コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 sis that occurs in blinding diseases such as proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
2 nd that this change can precede the onset of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
3 ctomy is performed in treating patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
4 se with moderately severe to very severe non proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
5 eased in the vitreous fluid of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
6 safety of combined surgery in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
7 sive neovascularization in the retina causes proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
8 lly relevant to the angiogenesis observed in proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
9 ization of ischemic retinal diseases such as proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
10 patients over 60 years of age or those with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
11 e with neovacularizations is the hallmark of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
12 such as age-related macular degeneration and proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
13 nonclearing vitreous hemorrhage secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
14 permeability that are characteristic of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
15 ACCORD trial participants with no history of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
16 agents also provide therapeutic benefits in proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
17 ents broadens therapeutic options for PRP in proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
18 eatment for reducing severe visual loss from proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
19 at least through 2 years, for patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
20 rence of neovascularization in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
21 betic retinopathy (diabetic macular edema or proliferative diabetic retinopathy), 17 trials (23%) inc
22 dergone cataract surgery (39.9%), those with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (25.7%), and those wi
23 ferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), 15 had proliferative diabetic retinopathy, 7 had retinal detach
24 cluding 0.9% of all injections that were for proliferative diabetic retinopathy), 8.3% to treat retin
26 thology related to both nonproliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy and age-related macul
27 and other pathological conditions, including proliferative diabetic retinopathy and age-related macul
28 ion and ocular permeability are hallmarks of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and age-related macul
29 meability contributes to the pathogenesis of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular
30 reatening diabetic retinopathy that includes proliferative diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular
31 herapy is a useful tool in the management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular
32 including age-related macular degeneration, proliferative diabetic retinopathy and glaucomatous opti
33 udies related to retinopathy of prematurity, proliferative diabetic retinopathy and in studies evalua
34 ear, however, how PlGF, which is elevated in proliferative diabetic retinopathy and is a VEGF homolog
35 mediator of aberrant retinal angiogenesis in proliferative diabetic retinopathy and its modulation ha
37 serum lipids or statins on the incidence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and macular edema.
39 and is an excellent target for treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and other ischemic re
40 angiogenesis and vascular remodeling during proliferative diabetic retinopathy and other ischemic re
41 D) occurs in approximately 5% of people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy and poses a threat to
42 n the retina that underlies the pathology of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy of pr
43 scularization, which underlies diseases like proliferative diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy of pr
44 numerous angiogenesis-based diseases such as proliferative diabetic retinopathy and solid tumors.
45 d in the serum and vitreous of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy and that smooth muscl
46 actor (IGF) biological activity increases in proliferative diabetic retinopathy and that this activit
47 change is more accentuated in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy and vitreous hemorrha
48 d with a variety of human diseases including proliferative diabetic retinopathy and wet age-related m
49 idated scale from stage 0 (none) to stage 4 (proliferative diabetic retinopathy), and percentage of t
50 ith Deferred Panretinal Photocoagulation for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy), and Protocol T (A C
51 lmark of the early stage of the disease, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and can be detected
52 from patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and concomitant reti
53 vitreous of patients with complications from proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and correlate with I
54 sening of diabetic retinopathy, incidence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and incidence of mac
55 ty factor is a likely angiogenic mediator in proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and its role is unde
56 nti-VEGF drugs in DME is not as robust as in proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and many patients wi
58 went vitrectomy for complications related to proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and the other 13 for
59 diseases such as retinopathy of prematurity, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and wet age-related
60 ients with diabetic macular edema, severe or proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and with history of
61 4 patients undergoing primary vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy at 16 different vitre
62 (DME) at baseline, were less likely to have proliferative diabetic retinopathy at baseline, received
63 ks and benefits of pars plana vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy, but clinical trial d
64 generating tractional forces associated with proliferative diabetic retinopathy can arise from Muller
66 nd Mechanistic Evaluation of Aflibercept for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (CLARITY) trial was c
67 r progression of retinopathy, progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy, clinically significa
68 55; 95% CI, 1.32-1.82), as did patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (CVA: HR, 2.53; 95% C
69 they had a history of proliferative disease (proliferative diabetic retinopathy), diabetic macular ed
71 nducted at 55 US sites among 305 adults with proliferative diabetic retinopathy enrolled between Febr
72 nducted at 55 US sites among 305 adults with proliferative diabetic retinopathy enrolled between Febr
73 range of prevalent ocular diseases including proliferative diabetic retinopathy, exudative age-relate
74 des clinically significant macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy, following cataract s
75 risk of severe vision loss in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy for the past four dec
78 separate studies reported that patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy have increased serum
79 period was associated with the incidence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (hazard ratio [HR], 1
82 statistically significant increased risk for proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the multivariate m
84 athy as defined by diabetic macular edema or proliferative diabetic retinopathy in unrelated cases as
85 Amongst those with diabetes, the presence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy increased the likelih
86 , anecdotal evidence has long suggested that proliferative diabetic retinopathy is rarely associated
88 zed broadly as proliferation, exemplified by proliferative diabetic retinopathy, leakage such as macu
89 hms for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage and non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy may be influenced by
90 es, patients aged <= 60 years and those with proliferative diabetic retinopathy may necessitate caref
91 ed in investigator-initiated trials studying proliferative diabetic retinopathy, neovascular age-rela
93 hy (PDR) development among patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) in US real-wor
95 s, including 10 individuals with DME and non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), 13 with DME,
96 0 patients with diabetes, 30 of them had non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), and 30 had pr
101 tein cholesterol and decreased prevalence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (odds ratio per 10 mg
103 y [NPDR]; 22 moderate NPDR; 9 severe NPDR; 5 proliferative diabetic retinopathy) of 40 diabetic patie
104 Overall, the probability of progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy or clinically signifi
105 e risk of progression from no retinopathy to proliferative diabetic retinopathy or clinically signifi
106 o determine the likelihood of progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy or clinically signifi
107 defined by prior laser treatment for either proliferative diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular e
108 density lipoprotein cholesterol and incident proliferative diabetic retinopathy or macular edema, nor
109 or of statin use with decreased incidence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy or macular edema, wer
110 pregnancy was not associated with higher non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy or proliferative diab
111 ns were especially elevated in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy or retinal detachment
114 ere NPDR, 4.8% for severe NPDR, and 5.1% for proliferative diabetic retinopathy; P < 0.001), hemoglob
116 presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (6), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (5), epiretinal
118 ts who underwent fundus examination, 60% had proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and 32% had dia
119 5 individuals with type 1 or 2 diabetes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and 61 individu
120 s samples from 20 diabetic patients: 13 with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and 7 with diab
121 e diagnosis of diabetes to sight-threatening proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and diabetic ma
123 diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and DME, 38 had proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and DME, 101 ha
124 nolone acetonide (FAc) on the progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and the impact
125 ine the time and risk factors for developing proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and vitreous he
126 Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) are one of the
127 logy recommends that patients diagnosed with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) be considered f
129 etters at 2 consecutive visits) or high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) developed.
130 ndothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment on proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) development amo
131 cation of patients at risk of progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) enables earlier
132 e macular microvascular changes in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) following panre
134 iabetic retinopathy (NPDR) was found in 69%, proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in 31% and adva
135 eviously been reported to be associated with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in Caucasian pa
136 ctors for events that represent worsening of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in eyes treated
137 ovide the real-world outcomes of people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in India and hi
139 tion (PRP) is a common approach for treating proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in the clinical
146 oth groups to treat development of high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or CI-DME with
147 ry and angiogenic factors from patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or diabetic mac
148 eated exclusively with anti-VEGF therapy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or nonprolifera
149 y eye centre (Aberdeen Royal Infirmary) with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) related complic
151 ascular endothelial growth factor agents for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) requires that p
152 alogues have been successfully used to treat proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) that is unrespo
156 roliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) were detected i
157 show that vitreal fluids from patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) were enriched w
158 roliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) were excellent
159 death, eyes with macular hole, and eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) were investigat
161 retinopathy (PVR) (n = 30), PVR (n = 16) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with tractional
162 elial growth factor (VEGF), in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with variable d
164 hy (NPDR) without macular edema, 20 eyes had proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) without macular
166 iabetic retinopathy (NPDR), 13 with DME, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and 27 healthy
167 c ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), treated proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and branch ret
168 RD), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and proliferat
169 rovascular membranes (FVMs), the hallmark of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), cause retinal
170 onproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), or diabetic ma
171 l among eyes with vitreous hemorrhage due to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), post hoc analy
172 moderate to severe retinopathy, and 28 with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), previously tre
173 ation (PRP) is the mainstay of treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), reducing the r
175 ers have been developed for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), the leading ca
176 pars plana vitrectomy, while in a case with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), vitrectomy was
177 retinal photocoagulation (PRP) when managing proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), with or withou
201 then thickening as the patient progressed to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR, 295.17 +/- 95.6
202 ignificantly lower in diabetic patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR; respectively, 2
203 ages of DR (diabetic macular edema [DME] and proliferative diabetic retinopathy [PDR]) have a higher
204 plications (diabetic macular edema [DME] and proliferative diabetic retinopathy [PDR]), which require
209 atin (SST) analogues have been used to treat proliferative diabetic retinopathy, pseudotumor cerebri,
210 ommon in eyes with retinal diseases, such as proliferative diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusi
212 ty of the primary RD repair, history of PVR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, serous RD, retinal d
215 n patients with severe NPDR or non-high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy, the same association
216 men; mean [SD] age, 54.8 [14.6] years) with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (there was a 1:1 rati
217 ants whose eyes had vitreous hemorrhage from proliferative diabetic retinopathy, there was no statist
218 020, among 120 treatment-naive patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy to evaluate the topog
219 deep capillary plexuses in patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy trained on a database
222 ify neovascularization (NV) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy using swept-source op
223 ompared with diabetes alone, the presence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy was associated with a
226 branes surgically removed from patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy were analyzed by zymo
228 ously untreated or post-laser treated active proliferative diabetic retinopathy were recruited from 2
230 nopathy (including diabetic macular edema or proliferative diabetic retinopathy) were used to test th
231 h vison loss due to vitreous hemorrhage from proliferative diabetic retinopathy who were enrolled fro