ライフサイエンスコーパス: provider

1 ed women to attend their usual contraceptive provider.

2 ID-19 pandemic and advice from their medical provider.

3 gnificant burden on hospitals and healthcare providers.

4 implications for affected patients and their providers.

5 es to influence the sustainability of dental providers.

6 ions for individuals with OA and health-care providers.

7 r Tseshaht dogs and, presumably, their human providers.

8 nd discharge to institutional postacute care providers.

9 widely and immediately utilized by existing providers.

10 ced actionable biometric data for healthcare providers.

11 ute spending and discharge to postacute care providers.

12 74 progress notes documented by 42 attending providers.

13 understood Chinese, and were not health care providers.

14 can contribute in other ways to patients and providers.

15 integrate data from a variety of healthcare providers.

16 TE risk assessment survey was distributed to providers.

17 s' role beyond water and wastewater services providers.

18 ucation to nephrologist and non-nephrologist providers.

19 f patients and both pediatric and adult care providers.

20 l shortage of adult and pediatric hepatology providers.

21 rom Twitter and two London mental healthcare providers.

22 can contribute in other ways to patients and providers.

23 r an educational intervention with inpatient providers.

24 19 pandemic on liver patients and healthcare providers.

25 lability of birth-attending and primary care providers.

26 rmal FIT result by direct communication with providers (19, 37.3%) or EHR messaging (11, 21.6%).

27 ns for BCx use and education and feedback to providers about BCx rates and indication inappropriatene

28 To better inform patients and healthcare providers about BIA-ALCL, we convened to review diagnost

29 or emerging discussions between patients and providers about deficiencies which new, better instrumen

30 Educating hepatology providers about PC principles and developing clear progn

31 Advanced practice providers accounted for 19% of all prescriptions, and am

32 had lower likelihood of seeing any eye care provider (adjusted HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.69-0.70) and were

33 coverage expansion on utilization, evaluate provider administrative costs in varied existing single-

34 tion optimization/stabilization, (3) patient/provider agreement regarding remission, and (4) no use o

35 BaYaka fathers who were better providers also tended to have lower testosterone.

36 The Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) Inpatient Files we

37 as associated with greater satisfaction with provider and clinic.

38 l logistic regression to assess facility and provider and patient characteristics associated with the

39 of sick-child care, facility readiness, and provider and patient characteristics.

40 Skilled, high-quality health providers and birth attendants are important for reducin

41 ont with the emergence of EVALI, health care providers and concerned parents are also asking what mig

42 Insurance providers and health care purchasers should review polic

43 e hub linking academia, industry, healthcare providers and hopefully policy makers to reduce the curr

44 Providers and patients need to be aware of the high risk

45 anges in these behavioral characteristics of providers and patients on diagnostic delay experienced b

46 ociated with a substantial survival benefit; providers and patients should consider these benefits wh

47 ms level, as well as at the level of medical providers and patients.

48 ost, quality, outcomes, and work required of providers and patients; consider the time horizon for th

49 onavirus 2 transmission, has challenged care providers and policy makers alike.

50 ination to switch between different types of providers and providers' inclination to delay ordering o

51 ric surgery guidelines, limited primary care providers and referring provider knowledge about bariatr

52 community-based pharmacists with HIV medical providers and required them to share patient clinical in

53 velopers and projects, through major service providers and research infrastructures, can describe the

54 care giving more responsibility to midlevel providers and staff), and enhancing client engagement in

55 Forty-four providers and support staff attended training.

56 to a 1-day workshop with parallel tracks for providers and support staff followed by monthly case con

57 with 2015 Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems for PQRS survey data.

58 ay impact hepatologists and liver transplant providers and their patients.

59 sciplinary meetings that include direct care providers), and the physical plant (e.g., large workstat

60 st be addressed at the levels of the system, provider, and individuals, to maximize the benefits of s

61 recognize and address threats to clinician, provider, and patient well-being; and (5) improve patien

62 sess the impact of PE investment on patient, provider, and practice metrics, including health outcome

63 primary care physicians and advance practice providers, and are essential in developing a pipeline of

64 necessary from patients, families, referring providers, and communities.

65 Policymakers, providers, and health centers can learn from high-achiev

66 izing the importance of biomedical research, providers, and healthcare delivery systems in advancing

67 argeted to ICU physicians, advanced practice providers, and nurses.

68 ws with health policy-makers, health service providers, and other experts working in the United Natio

69 communication between patients and multiple providers; and providing automated vaccine reminders to

70 Furthermore, Colombian providers appear to be working at or beyond capacity, do

71 Although advanced practice providers (APPs) can expand access to cirrhosis-related

72 Consumers, patients, and most health care providers are not able to discern the underlying science

73 fferences in postoperative prescribing among providers are poorly understood.

74 Hospitals and healthcare providers are preparing for the anticipated surge in cri

75 education and support to existing community providers are promising advances to aid rural people to

76 this scoping review indicate that healthcare providers are reluctant to initiate conversations around

77 Burn care providers are, therefore, faced with a plethora of chall

78 ncome countries (LMICs) dependent on private providers as a consequence of neglect of national health

79 d their communication with other health care providers, assisting management of patients during this

80 al offered the author, and other health care providers at high risk, the option to opt out of the car

81 ive health, but limited data exist regarding providers' attitudes and practices surrounding pregnancy

82 analysis suggests that subnational levels of provider availability across a region may be associated

83 tings preoperative requirements, and lack of provider availability and/or time.

84 es) and clinic characteristics (eg, types of providers, availability of evenings/weekends sessions).

85 Increased provider awareness of these long-term risks may guide ef

86 view with meta-analysis compares health- and provider-based outcomes of thoracoscopic to thoracotomy

87 bout early rehabilitation that may influence provider behavior and the success and appropriateness of

88 cally to 1643 United States heart transplant providers between June and August 2019.

89 association between increased panel size and provider burnout.

90 rted satisfaction with their clinic and care provider, but many reported antiretroviral medication no

91 toring may be an alternative if patients and providers can adhere to frequent, consistent follow-up s

92 on, and market-level incentives, health care providers can collaborate to contain drug prices, curbin

93 lability of psychologists and spiritual care providers), care protocols (e.g., specific yet flexible

94 Domestic providers caring for SIVH should follow the US Centers f

95 The prices that U.S. medical providers charge incorporate a hidden surcharge to cover

96 Provider COC had a greater effect on end-of-life care ex

97 We discovered that increases in the provider COCI were significantly associated with reducti

98 Annually, providers collected separate anal swabs for HPV detectio

99 ed urine, self-collected cervicovaginal, and provider-collected cervical hrHPV results; 83 women (27%

100 imates for self-collected cervicovaginal and provider-collected cervical samples (both 94% [95% CI, 8

101 ted cervicovaginal samples (kappa = 0.58) or provider-collected cervical samples (kappa = 0.54) was m

102 ples, self-collected cervicovaginal samples, provider-collected cervical samples, and cervical biopsy

103 PCR cycle threshold (C(T) ) established for provider-collected cervical samples, but sensitivity rem

104 e support both care coordination and regular provider communication within and between teams.

105 The survey explored providers' confidence in counseling, explanation of VUSs

106 The provider Continuity of Care Index (COCI) and site COCI w

107 e continuity of end-of-life care, especially provider continuity, for patients with end-stage renal d

108 families and support nondental primary care providers delivering preventive oral health services (PO

109 Providers demonstrated a preference for an in-person tra

110 2016 and 2018 was used to calculate the SAO provider density.

111 We estimated healthcare provider direct medical economic costs based on quantiti

112 Previous provider-directed electronic messaging interventions hav

113 on of the best practice advisory resulted in providers discontinuing propofol an average of 16.6 hour

114 facility congestion, patient and healthcare provider dissatisfaction, and suboptimal quality of serv

115 the inability to attend regular visits with providers, diversion of hospital resources, and social i

116 hat should the surgeon and other health care providers do?

117 nces are of concern to patients, payers, and providers, each of which had a stake in the integrity of

118 ) evaluating interventions including patient/provider education, inreach (e.g., reminder and recall s

119 Interventions such as provider education, inreach including reminder systems,

120 It is recommended that health service providers evaluate individual patterns of "GI health" wh

121 imultaneously trying to minimize health care provider exposure and use of personal protective equipme

122 mplified monitoring approach and health care provider exposure was reduced.

123 Health care providers, fitness professionals, and public health prac

124 ocess, explain where the infectious diseases provider fits in this scheme, and describe the challenge

125 DAT was requested by healthcare providers for 151 suspected diphtheria cases between 199

126 elivered by TFH and conventional health-care providers for people with psychosis was effective and co

127 TB patients first approached fully qualified providers (FQs), who take 9.74 days on average for diagn

128 cted care, mandated care in sepsis precludes providers from tailoring treatments to heterogeneous cli

129 ation and medical management recommendations providers give patients and their families.

130 bility between donors, implementers, service providers, governments, and the people who are the inten

131 and have extensive contact with health care providers, has not been investigated.

132 Eight providers have begun treating independently.

133 While health care providers have largely turned a blind eye, the cost of h

134 are; (3) advance policies to ensure oncology providers have sufficient resources to provide high-qual

135 These factors operate at the individual, provider, health system, community, and policy levels to

136 rventions available to the public, patients, providers, healthcare delivery systems, communities, pol

137 reated by the Camden Coalition of Healthcare Providers (hereafter, the Coalition) has received nation

138 Lack of provider HPV vaccine recommendation was reported by 73%

139 k for not reporting receipt of a health care provider HPV vaccine recommendation.

140 Health-care providers identified many sources of social support and

141 nd laboratory factors should help healthcare providers identify black patients at highest risk for se

142 on on 2,898,505 patients, cared for by 4,859 providers in 431 practices.

143 on on 6,040,996 patients, cared for by 8,853 providers in 724 practices.

144 As, hepatitis C treatment by a wide range of providers in different settings will be essential to inc

145 se burden, an increased role of primary care providers in screening, patient stratification, and trea

146 of patients diagnosed or treated by specific providers in specific locations and ways.

147 Data is collected from multiple providers in standard formats, including the Biological

148 The RLPM and RLEP assays will aid healthcare providers in the clinical diagnosis and surveillance of

149 escribe the experiences of these health-care providers in the early stages of the outbreak.

150 A workforce study of hepatology providers in the United States was completed using prima

151 tch between different types of providers and providers' inclination to delay ordering of accurate dia

152 30-day mortality), but also greater risk of provider infection (2.3% absolute increase in risk of pr

153 e risk of cardiac catheterization laboratory provider infection remained very low (<0.25%) across all

154 I on 30-day patient mortality and individual provider infection risk based on presence of cardiogenic

155 infection (2.3% absolute increase in risk of provider infection).

156 trategy with a 0.2% greater absolute risk of provider infection, and the tradeoff between patient and

157 Women who had spontaneous (sPTB) and provider-initiated (pi-PTB) preterm birth were compared

158 ced-based decision in preterm and early term provider-initiated deliveries, and to prevent perinatal

159 ratio 8.52, 95% CI 3.98-18.24) or optimised provider-initiated testing and counselling (6.29, 2.96-1

160 -testing group compared with either standard provider-initiated testing and counselling (adjusted odd

161 der offered during consultations), optimised provider-initiated testing and counselling (with additio

162 Around 4% of those tested in the standard provider-initiated testing and counselling and optimised

163 pared with 248 (13%) of 1951 in the standard provider-initiated testing and counselling group and 261

164 group and 261 (14%) of 1837 in the optimised provider-initiated testing and counselling group.

165 tiated testing and counselling and optimised provider-initiated testing and counselling groups felt c

166 :1) to one of the following groups: standard provider-initiated testing and counselling with no inter

167 nate the need for implant removal and reduce provider intervention.

168 Studies of patient-provider interventions (n = 12), health information tech

169 ance data were collected through patient and provider interview and immunization registries.

170 ify knowledge gaps and future directions for providers, investigators, health systems, and policymake

171 Engaging all providers involved in postoperative care is necessary to

172 , community oncologists, and relevant health providers is formed to develop an ASCO endorsement.

173 Clear communication with ordering providers is necessary to prevent overutilization of blo

174 limited primary care providers and referring provider knowledge about bariatric surgery, long travel

175 difficult airway features, more experienced provider level, and tracheal intubations without use of

176 One thousand twenty-nine AGS and 1,040 AAPOS provider locations were geocoded.

177 of preventable SCEs (74%) were secondary to provider management factors.

178 munity-based pharmacists and primary medical providers may identify and address HIV therapy-related p

179 es in the way health insurers pay healthcare providers may not only directly affect the insurer's pat

180 the intervention group additionally received provider mentoring using PRONTO simulation and team trai

181 of clonal haematopoiesis, some patients and providers might be content to let the events unfold natu

182 In the intervention, we emailed providers monthly reports of their anticoagulation perce

183 management, and governance processes and (2) provider motivation, agency, and relationships.

184 der, age, number of previous injections, and provider must be taken into account to ensure the best p

185 Health care providers must be sensitive to older adults' experience

186 Therefore clinical providers must demonstrate proficiency in interpreting g

187 Ground transportation providers must ensure adequate safety restraints are ava

188 events and, in consultation with health-care providers, must weigh the potential benefits and harms a

189 ctured interviews with veterans (n = 33) and providers (n = 40) throughout the veterans health admini

190 Providers (N=102) who completed the survey included 29 c

191 m participants (overlapping roles as medical providers [n = 20], medical assistants [n = 16], nurses

192 ns is cost saving to the national healthcare provider (National Health Service (NHS)) over a 5-year t

193 Providers need decision-making support with virtual exam

194 lysis was performed from an integrated payer-provider network perspective.

195 d on analysis of auto-assignment algorithms, provider networks, and plan quality.

196 was designed to evaluate the performance of providers new to the medical staff or providers who are

197 tially diagnosed by a non-ophthalmology care provider (NOCP) and confirmed by an ophthalmologist, 13

198 The National Health Service is the sole provider of emergency care in Scotland.

199 ion of audio-video telehealth visits for all providers of a multidisciplinary clinic on March 19 2020

200 ic stress.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT As the main providers of cellular energy, the dynamic transport of m

201 among the intensivists and advanced practice providers of established U.S. and Canadian critical care

202 suggests a positive approach of health care providers of FVG in decision making on hospitalization l

203 esting and counselling with no intervention (provider offered during consultations), optimised provid

204 here and meant to encourage dialogue between providers, offering ideas to improve safety in solid org

205 rs are rewarding high-performing health care providers on the basis of summaries of overall quality p

206 h as insurance coverage or lack of a regular provider, on preventive service use had mixed and inconc

207 intments on the Internet, communicating with providers online) are an integral part of modern healthc

208 ory surgery center setting, anesthesiologist provider, or postoperative hospitalization.

209 Rather than debate whether patients or provider organizations "own" the data, the authors propo

210 We observed provider-patient interactions in outpatient consultation

211 social factors, including the erosion of the provider-patient relationship, the emergence of internet

212 cations, changes in treatment guidelines and provider/patient preferences.

213 ducation of physicians and other health care providers, patients and their families, schools, and loc

214 ts impact on hepatologists, liver transplant providers, patients with liver disease, and liver transp

215 in the United States are increasingly tying provider payments to quality and value using pay-for-per

216 Improving the diagnostic accuracy of providers per se, without reducing the time to testing,

217 veness analyses were done from a health-care provider perspective using a decision tree model with a

218 From the healthcare provider perspective, the average direct medical economi

219 From the health care provider perspective, the estimated average direct medic

220 r of antidepressant prescriptions written by providers practicing 0 to 5 miles from a school that exp

221 s) to the number of prescriptions written by providers practicing 10 to 15 miles away (reference area

222 Providers prescribing medication to patients with glauco

223 Provider profiling involves comparing the performance of

224 tional models when partnering with a service provider, ranging from short-term, fee-for-service (FFS)

225 ide patient care meant that many health-care providers rapidly implemented and integrated telehealth

226 More than 80% of intervention providers read our emails, and 98% of the time a provide

227 Eye care providers ("readers") review the clinical data and recom

228 New video visit providers received video visit training and care quality

229 Patient-/parent-reported lack of health care provider recommendation for HPV vaccination is strongly

230 , including bariatric surgeons, primary care providers, registered dietitians, and health psychologis

231 79.1%) confirmed lack of colonoscopy, citing provider-related (19, 35.8%), patient-related (16, 30.2%

232 CSDC negatively affects patient-provider relationships, psychosocial functioning, and he

233 implications for quality of care and patient-provider relationships.

234 anticoagulation for patients of intervention providers relative to controls.

235 Hepatology providers report lack of training to deliver PC along wi

236 Most public and private insurance providers require prior authorization (PA) for OPAT, yet

237 d by a multidisciplinary group of healthcare providers, researchers, and parents/caregivers of childr

238 workforce included 7,296 and 824 hepatology providers, respectively, composed of hepatologists, gast

239 iders read our emails, and 98% of the time a provider reviewed our in-basket messages.

240 eferred strategy may be reasonable to reduce provider risk of COVID-19 infection.

241 ection, and the tradeoff between patient and provider risk with PPCI became more apparent in sensitiv

242 ted system challenges, lack of clarity about provider roles, and reimbursement policies as barriers t

243 pioid prescriptions is heavily influenced by provider routine/bias and not by objective criteria such

244 tandard mandating a detailed evaluation of a provider's performance.

245 In addition to the provider's prescribing pattern, other factors including

246 alth system, where requesting and consulting providers share a common electronic health record.

247 Healthcare providers should consider a diagnosis of Zika virus infe

248 Given these findings, health care providers, should assess patients' perceived risk to dev

249 ease and better access to expert health-care providers, should improve outcomes for patients with LN.

250 Health-care providers showed their resilience and the spirit of prof

251 The amount of time that providers spend using electronic health records (EHRs) t

252 U.S. insurers and providers spent $812 billion on administration, amountin

253 e treatment of acute COVID-19 cases, private providers suffered a liquidity crisis, itself propelled

254 of arthritis pain, realize the importance of providers' support on patients' adaptation, and provide

255 ng also suggest incidental diagnoses and low provider suspicion, highlighting the need for improved a

256 From the perspective of the healthcare provider, the average direct medical cost per case was U

257 ntal report of AD diagnosis by a health care provider through age 24 months.

258 rovide a narrative to help guide health-care providers through the complexities of non-surgical manag

259 ted patients and the risk of transmission to providers through this highly aerosolizing procedure.

260 3) What are the opportunities for healthcare providers to address the SDOH affecting the care of pati

261 reater communication and collaboration among providers to ensure that clinical practice reflects evid

262 nvestigating COPD trends may help healthcare providers to forecast future disease burden.

263 ospice PC integration would allow hepatology providers to improve clinical outcomes and QOL for patie

264 These results can be referenced by providers to manage patients' recovery expectations.

265 e by influential institutions and healthcare providers to recognise sexuality in older age and give o

266 technique may allow an additional option to providers to remove complex, large mucosal-based lesions

267 ted testing and counselling (with additional provider training and morning HIV testing), and facility

268 well as workforce development through local provider training in HCV management.

269 The provider training model moved from a graduated autonomy

270 nd post partum, including the integration of provider training with clinical delivery and monitoring

271 eening checklists; community engagement; and provider training.

272 Psychiatrists and other health care providers treating patients with pain should monitor suc

273 tting, routine vs complex coding, anesthesia provider type, duration, and any postoperative hospitali

274 tient and follow-up visits) for all clinical provider types of the multidisciplinary metabolic center

275 health system could not be examined, and all providers used the same software.

276 Direct engagement with providers using academic detailing coupled with electron

277 The distribution of time spent by providers using EHRs varies greatly within specialty.

278 Providers using only the UNIP captured pain in a maximum

279 The Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data from 2012-2015 wer

280 1 years), 11.2% versus 19.5% of controls had provider-verified pertussis vaccination, on average, 3.2

281 Data are gathered automatically from content providers via bespoke scripts.

282 nability of VIA programs including declining providers' VIA competence without mentorship and quality

283 Health-care providers volunteered and tried their best to provide ca

284 Similar variability between providers was observed for respiratory conditions where

285 problems (as identified by their health care provider) was used for model replication.

286 Patients and postoperative providers were blinded to allocation.

287 re male, whereas nearly three-fourths of the providers were female.

288 Individuals with primary care providers were most likely to start treatment.

289 For the manual review, 120 notes from 8 providers were randomly sampled.

290 The patients and providers were unblinded, and specific physical therapy

291 mated vaccine reminders to both patients and providers when vaccines are due using transplant-specifi

292 The analysis is relevant to other providers which may increasingly look towards these shif

293 stem (ILINet) monitors outpatient healthcare providers, which may be largely inaccessible to lower so

294 nce of providers new to the medical staff or providers who are requesting new privileges.

295 s one of the most vexing challenges faced by providers who care for patients after allogeneic hematop

296 rred for or underwent bariatric surgery, and providers who delivered care to veterans with severe obe

297 Of the approximately 24,000 providers who prescribed PrEP, two-thirds reported prima

298 , gastroenterologists, and advanced practice providers whose practice was >=50% hepatology.

299 vailability of genetic counsellors and other providers with experience in genetics is necessary.

300 ophylaxis in consultation with a health-care provider within a specified follow-up period.

301 enormous stress on hospitals and health care providers worldwide.