コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 mmatory agents, antibacterial compounds, and probiotics.
2 nomes of many taxa found in over-the-counter probiotics.
3 ished reviews reporting favorable effects of probiotics.
4 irable starter cultures and health-promoting probiotics.
5 microbiome and a brief review of the use of probiotics.
6 w, most research has focused on lactobacilli probiotics.
7 risk for adverse events among patients given probiotics.
8 e against this pathogen, represent potential probiotics.
9 Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are the common probiotics.
10 phenols, carotenoids, vitamins, enzymes, and probiotics.
11 delivery carrier for oral administration of probiotics.
12 at-killed LAB may be developed as anti-virus probiotics.
13 nfections related to lactobacilli containing probiotics.
14 ential application for improving efficacy of probiotics.
15 ion in animals, targeted antibiotics, and/or probiotics.
16 ifying strategies, and engineered phages and probiotics.
17 management strategies, including the use of probiotics.
18 ce and severity of adverse events related to probiotics.
19 can be reversed by favorable alterations by probiotics.
20 trategies for their prevention is the use of probiotics.
21 en systems, which include bioremediation and probiotics.
22 olated from each patient originated from the probiotics.
23 n a variety of commercial products including probiotics.
24 es infantis bacteremia in newborns receiving probiotics.
25 mediating the health-promoting attributes of probiotics.
26 o candidates to become industrially valuable probiotics.
27 were adjusted for gestational age and use of probiotics.
28 nutritional supplements with prebiotics and probiotics.
29 f H(2)O(2), D-lactate and L-lactate than the probiotics.
30 operationally referred to as next-generation probiotics, a concept that overlaps with the emerging co
31 dobacterium genus, which is commonly used in probiotics, accumulated in the ankylosing spondylitis pa
32 ts of herbs (such as cannabis and curcumin), probiotics, acupuncture, exercise, and mind-body therapy
34 f beneficial commensal microbes, marketed as probiotics, affects the enteric nervous system (ENS).
35 orted for probiotic encapsulation to protect probiotics against GI tract insults and improve their ad
36 creted to improve the protective activity of probiotics against Salmonella pathogenesis in C. elegans
38 ct on postoperative infections compared with probiotics alone (synbiotics RR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.33-0.66
39 n), anti-inflammatory drugs (mesalazine) and probiotics, alone or in combination, and eventually surg
40 icantly greater than that in the placebo and probiotics-alone groups (-0.59[-0.75, -0.44]%, -0.53[-0.
41 eatment of either BBR-alone, probiotics+BBR, probiotics-alone, or placebo, after a one-week run-in of
45 252 participants) were included; 9 evaluated probiotics and 12 evaluated synbiotics, with treatment d
46 episodes that included supplementation with probiotics and 83 episodes with no probiotics supplement
47 Additionally, microbiota perturbations by probiotics and antibiotics exert modulatory effects on s
49 ndomized controlled trials evaluating use of probiotics and CDI in hospitalized adults taking antibio
51 spite evidence for the beneficial effects of probiotics and low-fat dairy products, to our knowledge,
52 te the microbiome (for example, antibiotics, probiotics and microbiota transplants) have been shown t
55 ." We review some of the mechanisms by which probiotics and other beneficial commensals provide colon
57 finition of psychobiotics be expanded beyond probiotics and prebiotics to include other means of infl
58 administration of synbiotics (combination of probiotics and prebiotics) and must have included an ass
59 s, and synbiotics (preparations that combine probiotics and prebiotics) are nutritional adjuncts that
60 ed MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Journal of Probiotics and Prebiotics, and The Cochrane Library data
63 nt data suggest that the use of prophylactic probiotics and subglottic endotracheal tubes are cost-ef
64 light potential context-dependent effects of probiotics and suggest a model in which changes in host
66 , mucosal immunology, the health benefits of probiotics and the role of the microbiota during infecti
67 py and cognitive behavioural therapy), diet (probiotics) and percutaneous electrical nerve field stim
68 ological treatments, antidepressants, fiber, probiotics, and anticholinergics have not been adequatel
71 luded subglottic suction endotracheal tubes, probiotics, and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement
73 The most advanced approaches are antibodies, probiotics, and vaccines in phase 2 and phase 3 trials.
74 s, targeting of gut microbiota by innovative probiotics, antibiotics, and fecal transplant, in combin
77 ine: Moderate-quality evidence suggests that probiotics are associated with lower rates of antibiotic
78 addition, the uses or indications for these probiotics are described, along with the types of clinic
88 lth-promoting effector molecules produced by probiotics are well documented and have been linked to s
89 nt evidence thus does not support the use of probiotics as a single or coadjuvant therapy for treatme
90 2 were observed in CRC patients who received probiotics as compared to pre-treatment level (P < 0.05)
92 and modulation of the gut microbiota (e.g., probiotics) as a potential treatment to decrease parasit
93 ed a suitable approach for implementation of probiotics, as well as for evaluation of its effectivene
94 h knowledge provides a foundation for future probiotics-based research in microbial organism mediated
95 haemoglobin, as the primary outcome, in the probiotics+BBR (least-squares mean [95% CI], -1.04[-1.19
96 ted a 12-week treatment of either BBR-alone, probiotics+BBR, probiotics-alone, or placebo, after a on
103 is, we found evidence that administration of probiotics closer to the first dose of antibiotic reduce
104 ensive care unit (ICU) patients treated with probiotics compared to those not treated, and provide ge
105 ta to enable meta-analysis of the effects of probiotics compared with control on defecation frequency
106 d trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of probiotics compared with placebo or treatment as usual o
109 nd bacteremia from lactobacillus after using probiotics containing lactobacilli in the course of her
112 nate respiration or treatment using targeted probiotics could prevent microbiota alterations and infl
114 cies and functions, for example, by pre- and probiotics, could enhance microbiome resilience and lead
115 ; and (5) role of alternative therapies like probiotics, curcumin, and fecal microbiota transplantati
117 ro treatment of mononuclear cells with these probiotics demonstrated that EcN, but not LGG, induced I
120 hat were free of high risk of bias (only 5), probiotics did not confer any beneficial effects on defe
121 When compared to (any) control intervention, probiotics did not significantly increase defecation fre
123 ized controlled trials evaluating the use of probiotics during pregnancy or early infancy for prevent
126 ptoms, although the mechanisms through which probiotics exert their beneficial effects are largely un
127 e been learned from working with traditional probiotics, explore the kinds of organisms that are like
128 iometabolic effects of phenolics, dairy fat, probiotics, fermentation, coffee, tea, cocoa, eggs, spec
129 e was no evidence for significant effects of probiotics for any of the study's endpoints on those com
130 s consuming different types of formula (pre-/probiotics for Cluster 3 [17%], pHF-HA for Cluster 4 [7%
131 e balance of intestinal flora by introducing probiotics for disease prevention and treatment could be
132 therefore do not support the routine use of probiotics for improving growth or preventing late-onset
134 czema; however, no studies have investigated probiotics for prevention of allergic diseases in very p
136 sm in the gut and thereby serve as potential probiotics for the management of androgen-dependent dise
138 for alternatives to pharmaceuticals, such as probiotics, for the prevention of allergic disease.
139 y of delay in starting probiotics (P = .04); probiotics given within 2 days of antibiotic initiation
140 (95% CI 0.68-1.27); 73 (11%) infants in the probiotics group had sepsis compared with 77 (12%) in th
154 IGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Commercially available probiotics have the potential to modify visceral pain.
155 etary exposures, provisions of prebiotics or probiotics have yet to show therapeutic benefit for CVD.
156 , easy answers (whether about antibiotics or probiotics) have again given way to an appreciation for
158 Synbiotics, a mixture of prebiotics and probiotics, have been used for the prevention and treatm
162 effectiveness of single- vs multiple-strain probiotics in a network meta-analysis of randomized tria
163 alyzed the available data on the efficacy of probiotics in candidal colonization of host surfaces.
165 quipped to answer questions on the safety of probiotics in intervention studies with confidence." Cri
166 There is growing interest in the use of probiotics in periodontal therapy; however, until now, m
167 s have provided evidence for the efficacy of probiotics in preventing Clostridium difficile infection
169 ls have also shown the beneficial effects of probiotics in reducing oral, vaginal, and enteric coloni
170 tics, rigorous evidence assessing the use of probiotics in routine preterm newborn care is lacking.
174 reviews and meta-analyses on the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of functional constipation i
176 idial gastroenteritis emphasizes the role of probiotics in treating intestinal impairment after infec
178 dies are required to assess the viability of probiotics in yogurts protected using MTGase-mediated mi
179 se developments have provided a boost to the probiotics industry, which continues to experience expon
181 where the rational design of next-generation probiotics is being actively pursued to prevent disease
185 reatment of moderately preterm newborns with probiotics is unlikely to improve anthropometric outcome
187 ce ingestion of bacterial preparation (e.g., probiotics) is reported to impact human health, it is li
188 from South African women, commercial vaginal probiotics (L. casei rhamnosus, L. acidophilus) and 4 re
190 tment of sex steroid-deficient mice with the probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) or the comme
191 ects of preventive intranasal treatment with probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and L. rhamnosus G
193 emented, other promising strategies, such as probiotics, lysins, and antimicrobial peptides, are in v
194 se findings broaden our understanding of how probiotics may beneficially affect brain function in the
197 evaluate whether the regular consumption of probiotics may improve the known deterioration of period
202 ions highlight a novel pathway through which probiotics mediate cerebral changes and alter behavior.
203 ta modification with specific prebiotics and probiotics might offer a novel and cost-effective means
204 ion process by drugs, nutrients, and pre- or probiotics might offer better therapeutic approaches.
205 hat Lactobacillus fermentum, one of the main probiotics of the microbiota, exhibits an extraordinary
208 In this study, the effect of sustainable probiotics on Campylobacter jejuni colonization and gut
211 altering gut microbiota like oral intake of probiotics or berberine (BBR), a bacteriostatic agent, m
213 distributions and (iii) finding of potential probiotics or reliable pathogenic bacterial strains.
214 tify randomized controlled trials evaluating probiotics or synbiotics in adult patients undergoing el
216 either RCE (60 mg isoflavone aglycones/d and probiotics) or a masked placebo [control (CON)].RCE sign
217 efficacy for every day of delay in starting probiotics (P = .04); probiotics given within 2 days of
218 nsumed raw food (P = 0.01), to have consumed probiotics (P = 0.002), or to have been given antibiotic
219 consumption of infant formula (regular, pre-/probiotics, partially hydrolysed with hypoallergenic lab
220 ber of well-controlled studies indicate that probiotics, particularly lactobacilli, suppressCandidagr
221 strointestinal (GI) tract through the use of probiotics (PBio) is a safe and well-tolerated approach
222 cent work from Eran and colleagues shows how probiotics perturb rather than aid the recovery of the m
227 microbiome-modulating interventions, such as probiotics, prebiotics, antibiotics, fecal microbiota tr
228 formula with additional active ingredients (probiotics, prebiotics, or both) (LPFA) and breastfed in
230 lows for a more holistic approach when using probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, antibiotics, and ant
231 sing care), although the evidence on whether probiotics prevent infections and reduce antibiotic use
232 nonantibiotic prophylactic measures such as probiotics, prokinetics, bile acids, statins, and hemato
235 te ongoing debate about the health impact of probiotics, rigorous evidence assessing the use of probi
236 0 to -1.18 days; P = 0.005, n = 535, I = 91% probiotics RR: -0.65; 95% CI: -2.03-0.72; P = 0.35, n =
237 CI: 0.33-0.66; P < 0.0001, n = 1399, I = 53% probiotics RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.53-0.80; P < 0.0001, n =
238 ecially those supplemented with a mixture of probiotics (RR 0.54 [95% CI: 0.43-0.68], P < 0.00001).
239 utritional interventions with prebiotics and probiotics seem to exert immunological effects, their cl
241 hospital guidelines that recommended routine probiotics supplementation for neonates born before 34 c
242 med to estimate the causal effect of routine probiotics supplementation on moderately preterm newborn
246 supplemented to the water and live feed, (2) probiotics supplemented to the water only, and (3) no pr
248 target the microbiota, including prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and faecal microbiota transplanta
255 bacterial weapons can help in the design of probiotics that can both establish well and eliminate pr
258 nd provide a basis for rational selection of probiotics that modulate primary succession of the micro
259 rally Regarded as Safe and often employed as probiotics, the engineering of Lactobacillus membrane ve
260 a to better understand the mode of action of probiotics, their associated microbiomes, and their effe
263 e composition and highlight the potential of probiotics to attenuate high-fat diet-related metabolic
264 izable pipeline that can be applied to other probiotics to better understand their safety and enginee
265 d prescribing prophylactic vancomycin and/or probiotics to colonized patients to prevent progression
266 tract (RCE) rich in isoflavone aglycones and probiotics to concomitantly promote uptake and a favorab
268 evelop a procedure for the implementation of probiotics to prevent AAD in nursing homes, to evaluate
269 n-pathogenic organisms and have been used as probiotics to prevent antibiotic associated diarrhea.
270 tors (variable); (3) utilization of specific probiotics to prevent C. difficile overgrowth (8/8); (4)
273 is moderate evidence on the effectiveness of probiotics to prevent primary CDI, but there are few dat
274 f studies have investigated the potential of probiotics to promote wound healing in the digestive tra
276 s that can be developed into next-generation probiotics to reestablish or enhance colonization resist
277 Our results indicate that development of probiotics to target multiple E. coli pathotypes will be
279 dition to human milk, such as prebiotics and probiotics, to the management of high-risk infants.
281 t asthma, although the results of studies of probiotics used together with prebiotics have been overa
282 present work describes the encapsulation of probiotics using a by-product as wall material and a pro
285 Conversely, feeding SCI mice commercial probiotics (VSL#3) enriched with lactic acid-producing b
288 The number of episodes with AAD when using probiotics was significantly lower than when no probioti
290 biotics was significantly lower than when no probiotics was used (20% vs 36%; p = 0,022, Chi-square).
291 o evaluate the potential to improve existing probiotics, we compared the inflammatory and antimicrobi
292 adequate amounts and, as such, are labeled "probiotics." We review some of the mechanisms by which p
293 Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that probiotics were significantly more effective if given cl
294 ncapsulation system to preserve viability of probiotics when they are administrated orally and apply
296 This review briefly describes the history of probiotics, where probiotic strains were originally isol
297 cs were previously defined as live bacteria (probiotics) which, when ingested, confer mental health b
300 ce of effect for anthelmintics, antibiotics, probiotics, zinc, vitamin A, withholding breastfeeding,