戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 splasia or cancer, still require restorative proctocolectomy.
2 isease (CD), and pouchitis after restorative proctocolectomy.
3  with septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy.
4  with septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy.
5 nt of septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy.
6  flat mucosa are both strong indications for proctocolectomy.
7 at this disease can develop many years after proctocolectomy.
8 long-term option in patients requiring total proctocolectomy.
9 D; 49% underwent LAR, 27% colectomy, and 14% proctocolectomy.
10 ts with chronic ulcerative colitis requiring proctocolectomy.
11 51 left-sided, 46 rectal resections, and 151 proctocolectomies.
12                       Nine patients required proctocolectomy after liver transplantation; 5 because o
13  expectancy benefit (3.1 years compared with proctocolectomy and 0.3 years compared with subtotal col
14 ng patients who underwent colectomy or total proctocolectomy and experienced no significant increase
15 patients with ulcerative colitis after total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis is usua
16  summary, the history and development of the proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has inv
17 complication of in patients with restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
18 tomy with end ileostomy, or a combined total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
19              Studies of patients after total proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch anastomosis suggest t
20 peration should be individualized, but total proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch should be strongly co
21 ow-up of 60 months (range, 5-170 months) had proctocolectomy and IPAA at Mayo Medical Center in Roche
22 d colectomy to 10.0% in emergency open total proctocolectomy, and in upper gastrointestinal/hepatopan
23  surveillance to 15.6 years for prophylactic proctocolectomy at 25 years of age compared with no inte
24                        Although prophylactic proctocolectomy can essentially eliminate the risk of ca
25 .02) but not among those in the colectomy or proctocolectomy cohorts.
26 rmine whether age at the time of restorative proctocolectomy correlates with physiologic changes.
27                                 Prophylactic proctocolectomy does not appear necessary, but annual su
28 s a durable operation for patients requiring proctocolectomy for CUC; functional and QoL outcomes are
29 indeterminate colitis patients who underwent proctocolectomy for dysplasia were retrospectively selec
30 98 females, 336 males) underwent restorative proctocolectomy for inflammatory bowel disease between 1
31  expanding, 10-20% of patients still require proctocolectomy for medically refractory disease.
32                                  Restorative proctocolectomy for mucosal ulcerative colitis is well e
33 ts who had undergone a two-stage restorative proctocolectomy for mucosal ulcerative colitis were divi
34            Following APPEAR with restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, median Wexner co
35                                              Proctocolectomy had been performed before transplantatio
36 roximately 20 years during which restorative proctocolectomy has been performed for ulcerative coliti
37 s, undergoing minimally invasive restorative proctocolectomy in 1, 2, or 3 stages between January 201
38 d from 1,965 patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy in a single center between 1983 and 2001
39  Health-related quality of life (HRQL) after proctocolectomy is a critical parameter for management d
40 mosis is now the preferred option when total proctocolectomy is required for ulcerative colitis or fa
41                                  Restorative proctocolectomy is the elective surgical procedure of ch
42 complications within 3 months of restorative proctocolectomy or within 3 months of ileostomy closure.
43  proctectomy (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.98]), proctocolectomy (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.81-1.00]), and ente
44                                        Total proctocolectomy, or total colectomy and a 1-year interva
45 evere polyposis are frequently offered total proctocolectomy rather than colectomy and ileorectal ana
46                       From 1984 to 2007, 348 proctocolectomy specimens with preoperative dysplasia sh
47 tients with a nondilated rectum, restorative proctocolectomy the most suitable in those with dilatati
48 nsiently somewhat impaired after restorative proctocolectomy, the impairment is not an age-related ph
49 Sixteen patients (44%) who underwent a total proctocolectomy (TPC) or subtotal colectomy (STC) had mu
50 elvic septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy were identified from a prospective datab
51 nt contrast medium-enhanced CT after a total proctocolectomy with an IPAA.
52 minal colectomy, 354 (14.3%) underwent total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, and 1172 (47.3%) rec
53 omy with ileal pouch/anal anastomosis, total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, and partial colectom
54 ectomy or total abdominal colectomy, a total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, or a combined total
55                                  Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA)
56                                        Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis is the
57                         Although restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)
58                                  Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)
59 h ulcerative colitis who undergo restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)
60                                  Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)
61 e most common complication after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ul
62         Over the past few years, restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has em
63                                  Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a s
64                                        Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is con
65                                  Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is now
66 ents with ulcerative colitis (UC) undergoing proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
67 omy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA), total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch/anal anastomosis, total
68           Prophylactic surgical options were proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis and subtotal c
69                                              Proctocolectomy with ileostomy or ileal pouch-anal anast
70 th UC who received 2- or 3-stage restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA at our institution from 2001 t
71 ur data suggest that both the 2- and 3-stage proctocolectomy with IPAA demonstrate favourable and com
72 ammatory bowel disease underwent restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA from 1984 to 2009 at the Cleve
73                              The restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA has become the procedure of ch
74                                        Total proctocolectomy with IPAA is known to be associated with