ライフサイエンスコーパス: range of motion

1 e beliefs, lumbar mobility, and hip rotation range of motion).

2 wrist and finger movements across the entire range of motion.

3 ence and the experimental camera systems for range of motion.

4 and may cause shoulder pain and reduction of range of motion.

5 = 0.3233) were correlated to decreased knee range of motion.

6 n, it is a challenging problem to assess the range of motion.

7 h early surgical outcomes, specifically knee range of motion.

8 niometric equipment, devices used to measure range of motion.

9 active vision systems with limits in sensor range of motion.

10 instability without restricting the dynamic range of motion.

11 All KOA knees had a significantly reduced range of motion.

12 rate the ability to tune the flexibility and range of motion.

13 ecular wedges," sterically blocking the full range of motion.

14 e-length relationship for a 90 degrees joint range of motion.

15 ive joints and number of joints with limited range of motion.

16 nd hand, defined over the full physiological range of motion.

17 had joints with active arthritis or limited range of motion.

18 physical therapy to achieve effective joint range of motion.

19 been shown to be capable of producing a wide range of motions.

20 volume are sufficient to achieve significant ranges of motion.

21 ess >45 minutes (2 points), hip pain/limited range of motion (1 point), absence of rheumatoid factor

22 the limb was moved passively over a limited range of motion (~20 degrees at the hip).

23 xibility (-4.7 +/- 1.6 cm), and dorsiflexion range of motion (-3.1 +/- 0.9 degrees ) and higher modif

24 l outcomes of strength (56% of patients) and range of motion (38% of patients).

25 y of therapy were 8.0 (5.0-14.0) for passive range of motion, 5.0 (3.0-8.0) for physical therapy, and

26 elicit active vasomotor responses through a range of motion (85% to 130% of in vivo length; sarcomer

27 hing interventions consistently increase the range of motion about a joint and decrease total joint s

28 nsemble of the HU dimer and characterize the range of motions accessible to its flexible beta-arms.

29 ontact, reduced knee flexion, and lower knee range of motion across surfaces.

30 mates for prevalence of reduced strength and range of motion after SLNB and ALND were 15.2% versus 30

31 g, and sleep disturbance, with improved knee range of motion after TKA.

32 nt, real-time and accurate assessment of the range of motion, an assessment system combining MediaPip

33 Our range of motion analysis implies the potential for an er

34 doing so supports the notion that increased range of motion and associations of SOD1 ALS variants co

35 Ankle range of motion and balance of the trained leg improved

36 nstrated immediate improvement in the active range of motion and compensation for continuing physical

37 e of the BMI over one month led to increased range of motion and force at the shoulders in chronic su

38 ScGVHD had significant impairments of joint range of motion and grip strength (P < .001).

39 d surrounding tissues, resulting in impaired range of motion and hand function.

40 greater proximal compensations, with greater range of motion and higher angular velocity in the knee,

41 lasticity(3) could increase strength, expand range of motion and improve hand function in people with

42 heal with excessive scar tissue that limits range of motion and increases incidence of re-rupture.

43 Functionally, this is reflected in loss of range of motion and muscle strength and the development

44 Bedside cycle ergometry can provide range of motion and muscle strength training for intensi

45 out scoliosis suspected status were found in range of motion and muscle strength.

46 respiratory impairment, maintenance of joint range of motion and non-surgical management of joint def

47 Therapy began with active range of motion and progressed to activities of daily li

48 ual-analogue pain scale, and measurements of range of motion and straight-leg raising, to assess the

49 Range of Motion and stress distribution outcomes closely

50 For a physiologically realistic joint range of motion and therefore range of muscle fibre leng

51 al correlations of 0.39 and 0.58 between the range of motion and velocity, and between velocity and s

52 al motion patterns begin to establish normal ranges of motion and constitute a necessary first step i

53 ay lead to patient discomfort, limitation in range of motion, and cosmetic disfigurement.

54 fixed-flexion deformity, restricted-flexion range of motion, and crepitus.

55 normal or abnormal in terms of alignment and range of motion, and expressed the results as the total

56 , flattening of cutaneous lesions, increased range of motion, and improved performance status.

57 ), body mass index, pain, functional status, range of motion, and laxity were measured.

58 llary seroma, paresthesia, arm morbidity and range of motion, and lymphedema.

59 ns from other impairments such as knee pain, range of motion, and quadriceps strength.

60 with Fugl-Meyer lower extremity, ankle joint range of motion, and strength.

61 eflects a much slower, micro- to millisecond range of motion, and the motional regime can be tuned by

62 hange, step length, lower extremity strength/range of motion, and transfers.

63 ations were in upper body strength and torso range of motion, and with respect to the ambient environ

64 arthritis; 5) number of joints with limited range of motion; and 6) erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

65 ver, spikes are generated over only a narrow range of motion angles, indicating that spike generation

66 In the shoulder, the advantages of range of motion are traded for the disadvantages of vuln

67 y to radiation, including active and passive range of motion (AROM and PROM), muscle strength, limb e

68 no terminal glycine had essentially the same range of motion as the backbone carbons.

69 (VAS), RAND Short Form-36 Health Survey and range of motion at 33.2 +/- 1.0 (mean +/- SD) and 40.6 +

70 Stride, cadence, and range of motion at the lower extremity joints also chang

71 This work reveals the range of motion available to the DeCLIC NTD and calcium-

72 ercise program designed to improve strength, range of motion, balance and agility, and physical funct

73 spected by the GNM to determine the type and range of motions, both at the residue level and on a glo

74 The lengthening may improve the range of motion, but not necessarily the plagiocephaly,

75 ignificantly worse limb strength, edema, and range of motion, but these deficits were often transient

76 ractions with the index finger over a 10 deg range of motion by using 6 s shortening and lengthening

77 s of lymphedema, pain, reduced strength, and range of motion compared with SLNB.

78 approaches shed light on a rich and diverse range of motions covering timescales from picoseconds to

79 locomotor challenges including limited limb range of motion, crowding, and visual sensory deprivatio

80 ic solvents and that proteins exhibit a wide range of motions depending on the specific solvent envir

81 n which dense fibrous tissue prevents normal range of motion, develops in ~3-10% of TKA patients.

82 eriving several performance-related metrics; range of motion, duration, and angular velocity, of unip

83 ions do not impair normal neck movements and range of motion during walking.

84 easurements to calibrate the two-dimensional range of motion (excursion) versus DNA length were carri

85 Mobilization goals varied from range of motion exercises (81%) to ambulation (22%).

86 eous electrical nerve stimulation and active range-of-motion exercises did not result in a statistica

87 hieved increased knee extension with passive range-of-motion exercises once his skin thickening and t

88 eous electrical nerve stimulation and active range-of-motion exercises.

89 ranslate into a significantly reduced active range of motion for the fingers.

90 cture of the primase-helicase permits a free range of motion for the primase and helicase domains tha

91 develop debilitating knee stiffness (reduced range of motion) for poorly understood reasons.

92 ter) and examined for muscle strength, joint range of motion, hyperlaxity, bone strength, and skeleta

93 kinematics in CP hamstrings (CPH), and joint range of motion in CPA and CPH.

94 cantly reduced contractures and improved the range of motion in joints affected by advanced Dupuytren

95 he binding of extracellular subdomains whose range of motion in the 2D environment is reduced upon di

96 h migration that is retained despite a broad range of motion in the arms of the junction.

97 Overall, the range of motion in the joints was significantly improved

98 alcium-saturated calmodulin indicates a wide range of motion in the subnanosecond time regime.

99 ventional maniraptoran forelimb with typical ranges of motion in comparison with Allosaurus.

100 of our approach to the prediction of a wide range of motions, including large collective opening-clo

101 artilage mineralization may impact the joint range of motion, inflict pain, and increase chances for

102 tructured core of PrP(C), a markedly diverse range of motions is observed, consistent with the inhere

103 Range of motion, laxity, radiographic severity, and func

104 sphorus levels, measured reductions in joint range of motion, low-frequency conductive hearing loss,

105 between these structures suggest that large ranges of motion may be required for substrate transport

106 of the abdomen and brain, echocardiography, range-of-motion measurements, polysomnography, clinical

107 The shoulder joint has the greatest range of motion of any joint in the body and as a result

108 The morphology and range of motion of appendages can be revealed in fossils

109 Children had a limited range of motion of larger joints (i.e., knees/hips/shoul

110 The mean maximal range of motion of shoulder flexion and elbow extension

111 paring these structures illustrates the full range of motion of the activation gate, from closed with

112 AVN-related pain and limited range of motion of the affected joint were present in on

113 examination was notable for markedly reduced range of motion of the cervical spine.

114 gnificantly, except for durometer scores and range of motion of the elbows.

115 function of the elbow joint and full active range of motion of the extrinsic muscles of the hand, bu

116 A preserved range of motion of the knee joint in all MRL animals sug

117 orsal vertebra greatly increase the vertical range of motion of the neck.

118 actors describing, respectively, the spatial ranges of motions of the adhesive domains, and their rot

119 ound (p < 0.001), and increased dorsiflexion range-of-motion (p < 0.001).

120 that objects move slowly can explain a wide range of motion phenomena.

121 il hospital discharge, consisting of passive range of motion, physical therapy, and progressive resis

122 jects reported significantly greater phantom range of motion postamputation (AB: 12.47 2.41, TB: 10.1

123 cus (STS) may provide a neural basis for the range of motion-processing deficits observed in ASD, inc

124 -reset saccade rate in flies with their head range of motion restricted together implicate propriocep

125 al arch mobility, single-leg stance balance, range of motion (ROM) (first metatarsophalangeal joint a

126 Measures included knee range of motion (ROM) (Modified Thomas and passive knee

127 med to understand whether ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) and dynamic knee valgus (DKV) kine

128 itates surgery in an attempt to regain joint range of motion (ROM) and escape prolonged pain.

129 lasty (THA) is associated with postoperative range of motion (ROM) and gait kinematics.

130 ion and leads to a painful decrease in joint range of motion (ROM) and loss of independence due to pa

131 d included surgical technique, demographics, range of motion (ROM) at 1 year, complications, need for

132 Estimates of joint range of motion (ROM) have long been used to exclude ana

133 eactive protein (CRP) level on POD3; improve range of motion (ROM) in postoperative 5 days; reduce mo

134 This study compares upper cervical spine range of motion (ROM) in the three cardinal planes befor

135 limb (UL) lymphedema and improving shoulder range of motion (ROM) in women with BCRL.

136 We compared impingement free range of motion (ROM) using a novel computer navigated f

137 height, weight, and ankle dorsiflexion (DF) range of motion (ROM) were measured with a stadiometer (

138 se Activity Score (DAS) for skin and muscle, range of motion (ROM), and calcification.

139 conducted to analyze the alterations in the range of motion (ROM), intervertebral disc pressure (IDP

140 neck disability index (NDI), cervical spine range of motion (ROM), neck muscle strength, muscle acti

141 The outcomes of interest are the range of motion (ROM), pain (visual analogue scale, VAS)

142 factors for deviations from normal in joint range of motion (ROM), we used cross-sectional data coll

143 n = 19), and good (>= 115 degrees ; n = 10) range of motion (ROM).

144 tion, which is associated with reduced ankle range of motion (ROM).

145 e tibia) to the participants' volitional end range of motion (ROM).

146 were randomized to strength training (ST) or range-of-motion (ROM) exercises.

147 nd complex structure-from-motion, for a wide range of motion speeds, all centrally displayed, was ass

148 All ipRGCs responded robustly to a wide range of motion speeds, and M1-M4 cells appeared tuned t

149 tide experience much larger changes in their range of motion than those that are loosely tethered.

150 e tool that measures overall change in joint range of motion that affects physical function in JIA.

151 a dynamically stabilized joint with a large range of motion; therefore, we examined the effects of m

152 ntinuous, real-time data on joint angles and ranges of motion through an intuitive graphical interfac

153 Knee range of motion, Timed Up and Go, Stair-Climbing Test, a

154 high resistance and contractions over a wide range of motion to mimic the range occurring in Earth's

155 Supporting this account, the orbital range of motion used in each task traded off lawfully wi

156 dial-lateral and anterior-posterior absolute range of motion varied between 0.03 to 0.88 cm and 0.14

157 g ranges and optima may underlie how a broad range of motion velocities are encoded.

158 and kinematic features investigated were the range of motion, velocity of neck movement, smoothness o

159 fear of movement was associated with a lower range of motion, velocity, smoothness of neck movement,

160 Secondary outcomes were durometry, range of motion, visual analog scale scores for disease

161 ced, sensation and reflexes were intact, and range of motion was full, though painful.

162 paresthesia, seroma, and impaired extremity range of motion were more common in the immediate group

163 Radius, frequency, and angular range of motion were systematically varied.

164 Respiratory physiotherapy and passive range of motion were the most frequently applied rehabil

165 -P translations, rotations, as well as their ranges of motion were comparable between stable and unst

166 nterior capsule fibrosis and increased elbow range-of-motion when evaluated by joint mechanics.

167 nstrate that RNR continuously samples a wide range of motions while maintaining surprising asymmetry

168 ge-bore bearings, which provide an increased range of motion with enhanced stability and very low wea

169 ning three participants exhibited consistent range of motion, with a signal to noise ratio ranging fr

170 ange of 21 bp to 5.5 kbp exhibited a similar range of motion within the cytoplasm of myoblast cells r

171 are highly motile organelles that display a range of motions within a short time frame.

172 and variational approach to handle a diverse range of motion without any prior on the shape of moving

173 he attachment, subjects extended their wrist range of motion, yet maintained their level of compensat