コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
4 nd diameter of paraumbilical vein, number of portosystemic collateral channels and diameter of portal
7 paraumbilical vein (PUV) and the presence of portosystemic collateral shunts and their relationship w
8 -Stage Liver Disease score (P < 0.001), more portosystemic collaterals (P = 0.01) and splenomegaly (P
9 viates portal hypertension (PH), severity of portosystemic collaterals and mesenteric angiogenesis, i
10 hnic hyperemia, increased portal inflow, and portosystemic collaterals formation, which may induce le
12 rtal hypertension (shunting of blood through portosystemic collaterals) and hepatic insufficiency res
13 rtal hypertension (shunting of blood through portosystemic collaterals) and hepatic insufficiency tha
14 rtal hypertension (shunting of blood through portosystemic collaterals) and hepatic insufficiency.
15 mong gastroesophageal varices, splenomegaly, portosystemic collaterals, history of ascites, or platel
18 ver, TIPS is associated with higher rates of portosystemic encephalopathy and possibly higher costs.
19 d evidence of portal hypertension (recurrent portosystemic encephalopathy and variceal hemorrhage) in
23 ty-two patients with cirrhosis underwent the Portosystemic Encephalopathy-Syndrome-Test yielding the
28 esults were compared, which included initial portosystemic gradient and Doppler measurements of blood
30 eceptor were tested, and measurements of the portosystemic gradient were used to determine Gabsorp an
34 venography, which can be used to measure the portosystemic pressure gradient (PSPG) to identify TIPS-
38 r, eNOS (-/-) mice did develop a substantial portosystemic shunt (0.33% +/- 0.005% vs 84.53% +/- 0.19
39 2 +/- 0.003 vs 0.227 +/- 0.005 mL/min/g) and portosystemic shunt (0.47% +/- 0.01% vs 84.13% +/- 0.09%
40 ophylaxis group was less likely to require a portosystemic shunt (6% vs 15%, p < 0.001) with no diffe
43 ated by the presence of congenitally present portosystemic shunt (PSS), which resulted in markedly el
47 lity and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as a treatment for BCS with d
48 thoracentesis and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as second-line therapeutic op
49 ter placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) correlates with the absence o
50 ailure (ELF) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in patients with cir
52 d complications of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation performed by using a
53 ents who underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation, regardless of left
55 and bare stent in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for cirrhotic portal hyperten
56 ibe the results of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for the management of VOD aft
58 the placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been reported in up to 10
59 on human patients, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been worldwide considered
60 ients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) have lower rebleeding rates c
61 Implantation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) improves survival in patients
62 s, and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in a series of patients with
64 cacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in this population are unknow
65 opathy (HE) after Trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a common clinical problem.
71 ansplantation, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on patient selection and outc
72 The effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on portal hemodynamics, esoph
73 ty and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) performed semiemergently and
75 disease underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement for control of vari
76 hosis and ascites, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement improves control of
77 on with or without transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement in patients who are
80 nts undergoing the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure in patient groups w
81 cations related to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) stents found in the portal ve
82 converting failed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to distal splenorenal shunt (
84 ognosis of salvage transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using covered stents for refr
87 ble on the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with covered stents in patien
92 paracentesis, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)], but refractory hydrothorax
93 ng procedures (upper endoscopy, transjugular portosystemic shunt [TIPS], hemodialysis, and liver tran
94 traindications of transjugular intra-hepatic portosystemic shunt and for the treatment of gastro-esop
95 evaluate race as a predictor of undergoing a portosystemic shunt and LT and of dying in the hospital.
100 paracentesis with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of refractory asci
103 vein embolization, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement, balloon retrograde transv
110 previously placed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt underwent successful liver transplan
111 andomized trial of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt using covered stents and another pil
113 tes, the adjusted odds ratios of receiving a portosystemic shunt were 0.37 (95% CI: 0.27-0.51) and 0.
114 raindication for a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt who received either device implantat
115 l stenosis and the presence of a spontaneous portosystemic shunt whose successful endovascular treatm
116 ugs+endoscopy, the placement of transjugular portosystemic shunt within 72 hours of admission (pre-em
118 band ligation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, almost every acute variceal bleed c
120 e hepatocytes after liver warm ischemia with portosystemic shunt, compared with liver ischemia withou
121 ve been treated by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, surgical exploration, or peritoneov
128 ssion (pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: p-TIPS) increases the survival of h
129 ic artery flow, mesenteric vascular density, portosystemic shunting (PSS), intrahepatic angiogenesis,
130 ility, before/after transvenous intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS), and before/after yogurt t
131 catheter-directed thrombolysis, transjugular portosystemic shunting (TIPS), and liver transplantation
132 asty/thrombolysis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS), and orthotopic liver tran
133 th vehicle, JWH-015 significantly alleviated portosystemic shunting and mesenteric vascular density i
136 iography, which disclosed virtually complete portosystemic shunting in Fut2(-/-)(high) mice, discrete
137 c shunting in Fut2(-/-)(high) mice, discrete portosystemic shunting in Fut2(-/-)(low) mice, and no sh
139 scularization with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting may also be considered for transp
140 scularization with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting may be considered for selected pa
141 t2(-/-) mice is dominated by consequences of portosystemic shunting resulting in microcirculatory dis
145 be successfully used as a bridge to surgical portosystemic shunting, as well as liver transplantation
146 modalities such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting, hemodialysis, and in some cases,
147 amics, presence of CB receptors, severity of portosystemic shunting, mesenteric vascular density, vas
148 al indications for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting, such as those with refractory as
150 rum samples from dogs with either congenital portosystemic shunts (cPSS, n = 24) or high serum liver
151 lar in preclinical research, have congenital portosystemic shunts (PSS) that allow venous blood to en
152 urements, including portal pressure (PP) and portosystemic shunts (PSS), and collected tissues for hi
156 d to the consequent formation of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSSs), leading to complications r
159 te the efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) for the treatment of chronic
160 after creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) has been attributed to hemol
161 re of infection of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) has not been described previ
163 ts with the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in the treatment of these pa
168 ver the ability of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) to increase survival times o
169 ver the ability of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) to increase survival times o
170 linical utility of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) vis-a-vis total paracentesis
171 (CT) angiograms of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), helical CT angiography was
173 s alternative treatment options to operative portosystemic shunts and devascularization procedures.
179 ocumented the frequency of large spontaneous portosystemic shunts in patients with moderate or severe
185 lume paracenteses, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, and implanted drainage devices.
187 g and placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, have improved preoperative assessm
193 en a small covered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPS) (8 mm; n = 90), or medi
194 udy was to compare transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPSS) with variceal band lig
195 de, but fluoroscopically placed intrahepatic portosystemic stents have recently been used with increa