ライフサイエンスコーパス: postoperative infection

1 There were no cases of any postoperative infection.

2 CVH has an increased risk of postoperative infection.

3 rean delivery may further reduce the rate of postoperative infection.

4 Of the 108 patients, 41 developed a postoperative infection.

5 fective than placebo in reducing the risk of postoperative infection.

6 surgery and 42 patients (31.3%) because of a postoperative infection.

7 thalmic surgical patients, were reviewed for postoperative infection.

8 ted with a lower probability of developing a postoperative infection.

9 rginine administration significantly reduces postoperative infection.

10 d in third molar extraction sites to prevent postoperative infection.

11 A total of 403 patients (3.5%) had a postoperative infection.

12 osis in LT patients and the relative risk of postoperative infection.

13 sed to determine the factors associated with postoperative infection.

14 iome compositions, pathobiont expansion, and postoperative infections.

15 sociated with an increased susceptibility to postoperative infections.

16 rioperative suture colonization may minimize postoperative infections.

17 d to determine the specific impact of severe postoperative infections.

18 nfectious complications, particularly severe postoperative infections.

19 cid did not result in a greater incidence of postoperative infections.

20 Two patients (2.7%) had postoperative infections.

21 e scores of S-INF and S-INF-Core) to predict postoperative infections.

22 There were 3996 documented postoperative infections.

23 of preoperative skin antisepsis may decrease postoperative infections.

24 defining a patient subgroup at high risk for postoperative infections.

25 , waiting time, technical complications, and postoperative infections.

26 t Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) cause serious postoperative infections.

27 s to improve treatment outcomes and minimize postoperative infections.

28 .90; 95% CI, 1.37-2.63; P < .001), develop a postoperative infection (1.67; 1.48-1.89; P < .001), and

29 sed eosinophils (2.4), cancer history (2.1), postoperative infection (2.0), hypertension (2.0), CABG

30 etastasis-death 1.66 (1.41-1.97, P < 0.001), postoperative infection 3.27 (2.05-5.20, P < 0.001), and

31 irements, but was positively associated with postoperative infection (3.81 +/- 0.97 vs 2.79 +/- 0.73;

32 es in complications, including the number of postoperative infections (9% in the nail group vs 13% in

33 Postoperative infection after hand-assisted laparoscopic

34 The rate of early postoperative infection after intracameral moxifloxacin

35 Postoperative infections after a fracture exert tremendo

36 operative glucose control has been linked to postoperative infections after selected surgical procedu

37 eta-blocker users, as were the incidences in postoperative infection and anastomotic failure.

38 acement and removal can increase the risk of postoperative infection and bacteremia.

39 for bacterial species of direct relevance to postoperative infection and bacteremia.

40 There is a significant rate of postoperative infection and dehiscence in patients with

41 atched patients' complications, particularly postoperative infection and ileus, were compared.

42 Old age was associated with postoperative infection and longer length of hospitaliza

43 an identify LT patients at increased risk of postoperative infection and may provide guideposts for m

44 complications, including lower incidences of postoperative infections and bleeding complications, as

45 ric acid, and potential benefits in reducing postoperative infections and intestinal inflammation.

46 ng, making it a promising strategy to reduce postoperative infections and peri-implant diseases in Ti

47 disposing patients to a greater incidence of postoperative infections and rejection and a longer hosp

48 ne function, systemic inflammatory response, postoperative infections, and recovery after colorectal

49 Postoperative infections are a frequent source of preven

50 peritoneal dialysis (PD) on the incidence of postoperative infection as well as several other posttra

51 These patients may be at risk for serious postoperative infections as antitumor necrosis factor ag

52 lume eye facility, the incidence of presumed postoperative infection associated with unwrapped and wr

53 posite endpoint was clinical evidence of any postoperative infection at 30 days, including surgical s

54 n was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for postoperative infection based on treatment status.

55 requirement of transfusions or incidence of postoperative infection between the groups.

56 erative bacterial sternal contamination, nor postoperative infections, between patients who underwent

57 with no significant differences in rates of postoperative infections, bleedings, and stent migration

58 od transfusions on outcome variables such as postoperative infection, cancer recurrence, pulmonary fu

59 Synbiotics showed greater effect on postoperative infections compared with probiotics alone

60 rect costs, cost variability was highest for postoperative infection (CV = 1.71) and sepsis (CV = 1.3

61 amethasone was associated with reductions in postoperative infection, duration of postoperative mecha

62 Primary study endpoint was the occurrence of postoperative infection during the first 30 days.

63 e index), donor ischemic time, occurrence of postoperative infections, episodes of allograft rejectio

64 revious research demonstrating a low rate of postoperative infection following periodontal surgical p

65 oor nutritional state increases the risk for postoperative infections for spinal fusion patients.

66 This study suggests that postoperative infections have significant and sustained

67 ip between perioperative glucose control and postoperative infections in a nationwide sample of diabe

68 lerated, but did not reduce the incidence of postoperative infections in this high-risk oncologic pop

69 Multivariate Poisson regression model of postoperative infection including demographics, comorbid

70 The prevention of postoperative infection is often the basis for antibioti

71 he patient economic burden associated with a postoperative infection is unclear.

72 Early postoperative infections may manifest with wound-healing

73 PAT was associated with reduced postoperative infections (OR 0.27; 95% CI, 0.12-0.63; P

74 Postoperative infection (P = 0.006), renal failure requi

75 Intensive glucose control leads to less postoperative infections (POI) in critically ill surgica

76 sociation of perioperative hyperglycemia and postoperative infections (POI) in patients who had under

77 rse effects, it did not increase the risk of postoperative infection, postoperative nausea and vomiti

78 The overall postoperative infection rate was 8.0%.

79 immunosuppression that results in increased postoperative infection rate, and can also result in inc

80 cess-of-care measure predicted a decrease in postoperative infection rates from 11.5 to 5.3 per 1000

81 cess-of-care measure predicted a decrease in postoperative infection rates from 14.2 to 6.8 per 1000

82 eat analysis of 414 patients showed that the postoperative infection rates were 17% (35 of 207) in th

83 iate prophylactic antibiotic regimens reduce postoperative infection rates, improved instrumentation

84 Postoperative infections remain a significant problem am

85 association between suture colonization and postoperative infections remains hypothetical, measures

86 A critically ill patient with multiple postoperative infections repeatedly required profound vo

87 We investigated the postoperative infection risk for patients undergoing ele

88 llow-up; and (3) complications (composite of postoperative infection, symptomatic intracranial hemorr

89 investigated, 34.8% had at least one sign of postoperative infection; the overall appropriate rate of

90 Previous investigations showed reduced postoperative infections using skin preparation with chl

91 However, incurring a postoperative infection was not associated with an incre

92 Readmission diagnoses varied by specialty; postoperative infection was the most common readmission

93 Higher rates of postoperative infection were associated with mean 24 hou

94 control design, 53 individuals who developed postoperative infection were matched (approximately 3:1

95 nd 1.93 (95% CI, 1.38-2.68), and the odds of postoperative infections were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.69-1.12) a

96 Postoperative infections were associated with a $6080 an

97 Postoperative infections were associated with a 6.6% inc

98 Tuberculous and postoperative infections were excluded.

99 he unwrapped sterilization group 17 presumed postoperative infections were identified, compared to 9

100 Postoperative infections were more likely to occur at TH

101 Postoperative infections were recorded according to the

102 Heart failure and postoperative infections were the most frequent reasons

103 We investigated whether postoperative infection with meticillin-resistant Staphy

104 ved areas might be especially susceptible to postoperative infection with MRSA.

105 nes with the intent to minimize the rates of postoperative infection with small-gauge vitrectomy surg

106 8.1%), absolute risk reduction in developing postoperative infection, with 6 donors requiring treatme

107 A postoperative infection within 1 year of injury.

108 preoperative antibiotics reduces the risk of postoperative infection, yet few studies have described