ライフサイエンスコーパス: prone position

1 two 30 minutes steps (e.g., in supine, then prone position).

2 rd of care (that is, no instruction to adopt prone position).

3 were attributable to sleeping in the side or prone position.

4 y, when the animal was turned from supine to prone position.

5 y distress syndrome is often improved in the prone position.

6 7 infants (40%) were placed for sleep in the prone position.

7 ompressed with two fenestrated plates in the prone position.

8 significant changes in Crs were seen in the prone position.

9 of pneumothorax compared with the supine or prone position.

10 ients were randomized to RT in the supine or prone position.

11 p algorithm and acquired with the patient in prone position.

12 ing sleep hours and the person is found in a prone position.

13 tion response (change in Pao2/Fio2 ratio) to prone position.

14 ge, 53 years; age range, 18-84 years) in the prone position.

15 (6 ml/kg; PEEP 3 cm H(2)O; 3 h) in supine or prone position.

16 ter receiving noninvasive ventilation in the prone position.

17 ng the patient in the 6) Trendelenberg or 7) prone position.

18 eolar ventilation became more uniform in the prone position.

19 s obtained with the patient in the supine or prone position.

20 fflation, and helical scanning in supine and prone positions.

21 underwent CT colonography in both supine and prone positions.

22 quisition with the patient in the supine and prone positions.

23 lateral position compared with the supine or prone positions.

24 n; age range, 47-72 years) in the supine and prone positions.

25 even surfactant-depleted sheep in supine and prone positions.

26 distribution of injury might be altered with prone positioning.

27 /inverse-ratio ventilation, and intermittent prone positioning.

28 uring a COVID-19 surge period and receipt of prone positioning.

29 n to increase the appropriate utilization of prone positioning.

30 d cerebral perfusion pressure may occur with prone positioning.

31 ventilation modifies pulmonary responses to prone positioning.

32 NAION) is a rare but harmful complication of prone positioning.

33 ent's head position above heart level during prone positioning.

34 iratory pressure, recruitment maneuvers, and prone positioning.

35 lop strategies to improve adherence to awake prone positioning.

36 y due to the trunk lowering performed before prone positioning.

37 -lung interactions method) before and during prone positioning.

38 , greater use of neuromuscular blockade, and prone positioning.

39 ole of preload in the hemodynamic effects of prone positioning.

40 CT images were repeated in supine and prone positioning.

41 re-controlled inverse ratio ventilation, and prone positioning.

42 Responders had earlier prone position (1.4 d [interquartile range, 0.7-4.2 d] v

43 ollowed by iNO (13%), corticosteroids (10%), prone positioning (10%), HFOV (9%), and extracorporeal m

44 ained with the patient in the supine and the prone position, 11 moved from a dorsal to a ventral loca

45 were musculoskeletal pain or discomfort from prone positioning (13 of 205 patients [6.34%]) and desat

46 had a longer median time from intubation to prone position (2.0 d [interquartile range, 0.7-5.0 d] v

47 ratory system compliance did not change with prone position (45 +/- 15 vs 45 +/- 18 mL/cm H2O in supi

48 20.2]) and with turning from the side to the prone position (45.4 [23.4-87.9]).

49 vs 3.38; Pa o2 :F io2 ratio 65 vs 64 mm Hg; prone positioning after intubation 81 vs 78%; mortality

50 ntial to monitor and predict the response to prone positioning, aid in the dosage of flow rate in hig

51 Prone positioning allows to improve oxygenation and decr

52 The residual molecules assumed prone positions along the pores, with the tailgroup bein

53 The prone position alters the distribution of histologic abn

54 cant increase in intraocular pressure due to prone positioning among acute respiratory distress syndr

55 This translated to a 51% reduction in use of prone positioning among patients treated in 2022 versus

56 She is placed in the prone position and a neuromuscular blocking agent is adm

57 of 10 L/min (treatment); 3) in Trendelenburg/prone position and ventilated as in the control group (T

58 on, which incorporates the dynamic nature of prone positioning and adjusts for potential confounders.

59 Prone positioning and HFOV were more common in middle-in

60 Use of prone positioning and neuromuscular blockade was signifi

61 to guide therapies?, 5) What is the role of prone positioning and noninvasive ventilation in nonvent

62 ant variability in frequency and duration of prone positioning and respiratory supports applied, pron

63 hours was similar for patients randomised to prone positioning and standard of care.

64 ided greater skepticism over the efficacy of prone positioning and the currently available surfactant

65 Prone positioning and venovenous extracorporeal membrane

66 stention with the patient in both supine and prone positions and interpretation of both transverse an

67 dying a wide range of PBF values, supine and prone positions and various positive end-expiratory pres

68 ced lung injury, including low tidal volume, prone position, and neuromuscular blockers, demonstratin

69 8 (IQR, 64-99) mm Hg, 91.8% of patients were prone positioned, and 14 patients had refractory respira

70 ntions such as low tidal volume ventilation, prone positioning, and a conservative fluid strategy.

71 ion, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, prone positioning, and extracorporeal life support.

72 ding lung protective ventilation, paralysis, prone positioning, and inhaled nitric oxide.

73 Recruitment maneuvers, prone positioning, and kinetic therapy are all reported

74 We found that a 1.5 T MRI system, prone positioning, and MR enterography were frequently u

75 ementation whose Pao(2) increased >=20% with prone positioning, and their respiratory status after re

76 Awake prone positioning (APP) has shown inconstant association

77 ng regional injury and protective effects of prone positioning are unclear.

78 n quantitative lung CT-scan performed before prone-positioning are more likely to improve their stati

79 ical cannulation, renal replacement therapy, prone positioning as independent bleeding predictors in

80 Patients were randomized 1:1 to prone positioning (at least 4 sessions of 16 hours) (n =

81 mb and hindlimb during head-up tilt from the prone position before and after the removal of vestibula

82 COVID-19-related ARDS; and 164 (96%) were in prone position before ECMO initiation.

83 Prone positioning, bronchodilators, inhaled nitric oxide

84 chniques and other treatments (eg, steroids, prone positioning, bronchoscopy, and inhaled nitric oxid

85 g computed tomography (CT) in the supine and prone positions but not the standing position.

86 Infants were placed in the prone position by 70% of caregivers in 1992, prior to th

87 CT scans were obtained with patients in the prone position by using 5-mm-thick sections, 140 kVp, 13

88 Oxygenation improved significantly following prone positioning (change in SpO(2)/FIO(2) per hour pron

89 Prone positioning combined with low Vt was the best stra

90 es +/- 4.3 (62%) to each reading (supine and prone positions combined); average total reading time, 8

91 gnificant improvement in Rrs occurred in the prone position compared to supine in patients with obstr

92 intraocular pressure of 2- to 3-fold in the prone position compared with the supine position.

93 ients with severe ARDS supported by VV-ECMO, prone positioning compared with supine positioning did n

94 Awake prone positioning compared with usual care reduces the r

95 atients required rescue therapies, primarily prone positioning, compared with the conventional group

96 hypoxemic respiratory failure from COVID-19, prone positioning, compared with usual care without pron

97 In the prone position, computed tomography scan densities redis

98 positioning (n = 205) or usual care without prone positioning (control; n = 195).

99 a critical snow burial simulation while in a prone position covered by at least 50 cm of snow.

100 nhaled vasodilators increased whereas use of prone position decreased over time (p for trend = 0.04 a

101 Prone positioning decreased aeration in the anterior lun

102 linical trial confirms that treatment in the prone position decreases desquamation in women with larg

103 an or equal to 3 mL/cm H2O after 16 hours of prone-positioning defined prone-positioning responders.

104 Animal experiments clearly show that prone positioning delays or prevents ventilation-induced

105 f this study was to quantify the response to prone position, describe the differences between coronav

106 -19, a multifaceted intervention to increase prone positioning did not improve outcomes.

107 In 15 patients, prone positioning did not increase cardiac index greater

108 Awake prone positioning did not significantly affect secondary

109 Prone positioning did not significantly reduce mortality

110 ositioning, compared with usual care without prone positioning, did not significantly reduce endotrac

111 prone positioning location (ICU vs non-ICU), prone positioning dose (total minutes/d), frequency (ses

112 fashion with alternation between supine and prone position during incremental dosing.

113 patients, and patients who are placed in the prone position during ventilation may be more susceptibl

114 Prone positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygena

115 outcomes of patients treated with or without prone positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygena

116 ) have failed to show a beneficial effect of prone positioning during mechanical ventilatory support

117 Prone positioning during the COVID-19 pandemic has becom

118 Our study highlights that prone positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membr

119 The study investigated the impact of prone positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membr

120 core-matched analysis compared patients with prone-positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygena

121 Prone-positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membr

122 Prone positioning enhances lung recruitment and decrease

123 le and the inferior and anterior retina than prone positioning even when the gas fill is only 70% of

124 tracorporeal membrane oxygenation durations, prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation pa

125 ower (20% vs 42%, p < 0.01) than that for no prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation pa

126 acute respiratory distress syndrome, 64 were prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

127 y square-wave, knee-extensor exercise in the prone position for 6 min with a 6 min rest interval.

128 imum optimal ventilator settings may be in a prone position for at least 16 hours per day to improve

129 Two of 4 patients who were in the prone position for extended periods of time had bilatera

130 Prone positioning for acute respiratory distress syndrom

131 ion of lung-protective ventilation including prone positioning for coronavirus disease 2019 acute res

132 The use of prone positioning for COVID-19 ARDS is declining.

133 wed a high probability of benefit with awake prone positioning for endotracheal intubation (non-infor

134 evere ARDS, the recommendation is strong for prone positioning for more than 12 h/d (moderate confide

135 Prone positioning further decreased nonaerated tissue (3

136 tched pairs, mortality rate was 49.7% in the prone position group versus 60.1% in the supine position

137 s 4.8 h/d (IQR, 1.8 to 8.0 h/d) in the awake prone positioning group vs 0 h/d (IQR, 0 to 0 h/d) in th

138 By day 30, 70 of 205 patients (34.1%) in the prone positioning group were intubated vs 79 of 195 pati

139 In the awake prone positioning group, 21 patients (10%) experienced a

140 No woman, regardless of supine or prone position, had all breast tissue within the reduced

141 Acquisition in the prone position has been demonstrated to improve the spec

142 (POVL) as related to spinal surgery and the prone position has garnered increasing attention in the

143 Prone positioning has been shown to be a beneficial adju

144 We conclude that prone positioning has no effect on FRC and in this serie

145 tients with ARDS, neuromuscular blockade and prone positioning have further reduced mortality, probab

146 Before and within 20 minutes of starting prone positioning, hemodynamic, respiratory, intraabdomi

147 corticosteroids, inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), prone positioning, high-frequency oscillatory ventilatio

148 rfactant-deficient model of lung injury, the prone position improved gas exchange by restoring aerati

149 Although prone positioning improved posterior lung compliance in

150 However, the regional mechanism by which the prone position improves gas exchange in acutely injured

151 The prone position improves gas exchange in many patients wi

152 sthetized, mechanically ventilated pigs, the prone position improves pulmonary gas exchange to a grea

153 s syndrome (ARDS), but it is unknown whether prone positioning improves clinical outcomes among patie

154 Several changes are associated with prone position in C-ARDS: increased lung recruitment, de

155 Twenty-five observational studies reporting prone positioning in 758 patients were included.

156 Studies reporting prone positioning in hypoxemic, nonintubated adult patie

157 evere refractory hypoxemia due to ARDS (2C); prone positioning in sepsis-induced ARDS patients with a

158 m to determine the safety and feasibility of prone positioning in the neurologically ill patients.

159 o evaluate the potential survival benefit of prone positioning in venovenous ECMO patients cannulated

160 blood gases, FRC, Rrs, and Crs in supine and prone positions in 30 patients under neuromuscular block

161 der the heart was measured in the supine and prone positions in seven patients.

162 In the prone position, in which the rat's head was in the most

163 In the presence of abdominal distension, the prone position increased Pa O2 by 26 +/- 18 mm Hg (p < 0

164 When the abdomen was normal, the prone position increased PaO2 by 16 +/- 21 mm Hg (p < 0.

165 In seven patients, prone positioning increased cardiac index greater than o

166 In these patients, prone positioning increased mean systemic pressure by 28

167 In these patients, prone positioning increased mean systemic pressure by 82

168 Prone positioning increased mean systemic pressure in al

169 entilation and maximal alveolar recruitment, prone positioning increased the cardiac index only in pa

170 In all patients, prone positioning increased the ratio of arterial oxygen

171 Prone position induced recruitment in the dorsal part of

172 ber of therapies (eg, recruitment maneuvers, prone positioning, inhaled nitric oxide, high-frequency

173 vered include conservative fluid management, prone positioning, inhaled nitric oxide, inhaled vasodil

174 a single-detector CT scanner with supine and prone positioning, insufflation of the colon with air or

175 ve either the practitioner-recommended awake prone positioning intervention (intervention group) or u

176 ng patients recommended to receive the awake prone positioning intervention, suggesting potential har

177 to the Fio2), respiratory rate pre and post prone positioning, intubation rate, and mortality were e

178 erfusion SPECT (MPS) with the patient in the prone position is commonly used to minimize attenuation

179 east intensity modulated radiotherapy in the prone position is feasible and it permits a drastic redu

180 improvements in gas exchange occur with the prone position is not known.

181 Breast RT in the prone position is one strategy that may decrease these t

182 Prone position is used in acute respiratory distress syn

183 The prone position is used to improve gas exchange in patien

184 Prone positioning is protective and induces MKP-1.

185 ncluded in the final analysis, we found that prone positioning is safe and feasible in the neurologic

186 The efficacy and safety of prone positioning is unclear in nonintubated patients wi

187 sminogen activator and gas followed by brief prone positioning, is effective in displacing thick subm

188 Prone position less than 24 hours from intubation achiev

189 Data on prone positioning location (ICU vs non-ICU), prone posit

190 There was substantial heterogeneity in prone positioning location, dose and frequency, and resp

191 Prone position may be beneficial in patients supported b

192 Awake prone positioning may improve hypoxemia among patients w

193 rapid improvements in oxygenation following prone positioning may improve insulin sensitivity and in

194 Prone positioning may improve outcomes in patients with

195 Respiratory rate decreased post prone positioning (mean difference, -3.2 breaths/min; 95

196 Patients were randomized to awake prone positioning (n = 205) or usual care without prone

197 15 vs 8 cm H2O in controls; p < 0.001), more prone positioning (n = 33, 75% vs n = 6, 27% in controls

198 rventions to address severe hypoxemia (i.e., prone positioning, neuromuscular blockade, inhaled pulmo

199 include appropriate oxygen supplementation, prone positioning, noninvasive ventilation, and protecti

200 Several studies have reported prone positioning of nonintubated patients with coronavi

201 Prolonged prone positioning of patients with COVID-19 can be assoc

202 Background Supine or prone positioning of the patient on the gantry table is

203 In this nonrandomized controlled trial, prone positioning offered no observed clinical benefit a

204 atory distress syndrome, carefully performed prone positioning offers an absolute survival advantage

205 as imaged at computed tomography (CT) in the prone position on a dedicated table.

206 Prone position on ECMO was independently associated with

207 With subjects in the prone position on their hands and knees, ultrasonographi

208 The effects of prone positioning on lung aeration may depend on the sta

209 evaluated the effect of early application of prone positioning on outcomes in patients with severe AR

210 ew and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of prone positioning on oxygenation and clinical outcomes.

211 We compared the effects of prone positioning on regional lung aeration in late vers

212 erdependence between the effects of PEEP and prone positioning on these variables is unknown.

213 the study, a randomized controlled trial of prone positioning on venovenous extracorporeal membrane

214 and overdistension and assess the effect of prone positioning on ventilation distribution.

215 modulated radiotherapy, with the patient in prone position, optimally to spare the heart and lung.

216 y after delivery, to place the infant in the prone position (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.44-3.60).

217 ts including inhaled pulmonary vasodilators, prone positioning, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenatio

218 tion, intragastric pressure was lower in the prone position (p < 0.01).

219 Prone position, particularly when delivered early, achie

220 ian of 4.2 hours (IQR, 1.8-6.7 hours) in the prone position per day compared with 0 hours (IQR, 0-0.7

221 rformed either in supine position (SP) or in prone position (PP), if Pa o2 /F io2 ratio was less than

222 Before prone positioning, preload reserve was assessed by a pas

223 ious adverse events were reported during the prone position procedure.

224 ardiac motion, in a manner comparable to the prone position proposed with other SPECT cameras.

225 We propose a prone positioning protocol for the neurologically ill pa

226 This extended duration of prone positioning puts patients at risk of developing or

227 itioning with alternation between supine and prone position (R) during incremental dosing of three 5-

228 ia, and need for rescue therapies, including prone positioning, recruitment maneuvers, or bronchoscop

229 Awake prone positioning reduced the risk of endotracheal intub

230 On Day 1, prone positioning reinflated 18.9% 5.2% of lung mass in

231 y to postinfectious inflammatory neuropathy, prone positioning-related stretch and/or compression inj

232 cy (sessions/d), respiratory supports during prone positioning, relative changes in oxygenation varia

233 +/- 15 vs 45 +/- 18 mL/cm H2O in supine and prone position, respectively; p = 0.957) suggesting a de

234 after 16 hours of prone-positioning defined prone-positioning responders.

235 ury induced solely by mechanical forces, the prone position resulted in a less severe and more homoge

236 Prone positioning resulted in increased sensitivity for

237 Prone positioning returns as a desirable therapeutic opt

238 ion of patients that we have to ventilate in prone position seems interesting.

239 ne); cumulative incidences (until day 21) of prone position sessions, extracorporeal membrane oxygena

240 ned 466 patients with severe ARDS to undergo prone-positioning sessions of at least 16 hours or to be

241 severe ARDS, early application of prolonged prone-positioning sessions significantly decreased 28-da

242 Subsequent trials of prone positioning should aim to develop strategies to im

243 Prone positioning should be considered in the severest o

244 In the nine patients with preload reserve, prone positioning significantly increased cardiac index

245 Prone positioning significantly increased mean systemic

246 ovenous ECMO for respiratory failure in whom prone position status while on ECMO and in-hospital mort

247 ergo less extensive histologic change in the prone position than in the supine position.

248 Patients were randomised 1:1 to prone positioning (that is, instructing a patient to lie

249 With the patient in the prone position, the breast was compressed with two fenes

250 d the improvement in PAO2 in patients in the prone position, the underlying mechanism has yet to be d

251 sive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation; prone position therapy, and COVID-19-specific medical tr

252 he patient was turned from the supine to the prone position; thus, polyps appeared to be mobile.

253 hese modalities: high frequency ventilation, prone positioning, tracheal gas insufflation, and partia

254 MDCT was performed in the prone position, using a custom-made device similar to th

255 omized to be positioned: 1) in semirecumbent/prone position, ventilated with a duty cycle (TITTOT) of

256 al pressure wounds that were associated with prone position ventilation duration and day 3 Sequential

257 Total prone position ventilation duration was 4.87 d (2.08-9.9

258 Prone position ventilation is a potentially life-saving

259 d brain tissue oxygenation can be monitored, prone position ventilation should be considered a safe a

260 interquartile range) time from intubation to prone position ventilation was 0.28 d (0.11-0.80 d).

261 Prone position ventilation was applied for 30.3% (18.2-4

262 Prolonged prone position ventilation was feasible and relatively s

263 ory distress syndrome treated with prolonged prone position ventilation without daily repositioning.

264 ctive ventilation and prolonged protocolized prone position ventilation without daily supine repositi

265 ly short-term use of neuromuscular blockade, prone position ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane o

266 Sixty-one were treated with prone position ventilation, whereas 26 did not meet crit

267 ng these data, we emulated a target trial of prone positioning ventilation by categorizing mechanical

268 Early implementation of prone positioning ventilation improves survival in patie

269 n the intensive care unit required prolonged prone-position ventilation.

270 very infrequent cause of dysphagia following prone-position ventilation.

271 To communicate a complication of prone-position ventilation.

272 Randomized trials comparing awake prone positioning versus usual care in adults with covid

273 rvival were found between those who received prone positioning vs. inhaled vasodilators (propensity s

274 Median duration of prone position was 14 hours (12-18 hr).

275 The prone position was associated with an increase in lung g

276 At 3 months, switching from nonprone to prone position was associated with mother's race/ethnici

277 rogressively more hypoxemic; exposure to the prone position was extended from 8 to 17 hours/day, and

278 The hazard ratio for death with prone positioning was 0.39 (95% confidence interval [CI]

279 after randomization, the median duration of prone positioning was 4.8 h/d (IQR, 1.8 to 8.0 h/d) in t

280 Prone positioning was associated with an unexpected mode

281 ositioning and respiratory supports applied, prone positioning was associated with improvement in oxy

282 acute respiratory distress syndrome in whom prone positioning was decided.

283 Prone positioning was not associated with a significant

284 Adherence to prone positioning was poor, despite multiple efforts to

285 Prone positioning was protective against injurious venti

286 Prone positioning was used in 16.3% (95% CI, 13.7%-19.2%

287 CT with patients in both supine and prone positions was necessary, since seven (19%) and fiv

288 lonography (with patients in both supine and prone positions) was performed with a multisection helic

289 l pressure distributes more uniformly in the prone position, we hypothesized that the extent of injur

290 drew consent), and 14 patients randomized to prone position were excluded (4 declined treatment, 3 ha

291 ecruitment only decreased when high PEEP and prone positioning were applied together (4.1 +/- 1.9 to

292 Adverse events related to awake prone positioning were uncommon.

293 t in the lateral position (compared with the prone position), which mimics the natural resting/sleepi

294 after proning, with increasing trend during prone position, which persisted even at 30 minutes after

295 devastating, but preventable complication of prone positioning, which may pose significant risk of vi

296 1 cm of H2O; n = 8) and pigs studied in the prone position with a low PEEP (6 +/- 3 cm of H2O; n = 9

297 s were described, including molecules in the prone position with the perfluorinated aromatic rings lo

298 atients underwent scanning in the supine and prone positions with 3-mm collimation during a single br

299 Gas exchange was measured in the supine and prone positions, with and without abdominal distension,

300 erence in intubation rate in those receiving prone positioning within and outside ICU (32% [69/214] v

301 fraction decreased in dorsal regions in the prone position without a concomitant impairment of gas e