ライフサイエンスコーパス: proctectomy

1 ciated with better outcomes for colectomy or proctectomy.

2 e, 77% underwent colectomy and 23% underwent proctectomy.

3 stump surveillance and 12 underwent elective proctectomy.

4 antial risk for metachronous neoplasia after proctectomy.

5 developed high-risk adenoma or cancer after proctectomy.

6 codons 1309 and 1328 more commonly underwent proctectomy.

7 patients had one or more complications after proctectomy.

8 ients whose treatment historically relied on proctectomy.

9 that has not been reported during abdominal proctectomy.

10 cystectomies, 1,514 pancreatectomies, 2,607 proctectomies, 12,228 prostatectomies, and 10,151 pulmon

11 open colectomy 11% versus 14%, laparoscopic proctectomy 13% versus 16%, open proctectomy 13% vs 17%,

12 aparoscopic proctectomy 13% versus 16%, open proctectomy 13% vs 17%, major hepatectomy 8% versus 12%,

13 n reason overall (10.3%), after colectomy or proctectomy (18.1%), ventral hernia repair (16.7%), and

14 14.7%-15.3%] vs 23.9% [95% CI, 22.9%-24.9%]; proctectomy, 18.7% [95% CI, 18.0%-19.3%] vs 26.9% [95% C

15 P thresholds (HV or IHV)-esophagectomy 1.6%; proctectomy 19.7%; pancreatectomy 6.6%.

16 overall (19.5%) and also after colectomy or proctectomy (25.8%), ventral hernia repair (26.5%), hyst

17 surpass laparoscopy in colectomy (44.5%) and proctectomy (38.3%) by 2026.

18 patients, there were 178,311 (63%) colectomy/proctectomy, 38,167 (14%) pancreaticoduodenectomy, 40,32

19 39% MA) included 31,913 colectomies, 10,358 proctectomies, 4,604 hepatectomies, 2,895 pancreatectomi

20 y poorer adjusted OS than those treated with proctectomy alone or multimodality therapy.

21 If patients undergo proctectomy alone, close surveillance is mandatory.

22 Proctectomy and colectomy procedures compared across ope

23 ve patients with low rectal cancer requiring proctectomy and coloanal anastomosis.

24 One of these patients had required a proctectomy and end ileostomy for Crohn's disease.

25 Use of LE versus proctectomy and use of adjuvant radiation therapy were c

26 IRA failure was defined as secondary proctectomy and/or rectal cancer occurrence.

27 Most centers perform colectomy, proctectomy, and ileal pouch anal anastomoses (IPAA) wit

28 gher for all resections at LVH, but only for proctectomies at IVH.

29 re able to maintain their rectum; 2 required proctectomy at 11 and 16 years, respectively, for rectal

30 l cancer patients undergoing curative intent proctectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2014 wer

31 01) and for patients who underwent colectomy/proctectomy (C-statistic 0.73, 95%CI 0.72-0.74, p < 0.00

32 ve study of patients who underwent colectomy/proctectomy, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), pancre

33 decision for a limited resection focusing on proctectomy did not compromise overall survival.

34 A total of 276 patients underwent robotic proctectomy during the study period.

35 Patients who underwent colectomy, proctectomy, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, pancreatectomy,

36 allow for the clarification of the need for proctectomy especially in the poor risk surgical patient

37 ons have suggested that endoscopic transanal proctectomy (ETAP) is a promising technique and may be a

38 on of the lower gastrointestinal tract after proctectomy for low rectal cancer.

39 erative complications in patients undergoing proctectomy for nonmetastatic rectal cancer.

40 Robotic proctectomy for rectal cancer can be performed with good

41 All patients undergoing proctectomy for rectal cancer from 1991 to 1995 who were

42 vide reservoir function after reconstructive proctectomy for rectal cancer.

43 procedure volume (colectomy: >=80 cases/yr, proctectomy: >=35/yr, esophagectomy: >=41/yr, gastrectom

44 Total proctectomy had nearly a 30% increased risk of positive

45 erations: bariatric procedures, colectomy or proctectomy, hysterectomy, total hip or knee arthroplast

46 uire abdominoperineal excision or completion proctectomy, if treated by conventional means.

47 udy was to compare value (outcomes/costs) of proctectomy in patients with rectal cancer by 3 approach

48 The laparoscopic and open approaches to proctectomy in patients with rectal cancer provide simil

49 The role of minimally invasive proctectomy in rectal cancer is controversial.

50 The need and timing for completion proctectomy in this setting are uncertain.

51 Mortality rates after proctectomy in VA hospitals are comparable to those repo

52 at a median of 6 years (range 3.5-16) after proctectomy, including 3 at advanced stage.

53 If robotic proctectomy is to be widely applied in the future, the c

54 ation of open proctectomy (OP), laparoscopic proctectomy (LP), and robotic proctectomy (RP) in pathol

55 tomy (n = 137,462; median = 7), laparoscopic proctectomy (n = 12,238; median = 5), open proctectomy (

56 06-2012) performing esophagectomy (n = 968), proctectomy (n = 1250), or pancreatectomy (n = 1068) wer

57 c proctectomy (n = 12,238; median = 5), open proctectomy (n = 24,925; median = 6), major hepatectomy

58 dergoing segmental colectomy (n = 33,969) or proctectomy (n = 8591) for cancer from 1996-2003.

59 t IVH was associated with mortality only for proctectomies [odds ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval

60 National examination of open proctectomy (OP), laparoscopic proctectomy (LP), and rob

61 isk of positive margin compared with partial proctectomy (OR 1.293, 95%CI 1.185-1.411) and a laparosc

62 sophagectomy (OR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.58-0.87]), proctectomy (OR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.66-0.76]), and biliary

63 ncreatectomy (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.85-0.96]), proctectomy (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.98]), proctocolect

64 tric bypass), colorectal surgery (colectomy, proctectomy), or hiatal hernia surgery (paraesophageal h

65 py and/or radiation without tumor resection, proctectomy, or transanal local excision.

66 a fair predictor of mortality for colectomy/proctectomy patients (C-statistic 0.74, 95%CI 0.73-0.74,

67 .8%) and pancreatectomy (53.4%) and 48.1% of proctectomy patients received care at hospitals not meet

68 We evaluated 33,969 colectomy and 8591 proctectomy patients.

69 on, lung/bronchus resection, pancreatectomy, proctectomy, prostatectomy, or hysterectomy) from Januar

70 , laparoscopic proctectomy (LP), and robotic proctectomy (RP) in pathological outcomes and overall su

71 more aggressive approach to early completion proctectomy seems justified in this situation.

72 Proctectomy, surgical complications, and symptoms from t

73 Proctectomy, the Duhamel, and pull-through procedures we

74 alize esophagectomies, pancreatectomies, and proctectomies to hospitals meeting minimum volume standa

75 apy was chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery (proctectomy, transanal local excision, no tumor resectio

76 Mortality after proctectomy was 5.0% and 1.9%, respectively.

77 Proctectomy was associated with higher rates of tumor-fr

78 ctal cancer patients treated with SC-TNT and proctectomy, we found no significant association with PO

79 Two thirds of secondary proctectomies were performed for refractory proctitis, a

80 Then, she received a restorative proctectomy with colo-anal anastomosis and vaginal repai