ライフサイエンスコーパス: quantum limit

1 actor of 1.4 (3 decibels) below the standard quantum limit.

2 n be inferred with errors below the standard quantum limit.

3 h the diminishing returns of approaching the quantum limit.

4 tions of mechanical resonators down to their quantum limit.

5 otons in the laser cavity below the standard quantum limit.

6 ffect in a three-dimensional material in the quantum limit.

7 surpassing the design goal motivated by the quantum limit.

8 dimensional semiconductors, and approach the quantum limit.

9 in a 6.8(4)-decibel gain beyond the standard quantum limit.

10 lated noise temperatures approaching 10x the quantum limit.

11 scopy with sensitivities beyond the standard quantum limit.

12 ion and all-optical logic at the fundamental quantum limit.

13 ional Dirac or Weyl electrons in the extreme quantum limit.

14 ns and also an anomalous peak in the extreme quantum limit.

15 hat allow the design to surpass the standard quantum limit.

16 rbits' centers 7 decibels below the standard quantum limit.

17 ty [Formula: see text] dB below the standard quantum limit.

18 laser noise sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit.

19 enhanced interaction effects in the extreme quantum limit.

20 lel magnetization when the system enters the quantum limit.

21 and short channel effects when scaled to the quantum limit.

22 s, and its noise performance is close to the quantum limit.

23 ure component are reduced below the standard quantum limit.

24 drature of the field well below the standard quantum limit.

25 a noise floor 10 decibels above the standard quantum limit.

26 bing light-matter interference nature in the quantum limit.

27 of clean conductors, in particular near the quantum limit.

28 and the amplitude of phase diffusion at the quantum limit.

29 ce measurement precision beyond the standard quantum limit.

30 es many angle-dependent lines in the extreme quantum limit.

31 real operating conditions is three times the quantum limit.

32 dB sensitivity enhancement from the standard quantum limit.

33 ated particles is restricted by the standard quantum limit(1), which is proportional to [Formula: see

34 recision of measurements beyond the standard quantum limit(1,2).

35 lead to resolutions surpassing the standard quantum limit(1-3) set by projections of individual atom

36 measured continuously, known as the standard quantum limit(1-4).

37 tivity is bounded at present by the standard quantum limit, a fundamental floor set by quantum mechan

38 Here we demonstrate time transfer with near quantum-limited acquisition and timing at 10,000 times l

39 This high contrast obviates a following quantum-limited amplifier.

40 tal channels, namely bosonic lossy channels, quantum-limited amplifiers, dephasing and erasure channe

41 ments of 8.8 0.4 decibels below the standard quantum limit and a sensitivity for measuring electric f

42 e demonstrate a signal-to-noise ratio at the quantum limit and an optimal use of the measurement time

43 ity that is a factor of 4 above the standard quantum limit and consistent with theoretical prediction

44 for studying macroscopic spin systems in the quantum limit and for investigations of important topics

45 ple, the physical limits (i.e., the standard quantum limit and Heisenberg limit) for the phase estima

46 which is 1.94(1) decibels below the standard quantum limit and reaches a fractional precision at the

47 resistance of ~78 Omega um, approaching the quantum limit, and a record-high on/off ratio of ~10(11)

48 and delivery for sensing beyond the standard quantum limit, and extensions to multifunctional colloid

49 echanics, enable sensing beyond the standard quantum limit, and function as long-lived nodes of futur

50 extended to sense forces beyond the standard quantum limit, and may enable tests of quantum theory.

51 structure of monolayer WSe(2) in the extreme quantum limit, and observe fractional quantum Hall state

52 hen light is used as the probe, the standard quantum limit arises from the balance between the uncert

53 d comes within a factor of 2 of the absolute quantum limit as set by the quantum Cramer-Rao bound.

54 This is the quantum limit attained in other dilute metals upon appli

55 At the quantum limit B(*) (~32 T), tau/B experiences a change i

56 The standard quantum limit bounds the precision of measurements that

57 n with average fidelity of 0.77, beating the quantum limit by 10 standard deviations.

58 monolayer molybdenum disulfide close to the quantum limit by hybridization of energy bands with semi

59 The measurements are extended to the quantum limit by reducing the drive power until, on aver

60 This standard quantum limit can be surpassed by monitoring only one of

61 predicted that topological semimetals at the quantum limit can lead to a large, non-saturating thermo

62 This bound, the standard quantum limit, can be reached when the oscillator subjec

63 Our results point to the realization of a quantum-limit Chern phase in TbMn(6)Sn(6), and may enabl

64 Finally, we show how quantum-limited circulators can be realized with the sam

65 dark pulses over bright solitons in terms of quantum-limited coherence.

66 me chip, we implement a large-scale array of quantum-limited coherent receivers that can resolve non-

67 show that the uniformity of comb spacing of quantum-limited dark pulses is better than 1.2 x 10(-16)

68 he collective atomic response well below the quantum-limited decay of individual atoms into free spac

69 ping a three-dimensional electron gas in the quantum limit emerges as an outstanding open question.

70 Fermi energy, the system enters the extreme quantum limit (EQL) and becomes susceptible to a number

71 Strained SrNbO(3) films reach the extreme quantum limit, exhibiting a sign of fractional occupatio

72 We demonstrate an approach to obtaining near quantum-limited far-field imaging resolution of incohere

73 rmor frequencies, it can exceed the standard quantum limit for both noisy cases.

74 atomic displacements dips below the standard quantum limit for half of a cycle.

75 tainty by -3.2 +/- 0.5 dB below the standard quantum limit for N = 51 ions.

76 findings imply that tunnelling establishes a quantum limit for plasmonic field confinement of about 1

77 of a quantum state that exceeds the standard quantum limit for probing the collective spin of 10(11)

78 vation, the sensitivity is near the standard quantum limit for sensing the motion of a cesium atom.

79 The performance of our device is near the quantum limit for the interferometer size and quantum de

80 vity roughly a factor of 100 larger than the quantum limit for this oscillator.

81 cy noise at high frequencies, resulting in a quantum-limited frequency noise spectral density of 130

82 imic the behavior of fermions in the extreme quantum limit, giving rise to a sequence of plateaus at

83 ials, because isolated candidate MZMs in the quantum limit have been observed inside the topological

84 otonic transistor and its counterpart in the quantum limit, i.e., single-photon transistor based on a

85 for a consistent approach to achieving near quantum-limited imaging resolution of arbitrarily distri

86 The quantum limit in a Fermi liquid, realized when a single

87 re we use vacuum squeezing to circumvent the quantum limit in a search for dark matter.

88 owing measurements that surpass the standard quantum limit in sensitivity.

89 In this study, we propose that the quantum limit in such systems must be approached in reve

90 Breaking through the quantum limit invites an era of fundamental physics sear

91 osition resolution a factor of 4.3 above the quantum limit is achieved and demonstrates the near-idea

92 The only way to surpass the standard quantum limit is by introducing correlations between the

93 However, access to the quantum limit is typically impeded by the tendency of f-

94 uperconducting microresonators together with quantum-limited Josephson parametric amplifiers has enha

95 ysis shows that the upconversion receiver is quantum limited like conventional amplifiers and mixers,

96 mate all parameters and surpass the standard quantum limit, making it a powerful tool for metrologica

97 mplementation outperforms any ideal standard-quantum-limited measurement performing the same non-idea

98 Once in the ground state, quantum-limited measurements must then be demonstrated.

99 Through nearly quantum-limited measurements of the position and momentu

100 ficient experimental resolution, will enable quantum-limited measurements, providing information on e

101 ependent systems are limited by the standard quantum limit; measurements on entangled systems can sur

102 The thermal- and quantum-limiting noise involved in the conversion proces

103 ssisted tunneling, and strongly violates the quantum limit of charge diffusion.

104 Such molecular layers are at the quantum limit of device miniaturization and can show enh

105 ty approaches a value set by [planck]/m, the quantum limit of diffusion, where [planck]/m is Planck's

106 Here, we observe a universal quantum limit of diffusivity in a homogeneous, strongly

107 (5) acquires a robust plateau in the extreme quantum limit of magnetic field.

108 as the FET, the SET can approach closely the quantum limit of sensitivity.

109 uare-lattice site percolation in the extreme quantum limit of spin one-half.

110 on of an unconventional Hall response in the quantum limit of the bulk semimetal HfTe(5), adjacent to

111 ical insulator Sb(2) Te(3) films, an extreme quantum limit of the topological surface state is reache

112 , their energy dissipation often reaches the quantum limits of Si, which can be surpassed by using ma

113 ow-power quantum optical devices, surpassing quantum limits on position and force sensing, and the co

114 This nearly quantum-limited operation is critical for long-distance

115 Employing quantum-limited optical heterodyne detection, we explici

116 stals, providing exquisitely sensitive (near quantum-limited), optical measurements of mechanical vib

117 iated quantum measurement at its fundamental quantum limit over a non-trivial region of parameter spa

118 Using a near-quantum-limited parametric amplifier, we selectively mea

119 for amplifiers and frequency converters with quantum-limited performance in the microwave range.

120 far, only optical clocks have pushed towards quantum-limited performance(13).

121 o-frequency STM is expected to be capable of quantum-limited position measurements.

122 tial to the chiral n = 0 Landau level in the quantum limit, providing a disorder-free way of accessin

123 The quantum limit (QL) of an electron liquid, realised at st

124 ws a linear magnetic field dependence in the quantum limit regime.

125 nd [Formula: see text] dB below the standard quantum limit, respectively.

126 ement with an imprecision below the standard quantum limit scale.

127 a sensor on the basis of its atomic size and quantum-limited sensing capabilities.

128 This agility enables quantum-limited sensitivity in sensing applications as t

129 One implementation that might allow near quantum-limited sensitivity is to use a single electron

130 dity of the comb output and operate far from quantum-limited sensitivity.

131 are detected as an optical phase shift with quantum-limited sensitivity.

132 on metrology(1-6), operating near a standard quantum limit set by quantum noise(4,7).

133 e transfer has not operated at the analogous quantum limit set by the number of received photons.

134 utation is ultimately limited by noise, with quantum limits setting the fundamental noise floor.

135 ptical techniques that are routinely used in quantum-limited signal detection.

136 The torque changes sign in the quantum limit, signalling a reversal of the magnetic ani

137 k oscillators in general, derives a standard quantum limit (SQL) for all such devices, and quantifies

138 or laser (Dick noise(5)) and by the standard quantum limit (SQL) that arises from the quantum noise a

139 projection noise, gives rise to the standard quantum limit (SQL) to phase resolution.

140 nal frequency instability below the standard quantum limit (SQL) using GHZ states of up to four qubit

141 an apparent limitation known as the standard quantum limit (SQL).

142 in position and momentum below the standard quantum limit (SQL).

143 of the Weyl semimetal NbAs upon entering the quantum limit state in high magnetic fields.

144 is pushed below a scale set by the standard quantum limit, the measurement must perturb the motion o

145 nd time (10(-13) to 10(-12) s) represent the quantum limit, the nonstatistical regime of rates.

146 V below the Fermi energy, corresponding to a quantum limit-the field required to reach the lowest LL-

147 s of one system (to better than its standard quantum limit) through measurements on the other correla

148 n entangled systems can surpass the standard quantum limit to reach the ultimate precision allowed by

149 d detection noise levels below this standard quantum limit to realize the benefits of the intrinsic s

150 formation spans a spectrum from the standard quantum limit to the Heisenberg limit within a periodic

151 describe the physics that gives rise to the quantum limit to the Q-f product, explain design strateg

152 In this context, the fundamental quantum limit to the quality of the clones is imposed by

153 ur interest here is to determine fundamental quantum limits to the achievable multiparameter estimati

154 ic mechanical objects, providing fundamental quantum limits to the sensitivity of mechanical sensors

155 Our analysis clarifies the quantum limits to the stability of feedback oscillators

156 Our results establish that anomalous quantum limit torque measurements provide a direct exper

157 n achieve an energy-delay-product (EDP) near quantum limit using practical circuit parameters and ava

158 In the extreme quantum limit, we also observed a plateau in the z-axis

159 d magnetic fields that vanishes in the ultra-quantum limit, when only a single Landau level is occupi

160 der a magnetic field and achieve the extreme quantum limit, where only the lowest Landau level is occ

161 up to 60 T drives the system into the ultra-quantum limit, where we observe abrupt changes in the ma

162 ds can be taken to the relativistic magnetic quantum limit, which has so far been inaccessible in nat

163 onducting topological boundary states in the quantum limit, which opens up the possibility for studyi

164 -number variance was 4 dB below the standard quantum limit while the intracavity mean photon number s

165 tate metrology 8 decibels below the standard quantum limit with a detection system that has a noise f