戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 microbial identification and the analysis of quantitative structure-activity relationships.
2                            A two-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (2D QSAR) m
3 , we previously built Catalyst 3-dimensional quantitative structure activity relationship (3D-QSAR) m
4 ic pathogens, we developed three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D QSAR) m
5  indices analysis (CoMSIA) three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D QSAR) s
6 asis for the third step, a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) a
7 We report the results of a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) a
8 MFA/q2-GRS) method, has been used to build a quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) f
9 s were employed to develop three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) m
10          Toward this goal, three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) m
11  additional descriptors to three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) m
12                            Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) m
13 l steroids and developed a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) m
14                            Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) m
15                            Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) m
16                            Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) m
17  were proposed and several three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) m
18                            Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) m
19                            Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) m
20 man sequence mAb 2E2 using three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) m
21                          A three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) s
22 was accomplished using the three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) s
23      Molecular docking and three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) s
24 e report the synthesis and three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) s
25 en used as the basis for a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) s
26 e ability of the resulting three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) w
27 e to derive receptor-based three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships (3D-QSAR),
28  multivariate discriminant, fragment, and 3D-quantitative structure-activity relationship analyses, w
29 und, 2-octynoic acid, was unique in both its quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis an
30                                      Further quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis id
31                                     Finally, quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of
32                                            A quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis wa
33  Secondly, new and extended methods of QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationship) analysis h
34 sment Tool for Evaluating Risk (ASTER) QSAR (quantitative structure activity relationship) applicatio
35 animal data and outperformed 12 conventional quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches.
36                                            A quantitative structure-activity relationship based on th
37 ploy HFE cosolvents, we have established the quantitative structure-activity relationship between the
38 ented herein builds on the important work in quantitative structure-activity relationships by linking
39                      We present the cellular quantitative structure-activity relationship (cell-QSAR)
40 ng concern in central nervous system-related quantitative structure-activity relationship (CNS-QSAR)
41 ased on these data, two highly predictive 3D quantitative structure-activity relationship (comparativ
42                      Using three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship/comparative
43   To address this hypothesis, based upon our quantitative structure-activity relationship data, a tot
44               Finally, we developed a set of quantitative structure-activity relationship equations c
45 nfortunately, precludes the development of a quantitative structure-activity relationship for permang
46 nt-Frizzled CRD interactions and developed a quantitative structure-activity relationship for predict
47 alysis (CoMFA) to obtain a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship for pyridin
48                            The synthesis and quantitative structure-activity relationship for this be
49       Comparison of our data with outputs of quantitative structure-activity relationships for estima
50 r field analysis (CoMFA) was used to develop quantitative structure-activity relationships for physos
51 f the esters with the needed biostability, a quantitative structure-activity relationship has been de
52                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationships have been
53 o this 3D QSAR model as the first example of quantitative structure-activity relationships in the fie
54                                   In silico (quantitative structure-activity relationship), in vitro
55 lied a variable selection k nearest neighbor quantitative structure-activity relationship (kNN QSAR)
56 computed here and available, nonexperimental quantitative structure-activity relationship literature
57 igand-based computational approaches (binary quantitative structure-activity relationship), medicinal
58 iation of well-established three-dimensional quantitative structure--activity relationship methodolog
59 amides (MBSAs), we applied three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship methods, co
60                        This study presents a Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship model deriv
61 efficient fitness function based on a linear quantitative structure-activity relationship model for c
62 weeteners with known sweetness values, a new quantitative structure-activity relationship model for s
63                                            A quantitative structure-activity relationship model was e
64 ts of this study have been used to develop a quantitative structure-activity relationship model with
65     Using a homology and a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship model, a bi
66 duration in vivo and in vitro bioassays, and quantitative structure activity relationship modeling.
67 n integrated high-throughput experimentation/quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling ap
68                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling is
69 ng and chemical elaboration combined with 3D-quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling yi
70 ses structure-based docking and ligand-based quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling.
71                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationship models and
72                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationship models and
73 kflow for creating and validating predictive Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship models and
74 rmations were used to build CoMFA and CoMSIA quantitative structure-activity relationship models.
75 eld analysis (CoMFA) to develop two 3D-QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationship) models (Co
76 g lead optimization, while 3D-shape or QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationship) models pro
77 mary descriptors in development of the QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationships) of flavon
78  and experiments are underway to establish a quantitative structure-activity relationship on a limite
79 in drug screening, drug toxicity prediction, quantitative structure-activity relationship prediction,
80                     We tested how well three quantitative structure-activity relationship ((Q)SAR) to
81         These were then used in mechanistic (quantitative) structure-activity relationship ((Q)SAR) a
82 em mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), qualitative/quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) and
83                                        A new quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) mode
84                        InterPred combines 17 quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) mode
85 zylamine analogues show Y444F MAO A exhibits quantitative structure activity relationships (QSAR) pro
86  and compare the steric parameters common in quantitative structure activity relationships (QSAR), a
87                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) anal
88          Here we report a unique approach to quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) anal
89                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) anal
90                           A novel method for quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) anal
91                     A machine learning-based Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) anal
92                                            A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) anal
93 oactivity profile of compounds in silico and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) anal
94     Amino acid descriptors are often used in quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) anal
95                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) anal
96                        In the present study, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) and
97                       Three-dimensional (3D) quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) and
98                Machine learning (ML)-enabled quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) appr
99 lecular field topology analysis (MFTA), a 2D quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) appr
100 ites for THDCs targeting TTR, we developed a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) clas
101                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) corr
102                            Highly correlated quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) equa
103 tified by GC x GC-TOFMS were confirmed using quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) esti
104                                      A novel quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) for
105                             Determination of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) for
106 e ends have made use of two-dimensional (2D) quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) meth
107                                      Several quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) meth
108                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) meth
109                       Here, we show that the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) meth
110 port the development of rigorously validated quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
111  was used to construct four-dimensional (4D) quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
112        Here, we built machine-learning-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
113 employed to construct three-dimensional (3D)-quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
114  applied in the construction of parsimonious quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
115                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
116  process that utilizes a battery of in-house quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
117                                        Here, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
118 etic (PBPK) model by integrating an AI-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
119 is study, we selected 603 compounds by using quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
120 ally deep learning, shows great potential in quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
121                                  Open-source quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
122                                  Open-source quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
123                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
124                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
125                Simulated alternatives, e.g., quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
126 discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) combined with quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
127 eir assigned relative biodegradabilities and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
128 oyed these data to build and validate binary quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
129                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
130  be useful to employ toxicity estimates from quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
131                               Alternatively, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
132 (sigma*) constants from previously developed quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
133 rom soy proteins using LC-MS/MS coupled with quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
134                          First, we generated Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) mode
135         By use of support vector analysis, a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
136 , we have developed and rigorously validated quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
137                              Additionally, a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
138                         Rigorously validated quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
139 parameters were then used to develop several quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
140 utilized these data to develop the following quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
141 ery strategy that employs variable selection quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
142 ere used as a test set for validation of the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) mode
143            We examined the three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) of a
144 terized the electrophysiology, kinetics, and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) of t
145 ro ToxCast binding assays to assess OASIS, a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) plat
146 xperimental results were further compared to quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) pred
147 cy of incorrect categorization compared to a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) regr
148                                  A classical quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) stud
149 ceptor has been examined through Hansch-type quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) stud
150                                   An in vivo quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) stud
151 ficial neural network has been developed for quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) stud
152 d bifunctional analogues are reported, and a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) stud
153 ed molecular conformers as templates, the 3D quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) stud
154                              A comprehensive quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) stud
155 l and synthetic phosphoantigens by using the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) tech
156                                 We have used quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) tech
157 This correlation was used to calibrate a new quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) usin
158                                          The quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) was
159 substrate design, DT-diaphorase-cytotoxicity quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), and
160                 The synthesis, pharmacology, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), and
161                    Debromination rates fit a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), inc
162                                   Studies of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) by
163 work (GNN), has been developed for obtaining quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) for
164 ty of genetic neural network (GNN) to obtain quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) fro
165                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) hav
166 xpensive, we developed binary and continuous Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) mod
167     This field of research, broadly known as quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) mod
168 ave been employed as training sets to create quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) whi
169 nstants and the substituent parameters using quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR).
170                                     A simple quantitative-structure activity relationship (QSAR) mode
171                                              Quantitative structure activity relationships (QSARs) pr
172                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) co
173 , scaled by potency differences predicted by quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) fo
174 d is presented for developing and evaluating Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs) fo
175 teric similarity matrices (SM/GNN) to obtain quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) is
176  was applied to develop and evaluate various quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) to
177                  Modeling approaches such as quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) us
178    All of the correlations gave satisfactory quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs), b
179  new biomaterials is hindered by the lack of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs).
180 all molecules, including a lack of validated quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs).
181 ze the results into predictive models (e.g., quantitative structure-activity relationships, QSARs) fo
182          Receptor-dependent four-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (RD-4D-QSAR
183 ional approaches for drug discovery, such as quantitative structure-activity relationship, rely on st
184 lecular dynamics simulations combined with a quantitative structure activity relationship revealed th
185  approaches focused on the identification of quantitative structure-activity relationship (SAR) for e
186                                  Following a quantitative structure-activity relationship (SAR) study
187 y for lead discovery, lead optimization, and quantitative structure activity relationship studies has
188  the dependent variable in three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship studies (3D
189                                        These quantitative structure-activity relationship studies are
190                       Molecular modeling and quantitative structure-activity relationship studies dem
191  The synthesis, pharmacological testing, and quantitative structure-activity relationship studies of
192                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationship studies rev
193             On the basis of earlier reported quantitative structure-activity relationship studies, a
194                                 Based on our quantitative structure-activity relationship study of MD
195 rest since they represent the first detailed quantitative structure-activity relationship study of th
196                           A descriptor-based quantitative structure-activity relationship study using
197  structural basis, we used three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship techniques:
198 s, the program HINT was used to develop a 3D quantitative structure activity relationship that predic
199                                            A quantitative structure-activity relationship was discove
200                                            A quantitative structure-activity relationship was uncover
201                                              Quantitative structure-activity relationships were deriv
202 Rate constants are reasonably described by a quantitative structure-activity relationship with phenol

 
Page Top