コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ted in specific domains (e.g., language, SDQ prosocial).
2 ations for solar adoption: self-interest and prosocial.
3 amic networks only promote cooperation among prosocials.
4 But how does the brain learn what acts are prosocial?
5 social deficits were seen in the emission of prosocial 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USV) parallel
6 asticity and cognition, but led to increased prosocial 50-kHz USV emission rates and enhanced social
11 ild on this study by introducing intentional prosocial activities into classrooms and recommending th
14 atic memories within the context of positive/prosocial affects can facilitate diverse psychotherapies
15 rest to scholars of the effects of stress on prosocial and aggressive behavior, but call for refineme
16 es children's sleep, school performance, and prosocial and aggressive behaviors and that these effect
17 hile children watched characters engaging in prosocial and antisocial actions in two different tasks.
18 manization, emphasizing its implications for prosocial and antisocial behavior and for moral judgment
22 cial to mental health due to its anxiolytic, prosocial and antistress effects, but evidence for anxio
24 s that the ability to learn what actions are prosocial and choosing to perform helpful acts may be di
26 merging biases might help explain the robust prosocial and financial biases men exhibit toward attrac
27 and maternal-perinatal association, modulate prosocial and inbreeding-avoidance behaviors toward spec
28 che also coincides with the emergence of the prosocial and neurobehavioral skills of middle childhood
31 is no difference in reports of anger between prosocial and selfish individuals after finding out that
32 lassify participants a priori as egoistic or prosocial and then embedded them in homogeneous networks
33 use more energy from the communal resource, prosocials are less likely to act on their anger and ret
34 may reap more benefits from emphasizing the prosocial aspects of vaccination in sparser environments
40 its capacity for widespread cooperation and prosocial behavior among large and genetically heterogen
41 incentivized online experiment (n = 763) on prosocial behavior and a large field experiment (n = 17,
43 e.g., common group identity) can account for prosocial behavior and cooperative norms without the nee
44 suggest how interventions aimed at improving prosocial behavior and emotion regulation abilities hold
45 n motives form a powerful force in promoting prosocial behavior and enabling large-scale cooperation
46 ship between neurochemical systems and human prosocial behavior and have potential implications for o
47 the Israeli OPV campaign is attributable to prosocial behavior and heterogeneous perceived risk of p
49 ognitive perspective taking as precursors of prosocial behavior and suggest that these discrete route
53 creating the conditions for the extension of prosocial behavior beyond close-knit circles to include
54 The current study uses big data to study prosocial behavior by analyzing donations made on the Go
56 testosterone men may often engage in greater prosocial behavior compared to higher testosterone men.
57 ncreased attentiveness to others and greater prosocial behavior compared to individuals of higher SES
58 ts to others was personally costly, rates of prosocial behavior dropped across all six societies as c
60 in multiethnic societies depends on whether prosocial behavior extends beyond close-knit networks an
61 e that experience of conspecific companions' prosocial behavior facilitates prosocial behavior in chi
62 While a substantial body of scholarship on prosocial behavior has provided evidence of such norms,
64 ted whether direct reciprocity could promote prosocial behavior in brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apel
67 peptide oxytocin (OT) is thought to regulate prosocial behavior in mammals, there is considerable deb
68 d this amygdala representation and increased prosocial behavior in more individualistic participants
69 nary explanations also account for increased prosocial behavior in situations in which attractive ind
71 amework could provide insights into atypical prosocial behavior in those with disorders of social cog
73 frameworks model the conditions under which prosocial behavior is evolutionarily viable, yet no unif
76 later, the sign of the effect reversed, and prosocial behavior led to significantly lower happiness
77 t observations have suggested that, instead, prosocial behavior may reflect an intrinsic value placed
78 It is unclear, however, whether OT promotes prosocial behavior per se, or whether it facilitates soc
80 source of human altruism by suggesting that prosocial behavior results, in part, from our broader te
82 These results demonstrate that OXT promotes prosocial behavior through direct effects on VTA DA neur
85 , population density) with psychology (e.g., prosocial behavior), (b) process studies that clarify wh
87 erienced low status showed more communal and prosocial behavior, and endorsed more egalitarian life g
88 review work exploring responses to inequity, prosocial behavior, and other relevant behaviors in nonh
89 ate that group attachment positively affects prosocial behavior, and that this effect is not simply t
90 sion of public goods, collective action, and prosocial behavior, and we give special attention to fie
91 rovements to children's interpersonal (e.g., prosocial behavior, authority acceptance), intrapersonal
93 ligion contours people's moral judgments and prosocial behavior, the relation between religiosity and
103 ave generally positive effects on normative 'prosocial' behavior, recent laboratory research suggests
104 alience to social-related cues and exhibited prosocial behaviors (e.g., social-conditioned place pref
105 Therefore, this commentary can show why prosocial behaviors are biased toward physically attract
109 es live in highly social environments, where prosocial behaviors promote social bonds and cohesion an
110 n indicates that testosterone can also cause prosocial behaviors that are appropriate for increasing
111 length) and, second, the different types of prosocial behaviors that exist in social interactions.
112 hypothesized to be a critical facilitator of prosocial behaviors, but the link between empathy and pr
113 romantic and filial relationships, and other prosocial behaviors, such as trust and cooperation.
114 and other species alike regularly undertake prosocial behaviors-actions that benefit others without
121 es that oxytocin mainly enhances affiliative prosocial behaviors; the fear/stress theory suggests tha
124 across societies and (3) societally variable prosocial behaviour develops concurrently with the respo
125 ata support the view that the development of prosocial behaviour is shaped by a psychology for respon
126 societies, we provide evidence that (1) the prosocial behaviour of adults is predicted by what other
127 erformance suggested a reduced expression of prosocial behaviour, associated with decreased grey matt
131 to atypical social affiliation, and lack of prosocial behaviours in psychopathy, have yet to be syst
132 ability to strongly promote the emergence of prosocial behaviours, but they also create the possibili
135 omists, attractiveness-related financial and prosocial biases are the result of preferences or prejud
136 rrent perspectives on attractiveness-related prosocial biases emphasize the contribution of evolution
138 more important role in driving financial and prosocial biases toward attractive adults than previousl
139 provide an important service in highlighting prosocial biases toward attractive people from a cross-d
140 people are causally related to financial or prosocial biases toward them is weak or nonexistent.
141 vents monkeys from learning what actions are prosocial but does not stop them carrying out previously
142 There are numerous behaviours that appear prosocial but, on scrutiny, may not have been intended a
143 multiple facets of psychological well-being, prosocial character, and possibly mental health among yo
144 to the suggestion that well-being and other prosocial characteristics might be enhanced through trai
145 ferences predicted children's preference for prosocial characters and were influenced by parental val
147 hs) would engage in direct reciprocity in a 'prosocial choice test' where a donor could select either
148 between selfish and generous motives during prosocial choice, consistent with ideas that the TPJ pro
150 aling OT, monkeys increased the frequency of prosocial choices associated with reward to another monk
153 as herd immunity This research examines how prosocial concern for vaccination, defined as people's p
154 udinal survey of 2,490 Americans showed that prosocial concern had a larger positive influence on vac
156 density conditions, the benefits of inducing prosocial concern were due to greater perceived impact o
157 ship between dopaminergic mechanisms and two prosocial concerns at the core of a number of widely use
161 to decide for their best friend in a second prosocial condition, which required perspective taking.
163 te the discriminant validity between similar prosocial constructs and highlight the different prosoci
164 how phenomena such as altruistic punishment, prosocial contagion, self-other similarity, and numerous
165 drives learning only when we are acting in a prosocial context and signals a prosocial prediction err
168 ther neural sensitivity to eudaimonic (e.g., prosocial decisions) and hedonic (e.g., selfish rewards
169 To identify the causal function of rTPJ in prosocial decisions, we administered focal high definiti
172 l overlooks the contribution of a relational/prosocial dimension to the enjoyment of negative emotion
173 the precise boundaries of this surprisingly prosocial disposition has implications for understanding
174 ether young children increase their level of prosocial donating in response to an upwards shift in ge
176 derscoring a fear-reducing and strategically prosocial effect of testosterone on human social behavio
178 ndings are consistent with evidence that the prosocial effects are unique to MDMA relative to another
179 ltural variants were then selected for their prosocial effects in a long-term, cultural evolutionary
180 molecules of the decade due to its profound prosocial effects in nonvertebrate and vertebrate specie
181 peptide oxytocin (OXT) exerts anxiolytic and prosocial effects in the central nervous system of roden
185 hat suppression of "fear" could underlie the prosocial effects of amygdala manipulations, our data st
186 e welcome Norenzayan et al.'s claim that the prosocial effects of beliefs in supernatural agents exte
188 g the neurochemical mechanisms mediating the prosocial effects of MDMA could help in the development
190 opose that religious beliefs with incidental prosocial effects propagated via a long-term process of
191 ocessing, moral reasoning, and processing of prosocial emotions such as guilt and embarrassment may c
196 ealed that intranasal administration of the "prosocial" hormone oxytocin (OT) activates the frontal c
197 es differentially incorporate collaborative, prosocial ideals that are known to engage members of und
198 d choose between two tokens, with one being "prosocial" in that it rewarded both individuals (i.e., 1
199 useful to quantify individual differences in prosocial inclination that are not influenced by concern
200 ing interpersonal violations (Studies 1, 2), prosocial intentions (Study 3), and economic exploitatio
201 lated past event of helping others increased prosocial intentions to help the present person in need,
203 al benefits of physical exercise with dyadic prosocial interaction, would result in OT response.
206 study examines how messaging approaches in a prosocial intervention can influence not only the effect
210 icacy (e.g., passing bills), suggesting that prosocial language has an independent, direct effect on
212 1996 and 2014 found that declining levels of prosocial language strongly predicted public disapproval
214 remains unclear how the neural mechanisms of prosocial learning differ from those of self-relevant le
217 t human participants performed better during prosocial learning than during self-relevant learning, a
218 eural level, higher value sensitivity during prosocial learning was associated with stronger engageme
219 e as good at learning to avoid others' harm (prosocial learning) as they are at learning to avoid sel
220 ed how learning to protect others from pain (prosocial learning) differs from learning to protect one
221 y in the neural and behavioral efficiency of prosocial learning, which is predicted by trait empathy.
225 aging have 10% higher net present value, but prosocial messaging increases the likelihood that adopte
227 the past oxytocin was conceived merely as a prosocial molecule that nonselectively facilitated affil
229 orical cultures that were not concerned with prosocial morality or with public statement of belief.
231 A multifaceted construct, empathy includes a prosocial motivation or intention to help others in need
232 irming previous findings suggesting a common prosocial motivation underlying altruism and cooperation
234 ocial constructs and highlight the different prosocial motivations underlying economic game behaviour
235 cial dilemma game in which they could reveal prosocial motives towards an ingroup (ingroup-love) and
236 e benefit of increasing comprehension of the prosocial nature of the campaign would be limited if eve
240 reasingly cooperative, altruistic, and other prosocial norms of interaction from exploitation, especi
242 were spontaneously prosocial, selecting the prosocial option at the same rate regardless of whether
243 ly, this was the case even when choosing the prosocial option was materially costly for the subject (
246 ticipants read about individuals engaging in prosocial or antisocial behaviour, and rated the extent
248 ulatory roles of anger and guilt, as well as prosocial or selfish social preferences in a repeated so
249 embedded them in homogeneous networks of all prosocials or all egoists, or in heterogeneous networks
255 le a predictive division between proself and prosocial people and proves that people have attitude to
256 acting in a prosocial context and signals a prosocial prediction error conforming to classical princ
257 hat both partners alternated making choices, prosocial preference significantly increased, leading to
260 results contradict the suggested role of the prosocial preferences hypothesis and show how the comple
263 ecome an accepted paradigm that humans have "prosocial preferences" that lead to higher levels of coo
265 when nodes are occupied by persons with more prosocial preferences, who tend to attract and keep more
266 rely different sub-populations is confirmed: prosocial punishers on the one hand, who behave fairly a
267 sting the diversity benefits of communal and prosocial purposes, we find that women publish more freq
268 Resulting from their greater cooperation, prosocials' relations are more stable, yielding substant
270 ltural evolutionary theory of the origins of prosocial religions and apply it to resolve two puzzles
274 iscuss Abrahamic religions as the best-known prosocial religions, but the evidence shows that the cas
277 ultural group selection as an explanation of prosocial religiosity, we propose an alternative that vi
280 ial acts did not require personal sacrifice, prosocial responses increased steadily as children matur
281 nts that view maternal behaviour as tuned to prosocial responsiveness, by showing that vital elements
282 reward funds facilitates the maintenance of prosocial rewarding but prevents its invasion, and that
286 er, the evolutionary foundation of the human prosocial sentiment remains poorly understood, largely b
288 2,16,18), powerful moralizing 'big gods' and prosocial supernatural punishment tend to appear only af
289 ecent commentators have suggested that these prosocial tendencies arise from our unique capacity to u
290 xamining the cognitive mechanisms underlying prosocial tendencies has focused on the facilitating rol
296 ent and recompensation games with respect to prosocial traits from the Big Five and HEXACO models of
297 te strong and possibly runaway selection for prosocial traits, without requiring group selection, kin
298 ooperation by dividing people in proself and prosocial types, or appealing to forms of external contr
299 excellent opportunity to quantify and model prosocial vaccination as its primary objective was to av