コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 tors modulate pair bonding in the monogamous prairie vole.
2 a series of experiments using the monogamous prairie vole.
3 he formation of pair bonds in the monogamous prairie vole.
4 the effects of estrogen on the brain of the prairie vole.
5 [V1a receptor (V1aR)] antagonist in the male prairie vole.
6 ss molecularly-defined NAc cell types in the prairie vole.
7 ir bond formation in the socially monogamous prairie vole.
8 relate to the specialized life style of the prairie vole.
9 idine (BrdU) in the amygdala and DG than did prairie voles.
10 and VMH, but not in the pMeA or DG, than did prairie voles.
11 nvolved in pair bond formation in monogamous prairie voles.
12 1a receptor (V1aR) in a large sample of wild prairie voles.
13 is critical for pair-bond formation in male prairie voles.
14 total and selective social behaviors in male prairie voles.
15 a role in the preference for hind nipples in prairie voles.
16 estrus induction and pair bonding in female prairie voles.
17 labeling throughout the forebrain of female prairie voles.
18 role for the VNO in reproductive success in prairie voles.
19 inding in the ventral pallial region of male prairie voles.
20 al nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in lactating prairie voles.
21 body mass distribution in this population of prairie voles.
22 in the production of maternal aggression in prairie voles.
23 th maternal and mating-induced aggression in prairie voles.
24 ent in the control of maternal aggression in prairie voles.
25 n of postcopulatory aggression in adult male prairie voles.
26 mapping regional staining for c-fos) in male prairie voles.
27 montane voles, but it remained unchanged in prairie voles.
28 ne voles but did not change significantly in prairie voles.
29 romoted a partner preference in stress-naive prairie voles.
30 nged within the PrL of male, but not female, prairie voles.
31 ssive stress-coping in male, but not female, prairie voles.
32 innate immune system in both male and female prairie voles.
33 an occur in the absence of Oxtr signaling in prairie voles.
34 erences (an index of pair bonding) in female prairie voles.
35 ve different neurobiological actions in male prairie voles.
36 al circuitry mediate selective aggression in prairie voles.
37 nd consequences on social behavior in female prairie voles.
38 ological effects of AMPH treatment in female prairie voles.
39 iosus muscles in adult male, but not female, prairie voles.
40 ex difference would be similarly distinct in prairie voles.
41 drug experience in socially monogamous male prairie voles.
42 ression associated with pair bonding in male prairie voles.
43 ession is found in a chemosensory pathway in prairie voles.
44 and medial (pMeA) nuclei, in meadow, but not prairie, voles.
45 erpinnings of OXT receptor (OXTR) agonism in prairie voles, a rodent species with demonstrated transl
46 dy, we separated pair bonded male and female prairie voles after five days of co-housing, subjected t
51 e brains of two monogamous vole species, the prairie vole and pine vole, and two promiscuous vole spe
52 n more egalitarian and monogamous ones, like prairie voles and humans, when there is no perceived cos
53 ecular mechanisms underlying pair-bonding in prairie voles and paves the way to further our understan
56 hin the brains of closely related monogamous prairie voles and promiscuous meadow voles, and compare
57 its maternal aggression and NO production in prairie voles and suggest that the central release of NO
58 septum regulates pair bond formation in male prairie voles and that this process requires access to b
59 eptor binding that is similar to that of the prairie vole, and exhibit increased affiliative behaviou
60 for the behavioral effects of AMPH in female prairie voles, and found that conditioning with low to i
61 h alloparenting in juvenile and adult female prairie voles, and oxytocin receptor antagonist infused
62 regulation of partner preferences in female prairie voles, and suggest that oxytocin receptor expres
68 ized pair bonding in the socially monogamous prairie vole as an example of socio-sexual experience th
69 duced facilitation of pair bond formation in prairie voles, as well as potential sex differences in t
70 ctivation on partner preference formation in prairie voles, as well as the interaction between the MC
72 r the formation of social attachment in male prairie voles, because administration of haloperidol blo
74 exogenously administered OXT penetrates the prairie vole brain and showed that Receptor for Advanced
77 enhanced partner preference formation in the prairie vole, but not in the non-monogamous meadow vole.
78 e behaviour in the highly social, monogamous prairie vole, but not in the relatively asocial, promisc
81 y psychiatric disorders, discoveries made in prairie voles can direct novel treatment strategies for
84 ution of CART mRNA and peptide in monogamous prairie voles compared to congener promiscuous meadow vo
85 re, our study presents an integrated view of prairie vole dentate gyrus transcriptome and epigenome t
88 d AMPH administration in sexually naive male prairie voles enhanced V1aR expression in the AH and ind
91 thylome of hippocampal dentate gyrus of four prairie vole groups, namely attacker virgin males, paren
94 is, and the central nucleus of the amygdala, prairie voles had higher AVP receptor binding at birth t
95 hicle-exposed controls, prenatal VPA-exposed prairie voles had lower body weight throughout postnatal
96 ong-term pair-bonds, the socially monogamous prairie vole has emerged as an excellent model to study
97 ny species, including humans, and monogamous prairie voles have become the predominant model for inve
100 rences in CB1 densities across species, with prairie voles having higher CB1 binding in regions impli
101 nvironment influences CART expression in the prairie vole in a region- and stimulus-specific manner.
102 s research, the author observed 8 litters of prairie voles in a seminatural environment to confirm th
105 expression and impair social bonding in male prairie voles) increased D1, but not D2, receptor mRNA i
110 his selective aggression in pair-bonded male prairie voles is associated with increased release of va
111 The formation of monogamous pair bonds, by prairie voles, is facilitated by activation of dopamine
112 rs in selective peer attachment using female prairie voles lacking a functional oxytocin receptor gen
115 recently established the socially monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) as an animal model w
121 f intranasal OT given developmentally in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), a socially monogamo
122 nt species, the highly social and monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), greatly increases p
126 for drug-induced social deficits, using the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster)-a socially monogamou
129 he expression of pro-social behavior in male prairie voles (Microtus ochragaster), predicting that in
130 al species sympatric with cervids, including prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and field mice (Per
131 accumbens (NAc) expression across monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and promiscuous mea
133 OTRs) impairs the formation of pair bonds in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and zebra finches (
141 ry, and somatosensory cortex was examined in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) by using electrophy
147 Ralpha immunoreactivity (IR) was compared in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) from Illinois (IL),
152 abitation of sexually nai;ve male and female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) triggers a cascade
156 e meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) and prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) were injected with
157 uilding blocks of monogamous pair bonding in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster), as well as opportu
160 vectors were used to enhance ERalpha in male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster), which display high
168 segment of a 25-year study of the monogamous prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster, in Illinois, USA.
172 lationships with mates and peers (monogamous prairie voles) or peers (group-living meadow voles).
174 umber of TH-immunoreactive cells in the male prairie vole pBST and MeAPd, an effect that could be rev
179 r show that mice that are transgenic for the prairie vole receptor gene have a neuroanatomical patter
180 and/or changes in promoter structure of the prairie vole receptor gene may contribute to the species
181 corticosterone, a stress hormone, in female prairie voles recovering alone but not the female prairi
183 he cingulate cortex, AVP receptor binding in prairie voles showed a peak in early development with a
184 bits alcohol intake in male, but not female, prairie voles socially housed in the presence of untreat
185 l (IN) OXT administration in male and female prairie voles socially housed in the presence of untreat
186 organization, sexual differentiation of the prairie vole spinal cord differs from that found in most
189 ess both dopamine receptors (Drd1+/Drd2+) in prairie voles, suggesting these cells may be particularl
191 of aggression in sexually naive, adult male prairie voles that are comparable to those levels observ
194 VN) in male prairie voles, whereas in female prairie voles the morphological activation within the wh
195 cial defeat model in the socially monogamous prairie vole to investigate the impact of this stress on
199 rphic microsatellite in the 5' region of the prairie vole vasopressin 1a receptor (avpr1a) gene modif
200 may narrow the behavioral repertoire of male prairie voles via a DA receptor-specific mechanism in th
203 -photon in vivo Ca(2+) imaging in monogamous prairie voles, we found that pair bonding does not elici
210 ar nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) in male prairie voles, whereas in female prairie voles the morph
211 e investigated Oxtr expression in monogamous prairie voles, which have a well-characterized OXT syste
212 cleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) in male prairie voles, while defeat experience increased BNST CR
213 genetic and genomic tools for this species, prairie voles will likely maintain their current traject
214 essive behavioral testing of female and male prairie voles with immunohistochemistry for citrulline,
215 ed pair-bonding in Microtus ochrogaster, the prairie vole, with plastic changes in several brain regi
217 We hypothesized that PR expression in male prairie voles would differ from that described in other
218 we initially predicted that male and female prairie voles would exhibit similar behavioral responses