
198 rs and older, and notably for cancers with a poor prognosis (ie, oesophagus, stomach, pancreas, and l
199              Malnutrition is associated with poor prognosis in a wide range of illnesses.
200 utated gene that is highly associated with a poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
201 ver disease and cirrhosis, and it presents a poor prognosis in advanced stage.
202 rapy and radiotherapy and is associated with poor prognosis in advanced stage.
203                           MYC contributes to poor prognosis in aggressive lymphoma.
204 er, its increased expression correlates with poor prognosis in AML patients.
205 o-expression of SEMA7A/COX-2/FN predicts for poor prognosis in breast cancer patient cohorts.
206 , has previously shown to be associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer.
207 xpression of TIMP-1 and its association with poor prognosis in cancer.
208 cell proliferation and serves as a marker of poor prognosis in cancer.
209  the 35-kDa isoform and its association with poor prognosis in cancers.
210 lin1, Ena/VASP, and CapZ, is an indicator of poor prognosis in ccRCC.
211 ression of HMGB1 was associated with MVD and poor prognosis in clinical analyzation.
212 ased HSATII copy number is associated with a poor prognosis in colon cancer, and in human cytomegalov
213  previously been described as a biomarker of poor prognosis in different types of cancers.
214 d higher USP20 expression is associated with poor prognosis in ER(-) breast cancer patients.
215 s, can be induced by progestins, and predict poor prognosis in ER+ breast cancer.
216 d protein levels of ERalpha, associates with poor prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer patients.
217 elated with late clinical stage and predicts poor prognosis in ESCC patients.
218 p120ctn) and EGFR, two genes associated with poor prognosis in ESCC, work together to cause invasion.
219 iable analysis, miR-4516 was correlated with poor prognosis in GBM patients (HR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.12-1
220 on status and are positively associated with poor prognosis in glioblastoma patients.
221 val time and acted as a robust biomarker for poor prognosis in gliomas.
222 -associated recurrence is the major cause of poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), howeve
223      High p62 expression was associated with poor prognosis in human AML.
224  with MYC expression and was associated with poor prognosis in human group 3 medulloblastoma.
225       All three genes were associated with a poor prognosis in human patients and high levels of SERP
226  that elevated levels of BRF1 associate with poor prognosis in human prostate cancer.
227 itro and correlated with hypoxic markers and poor prognosis in LUADs.
228  tissues and cell lines, and correlated with poor prognosis in lung cancer patients.
229 phomas (DLBCLs) and has been associated with poor prognosis in many studies.
230  is associated with increased metastasis and poor prognosis in multiple cancers.
231 elements, leading to TERT overexpression and poor prognosis in neuroblastoma, but TERT-associated onc
232                    Three of the hallmarks of poor prognosis in paediatric ependymoma are drug resista
233 elates with the level of PrimPol protein and poor prognosis in patient samples.
234 levated risk of developing cancer as well as poor prognosis in patients with cancer.
235 plication stress markers was associated with poor prognosis in patients with HGSOC.
236  expression was an independent predictor for poor prognosis in patients with lung cancer.Conclusions:
237 the abundance of IRF4+ Tregs correlated with poor prognosis in patients with multiple human cancers.
238 with cancer-free tissues and correlated with poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC harboring mutant E
239 to chemoresistance and was associated with a poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer.
240 rdiomyopathy and is the major contributor to poor prognosis in patients with systemic amyloidosis.
241 em/progenitor marker NES was associated with poor prognosis in PN GBM patients, indicating a unique r
242 of INCENP were significantly associated with poor prognosis in primary tumors of neuroblastoma patien
243  Piwi-like 1 and its function as a marker of poor prognosis in RCC patients.
244 y hypoxia and obesity, has been related with poor prognosis in several tumors.
245 ve HIV-associated lymphoma with a relatively poor prognosis in the era of effective HIV therapy.
246 nferring no effect in the NOTCH2 subtype and poor prognosis in the MYD88 subtype.
247 imism in younger patients but may indicate a poor prognosis in the older population.
248 he single most powerful biological marker of poor prognosis in this disease.
249 tastasis formation, which is associated with poor prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
250 itivity and 91.9% specificity for predicting poor prognosis in women younger than 60 years.
251                                 It carries a poor prognosis, in part because its pathogenesis is not
252                                Phenotypes of poor prognosis included ADEM-like relapses progressing t
253 essing CLL represents a distinct subset with poor prognosis independent of IGHV mutations.
254 se overexpressed in human OC associated with poor prognosis, is essential for OC progression principa
255 er kidney transplant that is associated with poor prognosis, is not a specific entity but rather the
256  associating with therapeutic resistance and poor prognosis, its global or lung epithelial-specific d
257 s a recalcitrant cancer, i.e., a cancer with poor prognosis, lacking progress in diagnosis and treatm
258 elevated in cancer cells and correlates with poor prognosis, making PRMT5 a therapeutic target.
259  and the identified 17p-loss is an effective poor prognosis marker for Stage III patients.
260 ory subtype of renal cancer characterized by poor prognosis, markers of T cell dysfunction, and alter
261 tic to metastatic tumors and associated with poor prognosis, MMP9 protease overexpression.
262  that high G9a expression is associated with poor prognosis of CCA patients.
263 st crisis phase, and was associated with the poor prognosis of CML patients.
264  KDM3A upregulation axis are correlated with poor prognosis of colon cancer.
265                                          The poor prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) results largely fr
266  uptake and increased glycolysis in HCCs and poor prognosis of HCC patients.
267 independent diagnostic marker predicting the poor prognosis of HCC patients.
268 n therapies are all possible reasons for the poor prognosis of HF patients.
269 cement pathways have been altered due to the poor prognosis of intubated patients and the risk of tra
270  that higher levels of ZNF281 correlate with poor prognosis of patients treated with DNA-damaging the
271 ased incidence of cardiovascular disease and poor prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure (H
272 te treatment start is recommended due to the poor prognosis of untreated acute leukemia.
273            High-grade serous carcinoma has a poor prognosis, owing primarily to its early disseminati
274 AML) is a deadly hematologic malignancy with poor prognosis, particularly in the elderly.
275 ic thyroid cancer (ATC) is aggressive with a poor prognosis, partly because of the immunosuppressive
276 cent studies showing good, intermediate, and poor prognosis, respectively.
277 orme (GBM) is a malignant brain tumor with a poor prognosis resulting from tumor resistance to antica
278 erall expression, however, downregulation on poor prognosis samples.
279 represent a rational therapeutic strategy in poor-prognosis, SMARCA4/A2-deficient cancers.
280 ta-catenin-independent function of BCL9 in a poor-prognosis subtype of CRC tumors characterized by ex
281 tly associated with higher tumor burden, and poor prognosis, suggesting their relevance in hepatocarc
282 ntact, with VSVZ + GBM patients displaying a poor prognosis, the VSVZ + GBMs do not possess a distinc
283 and lethal human malignancies with extremely poor prognosis, there is an urgent demand of more effect
284 tronic health record and is used to indicate poor prognosis, to describe conflict with families, and
285                                            A poor prognosis was found for those patients who showed p
286 and immune response that are associated with poor prognosis were discovered including HMGCS2, GPX2 an
287  PEL is an aggressive disease with extremely poor prognosis when treated with conventional chemothera
288 egulated immunoregulation is associated with poor prognosis, whereas early innate signaling and Th1-s
289 involvement was common and associated with a poor prognosis, whereas opsoclonus, female sex, and youn
290 a implicate IgL translocation as a driver of poor prognosis which may be due to IMiD resistance.
291      Finally high MYO18B expression reflects poor prognosis while high MYL5 or MYO1B expression refle
292  metastatic uveal melanoma, which has a very poor prognosis with a median survival of less than 1 y.
293 ted recurrent thyroid carcinomas have a very poor prognosis with a median survival of less than a yea
294 anced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma have poor prognosis with conventional systemic therapy.
295       The major challenges in overcoming the poor prognosis with this disease include late detection
296 ry access issues) and were associated with a poor prognosis, with a very high in-hospital and late de
297 ne chemotherapy followed by resection have a poor prognosis, with long-term survival of 22%.
298 id tumor, where MYCN amplification heralds a poor prognosis, with only 11% of high-risk patients surv
299 ression of Keratin 14, a known biomarker for poor prognosis, with p = 2 x 10-45 for within-tumor test
300  cancers and its expression is predictive of poor prognosis within this aggressive breast cancer subt

 
Page Top