戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 , significantly improved HRQoL, and improved productivity.
2 n, triggering processes and impacts on ocean productivity.
3 netic diversity on tree growth and community productivity.
4 g this supply are land availability and land productivity.
5 dentified in tree rings versus gross primary productivity.
6  across experiments) on species richness and productivity.
7 fate to the ocean, or major shifts in marine productivity.
8 , such as episodic changes in oxygenation or productivity.
9 f salinized land and to increase global crop productivity.
10 s are important for maintaining agricultural productivity.
11 ity, and economic costs associated with lost productivity.
12 osystems, climate change has increased plant productivity.
13 plant-available nutrients and affect primary productivity.
14 at that limits plant growth and agricultural productivity.
15 n of diatoms, which dominate aquatic primary productivity.
16 icantly reduces expected annual agricultural productivity.
17 e long-term impact of nutrient enrichment on productivity.
18 h will disproportionately affect net primary productivity.
19 cations for enhanced algae and plant biomass productivity.
20  factors that determine their well-being and productivity.
21 y of microbial cell factories and compromise productivity.
22 nment and human health while maintaining its productivity.
23  of life and leads eventually to decrease of productivity.
24 , in parallel to the high potential level of productivity.
25 wth inhibition is often undesirable for crop productivity.
26 on or trophic state mediated through primary productivity.
27 environmental factors that constrain primary productivity.
28 nd both increases and decreases to ecosystem productivity.
29 thinner, seasonal ice with higher biological productivity.
30  can reduce grassland diversity and increase productivity.
31 l wetlands had narrow diet breadths and high productivity.
32 eficial consequences in plant metabolism and productivity.
33 l fertilization mechanism influencing forest productivity.
34 ndicated IONPs efficacy for improving biogas productivity.
35 nd, as a result, an overall reduction in R&D productivity.
36 ral ecosystems and for reliable agricultural productivity.
37 reduces plant growth and limits agricultural productivity.
38 g stomatal behavior and improving crop plant productivity.
39  values of yield, biological efficiency, and productivity.
40 etation to soil CO(2) fluxes and belowground productivity.
41 ng critical parameters involved in cell-free productivity.
42 ecting landscape function, biodiversity, and productivity.
43 dry conditions being the most favourable for productivity.
44 o their capacity to support high net primary productivity.
45 to cows, whereas low SWE and poor vegetation productivity 1 year prior together increased the likelih
46 rough experiments, giving excellent ethylene productivities (121 mmol/g from 1/99 mixture, 99.9999%),
47 site-selection criteria based on (1) biomass productivity, (2) water-use efficiency, and (3) water-st
48 linator mutualisms can increase persistence, productivity, abundance, and temporal stability of both
49 ss is significantly more variable than algae productivity across location and season.
50 othesis that summer warming stimulated plant productivity across much, but not all, of the Arctic tun
51  salinity, salt removal, water recovery, and productivity across the two technologies-energy consumpt
52  demands increase and climate threatens crop productivity, agricultural research develops innovative
53                    The fraction of total net productivity allocated belowground exceeds 50% in a larg
54 el will require high yields, high volumetric productivities and high titers.
55  scale, Ocular Comfort Index (OCI), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnair
56 ase Questionnaire-NASH, EuroQol-5D, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment) were prospectively
57 ms of DED are associated with decreased work productivity and activity level, both cross-sectionally
58 synthesis is the primary determinant of crop productivity and any gain in photosynthetic CO(2) assimi
59 effects strongly increase with floral reward productivity and are qualitatively robust to variation i
60                                        Woody productivity and biomass decrease from wet to dry forest
61 hicket alters the role of barrier islands in productivity and can have impacts on the natural resilie
62 he NH will play a significant role in forest productivity and carbon budgets in future.
63 l emissions may impact phytoplankton primary productivity and carbon cycling by supplying bioavailabl
64 thin a host and enhance the rates of oceanic productivity and carbon export.
65  stress will inform efforts to improve wheat productivity and climate resilience.
66              We found opposing gradients for productivity and climate sensitivity with highest growth
67 h which microfibers might interact, on plant productivity and community structure.
68  of ecosystems through changes in vegetation productivity and ecosystem carbon turnover time (tau(eco
69 se-mediated feedbacks that alter net primary productivity and elemental recycling.
70 ments to improve soil health seek to balance productivity and environmental considerations.
71 ian approach that incorporated gross primary productivity and environmental drivers to constrain sour
72 itive feedbacks from aboveground net primary productivity and exp(H), while the asymptotic J(CO2) res
73 ating that adaptation can result in a higher productivity and fitness in tolerant species in recurren
74 habiting dry forests, due to lower secondary productivity and greater resource overexploitation by lo
75    It has been a major constraint for higher productivity and has destroyed millions of citrus trees
76                       We also observe higher productivity and improved growth characteristics in spec
77 restimate the relationship between ecosystem productivity and mean rainfall amounts across sites (in
78      The high observed temporal variation in productivity and mortality suggests that this forest is
79 cs and understanding temporal variability in productivity and mortality.
80  turn might have impacted the marine primary productivity and organic carbon burial.
81 re marked by relatively high phytoplanktonic productivity and organic carbon fluxes at the seafloor r
82 rarchical biophysical regions based on plant productivity and phenology by clustering global 0.083 de
83 ales that correspond to differences in plant productivity and phenology would allow analysts to selec
84 ges in winter snowfall will affect ecosystem productivity and plant community structure during the gr
85 rs that greatly impact cell growth, specific productivity and product qualities of the biotherapeutic
86 me local environments, stimulating ecosystem productivity and promoting biotic recovery in the Early
87  status is an important indicator of soybean productivity and resistance to pathogens in adverse clim
88  In contrast, biological factors (i.e. plant productivity and soil bacterial diversity) and soil fact
89 itation change may critically influence root productivity and soil carbon dynamics under future clima
90 riability in field-observed GPP, net primary productivity and solar-induced fluorescence was better o
91 consumer biomass tracks plant quantity (e.g. productivity and standing biomass) and quality (nutrient
92 al evidence generation from a multi-criteria productivity and sustainability perspective is likely re
93  webs, thereby affecting rates of biological productivity and the pathways of energy and material flo
94 intenance of Fe homeostasis will alter plant productivity and the quality of their derived products.
95   Increased ocean CO(2) can enhance seagrass productivity and thermal tolerance, providing some compe
96 istent with the locations of higher volcanic productivity and thicker arc crust.
97  in controlling the extent of global primary productivity and thus atmospheric pO(2) on geologic time
98  to N, hence P application to increase plant productivity and thus C sequestration has been suggested
99 ases nitrogen (N) that could stimulate plant productivity and thus offset soil carbon losses from tun
100 e species hypothesis) through increased tree productivity and tree abundance resulting from complemen
101         The intersection of changing habitat productivity and warming water temperatures on salmonids
102 entifying genetic manipulations that improve productivity and yield of this economically highly relev
103 ine past variations in dust delivery, export productivity, and bottom-water oxygenation, respectively
104 degree Celsius), primarily by reducing woody productivity, and has a greater impact per degrees C in
105 n linked to seasonal variation in ecological productivity, and it has been hypothesized that primary
106 stimated above-ground biomass (EAGB) stocks, productivity, and mortality in old-growth tropical fores
107 tative services, thereby maintaining health, productivity, and quality of life.
108 Extreme heat adversely affects human health, productivity, and well-being, with more frequent and int
109 decision tree enabled an analysis of surgeon productivity annualized over a fiscal year.
110 efficiency (RUE) of above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP) under conditions of experimentally r
111 y low plant-available pools, elevated forest productivities are sustained.
112 areas, solar radiation, and non-forest plant productivity are among the most important global drivers
113 effects of these adverse conditions on plant productivity are becoming ever more alarming in recent y
114                    Changes in marine primary productivity are key to determine how climate change mig
115 tabolic characteristics underlying this high productivity are poorly understood including the mode of
116                 Rates and drivers of primary productivity are well understood for many terrestrial ec
117                                    Increased productivity as reflected by adjusted work relative valu
118  and economies in the form of lost wages and productivity, as well as higher medical expenses.
119 n in mean bloom magnitude and annual primary productivity, assuming simple changes in the seasonal ma
120 sed the time series of phytoplankton primary productivity at BATS site using machine learning techniq
121 rtance of bedrock geochemistry on vegetation productivity based on a critical zone investigation acro
122 ue that age and area in conjunction with non-productivity-based measures of ecological opportunity ex
123 find that adding water-stress constraints to productivity-based ranking of suitable sites reduces wat
124 rs of the experiment, with the difference in productivity between fertilized and unfertilized plots d
125 s and their projections are likely to affect productivity, biodiversity and distributions of deep-sea
126 dent on reefs may need to adapt to declining productivity, but further research to support ongoing re
127 nt led to an immediate positive increment in productivity, but that this effect became nonsignificant
128 s, herbicides reduce respiration and primary productivity by decreasing the abundance of phytoplankto
129 induced a negative feedback on phytoplankton productivity by reducing the availability of essential r
130 to two, many assume that long shifts improve productivity by removing one handover and staff overlap.
131           (d) All models attribute ecosystem productivity changes to the intensity of vegetation stre
132 nt (vs placebo) in the SNOT-22 item "reduced productivity." CONCLUSIONS: In adults with CRSwNP refrac
133 costs (formal and informal healthcare costs, productivity costs) from established sources or reasonab
134 ndirect nonmedical costs, such as travel and productivity costs) in addition to pharmacological thera
135           However, the energy efficiency and productivity (current density) achieved so far still fal
136 system is yet available to increase scouting productivity, data scale and fidelity.
137                      Across all populations, productivity declined with increased precipitation durin
138  number of practices, such as increased food productivity, dietary change and reduced food loss and w
139 ) examine if patterns of moose abundance and productivity differed before and after the collapse of t
140                      The enhanced vegetation productivity driven by increased concentrations of carbo
141     For all specialties, modest increases in productivity due to scribes may allow physicians to see
142 edominantly limited by soil N, even if plant productivity (e.g., litterfall) responds to rock-derived
143                   The Arctic tundra is a low productivity ecosystem supporting simple food webs, but
144 was found that accurate parasitic energy and productivity estimates of a VSA process require full pro
145  crop in sub-Saharan Africa, due to its high productivity even on nutrient poor soils.
146 describe strategies improving day or surgery productivity, few include perioperative interventions to
147 consequence of the overall decline in marine productivity following the last glaciation.
148  domestication, human farmers traded greater productivity for higher crop vulnerability outside speci
149                                        Plant productivity for major crops around the world, however,
150 tainty interval, 1.7-3.6 billion dollars) in productivity gains.
151 ecosystem functioning experiments found that productivity generally increases with species richness,
152 cosystem productivity (NEP), gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) and ecosystem respiration (RE) in res
153 phenology as a regulator for gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) in peatlands is empirically not well
154 tic capacity, that is, maximum gross primary productivity (GPP(max) ).
155 ath analyses revealed that the gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (RE) were p
156 ability of weather conditions, gross primary productivity (GPP) and net primary productivity (NPP) of
157          Relationships between gross primary productivity (GPP) and the remotely sensed photochemical
158  climate and CO(2) response of gross primary productivity (GPP) and transpiration at the global scale
159 X decreases the sensitivity of gross primary productivity (GPP) to soil moisture, which improves the
160  transfer of CO(2) into plants-gross primary productivity (GPP)-is the largest land carbon flux globa
161 ce of parallel nature-based contributions to productivity growth in non-rice crops over the period 19
162                      Although low vegetation productivity has been observed in karst regions, whether
163 alculations to reveal the origin of the high productivity, high selectivity, and high durability exhi
164 straining sugar production: net above-ground productivity, how far the community is into that year's
165 nt to which this is driven by (i) changes in productivity, (ii) exotic species' traits, or (iii) nove
166 mass-productivity ranking alone, with little productivity impact (<1.7% per-site on average).
167 oparticles, highlighting a threat to primary productivity in aquatic ecosystems.
168 d synthetic communities have shown increased productivity in comparison with monocultures and allow f
169  AI indicates a greater decline of ecosystem productivity in dry years compared to the increase in we
170 nutrient to light limitation control primary productivity in lake ecosystems as hydrological inputs o
171 the stabilizing effect of plant diversity on productivity in local communities.
172 t resilience in C(3) plants while sustaining productivity in the hotter and drier climates that are p
173 ct that global warming suppresses biological productivity in the Subarctic Atlantic Ocean as increasi
174 discuss their potential impact on biological productivity in the tropical North Atlantic.
175 aphic processes that control temperature and productivity in tropical waters, yet potential interacti
176 bial communities and ultimately agricultural productivity in two specific scenarios: firstly, in the
177 ich may alleviate N limitation and stimulate productivity in warming tundra.
178 AI indicates a greater increase of ecosystem productivity in wet years compared to the decline in dry
179 fy the net impacts of nitrogen enrichment on productivity, including its potential indirect effects o
180 The eddy-driven iron supply and consequently productivity increase with model resolution.
181 s/forb cover, while transpiration and annual productivity increase.
182 ver egg-laying following queen death and (2) productivity increases gradually with each additional wo
183 p theory that explains that as environmental productivity increases the ecological kinetics of divers
184                   Across biomes, belowground productivity increases with mean annual precipitation, a
185                                        Woody productivity increases with soil fertility, whereas resi
186 e variation in climate and ecosystem primary productivity, independent of plant life form.
187 efits of specialization are saturating (i.e. productivity is a concave function of specialization).
188                                    Ecosystem productivity is a key aspect of habitat suitability, esp
189               On average, belowground carbon productivity is estimated as 24.7 Pg y(-1), accounting f
190 ithin species and potential consequences for productivity is largely lacking.
191 al limitation, and the consequent effects on productivity is less well known.
192                                              Productivity loss is thus substantial for high strength
193 icult to constrain the extent of the primary productivity loss on land, hindering our understanding o
194 ect medical costs, and $1.4-$20.7 billion in productivity losses ($1.5-$23.1 billion total).
195 lity of forest landscapes to climate-induced productivity losses and mortality events.
196            We also estimate the magnitude of productivity losses associated with compromised bone str
197 conservation measures, long-term yearly soil productivity losses due to compaction and water erosion
198                                 Age-specific productivity losses from hunting cessation associated wi
199 ct medical costs, and $16.1-$42.7 billion in productivity losses.
200 ct medical costs, and $28.8-$57.4 billion in productivity losses.
201 ct medical costs, and $44.8-$64.7 billion in productivity losses.
202  post-fire erosion and can lead to long-term productivity losses.
203 The current work suggests that ocean primary productivity may not only depend on dissolved Fe but als
204 related with graminoid, shrub, and ecosystem productivity measured at field sites.
205 te (RWLR), while RWLR can predict vegetation productivity more effectively than previous models.
206  stereocontrol of the polypropylene and high productivity (multiple chains of block copolymer per met
207 sts with regards to academic rank, scholarly productivity, National Institutes of Health (NIH) fundin
208 primarily explained by response of net biome productivity (NBP) to climate change, and by changes in
209 al pattern of sensitivities of net ecosystem productivity (NEP), gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) a
210 ulations underestimated observed net primary productivity (NPP) and leaf area index (LAI) after 100 y
211 rate and boreal trees, enhancing net primary productivity (NPP) of forests.
212 s primary productivity (GPP) and net primary productivity (NPP) of wood and fruits of an old-growth,
213                    We quantified net primary productivity (NPP) using two methods as well as carbon s
214  warming, assuming no changes in net primary productivity (NPP).
215 ents a key driver of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP).
216 he engineered strain produced sucrose with a productivity of 1.1 g L(-1) day(-1) without the need of
217 se and other environmental indicators on the productivity of 15 Chinook salmon populations in the Coo
218 uld thus disrupt the community structure and productivity of a critical functional group, independent
219                       We tracked fitness and productivity of all generations.
220  the programming flexibility and development productivity of brain-inspired computing.
221  development was guided by the idea that the productivity of catalysts employing BrettPhos-like ligan
222                           However, their low productivity of chemicals is a major challenge for comme
223 chrony will have negative impacts on average productivity of consumers.
224 organismal traits, assemblage structure, and productivity of cryptobenthic reef fishes between the wo
225 -level should be investigated to enhance the productivity of drug-discovery research.
226                             However, because productivity of grazed pasture systems is generally low,
227                 Breeders have enhanced grain productivity of maize hybrids by pyramiding desirable ch
228 if sequence and spacing that may distinguish productivity of new enhancer formation.
229 s of insecticides on respiration and primary productivity of phytoplankton are driven by top-down eff
230 ns of critical pair and poor chromatographic productivity of purification methods.
231 thropogenic emissions on the functioning and productivity of Siberia's taiga.
232 attractive target for increasing the biomass productivity of some strains.
233 2) sink we identify has implications for the productivity of subseafloor microbial ecosystems and is
234 efficiency of photosynthesis can enhance the productivity of sucrose.
235 of the most important factors that determine productivity of terrestrial ecosystems.
236 ectrodes, which limits the incorporation and productivity of the bacterial colony.
237 btropical gyre and to support the biological productivity of the region; however, the physical mechan
238 in the northeast Atlantic may reduce primary productivity of this foundation species, as optimal temp
239 substantial impact on plant gas exchange and productivity, off-setting and possibly negating CO(2) fe
240 s of biogeochemical water type and ecosystem productivity on Earth's most diverse aquatic vertebrate
241 fuel a surprising burst in shrub belowground productivity, one possible mechanism explaining the "shr
242 on and Greenland barnacle goose survival and productivity over a 50 year period from 1968 to 2018.
243 ation does not follow a simple environmental productivity pattern.
244 ariation in aridity determines environmental productivity patterns, including large-scale variability
245  predicted by growing season, then ecosystem productivity, plant potassium (K) and phosphorous (P), r
246 gest predictor of all diversity metrics, and productivity played only a marginal role.
247  systems based on agricultural land area and productivity, population, and 7 diet scenarios ranging i
248 ave a devastating impact on plant growth and productivity, potentially resulting in the collapse of e
249 2) concentrations and their effects on plant productivity present challenging issues.
250 cific carbon inputs deduced from net primary productivity provide constraints on soil bacterial abund
251 r consumption by half, compared with biomass-productivity ranking alone, with little productivity imp
252   However, loci selected for improving grain productivity remain largely unclear.
253 ry contributes to the low karstic vegetation productivity remain unclear.
254 rannual variability of forest photosynthetic productivity remains a key objective in global biology.
255  resources on seasonal dynamics of ecosystem productivity remains largely unknown.
256 ctive theory of how mixing, circulation, and productivity respond to increasing surface buoyancy in 2
257 tate, local and remote drivers and the ocean productivity response from past events are critical step
258  our understanding of the belowground carbon productivity response to climate change and provides a c
259 th and turnover, likely due to greater plant productivity, resulting in higher amounts of microbial b
260 ture assessed, we find potential to increase productivity several-fold over current levels.
261 owever, the global scale of rainfall-induced productivity shocks on changes in cropland is yet to be
262 killed elk varied markedly with summer plant productivity, snow water equivalent (SWE) and winter per
263 ases characterized by abrupt decays in plant productivity, soil fertility, and plant cover and richne
264 , informed assessments of green total factor productivity (TFP) are supported, and possible lock-ins
265 ent aerosol, which can lead to greater plant productivity than hydroponic cultivation.
266                            They yield higher productivity than nonadapted ones when grown in the pres
267  and contribute more to the region's primary productivity than their standing stocks suggest.
268 ve global quantification of root/belowground productivity that will aid the budgeting and modeling of
269 ntial dietary minerals with increasing plant productivity-that particularly targets insect herbivores
270                        In spite of their low productivity, the evolution of methanogenic metabolisms
271 ll, despite the interruption of experimental productivity, the shutdown has proven for many PIs and t
272 n elk abundance was high and when the forage productivity they experienced in utero was poor.
273 esults illustrate the potential for gains in productivity through investment in soil biological healt
274                           Looking to improve productivity, time and simplicity, we are proposing a (1
275 oral (interannual) sensitivity of vegetation productivity to annual rainfall at a given site, even th
276 t agroecological and economic limitations on productivity to improve YG estimates and identify sustai
277 roduce the observed sensitivity of ecosystem productivity to rainfall changes at 10 sites across the
278 erely three easily interpretable parameters: productivity, total impact, and how lucky an author has
279 ng organic matter fluxes and in situ primary productivity under anoxic conditions.
280 y the global dimming impact on agroecosystem productivity under future climate change.
281 ay enhance soil-plant interactions and total productivity under resource limited conditions.
282 s higher correlations with drought and plant productivity under warming than control.
283 ed on remotely sensed measures of vegetation productivity using Dynamic Habitat Indices (DHIs), and b
284  including its potential indirect effects on productivity via changes in species richness and soil pH
285                                              Productivity was also associated with regional indices o
286 after prolonged dry or cold conditions, when productivity was low.
287  damaging disease in terms of animal health, productivity, welfare and antimicrobial use.
288 e analysis showed that seasons and ecosystem productivity were the most powerful variables in explain
289 graphic diversity, rainfall seasonality, and productivity were used to test the ecological opportunit
290  conditions corresponding to periods of high productivity, whereas partial isohydry was exhibited aft
291 te change, pose a threat to plant growth and productivity which could negatively affect carbon seques
292 rease of P input would elevate surface ocean productivity, which in turn enhances marine iron redox c
293 ces soil nitrate that influences net primary productivity, while the by-product of nitrification, nit
294 security persists and increased agricultural productivity will be needed, but much less is known abou
295 mands currently made on plant photosynthetic productivity will continue to increase.
296 erature was identified as a likely driver of productivity, with reduced NPP and standing stock observ
297 tions during autumn staging and survival and productivity, with warm, dry conditions being the most f
298 , bioderivatization had a positive effect on productivity without any apparent effect on growth.
299 t combinations, inflict a heavy toll on crop productivity worldwide.
300            Trace elements sustain biological productivity, yet the significance of trace element mobi

 
Page Top