ライフサイエンスコーパス: raccoon

1 ct of potential behavioural changes in rabid raccoons.

2 tectable in nontumor tissue or in unaffected raccoons.

3 ntified in neuroglial tumors of free-ranging raccoons.

4 th 100% of neuroglial tumors in free-ranging raccoons.

5 and variances in weekly home range size for raccoons.

6 ore than 20 years and including 35,387 rabid raccoons.

7 lates induced pathological findings of AD in raccoons.

8 n epidemic of rabies virus in North American raccoons.

9 ts; 88 (4%) to rodents/rabbits; 10 (0.5%) to raccoons; 5 (0.2%) to bats; and 24 (1.2%) to other anima

10 .7%) received RPEP after dog (95), cat (21), raccoon (8), bat (4), or other animal (8) exposures.

11 nine parvovirus (CPV) variants isolated from raccoons-a newly recognized CPV host-to different carniv

12 (GABA) in the somatosensory thalamus of the raccoon and to compare these features to those of other

13 sily observed and/or common mammals, such as raccoons and bobcats, bode poorly for species of conserv

14 nd control within terrestrial mammals (e.g., raccoons and foxes).

15 uences from puma, coyote, gray wolf, bobcat, raccoon, and striped skunk revealed two major groups rel

16 ntibodies to YEZV are found in wild deer and raccoons, and YEZV RNAs have been detected in ticks from

17 infections with Baylisascaris procyonis, the raccoon ascarid, have been increasingly recognized in do

18 -2a strains, suggesting that passage through raccoons assisted in the evolution of CPV-2a.

19 e that selection favors oral transmission to raccoons but classical stercorarian transmission to wood

20 These results indicated that raccoons can become infected with ADV and may have a rol

21 n this study, we investigated the effects of raccoon contact patterns on rabies spread using network

22 ng detailed data describing the variation in raccoon contact rates into a network modelling approach,

23 Our findings are reminiscent of the raccoon cortex with its forepaw-like somatosensory forep

24 t capsid (VP2) position 300 in the prototype raccoon CPV allows dog cell infection.

25 We simulated raccoon demography and RABV dynamics across a range of m

26 within raccoon populations, suggesting that raccoons develop little or no rabies immune class.

27 Although viruses from raccoons do not efficiently bind the dog transferrin rec

28 ciated RVVs (Asia, 159.8), arctic foxes with Raccoon Dog RVV (Europe, 115.8), and African wild dogs w

29 h related middle- and late-phase epidemic or raccoon dog strains.

30 s of meat adulteration such as fox, mink and raccoon dog was performed.

31 bes targeted nuclear genes for fox, mink and raccoon dog were designed for ddPCR system; In addition,

32 o found serological evidence of infection in raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procuyoinboides).

33 casses first more often than birds, and that raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) were the most fr

34 Himalayan palm civets (Paguma larvata), and raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides), sold in exotic

35 Raccoon dogs and mink carried the highest number of pote

36 of a novel canine respiratory coronavirus to raccoon dogs and of bat HKU5-like coronaviruses to mink,

37 hina and spread to humans via civet cats and raccoon dogs in the wet markets before spreading to 37 c

38 d serval cat, canine bocavirus 2 (CBoV-2) in raccoon dogs, and feline bocaviruses (FBoV) in murid rod

39 of zoonotic strains found in palm civets and raccoon dogs, as well as isolates spanning the early, mi

40 We also detect animal viruses that infect raccoon dogs, civets, and bamboo rats.

41 Animals such as raccoon dogs, mink and muskrats are farmed for fur and a

42 ing species such as civets, bamboo rats, and raccoon dogs, previously identified as possible intermed

43 , from birds to porcupines, and from dogs to raccoon dogs.

44 Trios of raccoons experimentally inoculated with ADV-TR and ADV-U

45 duced in Aleutian and non-Aleutian mink, but raccoons failed to show serological or pathological evid

46 s measured in seawater and in gull, cat, and raccoon feces.

47 iant virus that has circulated undetected in raccoons for at least 24 years, with transfers to and fr

48 The innervation of the digits on the raccoon forepaw was examined by using immunochemistry fo

49 from dairy cows, birds, domestic cats and a raccoon from affected farms indicated multidirectional i

50 including the deer mouse, Virginia opossum, raccoon, groundhog, Eastern cottontail, and Eastern red

51 Sylvatic carnivores, such as raccoons, have recently been recognized as important hos

52 orks incorporated the number and duration of raccoon interactions.

53 neurons in the somatosensory thalamus of the raccoon is less than that in the cat and monkey, but the

54 preparation of ADV-TR prepared from infected raccoon lymph nodes was inoculated into mink and raccoon

55 Raccoons may display different behaviours when infectiou

56 om fecal samples collected from anesthetized raccoons (n = 738) trapped in six Pennsylvania counties

57 umented a 99.3% decrease in the frequency of raccoon observations, decreases of 98.9% and 87.5% for o

58 s identified by PCR in samples from mink and raccoons on commercial ranches during an outbreak of Ale

59 dators relative to the novel-object control, raccoons only increased their GUD in coyote treatments.

60 rent trade-off scenarios in cycles involving raccoons or woodrats, including a proper three-way trade

61 Raccoon polyomavirus (RacPyV) is associated with 100% of

62 Recently, raccoon polyomavirus (RacPyV) was identified in neurogli

63 proximity logging collars on a wild suburban raccoon population and then simulated rabies spread acro

64 monstrate that when rabies enters a suburban raccoon population, the likelihood of a disease outbreak

65 of dumb and furious behaviours in the rabid raccoon population, there are similar outbreak sizes and

66 provide new insights into rabies dynamics in raccoon populations and have important implications for

67 approach, we were able to show that suburban raccoon populations are highly susceptible to rabies out

68 t patterns influence the spread of rabies in raccoon populations in order to design effective control

69 assumed low levels of immunity (1-5%) within raccoon populations, suggesting that raccoons develop li

70 ated with modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) and raccoon pox (RCN) viral vectors expressing the NiV fusio

71 A recombinant raccoon poxvirus, expressing the F1 antigen of Y. pestis

72 in one vaccine-treated group, that received raccoon poxviruses (RCN) expressing Pd calnexin (CAL) an

73 pardalis), Tayra (Eira barbara), Crab-eating Raccoon (Procyon cancrivorus) and domestic dog (Canis lu

74 eses by assessing the response of the common raccoon (Procyon lotor) and hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon

75 Raccoons (Procyon lotor) play an important role in the m

76 region: striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), raccoons (Procyon lotor), coyotes (Canis latrans), Virgi

77 ited States of America, which naturally have raccoons (Procyon lotor), foxes and other nest predators

78 ence and incidence of rabies virus (RABV) in raccoons (Procyon lotor).

79 ites in outbred, free-ranging populations of raccoons (Procyon lotor).

80 ticks (Ixodes texanus; n=718) collected from raccoons (Procyon lotor; n=91) and genotyped at 11 micro

81 (e.g., gray fox [Urocyon cinereoargenteus], raccoon [Procyon lotor], and coyote [Canis latrans]).

82 Comparison of raccoon pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pulse ty

83 e epizoology of rabies with the expansion of raccoon rabies from a small pocket around northern Virgi

84 Based on data for epidemic raccoon rabies in Connecticut, we developed a stochastic

85 An epizootic of raccoon rabies that began in the mid-Atlantic region of

86 ed kidney recipient were consistent with the raccoon rabies virus variant and were more than 99.9% id

87 exposed, infectious, and recovered model of raccoon rabies.

88 each host species but, with the exception of raccoons, relatively little evidence for onward transmis

89 e rabies virus outbreak among North American raccoons reveals the long lasting effect of the initial

90 DV, but only a single ADV-Pullman-inoculated raccoon showed evidence of infection.

91 ibutions of PV+ and CaBP+ cell bodies in the raccoon somatosensory thalamus are very similar to those

92 terozygote deficits (HDs) at the CP scale in raccoon ticks (Ixodes texanus; n=718) collected from rac

93 abies vaccination (ORV) programmes targeting raccoons-timing and frequency of bait delivery, width of

94 sessed the responses of both cotton rats and raccoons to life-size replicas of Burmese pythons and tw

95 n the transmission of virus to mink but that raccoon-to-raccoon transmission of ADV is unlikely.

96 mission of virus to mink but that raccoon-to-raccoon transmission of ADV is unlikely.

97 Two of 3 raccoons trapped in the vicinity had positive hemocultur

98 nic tumor antigen genes, we cultured primary raccoon tumor cells and passaged them in mice, confirmin

99 oon lymph nodes was inoculated into mink and raccoons, typical AD was induced in Aleutian and non-Ale

100 Raccoon virus capsids showed little binding to the canin

101 y, in capsid protein (VP2) phylogenies, most raccoon viruses fell as evolutionary intermediates betwe

102 , and periodicity of rabies epizootics among raccoons were compared with predictions derived from a s

103 protein of ADV, indicated that both mink and raccoons were infected by a new isolate of ADV, designat