ライフサイエンスコーパス: premolar

1 lesion revealed root exposure of the second premolar.

2 ry gingiva between the left canine and first premolar.

3 ith acute pain on the maxillary right second premolar.

4 texture analysis (3DST) on the upper fourth premolar.

5 eduled to undergo extraction of a mandibular premolar.

6 majority of abfractions and PCCR occurred in premolars.

7 he mandible between the roots of canines and premolars.

8 mandibular premolar or between apices of the premolars.

9 information from the lower molars and distal premolars.

10 s found to be below the apices of mandibular premolars.

11 iolucent lesion between his mandibular right premolars.

12 nd left second, third, and fourth mandibular premolars.

13 nts, or having no sealant-eligible molars or premolars.

14 rify this approach with four extracted human premolars.

15 eristics of the P3, M1-2, mandible and lower premolars.

16 anterior mandible or involving the maxillary premolars.

17 by eruption of molars faster than permanent premolars.

18 36 maxillary and 35 mandibular single-rooted premolars.

19 I, II, or III furcation defects in maxillary premolars.

20 ower shrinkage was tested in extracted human premolars.

21 n age of 54.25 +/- 17.08 years, including 17 premolars, 1 canine, and 2 incisors.

22 mulatta (12-22 years) had ligatures placed (premolar, 1st molar teeth) in all 4 quadrants.

23 study was divided among 7 for the maxillary premolar-1st molar region, 6 for the mandibular premolar

24 molar-1st molar region, 6 for the mandibular premolar-1st molar region, and 6 for the incisor-canine

25 tionship of the 3 regions was for mandibular premolar-1st molar sites, r2 = 0.78.

26 Approximately 79-80%, 59-60%, and 35-36% premolars 2D BSH remained in comparison to 75%, 50%, and

27 om 41 CT scans, 65% of the mandibular second premolars, 53% of the mandibular first molars, and 73% o

28 mit available bone for IIP, 7% of the second premolars, 9% of the first molars, and 31% of the second

29 eth adopt a size and shape characteristic of premolars, a tooth type that was lost in mice around 50-

30 nd left second, third, and fourth mandibular premolars; a resorbable collagen membrane was secured ov

31 (rs1219648) presented higher risk for having premolar agenesis (p = 0.02; OR = 1.8; 95% C.I., 1.1-3.0

32 ere found in more common cases of incisor or premolar agenesis, indicating that these have a differen

33 vidence of replacement of the ultimate upper premolar and a unique paleopathological case in Mesozoic

34 lar second premolar and mesial of the fourth premolar and Class II furcation defects at the buccal fu

35 nation determined hypodontia of right second premolar and delayed eruption of left second premolar in

36 including a proximal femur, the fourth upper premolar and first and second upper molars, and a mandib

37 created on the mesial surface of the second premolar and first molar in all quadrants.

38 , and a mandible preserving the lower second premolar and lower canine and incisor alveoli, reveal a

39 bony defects distal of the mandibular second premolar and mesial of the fourth premolar and Class II

40 fferent loading scenarios (incisive, canine, premolar and molar bites) to test the hypothesis that th

41 location and angulation were compared among premolar and molar edentulous sites.

42 Premolar and molar MBLs were measured on panoramic radio

43 CF was collected from the mesial surfaces of premolar and molar teeth using filter paper strips.

44 h significant differences between the second premolar and second molar sites.

45 ch as the loss of the upper and lower second premolar and the development of a honing blade for the u

46 aterally on the distal surface of the second premolar and the mesial surface of the first molar in ni

47 Twelve canines had their mandibular four premolars and first molar teeth extracted bilaterally.

48 design included extraction of all mandibular premolars and first molars in five canines.

49 All mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted in five dogs.

50 frequently seen near mandibular canines and premolars and is routinely treated with excisional biops

51 d premolars- most commonly, maxillary second premolars and mandibular central incisors.

52 s were placed on buccal left and right upper premolars and molars (UL, UR), labial upper central inci

53 plaque samples from mesio-buccal aspects of premolars and molars exhibiting probing depths in the 4-

54 Incisors and canines responded better than premolars and molars.

55 h was an in vitro study with 150 caries-free premolars and molars.

56 tively were placed in the regions of missing premolars and molars.

57 al incisors, followed by maxillary posterior premolars and molars.

58 unt of AL in anterior teeth was less than in premolars and molars.

59 f pulp vitality of two maxillary left second premolars and one maxillary left first molar occurs afte

60 were performed as follows-extractions of two premolars and one molar on each mandibular quadrant (Day

61 In addition, the deciduous fourth premolars and permanent first and second molars consiste

62 ll lower primary postcanine teeth (deciduous premolars and permanent molars) in hominins.

63 to-enamel junctions of mandibular molars and premolars and the position where the lingual nerve left

64 is, we analyzed the enamel of fourth primary premolars and the saliva proteome at 3 critical time poi

65 y with autosomal dominant agenesis of second premolars and third molars identified a locus on chromos

66 h agenesis in a single family lacking second premolars and third molars, we performed a mutational an

67 entition by a loss of the permanent canines, premolars and to some extent incisors.

68 g tooth types (incisors, cuspids, and molars/premolars), and two classifications: A- vs. B- (visually

69 ficantly more interproximal plaque in molar, premolar, and anterior teeth compared to manual floss at

70 omated flosser to manual floss for anterior, premolar, and molar teeth using the plaque index (PI) an

71 uid (GCF) samples were taken at one incisor, premolar, and molar tooth and stored with serum samples

72 ncisors and cuspids; between 84% and 92% for premolars; and between 59% and 96% for molars.

73 Upper and lower distal premolars are strongly molariform and are captured under

74 encountering the intraosseous artery at the premolar area is <21% during a lateral window sinus floo

75 sion in the gingiva of the mandibular canine-premolar area.

76 y vestibular gingiva extending to the second premolar areas, without any associated radiographic abno

77 patients, each requiring extraction of four premolars before orthodontic treatment, were enrolled in

78 lk sutures tied around the mandibular second premolars bilaterally, followed by the topical applicati

79 ne the clinical SOG dimensions around molar, premolar, canine, and incisor teeth in upper and lower j

80 Each subject required maxillary premolar, canine, or central incisor tooth extraction.

81 ysts located predominantly in the mandibular premolar-canine region.

82 traction because of orthodontic reasons, one premolar, chosen at random, was extracted 8 weeks before

83 ngle-rooted molars preceded by double-rooted premolars, combined with a very long muzzle, exceedingly

84 Ar. ramidus had a reduced canine/premolar complex and a little-derived cranial morphology

85 umans had a functionally honing canine-third premolar complex.

86 the first and second lower molar crowns, and premolar crown and radicular anatomy) indicates attribut

87 Both maxillary and mandibular premolars demonstrated a nonsignificant RSA percentage a

88 ology hypothesizes that loads applied to the premolars during feeding had a profound influence on the

89 measured from the PDL space of intact swine premolars ex vivo was equivalent to physical PDL strains

90 Forty-five (45) premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were randoml

91 178 human permanent mandibular first premolars extracted from a native Chinese population wer

92 In 25 patients requiring bilateral premolar extraction because of orthodontic reasons, one

93 Premolar extraction can increase the gingival display in

94 the modality of orthodontic treatment (i.e., premolar extraction versus non-extraction) can affect th

95 females; mean age, 14.1 y) undergoing first premolar extraction-based fixed appliance treatment were

96 rwent atraumatic bilateral second and fourth premolar extractions from both arches.

97 ntrol study for sample size, sex, mandibular premolar extractions, pretreatment age, post-treatment o

98 - 2.2 mm, and 12.5 +/- 2.5 mm for the second premolar, first molar, and second molar sites, respectiv

99 sites were 15%, 8.2%, and 2.4% in the second premolar, first molar, and second molar sites.

100 f the artery from the first premolar, second premolar, first molar, second molar, and third molar.

101 eived silk ligatures around their mandibular premolars followed by an application of a periodontal pa

102 its using ligatures around mandibular second premolars, followed by topical Porphyromonas gingivalis

103 Premolars from a second locality, the Lesedi Chamber, ar

104 Nine months after root coverage, all four premolars from each of the three patients were surgicall

105 nd Homo (n = 97), we find that the H. naledi premolars from the Dinaledi chamber consistently display

106 in a 49-year-old male whose right maxillary premolar furcation had a bony defect with poor biologic

107 premolar and delayed eruption of left second premolar in maxilla, as well as persistent deciduous tee

108 was used after extraction of the lower third premolar in mongrel male dogs.

109 est evidence of reduction of the first upper premolar in rhinocerotoids, and resembles paraceratherii

110 Tooth chipping was found on molars and premolars in 47% of subjects with a tongue piercing for

111 nd root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in a Chinese population.

112 omy and canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in southwestern Chinese population, which need

113 ller Class I recessions affecting canines or premolars in the maxillary arch.

114 tiodactyls, in the structure of its ears and premolars, in the density of its limb bones and in the s

115 ht sites on each molar and six sites on each premolar included plaque, bleeding on probing, probing d

116 uble heterozygous mice present with an extra premolar-like tooth revealing a genetic interaction betw

117 s, A. africanus, is well suited to withstand premolar loads.

118 and root canal morphology of maxillary first premolars (M1Ps) globally using cone-beam computed tomog

119 sites associated with the mandibular second premolar, mandibular first molar, and mandibular second

120 the following tooth types: mandibular second premolars, mandibular first molars, and mandibular secon

121 was performed at second-stage surgery in the premolar maxillary area with an ADM.

122 GCF was collected from 16 molar and premolar mesiobuccal sites and then clinical attachment

123 Defined regions (anterior, cuspid, premolar, molar) on two preserved human mandibles were i

124 roximal bone height (BH), were analyzed in 2 premolar/molar interproximal > or = 5 mm pockets at base

125 gatures at the gingival margins of maxillary premolar/molar teeth.

126 ensis, particularly in aspects of canine and premolar morphology, and in its retention of pedal grasp

127 duals with missing molars also lacked second premolars- most commonly, maxillary second premolars and

128 MSCs were obtained from PDL and P tissue of premolars (n = 3) extracted for orthodontic reasons.

129 Cs) from PDL tissue were isolated from human premolars (n = 3).

130 The third premolars of both quadrants served as negative controls.

131 , we assess the morphology of the mandibular premolars of the species at the enamel-dentine junction

132 er Class I or II recession defects at either premolar or anterior sites in 30 individuals.

133 ally located apical to the second mandibular premolar or between apices of the premolars.

134 d of extraction of a single posterior tooth (premolar or molar) and subsequent replacement with a den

135 All implants replaced mandibular premolars or molars.

136 he mesio-buccal root of the maxillary fourth premolar (P4) was performed bilaterally in 8 dogs.

137 n the distal socket of the mandibular fourth premolar (P4), while the adjacent empty mesial socket of

138 ally created on the buccal of the mandibular premolars (PI and PII).

139 various locations correlating to molar (M), premolar (PM), and anterior (A) regions.

140 the lateral aspect of the mandibular second premolar (PM2) mesial roots including removal of root ce

141 silk ligatures were placed around the third premolars (PM3), fourth premolars (PM4), and first molar

142 namel junction (CEJ) of the maxillary fourth premolar (PM4; thin bone over root); 2) 6 mm apical to t

143 ced around the third premolars (PM3), fourth premolars (PM4), and first molars (M1).

144 confirmed for P. fruitaensis as indicated by premolar positioning, facet orientation, and collision a

145 urface in the anterior maxillae or mandible (premolar-premolar) and 52 carefully selected controls (C

146 Twenty patients with incisors or premolars presenting with a facial recession of > or = 4

147 he formation of the germ of the second lower premolar (r=0.67; p<0.001).

148 cted, in one quadrant, the second and fourth premolars received nonresorbable expanded polytetrafluor

149 The other quadrant, second and fourth premolars, received the bioabsorbable membranes, made of

150 platform and 13 mm in length) placed in the premolar region of the mandible.

151 nts, each with a hopeless tooth (anterior or premolar region), were recruited to receive dental impla

152 In the premolar region, nBV/TV slightly declined from 20.4% in

153 lant areas in the upper incisor, canine, and premolar regions of 18 patients.

154 at the second molar, first molar, and second premolar, respectively.

155 nding to a 75%, 50%, and 25% 2D BSH reserve, premolars retained 67-68%, 39-41%, and 15-17% 3D BA-RSA,

156 5) the distance of the artery from the first premolar, second premolar, first molar, second molar, an

157 s that a thick facial plate, small gaps, and premolar sites were more favorable for successful implan

158 lants at the right and left maxillary second premolar sites.

159 Nine beagle dogs had all premolar teeth extracted and adjacent alveolar bone redu

160 parisons were made with 15 untreated control premolar teeth from the same subjects.

161 ontal defects were created at the mandibular premolar teeth in 9 beagle dogs.

162 defects were surgically created in maxillary premolar teeth in adult, female, mini-pigs and filled wi

163 mesial roots of freshly extracted mandibular premolar teeth in three minipigs.

164 ferential defects were created in mandibular premolar teeth of 6 beagle dogs, followed by placement o

165 Four mandibular premolar teeth per quadrant were extracted; a total of 4

166 nd left second, third, and fourth mandibular premolar teeth were extracted; the implant osteotomies w

167 Fifteen premolar teeth were treated with straight-wire fixed ort

168 , oral sites other than maxillary canine and premolar teeth, and Miller Class III and IV defects; 2)

169 icle) gels, topically applied twice daily to premolar teeth.

170 tal root for the third and fourth mandibular premolar teeth.

171 atures around the mandibular first molar and premolar teeth.

172 es were prepared from the roots of extracted premolar teeth.

173 served in the P-MSCs compared to PDL-MSCs of premolar teeth.

174 crown height More bone removal was noted at premolar than at molar sites; however, this was not stat

175 nds to increase in thickness from the second premolar to the second molar and from 5 mm up to 15 mm.

176 s with an unrestorable maxillary anterior or premolar tooth were randomized to receive either a provi

177 ed movement," DM), whereas the contralateral premolar was extracted 1 week before ("early movement,"

178 We present five cases in which a maxillary premolar was extracted and an implant placed into the ex

179 Cementum-covered roots of 20 extracted human premolars were coated with resin caps, leaving four area

180 DLCs obtained from extracted third molars or premolars were cultured with calcitriol, or EMD.

181 Extracted human maxillary premolars were examined using a [Formula: see text]CT in

182 illary and 35 mandibular single-rooted human premolars were examined.

183 In phase I, three premolars were extracted on one side of the oral cavity;

184 n healed extraction sites, and contralateral premolars were extracted.

185 Seventy single-rooted mandibular premolars were included.

186 Second, third, and fourth mandibular premolars were involved; experimental periods covered fr

187 subjects in need of extraction of maxillary premolars were recruited.

188 gingival recessions >/=2.0 mm in canines or premolars were selected.

189 Twenty-five GRs in maxillary canines and premolars were treated with coronally positioned flap pl

190 lade for the upper canine on the lower third premolar-which suggest that oligopithecines constitute t

191 extraction site of a molar or a first upper premolar with a flapless approach.

192 etermining the severity of periodontitis for premolars with alveolar bone loss based on 3D's or 2D's

193 RET was performed on 24 immature premolars with an autologous blood clot (PC), gelatin-ba

194 This is particularly true for maxillary premolars with multiple roots.

195 amely, the open and closed healing of canine premolars with severe periodontitis.

196 combining enlarged, elongate, and molariform premolars with simple upper molars that lack hypocones.

197 Sixty first premolars with two roots were inoculated with fluorescen

198 ntism, and C-shaped canals in mandibular 1st premolars, with substantial demographic and regional dif

199 dontal disease, incisor and canine (zone 1), premolar (zone 2), and molar (zone 3) SOG dimensions wer