コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 (D.melanogaster release 4.3) and flybase (D.pseudoobscura).
2 of gene expression in D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura.
3 n expansion in D. miranda, in contrast to D. pseudoobscura.
4 the Bogota and USA subspecies of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
5 in D. simulans and retarded by 24 min in D. pseudoobscura.
6 followed by D. melanogaster, and then by D. pseudoobscura.
7 s, and by 11 min, 32 s, respectively, in D. pseudoobscura.
8 ophila, D. melanogaster, D. simulans, and D. pseudoobscura.
9 yzed for the second chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
10 Est-5 gene duplication and divergence in D. pseudoobscura.
11 D. melanogaster, D. yakuba, D. erecta and D. pseudoobscura.
12 ith the wild-type expression of Est-5B in D. pseudoobscura.
13 s for populations of genotypes in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
14 ars to have arisen via introgression from D. pseudoobscura.
15 close 69% and improve 12% of all gaps in D. pseudoobscura.
16 the Bogota and USA subspecies of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
17 a comparable study of its sister species, D. pseudoobscura.
18 the Bogota and U.S. subspecies of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
19 estimates of these parameters in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
20 ly 1.5 million shotgun reads from Drosophila pseudoobscura.
21 same under-representation on the neo-X of D. pseudoobscura.
22 melanogaster Acp genes are detectable in D. pseudoobscura.
23 ic evidence for such an allele in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
24 aster ACPs in D. simulans, D. yakuba, and D. pseudoobscura.
25 as examining available sequence data from D. pseudoobscura.
26 served in comparison with D. simulans and D. pseudoobscura.
27 es (>50 kbp) in D. melanogaster (42%) and D. pseudoobscura (26%) constitute their own TADs, implying
28 e Mojave Desert of California and Drosophila pseudoobscura across the western United States presaged
29 ects populations of the fruit fly Drosophila pseudoobscura against extinction caused by a "selfish" s
31 melanogaster, the version 2 draft Drosophila pseudoobscura, an assembly of the Assemblathon 2.0 budge
33 raction of amino acid differences between D. pseudoobscura and D. affinis appear to have been fixed b
35 , by using the public genome sequences of D. pseudoobscura and D. melanogaster and approximately 50 i
36 AD map for D. pseudoobscura Comparison of D. pseudoobscura and D. melanogaster, which are separated b
37 ally, we utilized recombination maps from D. pseudoobscura and D. miranda to explore whether changes
38 d coding and non-coding sequences between D. pseudoobscura and D. miranda, and investigated their pat
39 ed times since speciation are one mya for D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis and 2 mya since the form
41 e genetic basis of the difference between D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis in two courtship song el
42 xpressed in adult male hybrids of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis relative to pure species
43 we use the sequence assemblies of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis to test hypotheses regar
44 arge amount of variation was found within D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis, consistent with histori
47 t sites is, on average, very weak in both D. pseudoobscura and D. simulans (magnitude of NS approxima
48 etween two species of Drosophila, Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. subobscura, in codons that differ b
49 enced the PLC-gamma homologs from Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. virilis and compared their gene str
51 hila melanogaster genes, as well as fewer D. pseudoobscura and D. virilis genes, was examined from th
53 terspecific comparisons with D. simulans, D. pseudoobscura and D.virilis to explore the molecular evo
54 and female species preferences in Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis, two occasionall
55 isolated a dos homolog from both Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila virilis and compared their
56 (2)His(2) zinc finger proteins in Drosophila pseudoobscura and identified associations with empirical
57 -five period locus sequences from Drosophila pseudoobscura and its siblings species, D. p. bogotana,
58 e of a second Drosophila species, Drosophila pseudoobscura, and compared this to the genome sequence
59 codon usage patterns in D. melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura, and D. virilis compared with the rest of
61 the completed genomes of D. melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura, and Drosophila yakuba to show that there
62 s also present in the sequenced genome of D. pseudoobscura, and homologs have been found in Aedes aeg
64 mal rearrangements between D. miranda and D. pseudoobscura are far higher than those found before in
67 highly variable and shares variation with D. pseudoobscura at other loci, the low level of variation
69 riation in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura, at a set of loci that had been chosen pur
70 ixed variation across the X chromosome of D. pseudoobscura because, while significant linkage disequi
71 ed with two allopatric strains of Drosophila pseudoobscura, BogER from Colombia and AH162 from Califo
72 ura and close relatives D. persimilis and D. pseudoobscura bogotana has been studied using comparativ
75 the antisense messages are transcribed in D. pseudoobscura, but only the sense message (TRAP100) is t
76 pression diminishes across development in D. pseudoobscura, but remains elevated in D. miranda, the s
77 e possible ancestral arrangements for the D. pseudoobscura C chromosome, which are different from tho
78 the higher level of sequence variation in D. pseudoobscura can be explained by differences in regiona
79 mbination across a 40Kb region of Drosophila pseudoobscura chromosome 2, with one 20kb interval assay
82 accompanying high-resolution TAD map for D. pseudoobscura Comparison of D. pseudoobscura and D. mela
83 pared to its well-studied sibling species D. pseudoobscura, D. miranda has much less nucleotide seque
84 y diverged species of Drosophila: Drosophila pseudoobscura, D. persimilis, and D. pseudoobscura bogot
87 tween Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura, despite extensive divergence of other seq
88 nger sequencing on gaps from the original D. pseudoobscura draft assembly and shown to be dependent o
90 trongly associated with mating success to D. pseudoobscura females, while intrapulse frequency is ass
91 ess of three experimental sets of Drosophila pseudoobscura females: monogamous females allowed to cop
92 oof-of-principle experiments showing that D. pseudoobscura fosmids can successfully rescue RNAi-induc
94 edicted direction among 99 alleles of two D. pseudoobscura genes and five alleles of eight D. simulan
95 dditionally, many DNA duplications in the D. pseudoobscura genome are flanked by a repetitive sequenc
97 ila miranda BAC sequences and the Drosophila pseudoobscura genome sequence, we aligned coding and non
98 I observed one duplicated gene in the D. pseudoobscura genome that appears to have been generated
99 recently duplicated genes in the Drosophila pseudoobscura genome to understand the factors affecting
100 ible for recently duplicated genes in the D. pseudoobscura genome, and I observed both retroposed and
101 comparisons of Drosophila melanogaster and D.pseudoobscura genomes, we show here that our algorithm s
103 within conserved regions of synteny with D. pseudoobscura had highly correlated expression; these re
105 nce in two natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura has been driven by adaptive evolution.
106 ort the hypothesis that the inversions of D. pseudoobscura have emerged as suppressors of recombinati
107 Applying the procedure to the Drosophila pseudoobscura Hsp82 gene inserted at ectopic sites in D.
108 New findings in the platypus and Drosophila pseudoobscura illustrate, yet again, that the sex chromo
109 drastic amplification on the largest Y in D. pseudoobscura independently amplified on a polymorphic l
110 that this ratio is much less than one in D. pseudoobscura is also consistent with the model's predic
111 evel of polymorphism at the Gpdh locus in D. pseudoobscura is comparable to that found at other loci,
112 nscriptional regulation of TRAP100 in the D. pseudoobscura lineage and that its underexpression in st
113 for genes on this chromosomal arm in the D. pseudoobscura lineage, relative to the D. melanogaster l
115 ion in crossover rate at a local scale in D. pseudoobscura, little is known about the fine-scale stru
116 sense message is transcribed similarly in D. pseudoobscura males and females and in hybrids of D. pse
117 ci surveyed are negative, suggesting that D. pseudoobscura may have experienced a rapid population ex
118 a is approximately one-quarter of that in D. pseudoobscura; mean X-linked silent diversity is about t
120 ution of both protein-coding genes on the D. pseudoobscura neo-X chromosome and microRNA genes of D.
121 ll species of the Drosophila subgenus and D. pseudoobscura of the Sophophora subgenus completely lack
122 Finally, I review recent work in Drosophila pseudoobscura on the possible role of meiotic drive in t
123 mbination across approximately 43% of the D. pseudoobscura physical genome in two separate recombinat
124 r the five loci show that gene flow among D. pseudoobscura populations is sufficient to homogenize in
125 ferring high or low assortative mating in D. pseudoobscura produce the same effects when inserted int
127 oss each of these genomes relative to the D. pseudoobscura reference genome, and use RT-PCR to confir
129 survey of nucleotide polymorphism within D. pseudoobscura revealed no amino acid variation in this s
130 nd not shared between D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura show that there are separate classes under
132 proteins across taxa, we use the Drosophila pseudoobscura species group in an attempt to identify re
133 gene fragments in Drosophila miranda (in the pseudoobscura species group) with the completed genomes
135 mic incompatibility system exists between D. pseudoobscura strains BogER and AH162; and, that BogER f
136 elated genes was sequenced in 139 Drosophila pseudoobscura strains collected from 13 populations.
137 and Heat-shock protein 83, in 40 Drosophila pseudoobscura strains collected from two populations.
138 wo other loci, in both D. p. bogotana and D. pseudoobscura, strongly suggest this reduction is due to
139 fects of PTC mutations within the Drosophila pseudoobscura subclade using 18 resequenced genomes alig
140 cleotide substitutions for Acp26Aa in the D. pseudoobscura subgroup but not in the D. melanogaster su
141 osomes secondarily became telocentric in the pseudoobscura subgroup through centromere repositioning
142 indel substitution within Acp26Aa in the D. pseudoobscura subgroup were up to several times those in
145 miranda relative to its sibling species, D. pseudoobscura, suggest that it has a much smaller effect
146 protein is present in D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura testes, cognate proteins for the gene1/2-t
147 gically distinct Y Chromosomes in Drosophila pseudoobscura that differ in size and shape, but the mol
148 mine simultaneously in outbred WT Drosophila pseudoobscura the lifetime costs and benefits to females
150 able genomes of another fruit fly Drosophila pseudoobscura, the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae an
151 have used the inversion system of Drosophila pseudoobscura to investigate how genetic flux occurs amo
152 y subjecting another polyandrous species, D. pseudoobscura, to 150 generations of experimental monoga
153 ral populations of Drosophila miranda and D. pseudoobscura, together with their sequence divergence f
154 n two experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura was subdivided into the effects of female
155 detected losses in the lineage leading to D. pseudoobscura We find that while the original (syntenic)
156 e content of polymorphic Y Chromosomes in D. pseudoobscura We show that Y Chromosomes differ almost t
157 erved between D. melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura, we found that many key developmental body
158 erved between D. melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura, we tag 5.3 kb of noncoding DNA as potenti
160 ete genomes of Drosophila melanogaster and D.pseudoobscura were analyzed for binding sites of the hom
161 viously sequenced Est-5B genes in Drosophila pseudoobscura were determined to compare patterns of pol
162 iation experiment, populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura were subjected to divergent dietary select
163 the knot wing cis-regulatory element from D. pseudoobscura, which contains a cluster of UBX-binding s
164 ne orders on three chromosomes of Drosophila pseudoobscura with its close relative, D. miranda, and t