ライフサイエンスコーパス: preoperative

1 nferiority compared with enoxaparin, and the preoperative 1.8-mg/kg dose of osocimab met criteria for

2 Preoperative, 1-month and 3-month postoperative data was

3 A total of 117 patients had preoperative adduction deficits, which were significantl

4 Thus, preoperative analysis of CTCs by this test may guide tre

5 Preoperative and 6 months postoperative visual and refra

6 All patients received baseline preoperative and follow-up measurements after treatment.

7 culated from a composite risk score based on preoperative and intraoperative parameters registered in

8 Preoperative and intraoperative variables significantly

9 atient selection, implantation strategy, and preoperative and perioperative treatment is applied at o

10 ograft was used in 73 cases, 53 of which had preoperative and postoperative CBCT scans.

11 Patient demographics, diagnoses, preoperative and postoperative clinical data, outcome me

12 tion after >1 hour of monocular occlusion at preoperative and postoperative examinations within 1 wee

13 Mean preoperative and postoperative IOP, AGM, and BCVA did no

14 clinical management, counsel patients in the preoperative and postoperative settings, and elicit sens

15 re collected on demographic characteristics, preoperative and postoperative visual acuity (VA), and M

16 When PRS was included with preoperative and preoperative plus intraoperative models

17 s (OR 1.80, P = 0.010), inadequate timing of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (OR 1.62, P = 0.047)

18 Preoperative antibiotics were initially collected as fir

19 cipant's race, age, sex, and the presence of preoperative apical scarring and environmental allergies

20 Preoperative apical scarring led to worsening haze (P =

21 Unassisted AVF maturation associated with preoperative arterial diameter (adjusted odds ratio [aOR

22 Overall AVF maturation associated with preoperative arterial diameter (aOR, 1.36 per 1-mm incre

23 Further study evaluating the effect of preoperative arterial diameter and other hemodynamic fac

24 Preoperative arterial diameter may be an under-recognize

25 eceiver operating curves, the combination of preoperative arterial diameter, systolic BP, and left ve

26 ghly myopic eyes, indicating that individual preoperative assessment and modification of surgical tec

27 Preoperative atrophy of the left hippocampal tail predic

28 as improved at all time points compared with preoperative BCVA (P < 0.05).

29 emonstrated significant correlations between preoperative BCVA and above outcome measures.

30 ients, and final BCVA correlated with better preoperative BCVA and better postoperative OCT parameter

31 The mean preoperative BCVA was 0.20+/-0.14 (range, 0.03-0.66).

32 Preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) showed

33 The mean preoperative best-corrected logMAR visual acuity for all

34 Mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/

35 Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity was significan

36 Patients were subdivided according to preoperative beta-blocker exposure status.

37 Preoperative beta-blocker use is strongly associated wit

38 f whom 3513 (29.36%) were exposed to regular preoperative beta-blockers.

39 k factors for developing incisional SSI were preoperative biliary drainage (odds ratio, 3.04; 95% con

40 Preoperative biliary drainage should be performed in sel

41 There was also no difference in the preoperative blood results.

42 Preoperative blood samples from 242 patients between Sep

43 Mean preoperative BMI was 44.8 kg/m and 75.7% had noninsulin

44 tients were matched based on age, race, sex, preoperative body mass index (BMI) and weight loss at 1

45 postoperative neuropsychiatric outcomes than preoperative brain structure and that stimulation acts t

46 between November 2000 and December 2008 for preoperative breast MRI.

47 Preoperative BSCVA, Kmax, refraction, corneal cylinder,

48 Mean preoperative CA(ant) and CA(tot) (1.62 +/- 0.49 D and 1.

49 rative UDVA when performing alignment to the preoperative calculated axis (51%) was 0.24 +/- 0.16 log

50 positive, were randomly assigned to 5 weeks preoperative capecitabine-based chemoradiation (45-50.4

51 gates whether the addition of oxaliplatin to preoperative capecitabine-based chemoradiation and posto

52 The addition of oxaliplatin to preoperative capecitabine-based chemoradiation and posto

53 Although preoperative cardiac risk assessment can facilitate the

54 Preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment requires a f

55 Indications, Extent and Outcomes of Surgery, Preoperative Care, Initial Thyroidectomy, Perioperative

56 Indications, Extent and Outcomes of Surgery, Preoperative Care, Initial Thyroidectomy, Perioperative

57 alysis of the reference patient undergoing a preoperative cataract examination with and without a scr

58 tive breast cancer were randomly assigned to preoperative CDDP (75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks x 4 doses) o

59 The mean preoperative CDVA was 2.7+/- 0.5 logMAR, which improved

60 ing of primary ECs between 2014 and 2018 and preoperative CE-CT were included (n = 150).

61 Preoperative CECD measured 1807 cells/mm(2) (SD, 172 cel

62 All the analyzed preoperative characteristics did not statistically diffe

63 pancreatic fistula in patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (0% vs 9.2%, P = 0.011).

64 t chemotherapy showed improved survival with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (35.2 v 19.8 months; P =

65 he trial randomly assigned (1:1) patients to preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and t

66 Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for resectable or borderl

67 Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is increasingly used in p

68 Preoperative chemoradiotherapy may improve the radical r

69 up of patients with squamous cell carcinoma, preoperative chemoradiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with

70 he subgroup of patients with adenocarcinoma, preoperative chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemothe

71 Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was associated with signi

72 tigated whether the addition of pazopanib to preoperative chemoradiotherapy would improve pathologica

73 e residual disease at surgery after standard preoperative chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy shou

74 APC and PIK3CA predicts inferior response to preoperative chemotherapy and poor survival in patients

75 l vein embolization (5%, 9%, 9%, P = 0.001), preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastase

76 ng system, lack validation in the setting of preoperative chemotherapy.

77 Body composition on preoperative chest computed tomography is an independent

78 factors for developing organ/space SSI were preoperative cholangitis (odds ratio, 10.07; 95% confide

79 e the common bacterial pathogens that caused preoperative cholangitis as well as SSI after PD.

80 Minimizing the occurrence of preoperative cholangitis would decrease the incidence of

81 Preoperative CMR showed late gadolinium enhancement in 7

82 as to evaluate the impact of optimization of preoperative comorbidities by nonsurgical clinicians on

83 Preoperative comorbidities can have substantial effects

84 d control groups (age, sex, body-mass-index, preoperative comorbidities, hepatic function, ASA class,

85 ll races, Black patients had higher rates of preoperative comorbidities.

86 We optimized classification models for preoperative Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonanc

87 The preoperative consultation, operative report, and POD1 an

88 We obtained preoperative, contrast-enhanced CT scans and correspondi

89 Median preoperative costs increased by $684 (P < 0.001) in the

90 ction, (B) screening patients and staff, (C) preoperative COVID-19 patient testing, (D) isolating pat

91 entation, diagnosis, surgical procedure, and preoperative COVID-19 testing.

92 th of hospital stay of 29 days (25% required preoperative critical care support).

93 Preoperative CV, percent of hexagonal cells, and CCT wer

94 ght benefit from the strengthening effect of preoperative CXL of donor tissue.

95 rative UDVA (OR: 9.08, P = .02), and greater preoperative cylinder (OR: 1.51; P = .04) were independe

96 ing clinicians and patients' families in the preoperative decision making process.

97 may prove valuable for real-time noninvasive preoperative delineation of skin cancer.

98 ion imaging and evaluate its performance for preoperative demarcation of keratinocyte carcinomas.

99 Preoperative demographics, exodeviation and motility, in

100 the reproducibility of predictive models for preoperative detection of MVI in HCC.Supplemental materi

101 de guidance for surgical correction based on preoperative deviation and ductions.

102 , 25 eyes that underwent PK in patients with preoperative diagnosis of MCD, and 28 normal eyes.

103 d with surgical resection because of limited preoperative diagnostic methods that can accurately iden

104 Determine whether preoperative dietary prehabilitation with a low-fat, hig

105 Within a single surgical unit preoperative differential blood cell results including n

106 When considering surgery in these patients, preoperative discussion is necessary to ensure concordan

107 Preoperative donor ECD decreased by 59% at 5 years and 6

108 Mean endothelial cell loss as compared to preoperative donor ECD for the entire study group was 33

109 udy was to evaluate the efficacy of a single preoperative dose of methylprednisolone for preventing p

110 A single preoperative dose of methylprednisolone significantly re

111 Postoperative and preoperative doses of 0.3 mg/kg of osocimab did not meet

112 Larger preoperative duction deficits were associated with large

113 ctors-age >=65 years old, diabetes mellitus, preoperative eGFR, and nephrectomy type (partial/radical

114 session management, with a limited role for preoperative endoscopic clearance.

115 indicators were rated as valid, covering the preoperative evaluation (9 indicators), immediate preope

116 e of the greatest unmet needs in the current preoperative evaluation is to assess the presence and se

117 ens following removal of implant(s), and the preoperative evaluation of the patient with suspected BI

118 re addressed, which included subquestions on preoperative evaluations, surgical diagnostic and therap

119 ted tau expression, correlated with impaired preoperative executive function.

120 ing for CTR, number of liver metastases, and preoperative extrahepatic disease.

121 Additional preoperative factors examined were age, race, gender, la

122 Preoperative factors independently predictive of AKI wer

123 durable MCS after ECLS remains limited, yet preoperative factors may allow differentiating futile pa

124 ment, postoperative outcomes, association of preoperative features with postoperative outcomes.

125 MainOutcomeMeasures: Preoperative features, intraoperative management, postop

126 other than graft detachment, and severity of preoperative FECD (all P < .01) showed the strongest rel

127 ompared with other risk factors, patterns of preoperative fills were most strongly correlated with pe

128 trate the validity of the RAI for evaluating preoperative frailty, but they have not demonstrated the

129 growing adenocarcinoma after an unremarkable preoperative gastroscopy.

130 -cardiac anomalies, suggesting a benefit for preoperative genetic testing even when genetic abnormali

131 Older age and preoperative geriatric variables (Origin status from hom

132 Median number of preoperative glaucoma medications was 2.5 (range 0-5, me

133 cteristics, including age, preoperative IOP, preoperative glaucoma medications, and previous glaucoma

134 received SAR versus MAR, within groups with preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >=60 mL/mi

135 Low preoperative hemoglobin (OR 5.40, P < 0.001), contaminat

136 Background Assessment of femoral torsion at preoperative hip imaging is commonly recommended.

137 dult participants identified with anaemia at preoperative hospital visits before elective major open

138 t of synechial angle closure preoperatively, preoperative hyphema, IOP at the first NLP visit, and fi

139 Preoperative identification of patients at risk for adve

140 However, preoperative identification through routine imaging or b

141 Wide variation in preoperative imaging in children with suspected appendic

142 Conclusion: The preoperative imaging road map provided by SPECT/CT enhan

143 size of an existing lesion (5 mm compared to preoperative imaging).

144 sociated with higher patient compliance with preoperative instructions and significantly lower rates

145 Of these, 11 reviews focused on preoperative interventions to prevent infection, while 1

146 group, novel strategies to provide the best preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care for

147 This database includes preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative patient

148 We herein provide suggestions on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative strategi

149 Preoperative intravenous iron was not superior to placeb

150 Data from patients with keratoconus who had preoperative IOLMaster biometry were included.

151 Higher preoperative IOP (5 mmHg increase; HR, 1.2; P = 0.038) a

152 12 mmHg or less (P = 0.001), whereas higher preoperative IOP (P = 0.001) with increased failure for

153 rative MMC enhances survival, whereas higher preoperative IOP and postoperative maneuvers are predict

154 Mean preoperative IOP decreased from 20.4 +/- 5.3 mmHg to 14.

155 The mean preoperative IOP for all patients was 15.2 mmHg (standar

156 with a mean age of 46.94 +/- 11.81 years and preoperative IOP of 27.70 +/- 10.30 mmHg taking 3.73 +/-

157 Hg with phacoemulsification in patients with preoperative IOP of less than 20 mmHg.

158 Median preoperative IOP was 30 mm Hg (range 18-49 mm Hg, mean 3

159 ye at any postoperative visit to higher than preoperative IOP within the first 3 months.

160 Age, sex, race, NVG etiology, tube type, preoperative IOP, extent of synechial angle closure preo

161 Preoperative IOP, medication use, washed-out diurnal IOP

162 in baseline characteristics, including age, preoperative IOP, preoperative glaucoma medications, and

163 ecial attention was paid to the influence of preoperative kidney function as well as the impact of th

164 Younger patients and those with a higher preoperative Kmax need to be monitored closely for progr

165 Patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative laboratory results, and surgery details wer

166 al Outcomes stage 3 acute kidney injury were preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (odds ra

167 y required inpatient admission with a median preoperative length of hospital stay of 29 days (25% req

168 postmenopausal women with ER-positive DCIS, preoperative letrozole resulted in significant imaging a

169 Lower preoperative levator function was significantly associat

170 erging (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT imaging in preoperative localization of hyperfunctioning parathyroi

171 injury in male and female mice, we show that preoperative LPSx4 provides complete protection from isc

172 The proportion of patients with preoperative lymphoscintigraphic detection or excised SL

173 .11 +/- 0.47 logMAR; P = .03), and a greater preoperative manifest cylinder (7.56 +/- 2.26 vs 5.72 +/

174 ted distance visual acuity (UDVA) divided by preoperative mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA

175 Patient compliance with preoperative mechanical and antibiotic bowel preparation

176 Overuse of routine preoperative medical testing by high-testing physicians

177 Patients with preoperative mental illness had a higher chance of surgi

178 Preoperative model for NTR identified >1 nodule [sub-dis

179 Patients with preoperative MOLST had a 30-day mortality of 9.2% (37 pa

180 Fewer than half of surgical patients with preoperative MOLST have documented code status discussio

181 The minority of patients with preoperative MOLST were discharged home (169 [42%]), and

182 inclusion criteria, 402 (1.8%) patients had preoperative MOLST.

183 dy aims to identify its progression from the preoperative MR radiomics.

184 Purpose To investigate whether preoperative MRI can help identify MTM-HCCs in patients

185 nal cancers were identified among 1396 total preoperative MRI examinations (median patient age, 56 ye

186 with unilateral breast cancer who underwent preoperative MRI from January 2005 to February 2015.

187 A subset of patients underwent preoperative MRI.

188 With preoperative MT, all American Thyroid Association interm

189 ary 2008 and February 2018 and who underwent preoperative multiphase contrast material-enhanced MRI.

190 Preoperative N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide a

191 Of those patients with a poor preoperative nomogram score, approximately 50% of patien

192 In addition, to examine if preoperative NT-Pro-BNP can predict the risk for postope

193 Preoperative NT-Pro-BNP predicted CPC [odds ratio (confi

194 In the base case, an adjunctive preoperative OCT was cost effective from a third-party p

195 Extensive preoperative ophthalmic evaluation and meticulous postop

196 ize the importance of screening patients for preoperative opioid exposure and creating risk mitigatio

197 Higher levels of preoperative opioid exposure are associated with increas

198 Preoperative opioid exposure was also associated with hi

199 Low, moderate, and high chronic preoperative opioid exposures were predictive of all-cau

200 e dose, duration, recency, and continuity of preoperative opioid prescription fills.

201 Of 373,991 patients, 168,579 (45%) filled a preoperative opioid prescription within 12 months of sur

202 The association between preoperative opioid use and persistent use was determine

203 Going forward, identifying preoperative opioid use can inform surgeon prescribing a

204 Preoperative opioid use is common among patients who und

205 Preoperative opioid use is common, and varies by dose, r

206 Preoperative opioid use was the most influential predict

207 Decreasing complication rates through preoperative optimization will improve patient outcomes

208 The explanatory variable of interest ("preoperative optimization") was defined by whether the p

209 Preoperative OSFI results were calculated for each enrol

210 e of ACIOL implantation, but the severity of preoperative pathologic features was not controlled for.

211 veloped in the present study may assist with preoperative patient counseling and prognosis.

212 Both complications and preoperative patient risk have been shown to increase co

213 tical illness predictors were nonmodifiable (preoperative/patient and operative factors), whereas onl

214 A retrospective cohort of preoperative patients within the national healthcare sys

215 had a urinalysis performed during the 30-day preoperative period was created; patients with positive

216 allow cataract surgeons to perform a useful preoperative personalized risk assessment.

217 n = 5) or areas remote from the tumor on the preoperative PET scan (n = 6) (2.92 +/- 1.24 vs. 1.62 +/

218 Background Functional MRI improves preoperative planning in patients with brain tumors, but

219 al basis of lens platforms used and thorough preoperative planning to aid decision making.

220 pportunities provided by medical imaging for preoperative planning, intraoperative guidance, and post

221 When PRS was included with preoperative and preoperative plus intraoperative models, up to 3.6% of p

222 erative variables, and a model with combined preoperative plus intraoperative variables.

223 n special circumstances, to UBM in detecting preoperative posttraumatic PC rupture.

224 The aim of the study was to identify preoperative predictors of non transplantable recurrence

225 odule, and AFP >100 ng/mL were identified as preoperative predictors of NTR.

226 Preoperative predictors of success at 10 years were soug

227 It is unknown if preoperative prehabilitation improves outcomes of obese

228 Patients received 21.6 Gy to the preoperative primary tumor volume.

229 tric surgery, indicating a role for tailored preoperative psychiatric evaluation and postoperative su

230 ients alive at 1 year, 15 reported return to preoperative pulmonary status.

231 Preoperative pyuria was associated with postoperative C.

232 Preoperative QoV scores improved significantly postopera

233 Preoperative radiological studies were reviewed by an ab

234 lgorithm, to receive either surgery alone or preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery.

235 of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery al

236 Preoperative radiotherapy should not be considered as st

237 r dose intravenously on days 1-2) with 45 Gy preoperative radiotherapy, followed by surgical resectio

238 erative evaluation (9 indicators), immediate preoperative readiness (2 indicators), intraoperative (1

239 Elective VHR was performed once preoperative requirements were met: 7% total body weight

240 cess to healthy foods, difficulties meetings preoperative requirements, and lack of provider availabi

241 Preoperative respiratory disease predicted pneumonia (P=

242 ght the need to incorporate frailty into the preoperative risk stratification and investigate strateg

243 s Review summarizes the current data guiding preoperative risk stratification as well as periprocedur

244 patients include chemoprophylaxis based upon preoperative risk stratification.

245 higher post ptosis surgery compared with the preoperative score (25.38 vs 17.24, respectively, paired

246 Preoperative screening allowed us to take adequate preca

247 Broad preoperative screening led to 1 positive COVID-19 test i

248 ents without COVID-19 symptoms who underwent preoperative screening using chest CT and RT-PCR before

249 114 eyes had a preoperative SEQ of - 11.02 +/- 0.81 D, with a median fo

250 mental health assessment and services in the preoperative setting to improve outcomes for this vulner

251 o evaluate the care bundle, which included a preoperative shower with 4% chlorhexidine soap, appropri

252 of 0.3 or more (but not age, gender, or any preoperative sign) was a good predictor of ocular surfac

253 onors were randomly and blindly allocated to preoperative single-dose intravenous co-amoxiclav or sal

254 There is uncertainty around preoperative skin antisepsis in clean surgery.

255 tor 2 and estrogen receptor had an impact on preoperative SLN visualization and intraoperative locali

256 Results: Preoperative SPECT/CT revealed no differences in the SN

257 Preoperative sphere ranged between -1.00 and -10.00 diop

258 Data on preoperative status, operative details, intraoperative a

259 Patients were randomized to MMC delivered by preoperative subconjunctival injection or by intraoperat

260 rs associated with RD after initial PPV were preoperative subretinal hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR], 5.7

261 were included if they could be matched to a preoperative surgical clinic visit within 90 days of an

262 Preoperative surgical evaluation and risk stratification

263 biomodel production, provision of unlimited preoperative surgical rehearsal, and potential for intra

264 SSIS resulted in resolution of preoperative symptoms in all.

265 ine soap, appropriate hair removal, adequate preoperative systemic antibiotic prophylaxis, the admini

266 resectable cohorts differed significantly in preoperative systemic chemotherapy exposure, node-positi

267 confidence interval [95% CI], 1.23 to 1.83), preoperative systolic BP (aOR, 1.16 per 10-mm Hg increas

268 per 1-mm increase; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.66) and preoperative systolic BP (aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.3

269 ught to determine whether the use of routine preoperative testing leads to harm in the form of delaye

270 odels, and patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 preoperative tests.

271 undergo surgery included toxicity related to preoperative therapy (n = 9), progression (n = 9), or ot

272 f whom 66 patients underwent resection after preoperative therapy and 98 patients after immediate sur

273 he 103 eligible patients, 77 (76%) completed preoperative therapy and underwent surgery; reasons pati

274 rative chemotherapy to patients who received preoperative therapy are lacking.

275 with PDAC who underwent pancreatectomy after preoperative therapy between 2010 and July 2017 at The U

276 ed about the potential harmful effect of any preoperative therapy on the surgical complication rate a

277 primary tumors, 34 recurrent tumors) who had preoperative (time before surgery: median, 23 d; range,

278 The UDVA improved from 1.26 +/- 0.13 logMAR preoperative to -0.02 +/- 0.15logMAR in LASIK Xtra eyes

279 Preoperative transvaginal US had low sensitivity for det

280 atients treated with a median of 4 cycles of preoperative treatment and pancreatectomy, 155 (63%) ini

281 surgical procedure, based on tumor biology, preoperative treatment sequencing, and response to syste

282 revious PKP (73.5% vs 45.5%; P = .03), worse preoperative UDVA (1.42 +/- 0.47 vs 1.11 +/- 0.47 logMAR

283 LK) (odds ratio [OR]: 8.52; P = .009), worse preoperative UDVA (OR: 9.08, P = .02), and greater preop

284 This suggests a need to reassess the preoperative ultrasound criteria used to optimize AVF ma

285 Preoperative ultrasound mapping is routinely used to sel

286 The primary exposure was pyuria on preoperative urinalysis.

287 Preoperative use was defined as any opioid prescription

288 Minimum linear diameter correlated with preoperative VA (r = 0.49; P <= 0.0001) and postoperativ

289 Preoperative VA, the distribution of race/ethnicity, age

290 surface severity scores improved from a mean preoperative value of 29.1+/- 9.7 to 18.7+/- 7.2 postope

291 toperative arterial diameter compared to the preoperative value.

292 cant improvement after surgery compared with preoperative values (p <= 0.002).

293 e increase in (18)F-FET uptake compared with preoperative values in either the residual tumor (n = 5)

294 n BSCVA improved significantly from baseline preoperative values of 0.92 +/- 0.58 to 0.02 +/- 0.07 at

295 A prediction model for NTR based on preoperative variables was developed using sub-distribut

296 ariables was analyzed and the association of preoperative variables with final visual acuity was asse

297 ac risk index, a model comprised entirely of preoperative variables, and a model with combined preope

298 All patients underwent a preoperative vascular mapping with Doppler ultrasound (U

299 he impedance time series is then mapped to a preoperative vessel model to determine the relative posi

300 or 18 statements representing three domains: preoperative work-up, treatment and follow-up.