ライフサイエンスコーパス: randomized controlled trial

1 study was a parallel, dual-arm, double-blind randomized controlled trial.

2 r allogeneic HCT in a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

3 vents and self-rated health in a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

4 sty; NCT01121224) prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

5 g these designs or selecting the traditional randomized controlled trial.

6 y unresectable CRLM as evidenced in a recent randomized controlled trial.

7 rom the Onyx ONE US/Japan study and Onyx ONE randomized controlled trial.

8 bel, two-arm, non-inferiority, multi-center, randomized controlled trial.

9 f Pharmacotherapy of Psychotic Depression II randomized controlled trial.

10 uch an approach would need to be tested in a randomized controlled trial.

11 life (HRQOL) following HMIE and OE within a randomized controlled trial.

12 cute coronary syndrome by a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

13 cal practice, despite more than 2 decades of randomized controlled trials.

14 iews, and analyses of the usual care arms of randomized controlled trials.

15 Two-thirds of the included studies were randomized controlled trials.

16 cancer patients: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

17 g for nonectatic indications, as well as non-randomized controlled trials.

18 oceedings were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials.

19 ia in patients with type 2 diabetes in large randomized controlled trials.

20 imulation (tDCS) as an effective approach in randomized controlled trials.

21 ugh a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

22 atients receiving fixed, frequent therapy in randomized controlled trials.

23 es: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

24 is response warrants further confirmation in randomized controlled trials.

25 ies Arthritis [WOMAC] index); study type was randomized controlled trials.

26 tients with HER2-positive breast cancer in a randomized, controlled trial.

27 cobacter pylori eradication: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

28 nd call for further validation, ideally in a randomized, controlled trial.

29 These findings need to be confirmed in a randomized, controlled trial.

30 This was an open-label, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial.

31 n have recently been demonstrated in a large randomized, controlled trial.

32 l data are available from adequately powered randomized, controlled trials.

33 roved with cognitive behavioral therapy (246 randomized controlled trials; 17 209 participants) and a

34 ds: In a two-arm, blinded, between-subjects, randomized controlled trial, 2,012 participants were sel

35 t a systematic review of published phase III randomized controlled trials (2007-2020) on systemic the

36 In a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, 34 participants with estab

37 In this single-center, randomized, controlled trial, 35 consecutive patients wi

38 rticipants) and antianxiety medications (126 randomized controlled trials; 8225 participants).

39 Data from a recent randomized controlled trial, a post hoc analysis of that

40 ols need to be incorporated in well-designed randomized controlled trials aiming to establish optimal

41 Randomized controlled trials, albeit in limited numbers,

42 This rigorous randomized controlled trial among persons with recent ex

43 39 studies (18 randomized controlled trials and 21 observational studie

44 Further studies with multicentre randomized controlled trials and larger populations of h

45 To date, a number of well-performed randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have demo

46 lower than dictated by the protocol in many randomized controlled trials and negative results may re

47 Given the discrepant findings from randomized controlled trials and observational studies,

48 Randomized controlled trials and prospective observation

49 Both randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental stud

50 reviewed systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies

51 included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retros

52 Randomized controlled trials are crucial for the evaluat

53 However, adequately powered randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm th

54 Contemporary randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the

55 Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the

56 Randomized controlled trials are needed to establish any

57 ve against COVID-19, but adequately powered, randomized controlled trials are needed.

58 Larger randomized controlled trials are required to assess the

59 patients, but more large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to further con

60 We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the use of commer

61 me rehospitalized, nonadherence at the final randomized controlled trial assessment) were each associ

62 A randomized controlled trial assigned ambulatory anorecta

63 We performed a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial at 13 study centers between

64 VF patency, we performed an observer-blinded randomized controlled trial at three university hospital

65 We tested the interventions in six randomized controlled trials at a large public universit

66 cted a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial at six hospitals in Austral

67 rtality (odds ratio 0.94 [0.79-1.12], n = 38 randomized controlled trials) but reduced duration of me

68 Given the recent randomized controlled trial by Nasralla et al demonstrat

69 Our findings indicate the impact that randomized controlled trials can have on real-world prac

70 In a randomized controlled trial, children from Guinea-Bissau

71 available clinical data only.Methods: Three randomized controlled trial cohorts served as the traini

72 eatment have consistently been identified in randomized controlled trial cohorts using latent class a

73 onal, multicenter, non-inferior, open label, randomized, controlled trials COLOR and COLOR II, compar

74 s multicenter 3-arm, parallel-group, patient-randomized controlled trial compared clinical effectiven

75 A randomized controlled trial comparing aNRP with standard

76 Materials and Methods This randomized controlled trial comparing DBT+SM and DM was

77 A randomized controlled trial comparing mBCG and RC will b

78 Randomized controlled trials comparing acute postprandia

79 Randomized controlled trials comparing an original PGA w

80 eta-analysis based on a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing anticoagulant int

81 Comparative observational studies and randomized controlled trials comparing cysteamine with c

82 c analysis on 1,047 patients with PDD from 2 randomized controlled trials comparing rivastigmine vers

83 rey literature, current to July 8, 2020, for randomized controlled trials comparing transepithelial a

84 Two randomized controlled trials comparing water softeners w

85 We performed a randomized, controlled trial comparing systematic with r

86 We therefore performed a randomized, controlled trial comparing these 2 technique

87 The RCT DUPLICATE initiative (Randomized, Controlled Trials Duplicated Using Prospecti

88 s and Methods This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled consecutive partici

89 of 130 cells/ml) from a previously published randomized controlled trial evaluating the LAM test in h

90 infants remains lacking; adequately powered randomized controlled trials evaluating probiotic supple

91 ectronic databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating probiotics or sy

92 Randomized, controlled trials evaluating the clinical ef

93 2-center (Barcelona, Spain; Loma Linda, CA) randomized controlled trial examining the cognitive effe

94 rched from inception to February 1, 2020 for randomized controlled trials examining antidepressants c

95 Two small short-term randomized controlled trials examining doxycycline proph

96 Randomized controlled trials examining the impact of sel

97 combination will be evaluated in a phase II randomized controlled trial for locally advanced PDAC.

98 human pancreas to multiple meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials for hypothermic machine per

99 We systematically review randomized controlled trials for post-intensive care syn

100 ommendations based on a systematic review of randomized controlled trials from December 2015 to 2019.

101 Six electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials from January 2010 to July 2

102 This prospective randomized double blinded randomized controlled trial has revealed a significant d

103 Recently, a number of randomized controlled trials have been completed and the

104 Two blinded randomized controlled trials have been published, one wi

105 prove biologic plausibility and causality as randomized controlled trials have not been performed.

106 or accelerated fibrosis progression, yet few randomized controlled trials have tested clinic-based al

107 Findings from randomized controlled trials have yielded conflicting re

108 New randomized, controlled trials have become available on o

109 lable data set of mortality events from PTXD randomized controlled trials, identified an absolute 4.6

110 This was a mixed-methods randomized controlled trial in a mixed surgical sample w

111 therefore conducted a comprehensive, 12-week randomized controlled trial in active-duty Air Force Air

112 We conducted a multicenter, open label, randomized controlled trial in Catalonia (Spain) between

113 We performed a noninferiority randomized controlled trial in four different centers th

114 These are secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial in rural Malawi.

115 ducted an age de-escalation, dose-escalation randomized controlled trial in Siaya County, western Ken

116 emonstrate the urgent need for high-quality, randomized controlled trials in the pediatric population

117 g patient experience, although evidence from randomized controlled trials in the United States is lac

118 at PAC use has not been studied as part of a randomized, controlled trial in patients with CS with or

119 Within a subsample of a cluster-randomized, controlled trial in rural Bangladesh, we enr

120 We conducted a cluster-randomized, controlled trial in rural districts in Bangl

121 pon injury might explain results from large, randomized, controlled trials in which improved renal ou

122 Although the present study was not a randomized controlled trial, in this cancer cohort with

123 We implemented a parallel-cluster-randomized controlled trial, in which 162 villages were

124 This randomized controlled trial included 24 men.

125 A prospective randomized controlled trial including 108 patients sched

126 Five randomized controlled trials including 567 lactating wom

127 ysis of efficacy and safety outcomes from 12 randomized controlled trials including a total of 52 816

128 Randomized controlled trials including the use of either

129 In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, individuals with spider pho

130 aseline and longitudinal data from 2 cluster-randomized controlled trials (Innovative Approaches for

131 training (HIIT) programs, as part of a 12-mo randomized controlled trial investigating how different

132 servational study using data from four large randomized controlled trials investigating different pre

133 Randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of

134 vational studies (cohort, case-control), and randomized controlled trials involving patients 18 years

135 In this randomized, controlled trial involving patients with ver

136 Ultimately, a randomized controlled trial is needed, examining effects

137 nd total hospital stay, although the lack of randomized, controlled trials limits the validity of the

138 In a randomized controlled trial, lung transplant recipients

139 Sixty independent randomized controlled trials met inclusion (total N = 21

140 Seventeen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria.

141 Nine phase III randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria.

142 otics that have already been tested in human randomized controlled trials, most of these potential th

143 ed in Onyx ONE US/Japan (n=752) and Onyx ONE randomized controlled trial (n=1018), 1506 patients fulf

144 Study design included randomized controlled trials (n = 19), retrospective mat

145 ve, multicenter, single-blinded, all-comers, randomized controlled trial (NCT02385279), allocating in

146 This randomized controlled trial (NCT02408926) followed term

147 Here we report the results of a randomized controlled trial (NCT02542592) in which we em

148 A 1-y randomized controlled trial [New Dietary Strategies Addr

149 We found 43 randomized controlled trials (nine on cycling, 14 on neu

150 This study was a cluster-randomized controlled trial of 12 primary health care ce

151 Multicentre prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of 3 methods of hiatus herni

152 al meningitis using clinical isolates from a randomized controlled trial of antifungal treatment (amp

153 In a post hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of CCTA in patients with sta

154 tion after HCT, samples were analyzed from a randomized controlled trial of CMV intravenous immunoglo

155 obile health (mHealth) program was a cluster-randomized controlled trial of diarrhea patient househol

156 We analyzed samples from a large randomized controlled trial of FMT for ulcerative coliti

157 -19 (AZD1222), in a single-blinded phase 1/2 randomized controlled trial of healthy adults aged 18-55

158 ta came from 637 Ugandan women enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of intermittent preventive t

159 infant microbiota modified the effects of a randomized controlled trial of lipid-based nutrient supp

160 Intervention Network (HAPIN), a multicountry randomized controlled trial of liquefied petroleum gas s

161 nd colleagues report the results of a unique randomized controlled trial of mask wearing in the commu

162 nd colleagues report the results of a unique randomized controlled trial of masks in the community to

163 umber NCT03702582Rationale and Design of the Randomized Controlled Trial of New Oral Anticoagulants v

164 Previously reports from a randomized controlled trial of Nissen vs. anterior 180-d

165 One randomized controlled trial of olaparib versus placebo,

166 previously reported 52-week outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of peanut epicutaneous immun

167 This first randomized controlled trial of real-time functional magn

168 rried out using data from the only available randomized controlled trial of the checklist.

169 We performed a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial of twice-weekly oral brincid

170 lls (PBMC) were obtained from infants from 2 randomized controlled trials of early introduction of eg

171 In addition, we reviewed randomized controlled trials of interventions targeting

172 ted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of LNS designed to prevent

173 Two large randomized controlled trials of low-dose CT (LDCT)-based

174 in children whose mothers participated in 2 randomized controlled trials of micronutrient supplement

175 med a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of surgical treatment of su

176 s for the local therapy recommendations; six randomized controlled trials of systemic therapy met eli

177 d risk of acute respiratory infection (ARI), randomized controlled trials of vitamin D supplementatio

178 Recent findings from randomized controlled trials of water, sanitation, and h

179 nts in the preemptive therapy (PET) arm of a randomized, controlled trial of PET versus valganciclovi

180 edicine and Public Health (NSIGHT2) study, a randomized, controlled trial of rapid diagnostic genomic

181 cine and Public Health (NSIGHT2) study was a randomized, controlled trial of rapid whole-genome seque

182 Randomized, controlled trials of hydroxychloroquine in p

183 Data from phase 3, randomized, controlled trials of vitamin D supplementati

184 BEEP is a pragmatic, multi-centre, randomized-controlled trial of daily emollient for the f

185 We performed a single-center, phase 1b/2a, randomized controlled trial on infants 2.5 to 12 kg unde

186 review and meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized controlled trials on bempedoic acid (PROSPERO

187 There is a need for a higher quality of randomized controlled trials or case control studies wit

188 sessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (randomized controlled trials) or Newcastle-Ottawa Scale

189 In the DIRECT PLUS (Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial Polyphenols-Unprocessed) wei

190 Five randomized controlled trials provide the evidence base.

191 Secondary data analysis of randomized controlled trials published between 1998 and

192 registries were searched to October 2018 for randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs

193 1 prospective cohort studies (N = 9986), one randomized controlled trial (RCT) (N = 367), and 29 retr

194 ze calculation is essential to ensure that a randomized controlled trial (RCT) has enough power to de

195 Despite promising animal data, there is no randomized controlled trial (RCT) on the effects of high

196 A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was undertaken to dete

197 In an open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT), consecutive patients

198 was to determine whether when evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT), PFC compared to bridg

199 y allocated to treatment in a 1:1 ratio in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

200 We identified 17 studies (6 randomized controlled trial [RCT], 5 cohorts, and 6 case

201 d and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of

202 and updated the systematic review to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of

203 A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational st

204 mary meta-analyses separately for reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experiment

205 d and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic revie

206 Antibiotic non-inferiority randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are used for approva

207 Some of these tools consider hypothetical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as gold standards.

208 However, the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted among pati

209 cal decision making and to support efficient randomized controlled trials (RCTs) designed to evaluate

210 Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated th

211 We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the is

212 We systematically identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the sa

213 We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of health system int

214 are able to address research questions that randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of individual patien

215 s and patient-reported outcomes at home, but randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of eH

216 on of women as authors in heart failure (HF) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in high-im

217 Review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) supported our findin

218 mbase, Scopus and Cochrane were reviewed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared prophy

219 ted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the eff

220 r these agents, the present meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was undertaken.

221 Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible if the

222 Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with concealed alloc

223 n been impeded or delayed due to the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with hard clinical o

224 ia sought systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and comparative obs

225 and reviewed all referenced publications for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), focusing on the rac

226 In randomized controlled trials (RCTs), HTE is typically ex

227 A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCT interventio

228 vention with paclitaxel-coated balloons from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

229 for dentin hypersensitivity (DH), tested in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

230 ured process to design RWE studies emulating randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and compare results

231 A network meta-analysis including only randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on PSP out

232 decreased with psychological therapies (246 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] in 5 systematic revi

233 Randomized controlled trials reporting data for these lo

234 A total of 34 randomized controlled trials reporting on 2723 participa

235 There were 29 eligible randomized controlled trials searched, and a total of 10

236 uded 50 studies with 18 449 participants: 29 randomized controlled trials, seven controlled clinical

237 Rationale: A recent randomized controlled trial showed that a peripheral per

238 A recent multicenter, international randomized controlled trial showed that DOF following a

239 Furthermore, 2 large randomized controlled trials showed inferior performance

240 This randomized controlled trial shows that, although not pow

241 Largely based on one randomized controlled trial, standard dose of epinephrin

242 ilure) trial was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial; subjects were randomized 1

243 Findings from this exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial support further investigatio

244 PREVAIL was a randomized controlled trial that assessed models of HCV

245 ed based on the probability of outcomes in a randomized controlled trial that compared valganciclovir

246 s been designed as a pragmatic, prospective, randomized controlled trial that will compare financial,

247 s, reports of rigorously conducted phase III randomized controlled trials that compared >= 2 imaging

248 Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared the current s

249 All 29 randomized controlled trials that were included had no r

250 sessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale

251 urrence in ESUS, which was tested in 2 large randomized controlled trials: the NAVIGATE ESUS (Rivarox

252 is due to the absence of adequately powered, randomized controlled trials; the often transient nature

253 19 should be prospectively investigated in a randomized controlled trial to ascertain the extent of r

254 ageous choices, was tested in a double-blind randomized controlled trial to assess its impact on over

255 We conducted a UK-based multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes of kidne

256 We conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine whether a paren

257 was to conduct a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial to investigate this after a

258 diverse populations and guide the design of randomized controlled trials to control exposures in het

259 charge thromboprophylaxis remains uncertain, randomized controlled trials to evaluate the role of con

260 med a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate the effect o

261 We performed a randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy an

262 We performed a randomized, controlled trial to investigate the effects

263 POMA was examined in a randomized controlled trial under double-blind condition

264 This study was a cluster-randomized controlled trial utilizing a Type-3 Hybrid im

265 This non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was carried out between Sept

266 s prospective, single blinded (endoscopist), randomized controlled trial was conducted as a pilot stu

267 A single-blind, 3-arm, randomized controlled trial was conducted at the obstetr

268 nonbanded sleeve gastrectomy single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted from January 2

269 This randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 cities in

270 A randomized controlled trial was conducted in peri-implan

271 An open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in southwester

272 A randomized controlled trial was conducted to test the hy

273 This randomized controlled trial was primarily aimed at testi

274 The aim of the present randomized controlled trial was to compare the efficacy

275 The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy

276 Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials was used to assess the qual

277 The aim of this prospective randomized-controlled trial was to evaluate the risks/be

278 el, pragmatic, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial, we enrolled patients with c

279 In a randomized, controlled trial, we assigned a subgroup of

280 In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned, in a 1:1 rati

281 In a pragmatic, three-group, cluster-randomized, controlled trial, we estimated the effect of

282 In a stepped-wedge cluster randomized, controlled trial, we implemented a high-sens

283 In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, we randomized 64 pediatric

284 In this randomized, controlled trial, we randomly assigned adult

285 Patients in this multicenter, international randomized controlled trial were randomized to directly

286 Forty-one randomized controlled trials were identified (n = 9821;

287 Randomized controlled trials were only evaluated in the

288 Twenty-four randomized, controlled trials were selected using Medlin

289 dontal treatment effect on birth outcomes in randomized controlled trials when fetal losses are unequ

290 A parallel arm randomized controlled trial will be performed for which

291 More clinical studies, especially randomized controlled trials, will need to be conducted

292 ted single-center, single-blind prospective, randomized controlled trial with 2 parallel treatment gr

293 ase Prevention (PC-SHOP) study is a parallel randomized controlled trial with a 3 month follow-up con

294 It was based on a 2-arm multicenter randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessm

295 We conducted a randomized controlled trial with healthy male and female

296 dy was an assessor- and statistician-blinded randomized controlled trial with nested, qualitative int

297 We performed a cluster randomized controlled trial with randomization at the le

298 Nine randomized controlled trials with 1036 informal caregive

299 Therefore, randomized controlled trials with intention-to-treat ana

300 or 53 (93%) of the vaccines was supported by randomized controlled trials, with a median cohort size