戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 from 875 representative reservoirs (209 with power plants).
2  from the damaged Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant.
3  and north of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant.
4 ameters approaching those of a future fusion power plant.
5  representative of an actual flue gas from a power plant.
6 ssion and uptake timing over the life of the power plant.
7 .0) for term LBW for each 5 km closer to any power plant.
8 of efficient cleaning techniques used at the power plant.
9  shutdown, respectively, of an existing NGCC power plant.
10 o partial combustion of ambient CH(4) in the power plant.
11  natural gas turbine-based combined heat and power plant.
12 carota) collected near the Chernobyl nuclear power plant.
13 s of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide from power plants.
14 es a lot of water for cooling thermoelectric power plants.
15 e been affected by emissions from coal-fired power plants.
16 ionuclides at nuclear facilities and nuclear power plants.
17 ased on data from 19,941 fossil-fuel burning power plants.
18 r generation in the world is from coal based power plants.
19 gas (GHG) reductions for existing coal-fired power plants.
20 d with that from traditional bituminous coal power plants.
21 e energy needs for steam turbines in thermal-power plants.
22 lan's emission regulation for new coal-fired power plants.
23 ants born to pregnant women living closer to power plants.
24 t when exposure was categorized by number of power plants.
25 gineered carbon particle factories, and coal power plants.
26 idential gas furnaces, and natural-gas-fired power plants.
27 igh-temperature application in fossil-energy power plants.
28 rs of emissions occurring on their behalf at power plants.
29  mercury (Hg(0)) in flue gases of coal-fired power plants.
30 implications for the design of future fusion power plants.
31  in pollutant emissions from NC's coal-fired power plants.
32 ion distances between biorefineries and coal power plants.
33 ated with CO2 emissions from coal burning in power plants.
34 iting CO2 emissions from coal- and gas-fired power plants.
35 ermal approach best suited for utility-scale power plants.
36 er demanding environments such as coal-fired power plants.
37 y 30% in supercritical pulverized coal-fired power plants.
38 loped a spatially resolved model of existing power plants.
39 d power plants but not for natural gas-fired power plants.
40 carbon dioxide (CO(2)) capture at coal-fired power plants.
41 y for retrofit since it does not require new power plants.
42 ies are actively building and operating coal power plants.
43 thdrawals and consumption) at thermoelectric power plants.
44 d sustain economic growth with fossil fueled power plants.
45 may exceed carbon intensities of fossil-fuel power plants.
46 echnologies for CO(2) capture from gas-fired power plants.
47  within 10% of the emissions reported by the power plants.
48 would be affected by bromide discharges from power plants.
49 ombustion CO2 capture from fossil fuel-fired power plants.
50 rect carbon capture from coal or natural gas power plants.
51 ected from farms located near two coal-fired power plants.
52 O2 from the flue gas emissions of coal-fired power plants.
53 l (PC) and natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants.
54 toric selenium inputs from nearby coal-fired power plants.
55 tudies, contributions from gas flaring (6%), power plants (9%), and open fires (12%) are relatively s
56 ion caused by the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident has aroused great concern regarding
57               The Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in 2011 has released a large amount
58 isotopic ratio in the aftermath of a nuclear power plant accident provide valuable information on the
59 ion of health risks resulting from a nuclear power plant accident, reflected in a set of seven guidel
60  1986 Chornobyl (Ukrainian spelling) nuclear power plant accident.
61 al., following the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.
62 n eastern Europe since the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident.
63 leanup workers of the 1986 Chornobyl nuclear power plant accident.
64 ts after the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear power plant accidents indicate a clear need to identify
65 hronic ionizing radiation (CIR) from nuclear power plant accidents, acts of terrorism, and space expl
66 cord both the opening of a nearby coal-fired power plant and amendments to the Clean Air Act.
67 ecific amount of added water use varies with power plant and CCS designs.
68 ervations on near-field Hg deposition from a power plant and global scale atmospheric gaseous Hg.
69                 Our model integrates data on power plant and municipal wastewater treatment plant ope
70  cells because they function as the cellular power plant and play a central role in the early stages
71            For a few favorable sites of both power plant and upstream processes, CCS realizes a net b
72 ssociations between residential proximity to power plants and adverse birth outcomes including preter
73 own as waste heat) generated by U.S. thermal power plants and assesses the intermittency and transpor
74                       The fuel efficiency in power plants and automobile engines can be dramatically
75 2)-free) than fossil-derived sources such as power plants and can be directly coupled with distribute
76 births born from 2004 to 2005 and all active power plants and determined residential proximity to the
77 sulfur dioxide (SO2) emitted from coal-fired power plants and industry is a major pollutant contribut
78 ficiency among newer South Korean coal-fired power plants and lower emissions from U.S. replacement o
79 2.5 and ozone-related deaths attributable to power plants and mobile sources falls from about 68,000
80  energy future by converting waste heat from power plants and other industrial processes into usable
81 ant airflow and uninterrupted emissions from power plants and petrochemical facilities, contributing
82 ea, we observed high de facto reuse for some power plants and substantial costs for retrofitting to u
83 erive top-down NO(X) emissions for two large power plants and three megacities in North America.
84 lations are promoting a shift away from coal power plants and toward natural gas plants as the lowest
85   Analysis of hourly reported emissions from power plants and traffic counts shows that 97% of the da
86 tant emission sources to atmosphere are coal power plants and zinc production.
87 egrates climate-driven hydrological, thermal power plant, and capacity expansion models.
88 imary production of the area, the age of the power plant, and the inclusion of bubbling emissions in
89 tural gas processing, then from paper mills, power plants, and iron and steel plants.
90 efforts to reduce the emissions from peaking power plants, and that there is a need to quantify the e
91 d with distances from the studied coal-fired power plants, and the mercury contents in lettuce, amara
92 e investigated in three different coal-fired power plants, and the results were used to develop a gen
93 ressions for the thermal efficiency of these power plants are derived under 16 different CCS retrofit
94 f cooling water shortages to thermo-electric power plants are increasingly studied as an important cl
95 , where 9 of the state's 14 major coal-fired power plants are located.
96                                         Coal power plants are producing huge amounts of coal ash that
97          The majority of "Incompatible" USSE power plants are sited far from existing transmission in
98 nsmission lines needed for stand-alone solar power plants are taken into account, the solar portion o
99                  Emission hot spots, such as power plants, are excluded to focus on urban relationshi
100  the cooling water discharge (CWD) area of a power plant as a model for long-term warming.
101 egration of these units in functioning solar power plants as well as the economic aspects are also br
102 combustion, coal combustion of a heating and power plant, as well as heavy and light fuel oil combust
103 and sequester carbon dioxide from coal-fired power plants, as well as other low-carbon electricity-ge
104                    Effluents from coal-fired power plant ash ponds are a major source of environmenta
105 ion of the electricity demand is supplied by power plants at low-damage times and in low-damage locat
106 ique fate and transport through a coal-fired power plant because of high vapor pressures of oxide (Se
107 adjoint sensitivity analysis and to simulate power plants' behavior under emission and simplified ele
108 ycle (without CO2 capture) and on-shore wind power plants, both from a levelized and marginal COE poi
109 egions are the most likely to see effects of power plant bromide discharges on populations served by
110 on from new coal-fired and natural gas-fired power plants built in the US.
111 50% reduction in the carbon intensity of new power plants built in these regions over the next decade
112 mination that CCS is the BSER for coal-fired power plants but not for natural gas-fired power plants.
113 educing disproportionality among fossil-fuel power plants by targeting those plants in the upper end
114          Increased impacts upstream from the power plant can dramatically change the social acceptabi
115 mework hypothesizes that emissions from coal power plants can be explained by plant-specific factors
116                            Building new coal power plant capacities will lead to lock-in effects for
117 revious research indicates that reduction in power plant capacity caused by environmental regulations
118 s mercury (Hg(0)) in a commercial coal-fired power plant (CFPP) exhaust plume was investigated by sim
119                                   Coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) generate air, water, and solids emi
120 g) emission ratios (EmRs) for six coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) in the southeastern U.S.
121 odel of trace element behavior at coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) to estimate the trace element conce
122         Trace elements (TEs) exit coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) via solid, liquid, and gaseous wast
123 eq/MWh) because of heterogeneity in existing power plant characteristics such as efficiency, age, and
124 such as oil refineries, smelters, coal-fired power plants, cities, wildfires and ships-reveal that ae
125 hicle (BEV) efficiency, range, and use-phase power plant CO2 emissions in the U.S.
126 thropogenic contamination through coal-fired power plants, conventional oil and gas extraction, texti
127 from the flue emissions of natural gas-fired power plants could reduce their carbon intensity.
128                               Thermoelectric power plants demand large quantities of cooling water, a
129                               Together these power plants discharged an estimated 18.9 billion GJ(th)
130 nt work seeks to identify U.S. regions where power plant discharges could affect drinking water.
131 , climate damages, and health damages in the power plant dispatch maximizes the net benefits of redis
132          This study develops a reduced-order power plant dispatch model and uses it to simulate margi
133                                     We use a power plant dispatch model to quantify the effects of di
134 aterial for gas turbines in aero engines and power plants due to their outstanding high temperature c
135 w that a shift in utilization among existing power plants during selected hourly periods could have p
136 ments made downwind from specific coal fired power plants during the 2013 Southeast Nexus field campa
137 oring Instrument (OMI) for Indian coal-fired power plants during the OMI era of 2005-2012.
138 e determination of NO and NO2 at the caloric power plant Durnrohr (Austria).
139  ultimate recovery (EUR) of the well and the power plant efficiency: increase in either quantity will
140 sible and energy-competitive, with a low net power-plant efficiency penalty of 7.7%.
141 utants offer promise for the verification of power plant emission factors and abatement technologies
142                         The effectiveness of power-plant emission controls on the atmospheric concent
143  premature deaths attributable to coal-fired power plant emissions.
144                              Burning coal in power plants emits more nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide,
145 issions associated with pulverized coal (PC) power plants equipped with postcombustion CO2 capture fo
146                                   Coal-fired power plants equipped with wet flue gas desulfurization
147               The Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) accident led to important releases o
148 ars following the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant (FDNPP) accident, the distribution of (90)Sr
149 ples from near the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) and across the Pacific Ocean.
150 y fallout from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) event.
151 ar disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) in March 2011 caused partial meltdow
152  released from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) provide nano-scale chemical fingerpr
153 iginating from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) were identified in the atmosphere at
154 he accident at the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP).
155 narios that characterize (1) the most recent power plant fleet for which sufficient data are availabl
156  data are available, (2) a hypothetical 2018 power plant fleet that reflects upcoming plant retiremen
157 ermined residential proximity to the nearest power plant for each birth.
158 d cost of electricity than stand-alone solar power plants given strong solar resource in the US south
159    We find that the solar portion of an ISCC power plant has a lower levelized cost of electricity th
160 , but exporting lignin to be cofired at coal power plants has the potential to substantially reduce b
161 ous health risks to consumers and coal-fired power plants have been identified as the major source of
162  emanating from a coal- or natural gas-fired power plant, have never been reported.
163 bings in 1945 and major accidents at nuclear power plants, have highlighted similarities in potential
164 pectively, and were strongly correlated with power-plant Hg emissions from the upwind states.
165 n performed to explore whether the degree of power plant idling/cycling could be related to the physi
166 200 million can be gained for this subset of power plants if a larger fraction of the electricity dem
167 r to date that was installed at a coal-fired power plant in Germany.
168 r accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in March 2011.
169 erted heat flux from individual U.S. thermal power plants in 2012.
170 s and consumption for cooling thermoelectric power plants in ERCOT by as much as 75% and 23%, respect
171 lfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from coal-fired power plants in India have increased notably in the past
172 t is several (>50 km) kilometers downwind of power plants in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia.
173 pill affected waters; (2) CCR effluents from power plants in Tennessee and North Carolina; (3) lakes
174 d this broadly applicable methodology to 125 power plants in Texas as a test case.
175 te CO2 emission factors associated with coal power plants in the absence of reported data.
176  of Ekibastuz that hosts the biggest thermal power plants in the country and exhibits the higher SO(2
177                                   Coal-fired power plants in the United States are required to reduce
178 vidence that reductions in Hg emissions from power plants in the United States had their intended imp
179 ta on run-up heights, for 89 coastal nuclear power plants in the world.
180 s within the permissible limit in coal-fired power plants in Victoria.
181 , and SO2 emissions from a 585 MW coal fired power plant, in Boardman OR, were found to be significan
182 cluding emission control measures of thermal power plants, increased hydro-power usage, vehicle emiss
183        The results from a case study of U.S. power plants indicate that time-specific MDs are high ar
184 ged, concerns remain about whether or not PV power plants induce a "heat island" (PVHI) effect, much
185 turing CO2 from a natural gas combined cycle power plant instead of the air reduces the production co
186 11 accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant is analysed using combined high-resolution l
187 ure and sequestration from natural gas-fired power plants is an attractive strategy to mitigate globa
188 sector, the utilization of natural gas-fired power plants is anticipated to continue.
189 emoval, and increased use of bromide at some power plants is expected.
190 ruction of natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants is incompatible with a transition to global
191  components in the flue streams of gas-fired power plants is particularly challenging due to the low
192 nary combustion, in particular in coal-fired power plants, is found to be the main responsible sector
193 lity and stochastic uncertainty for 407 coal power plant locations in the U.S. are analyzed.
194  consumption are caused by a small number of power plants, mainly baseload coal-fired generators.
195  fuel cycle (e.g., natural gas and coal) and power plant manufacturing (e.g., equipment and construct
196 Nationally, water use for the fuel cycle and power plant manufacturing can reach up to 26% of the tot
197 n into account, the solar portion of an ISCC power plant may be more cost-effective.
198  (FGD) wastewater discharges from coal-fired power plants may increase bromide concentrations at down
199 strategies at high-emissions portions of the power plant merit order.
200                              As the cellular power plant, mitochondria play a significant role in hom
201       This study developed and applied a new power plant modeling option for a hybrid cooling system
202                         This study employs a power plant modeling tool to explore the feasibility of
203 thane (CH4) emissions from natural gas-fired power plants (NGPP) and oil refineries, two major end us
204 discusses 23 flights at 14 natural gas-fired power plants (NGPPs) using an aircraft-based mass balanc
205   This is a result of reduced investments in power plant NOX controls in earlier years in anticipatio
206 eshwater systems after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) accident in 1986 and in freshwater and
207 ated steel components from the Swiss Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Gosgen and the Spallation Neutron Sour
208 rge generating capacity of base-load nuclear power plants (NPPs) without ramping capability in the re
209 ure of how clusters of low- or high-emitting power plants of similar production cost create large swi
210 Hourly emissions are resolved for individual power plants; oil and gas emissions are basin-specific.
211  in the reservoir of the Jirau Hydroelectric Power Plant - on the Madeira River.
212 mide loads were evaluated for all coal-fired power plants operating wet FGD, and flow paths were used
213 ced water discharges and 33% with coal-fired power plants operating wet FGD, with 18% derived from na
214 health impacts into cost-based decisions for power plant operation.
215 ncy Clean Air Markets database of historical power plant operation.
216 tively minimized by intelligently modulating power plant operations over multihour periods, without i
217 ction, however, is small relative to that of power plant operations.
218      While results suggested that individual power plants' operations were unique, weak trends consis
219 he accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant over 2011-2014.
220                                    To assess power plant performance, we evaluated reliability metric
221                           If built, proposed power plants (planned, permitted or under construction)
222 entation of CO2 capture at fossil fuel-fired power plants postcombustion.
223       From a detailed analysis of coal-fired power plants presently planned or under construction in
224                      In the U.S., coal fired power plants produce over 136 million tons of coal combu
225                        A LIFE-based fleet of power plants promises clean energy generation with no gr
226 ing from different Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant reactors (Units 1 and 3) is hereby examined
227    Carbon capture and storage (CCS) for coal power plants reduces onsite carbon dioxide emissions, bu
228 ual average SO2 concentrations in coal-fired power plant regions increased by >60% during 2005-2012,
229                                              Power plant regions with annual SO2 emissions greater th
230                          Although coal-fired power plants remain NC's leading SO2 source, a trend ana
231 s are a key target because a small number of power plants represent a large portion of total global e
232  water resources exist within 25 miles of 92 power plants (representing 61% of capacity and 50% of ge
233 ter effluent in a water source, is common at power plants, representing baseline conditions.
234 er years in anticipation of accelerated coal power plant retirements, energy penalties associated wit
235 allow assessing a marginal change (e.g., one power plant's emissions) for different background emissi
236  the land side of Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plants since 2013.
237  nonpotable application is at thermoelectric power plants since these facilities require cooling, oft
238 sisted CO(2) capture process from coal fired power plants strives for the determination of degradatio
239 hifting of NOX emissions in later years from power plants subject to a regional NOX cap to those in r
240                         Improvements to coal power plant technology and the cofired combustion of bio
241 (0) concentrations were at levels of typical power plants (tens of ppb).
242 0), with 3-times higher mortality rates from power plants than transport.
243 ments in the capture unit, retrofitting a PC power plant that maintains its gross power output (compa
244               When the CO2 is sourced from a power plant, the electricity coproduct is assumed to dis
245 ccident at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, the future contribution of nuclear power to
246          Unlike emissions from fossil-fueled power plants, the carbon footprint of the industrial sec
247             Owing to the mature size of coal power plants, the diffusion of FGD is driven by unit num
248 able cooling water source for thermoelectric power plants, thereby mitigating some of the freshwater
249 of reducing carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants through co-firing bio-oil and sequestering
250 y costs required to convert an existing NGCC power plant to a biomethane-based bioenergy with carbon
251  capacity factor of the solar portion of the power plant to be above 21%.
252  and extracting electric power from the main power plant to meet the CCS plant's electricity and stea
253 from Unit 1 of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant to provide a better understanding of the eve
254 scharged from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant to the sea was estimated to be 2.35 GBq, and
255     We consider the vulnerability of nuclear power plants to a disaster like the one that occurred at
256 grading existing subcritical pulverized coal power plants to increase their efficiency, improving env
257 "base load" coal-fired and natural gas-fired power plants to justify the EPA's determination that CCS
258  method of replacing conventional coal-fired power plants to meet the demands for lower CO2 emissions
259 e thermal energy from geothermal and nuclear power plants to produce steam and transport the purified
260 tricter emissions requirements on coal-fired power plants together with low natural gas prices have c
261      If the planned retirement of coal-fired power plants together with new installations and upgrade
262                                  For the two power plants, top-down NO(X) emissions agree to within 1
263 te an analytical approach for evaluating the power plant total THM (TTHM) and risk contributions.
264                    Utilizing this model, the power plant TTHM contribution was estimated to range fro
265 mpared hydrologic and economic conditions at power plants under three scenarios: quantified de facto
266 h distinct emission factors (clean and dirty power plants, urban, and fires).
267 th alternative use options: cofiring in coal power plants, use as charcoal, and use as a fuel for hea
268 on capture technologies on natural gas-fired power plants, using site-specific emissions and regional
269 ter for women living near different types of power plants was also determined by using National Envir
270                  The fly ash in all of these power plants was, in contrast, enriched in the heavy iso
271 air temperature and humidity, and consequent power plant water requirements.
272 ht better positions us to interpret reported power plant water use data as well as improve future wat
273  many industrial applications, such as steam power plants, water desalination, and de-icing of aerody
274 using reclaimed water to cool thermoelectric power plants, we developed a spatially resolved model of
275 ollution in food crops grown near coal-fired power plants, we measured the total mercury concentratio
276 men who lived closer to coal and solid waste power plants were exposed to higher levels of particulat
277   All of the bottom ashes collected in these power plants were isotopically depleted in the heavy iso
278 sed on oil and gas wastewater and coal-fired power plant wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD) wastewate
279 resent work evaluates the role of coal-fired power plant wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD)-associate
280                                  The type of power plant where the natural gas is utilized is far mor
281 lternative for the design of next-generation power plants, which are expected to operate at higher te
282 as done at full-scale on a 900 MW coal-fired power plant with electrostatic precipitator (ESP) and we
283 thway for clean power generation in existing power plants with a potential for significant reductions
284 cooling system at coal- or natural-gas-fired power plants with and without amine-based carbon capture
285                          We conclude that PC power plants with CO2 capture are likely to remain less
286 inclusion of mass and energy feedbacks in PC power plants with CO2 capture into previous analyses, as
287 in an urban region with two large coal-fired power plants with distinct scrubbing technologies that h
288 ) adsorbents into the flue gas of coal fired power plants with electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) is
289                      Replacing 8-10 existing power plants with modern natural gas combined cycle unit
290 determining the best locations for replacing power plants with new wind, solar, or natural gas to mee
291                               Thermoelectric power plants with once-through cooling systems generated
292 mostly reflect circulation between ponds and power plants, with only two-thirds of this water require
293 on, but there was considerable variation for power plants within and outside of Japan; 2.
294 ins its gross power output (compared to a PC power plant without a capture unit) can cause a drop in
295 rage 1.6 times higher than the ones of hydro-power plants (without considering natural land transform
296  three tidal stream devices to offshore wind power plants (without considering water depletion).
297 lidated models were then applied to 764 coal power plants worldwide, for which no reported data were
298 ossil electricity is produced and how such a power plant would operate, given hourly solar resource d
299 ectricity generated by a fossil fuel-burning power plant would rise substantially, owing to the expen
300                               In many cases, power plants would retrofit open-loop systems to cooling

 
Page Top