戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 wed greater conspecific-preference than face-preference.
2 nderlying ancestry component linked to human preference.
3 objective measure of morningness-eveningness preference.
4  genomic regions associated with visual mate preference.
5 ve subsites have a key role in galactomannan preference.
6 lity (4-point scale) and determined the scan preference.
7 ation through shifts in cellular orientation preference.
8 king behaviors, locomotor activity and place preference.
9 es for PME traits related to feed intake and preference.
10 ith flanking bases influencing the degree of preference.
11 eated with DAAs according to the physicians' preference.
12 ts the VSG-induced shift toward carbohydrate preference.
13 imilarities in their structure and substrate preference.
14  selected based on endoscopist expertise and preference.
15 ers a vacant A site, whereas RQC displays no preference.
16 y, excitations often establish a directional preference.
17 of the move to adopt TM is driven by patient preference.
18 ocomotor sensitization and conditioned place preference.
19 ical intracranial self-stimulation and place preference.
20  seasonal home range differences and habitat preferences.
21  meat products to satisfy their various meat preferences.
22 l-amygdala network underlies social-decision preferences.
23 Solanum lycopersicum) fruit flavor and human preferences.
24 ches have been developed for evaluating risk preferences.
25 ctive binding agents with retained glycoform preferences.
26 ce that infection treatment shifted foraging preferences.
27 ecisions are often discordant with patients' preferences.
28 ty index indicating the consistency of their preferences.
29 and PGANT9B also display unique glycopeptide preferences.
30 f instrumental divergence on economic choice preferences.
31  the context of costs and patient values and preferences.
32 re strongly associated with divergent visual preferences.
33 in treatment guidelines and provider/patient preferences.
34 to by tailoring news diets toward the users' preferences.
35 rding to resource availability and community preferences.
36 ", interactions in determining regiochemical preferences.
37 monstrating previously unknown GrB substrate preferences.
38 ctivities, whereas maintaining its substrate preferences.
39 tential outcomes and reflecting on their own preferences.
40      Does college change students' political preferences?
41  govern reactivity trends and regioselective preferences?
42 utterflies with distinct mate and host plant preferences, a finding that supports a polygenic archite
43 echanisms underlying variation in pollinator preferences across populations, and how environmental co
44 dependent male resilience to reduced sucrose preference after subchronic variable stress.
45 882His variant acquire CpG flanking sequence preference akin to that of DNMT3B, which is non-cooperat
46  shared decision-making, quality of life, or preferences (all ps > 0.05).
47              TWPC samples were evaluated for preference and acceptability.
48 cement, as assessed by the conditioned place preference and drug self-administration procedures.
49 plore the evolutionary origins of human face-preference and its relationship to conspecific-preferenc
50 ipitate female-specific reduction in sucrose preference and performed gonadectomies to test the contr
51 atal neurotransmission and influences social preference and repetitive behavior.
52 etween self-reported morningness-eveningness preference and rs10830963 on risk of type 2 diabetes was
53  the human enzyme that explain its substrate preference and the mechanistic basis for catalysis.
54 ilies, to understand the context of parental preference and to determine whose fitness interests are
55              While many species showed equal preference and/or equal performance in many traits, in g
56 n the observed variations in peptide binding preferences and affinities for each of the four HLA-E-li
57 ted cofactors, altered integration targeting preferences and are not restricted by MxB expression.
58 ogous enzymes exhibiting divergent substrate preferences and catalytic mechanisms.
59  RNA demethylases beyond different substrate preferences and cellular localization, where m6A demethy
60  microbiota signature, independent of sexual preferences and demographic confounders, in order to ass
61 ibe diverse spectral and temporal modulation preferences and distinct nonlinearities, and their modif
62 posure to sweet tastes predicts similar food preferences and eating behavior in later life and is ass
63 l Drosophila exhibit idiosyncratic olfactory preferences and idiosyncratic neural responses to odors,
64 ould focus on association with altered taste preferences and potential oral health consequences.
65 ns and ensure that individual patient needs, preferences and values are honoured in the care that is
66 lf-administration, cocaine-conditioned place preference, and cocaine-primed reinstatement of drug see
67 y before body weight, body composition, diet preference, and glucose and lipid metabolic endpoints we
68 ecific-preference, no regions exhibited face-preference, and the majority of the visually-responsive
69 n herbivore movements, space-use, individual preference, and the spatio-temporal pattern of resources
70 mation use by rational agents with differing preferences, and demonstrate that the resulting collecti
71 avoid dialysis, is guided by patient values, preferences, and goals, with a focus on quality of life
72 we argue that this makes discussions of risk preferences, and indeed the motivations of behaviour, no
73  of life, predicted life expectancy, patient preferences, and other patient factors be considered, be
74 sure amputee subject and prosthetist subject preferences, and provided a reliability index indicating
75  that differences in GPCR-G protein coupling preferences, and the Galpha(o) substrate preference of R
76 ticipants' reaction times in predicting risk preferences; and 4) manipulating risk preferences via a
77                 We conclude that cooperative preferences are contagious; social and cultural learning
78    The kinase-specific positional amino acid preferences are learned using a bidirectional recurrent
79                                Lectin glycan preferences are usually centered on specific monosacchar
80 ds of hyperactivity and alterations in place preference, are not phenocopied by MK-801, suggesting a
81 etries in motor behavior, such as human hand preference, are observed throughout bilateria.
82 ring acceptability and contraceptive product preference as a proxy for HIV prevention delivery method
83                                A free-choice preference assessment showed that piglets had a preferen
84 nt experienced by populations and individual preferences at varying temporal and spatial scales.
85 that these specific representations modulate preference behavior toward males and females.
86 Here, we couple QTL for divergence in visual preference behaviours with population genomic and gene e
87  mechanisms underlying changes in these mate preference behaviours.
88                      The divergent substrate preference between DNMT3A and DNMT3B provides an explana
89 ses and identified a difference in substrate preference between METTL15 and its bacterial ortholog rs
90      The protocol is thus designed to assess preference between social and non-social stimuli under c
91      Patients and technicians were asked for preferences between the machines.
92 ven specificity subgroups defined by binding preferences between their DIP and Dpr members.
93  FGF21 administration does not alter protein preference, but instead promotes the foraging of other m
94 day and night resulting in varying circadian preferences called chronotypes.
95 on process, and no existing models of social preference can account for the observed individual diffe
96  insight into how BHAB-specific microhabitat preferences can affect toxicity risks.
97 h has explored the neural pathways promoting preference change in the absence of external reinforceme
98 obtain the currently most desired outcome as preferences change.
99 on, locomotor activity, or conditioned place preference compared with WT littermate controls.
100 its inhibition impedes sucrose-driven flavor preference conditioning.
101 operation and coordination, including social preferences, cooperative beliefs, (emotion) signaling, a
102 d reinstatement of cocaine conditioned place preference (CPP) and the effects of low dose guanfacine
103 In this study, we used the conditioned place preference (CPP) model to investigate the involvement of
104 was then combined with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm to determine the relationship
105 (0, 5, 10 mg/kg) using the conditioned place preference (CPP) test.
106              Studies using conditioned place preference (CPP) tests of reward indicate that song prod
107 ensities, and that cocaine conditioned place preference (CPP) training followed by abstinence selecti
108 ss consistent than amputee subjects in their preferences (CV of 5.6% for amputee subjects, CV of 23%
109 oward HJ cleavage but with a target sequence preference distinct from that of RuvC, highlighting a un
110 p recipients, while not-groupy participants' preferences do not change across group context.
111          Classical OFT predicts that dietary preferences do not change as food becomes limiting, so i
112 ted with cortical regions showing peripheral preference (e.g. parahippocampal cortex).
113                             This would allow preference evolution without altering perception of the
114 If mating signals predict good genes, mating preferences evolve because attractive mates yield additi
115 pendence in the design and interpretation of preference experiments.
116 lex process that can be influenced by innate preferences, flower constancy, the composition of the ch
117 eight loss, metabolic improvements, and diet preference following vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG).
118             Borden and Getty showed that the preference for 2 + 2 cycloaddition is due to the necessi
119 ference assessment showed that piglets had a preference for a feeder sprayed with a solution containi
120 by two biases: choice bias, which reflects a preference for a given response, and contraction bias, w
121 ion in all the chromosomes (1-5) without any preference for a particular chromosome region.
122 d male-male aggression and conditioned place preference for aggression-paired contexts.
123 sumed significantly more and showed enhanced preference for alcohol in a 24 h intermittent access dri
124 ol consumption and reduced conditioned place preference for alcohol.
125                     Providers demonstrated a preference for an in-person training workshop, though fu
126 gs from these cells further reveal that this preference for approaching motion arises in the interpla
127 tituting an RNA-binding surface exhibiting a preference for binding double-strand RNA (dsRNA) over si
128 referentially insert at TNA sequences with a preference for C and G nucleotides in the immediately fl
129 mechanosensitive ion channels that exhibit a preference for calcium in response to mechanical stimuli
130 ted with carbapenems, along with the general preference for carbapenem-sparing regimens, suggests usi
131 egarding network development, a connectivity preference for cholecystokinin-expressing interneurons t
132 ent developmental stages, revealing a strong preference for clustering at the polar domains.
133 e and moderated by individual differences in preference for consistency.
134 constrained because measurements of carbon's preference for core versus mantle materials at the press
135 nformational ensemble, which is coupled to a preference for CsgE binding.
136 e proton affinity (PA = 258 kcal/mol), and a preference for electron-poor alkenes.
137                                     Infants' preference for faces with direct compared to averted eye
138 evel, where roe deer characterised by a high preference for feeding sites exhibited more pronounced b
139                        Parents showed strong preference for formally trained practitioners in special
140 onjugation (i.e. the anomeric effect) or the preference for gauche conformations about the C1-O5 bond
141             This effect leads to unwarranted preference for happy endings.
142 f agency, recent work demonstrating a strong preference for high-agency environments indicates a sali
143 y, integration site analyses reveal a strong preference for HIV-1 to integrate into speckle-associate
144 t the monoubiquitinated ID complex loses its preference for ICL and related branched DNA structures,
145                               Interestingly, preference for in-person versus virtual surgical consult
146 le; our binding experiments revealed the LBD preference for l-Glu but also for sulfur-containing amin
147 f-function mutant to reveal the C(i) species preference for LCI1.
148 lated modulation also varied with a bouton's preference for luminance changes and direction or axis o
149  in vivo growth assays show that IrtAB has a preference for mycobactin over carboxymycobactin as its
150 endent FAD-containing monooxygenase having a preference for NADPH.
151 areas, its role in regulating motivation and preference for nutrients has not yet been investigated.
152 n primates, maternal obesity also predicts a preference for palatable foods in the offspring.
153                             We find that the preference for paternalism holds when advice is solicite
154                      Lastly, we see that the preference for paternalism only occurs when decision mak
155 rse pericentromeric regions, showing a local preference for polymorphic regions.
156 astern Asia, nor whether the subgroup with a preference for rice and millet is present in the region.
157 cal effort for reward as well as reduced the preference for risky outcomes.
158 or 6OMT activity and a strong stereospecific preference for S-enantiomers.
159 he latter cluster confers to SAR1B a binding preference for SEC23A that is stronger than that of SAR1
160 ng dolphin presence, with dolphins showing a preference for shallow waters (5-15 m) less than 2 km fr
161 tify the molecular basis for the distinctive preference for sulphated receptors displayed by the majo
162  consultation reflected access to care, with preference for telemedicine decreasing from 72% to 33% w
163 t torsional strain plays a major role in the preference for the antifacial hydride approach, consiste
164 he closed state of the channels, it has more preference for the inactivated one.
165 action on oligosaccharide standards showed a preference for the larger oligosaccharides.
166  CO(2) and CH(4) fluxes implying a microbial preference for the more labile C fraction in the peat ma
167  the fullerene-steroid hybrids proceeds with preference for the Re face of the 1,3-dipole, with forma
168                          THFA shows a strong preference for the trans- over the cis-COOH configuratio
169 h thousands of Pol II transcribed genes with preference for transcription start site and promoter reg
170  restricted to the alpine belt have a higher preference for warm temperatures and a stronger response
171 lin protein 22 (PMP22) exhibits a pronounced preference for, promotes the formation of, and stabilize
172 NT9B O-glycosyltransferases confers distinct preferences for a variety of endogenous substrates.
173                                        Then, preferences for accurate predictors increased over time,
174                The pH-modulated shifts in BC preferences for BCCP and BADC partners suggest they cont
175 signals to attract females, and females have preferences for certain signal traits.
176  the current state of communication, patient preferences for communication about palliative care topi
177 ur study provides guidelines for animal meat preferences for consumers and sheds light on the functio
178                    We observed no effects on preferences for delayed rewards.
179 toward equal outcomes, people express weaker preferences for options that increase equality when cons
180                         Bromodomains exhibit preferences for specific patterns of post-translational
181           Animals exhibit innate and learned preferences for temperature and humidity-conditions crit
182          We report five studies that examine preferences for the allocation of environmental harms an
183    By directly measuring adhesion forces and preferences for three types of endogenous neural progeni
184 ost-operative mortality and the diversity of preferences found in MOLST, thoughtful discussion before
185 d genetic variants associated with a morning preference from a published genome-wide association meta
186 enase (ALDH) family with different substrate preferences from reported ALDH families, named the L-AHG
187 CC is necessary for acquisition of prosocial preferences from vicarious reinforcement.
188                           Importantly, these preferences held constant across reported levels of fina
189  Rcrus1 and posterior vermis improved social preference impairments and repetitive/inflexible behavio
190 rons in TeA impairs auditory-driven maternal preference in a pup-retrieval assay.
191 t rating (response time) accurately predicts preference in choice, overcoming failures of procedure i
192 lly interpreted as evidence for an intrinsic preference in favor of sooner rewards.
193  tertiary structure reduce or eliminate this preference in favor of the disordered phase.
194  object recognition in both sexes and social preference in females.
195 lated by serotonin, and we found that social preference in isolated fish could be rescued by acutely
196 of vHPC-NAc neurons causes decreased sucrose preference in male mice after subchronic variable stress
197                                  Conspecific-preference in social perception is evident for multiple
198 crystal X-ray structures reveals that isomer preference in the crystal lattice is due to general shap
199 ble for substrate deprotonation and isotopic preferences in AMT pores and that decreased deprotonatio
200 been shaped by both bona fide TE integration preferences in eukaryotic genomes and by selection follo
201 ore this question by assessing collaborative preferences in interdisciplinary research at multiple sc
202 imensional combinatorial screening, revealed preferences in small-molecule chemotypes that bind RNA a
203  small-molecule chemotypes that bind RNA and preferences in the RNA motifs that bind small molecules.
204 uspension and forced swim tests; and sucrose preference increased.
205 iated signaling contributes to macronutrient preference independent of VSG, while removal of CD36 sig
206 on and a lack of D-amphetamine-induced place preference, indicating a disruption of the dopamine-depe
207 hile orderly modular networks of orientation preference initially arise independent of visual experie
208 icial oxyanion receptors with switchable ion preference is a challenging goal in host-guest chemistry
209 pressing neurons leading to acquired cocaine preference is incomplete.
210 coming failures of procedure invariance; (2) preference is not constructed at choice time nor does it
211 ta reinforces the notion that simple C-patch preference is not fully predictive of hnRNPK localizatio
212 relationships between BHABs and microhabitat preferences is based on non-quantitative anecdotal obser
213 e show that local heterogeneity of frequency preferences is not unique to rodents.
214 conflict strongly predict participants' risk preferences (loss aversion and decreasing marginal utili
215 es) choice observations were included in the preference models.
216 espite the importance of flavor for consumer preference, most plant breeding programs have neglected
217 al mid suprasylvian gyrus showed conspecific-preference, no regions exhibited face-preference, and th
218 e correctly predicted from the thermodynamic preference observed in computational models.
219  the correlation between measures of habitat preference (occurrence, abundance, fidelity, inter-seaso
220 al characterization helps to rationalize the preference of ACAT1 for unsaturated acyl chains, and pro
221                    Our finding indicates the preference of chalcogenide (c-) terminated structures ov
222 ivity, CpG specificity and flanking sequence preference of DNMT3A.
223                                          The preference of each nucleobase for either type of interac
224                               The behavioral preference of females was quantified in seven combinatio
225 vide an opportunity to analyze position-wise preference of miRNAs in terms of target binding, which c
226                   Therefore, the mechanistic preference of PH(2)(-) is steered to the S(N)2 reaction
227 e studies demonstrate that the ordered phase preference of PMP22 derives from global structural featu
228 ing preferences, and the Galpha(o) substrate preference of RGS6, shape A(1)R- and M(2)R-GIRK signalin
229 he ligand scaffold to adapt to the geometric preference of the bridging species was found to facilita
230 lfated salicinoids do not affect the feeding preference of the generalist caterpillar Lymantria dispa
231  motion signals in MT that locally match the preference of the MSTd cell in both parallax and dispari
232 hylation patterns are guided by the sequence preference of these enzymes.
233 veloped a simple method based on spontaneous preference of zebrafish for using the larger available h
234 concepts in organic chemistry, describes the preferences of a substituent at the anomeric carbon in g
235 n play a dominant role in the conformational preferences of each analogue.
236 tural amino acids to fully map the substrate preferences of GrB, demonstrating previously unknown GrB
237                           While the location preferences of hnRNPK for C-patches are conformationally
238 unexpected local variability in the stimulus preferences of individual neurons in A1 and other primar
239 g recognition or by altering the RNA-binding preferences of individual splicing factors.
240 y when confined to predicting the mutational preferences of limited common ancestral descent, such as
241 tudies on conformational and configurational preferences of organometallic complexes stabilized by vi
242                                The rotameric preferences of R1 side chain are determined by the type
243               The effect of site integration preferences of specific TEs on evolutionary outcomes and
244 papers, the results reflect both the funding preferences of the NIH and the composition of the applic
245  also to acquire new knowledge regarding the preferences of the observed actor.
246 ard refugees by systematically examining the preferences of US local elected officials and offers uni
247                     For instance, individual preferences of where to live may lead to the emergence o
248 amined potential causal effects of a morning preference on objectively captured response performances
249 ssessment revealed the influence of personal preference on physicians' willingness to adopt the 60-s/
250 ifference was found in patient or technician preference or image acquisition time between devices.
251  outcomes that will follow possible choices; preference, or how people weigh those outcomes; and choi
252 pendent positive or negative other-regarding preference (ORP), whereby decisions affected the reward
253                         With similar habitat preferences Ostreopsis may serve as an indicator organis
254 prevents the pathological shift of substrate preference, preserves cardiac function and energetics, a
255 assess the consistency of the actions with a preference previously demonstrated by the agent and, imp
256 may support decisions in relation to patient preferences, prognosis, and proportionality.
257 d female mice in a cocaine conditioned place preference protocol followed by 2 weeks of abstinence, a
258 of freely moving mice in a conditioned place-preference protocol so as to mediate Pavlovian condition
259  risks of anticoagulation along with patient preference rather than on an algorithmic pathway based o
260  cultural familiarity and individual musical preferences remain open questions.
261 pulation distribution of object-angle tuning preferences remained stable.
262     The evolution of male signals and female preferences remains a central question in the study of a
263                                  Our habitat preference results, based on longitudinal GPS data, allo
264 st there are region, size, and/or structural preferences selected for during for their amplification.
265 or is strongly dependent on the structure of preference sharing within the group, as well as the qual
266                                        These preferences stand in stark contrast to the side chain po
267           During social transmission of food preference (STFP), the combination of an olfactory senso
268 ons also contributed to opioid-induced place preference, suggesting a role in signaling positive vale
269 neural populations accurately encoded choice preference switches.
270                     The three-chamber social preference test is often used to assess social deficits
271  both subjects and stimuli during the social preference test, we reveal marked differences in behavio
272 r, and anxiety-like behavior using saccharin preference testing, reward-omission testing, and open-fi
273  (measured via the forced swim and saccharin preference tests) behaviors in outbred rats relate to mi
274 responsive cortex showed greater conspecific-preference than face-preference.
275 f male and female human participants' choice preferences than did a conventional model, sensitive onl
276 s to estimate relative abundance and habitat preference that control for uneven genome quality and sa
277 ," such that groupy participants have social preferences that change for in-group and out-group recip
278 each toxin exhibits different glycan-binding preferences that correlate with glycan expression profil
279 ter surgery, all monkeys retained the social preferences they had demonstrated with the preoperativel
280 mer regime, each enantiomer showing a strong preference to associate with itself, but socially self-s
281  Monkeys showed a pro-variance bias (PVB): a preference to choose options with more variable evidence
282 Look Duration (RALD), indicating attentional preference to different stimuli, such as social versus n
283 H(4)-(C(O)PPh)}(2) are similarly obtained in preference to higher oligomers, in contrast to precedent
284  phenotypes, the low-LI individuals showed a preference to visiting familiar feeders, which contrasts
285            Na(+)-depleted mice showed robust preferences to "light taste" (H(2)O illuminated with 470
286                           We then used these preferences to design substrate-based inhibitors and a G
287  choice, or how people combine judgments and preferences to reach a decision.
288 ts demonstrate that despite well-established preferences toward equal outcomes, people express weaker
289          The evolution of human diets led to preferences toward polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) con
290 n Ang II formation, thus displaying a strong preference towards the reno-protective alternative RAS a
291 ur ancestral state reconstruction of habitat preference, using c.
292                             A representative preference value set for patients with food allergy was
293 Short-Form Six-Dimension version 2 (SF-6Dv2) preference value set for the calculation of health utili
294 g risk preferences; and 4) manipulating risk preferences via a broad versus narrow bracketing manipul
295                                         This preference was even more stringent for a superinhibitory
296 th the preoperatively learned cues, but this preference was reduced in the monkeys with ACC lesions.
297 eference and its relationship to conspecific-preference, we conducted the first comparative and nonin
298 mulation is sufficient to condition a flavor preference, while its inhibition impedes sucrose-driven
299 level of AHs is defined by their interaction preference with neutral lipids and ability to decrease s
300 nts with PA discussed their end-of-life care preferences with their physician.

 
Page Top