ライフサイエンスコーパス: rating of

1 istrict-level (smaller) hospitals had a mean rating of 0.8 for all items in 2004 vs 1.3 in 2014 (P =

2 s not particularly painful, with a mean pain rating of 1.08 of 10.

3 002); regional (larger) hospitals had a mean rating of 1.1 in 2004 vs 1.4 in 2014 (P = .01).

4 Ratings of 12 good-parent attributes, with subsequent us

5 of-care instrument scoresheets and tested on ratings of 140 children videos from YouTube.

6 reported quality of communication (QOC; mean rating of 17 items rated from 0-10, with 0 = poor and 10

7 An optimal subjective heterogeneity rating of 2 or higher was identified as a predictor of R

8 cordance by comparing patient and oncologist ratings of 2-year survival probability.

9 ted quality of end-of-life care (QEOLC; mean rating of 26 items rated from 0-10) and depressive sympt

10 egories, except time and motion, which had a rating of 3.

11 However, with a mean rating of 3.0/3 for PET/MR and 2.3/3 for PET/CT, image q

12 se preference was tested by measuring liking ratings of 3 desserts of varying sucrose content (A: 26%

13 months, that was moderate or severe (minimum rating of 4 out of 10) most, or all of the time.

14 ndents to both rounds assigned an importance rating of 5 or more in round 2.

15 ic quality varied, but 30 reviews had AMSTAR ratings of 5 or higher.

16 Three fuels had a constant octane rating of 87 with varied aromatic concentrations at 15%,

17 atus (SES) groups in German society provided ratings of 909 social concepts along three basic dimensi

18 ent factors associated with moderate or high rating of A MeaSurement Tool to Assess SRs 2 were public

19 The committee assigns the recommendations a rating of A, B, or C, depending on the quality of eviden

20 ting decreases in pain sensitivity and lower ratings of abuse-related subjective effects than marijua

21 ing symptoms along with independent clinical ratings of adaptive functioning.

22 osite score was derived from multi-informant ratings of ADHD symptomatology.

23 Parent ratings of ADHD symptoms (Development and Well-Being Ass

24 The association between self-ratings of ADHD symptoms and waiting-induced attenuation

25 Parent ratings of ADHD symptoms were obtained using the Develop

26 l as child self-reported depression and peer ratings of aggression and disruptive behavior.

27 had significantly larger increases in global ratings of akathisia (0.73 [95% CI, 0.59-0.87] vs 0.45 [

28 ygdala bilaterally and in behavioral arousal ratings of alcohol pictures, compared with the sham trai

29 amygdala correlated with craving and arousal ratings of alcohol stimuli; correlations in the nucleus

30 ic skin response, and changes in self-report ratings of alertness levels and affective states (arousa

31 va samples for hormonal analyses, subjective ratings of alertness, wellbeing, visual comfort and cogn

32 A visual rating of anatomic features (T1 weighted, T1 weighted wi

33 Ratings of anxiety were assessed 3-h post-infusion and f

34 We obtained ratings of anxiety, irritability, and ADHD, and 10 minut

35 d to mediate the effect of hypo-hydration on ratings of anxiety.

36 Serial ratings of appetite and food appeal were obtained.

37 Subjective ratings of appetite will be recorded by participants at

38 ing between December 2010 and July 2011 with rating of appropriateness by the ACCF and ACR criteria.

39 of Life Questionnaire scores and clinicians' ratings of asthma control.

40 tionnaire, and lung function and clinicians' ratings of asthma status among a population of children

41 enign and malignant lesions were a PSMA RADS rating of at least 4, an SUV(max) of at least 4.1, and S

42 op 5" practices from among those with median ratings of at least +2 for all 3 criteria.

43 measure was the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and secondary outcome measures w

44 outcome was the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA), and the inventory of non-ataxia

45 CCFS) Scale and Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), in patients with spinocerebella

46 ndpoint was the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA).

47 cebo, using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA; mean difference [MD] = +2.70, 95

48 The average Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia score (SARA, a standardized measure of

49 sustained attention (P = .01) and on parent ratings of attention problems (P = .02).

50 iameter change was not related to subjective ratings of attractiveness, but was positively correlated

51 s to identify groups of parents with similar ratings of attributes, and ascertainment of whether memb

52 (EA) and 6% (AA)) was associated with lower ratings of aversive effects (P<5 x 10(-8)) with marked s

53 ration timecourse of 'anxious' and increased ratings of 'bad drug effects,' as compared with placebo.

54 struments obtain self-ratings and collateral ratings of behavioral, emotional, social, and thought pr

55 varied widely and positively correlated with ratings of bitterness intensity of PROP (P = 0.007) and

56 ar perceptions of objectivity versus bias in ratings of blog authors favoring the candidate participa

57 Neither dose condition increased ratings of capsule 'liking' or desire to take the capsul

58 nd high predicted Medicare spending, overall ratings of care differentially improved in the ACO group

59 cancer treatment were associated with lower ratings of care quality and physician communication.

60 leted by spiritual care providers and family ratings of care.

61 Survey respondents who reported very good ratings of case manager performance across all items had

62 jects' condition were assessed with a global rating of change questionnaire.

63 n-group differences in scores for the Global Rating of Change scale (0 [CI, -2 to 1]) and pain rating

64 nts rated the T4NSS daily, a 15-point global rating of change scale (GRCS) and the Rhinoconjunctiviti

65 gic rhinitis (AR) recorded a 15-point global rating of change scale (GRCS) score and the Rhinoconjunc

66 inical recovery was assessed with the global rating of change scale and Boston Carpal Tunnel Question

67 Both groups showed improvements in Global Rating of Change scale and pain rating scores, but betwe

68 Up and Go test, and the score on the Global Rating of Change scale, all assessed at 1 year.

69 oved post-therapy, assessed both by a global rating of change score (GRCS) and by the VCDQ [median (I

70 The 2 primary outcomes were 1-year global rating of change scores for complete recovery or much im

71 Secondary outcomes included the Global Rating of Change scores, the Numeric Pain Rating Scale s

72 Gemini twin birth cohort, including parental ratings of child EOE and EUE using the Child Eating Beha

73 the autism spectrum comparison group, parent ratings of childhood behaviour indicated children with a

74 At 40 months, parent ratings of children in the phosphatidylcholine group (N=

75 Parent/guardian ratings of children on a measure of temperament were use

76 Brain activity was related to parents' ratings of children's SOR symptoms.

77 dicted the increase in smoker's pleasantness ratings of cigarette cues.

78 Participants provided baseline ratings of clear (happy, angry) and ambiguous (surprised

79 or cocaine before presentation of a cue, and ratings of cocaine "liking" (hedonic feelings toward coc

80 stress (and their interaction) on momentary ratings of cocaine and heroin craving.

81 agnitude activity correlated negatively with ratings of cocaine craving and positively with how high

82 , clinical attachment level (CAL), clinician rating of color and texture compared with surrounding ti

83 hysiotherapy groups did not differ on 1-year ratings of complete recovery or much improvement (91% vs

84 We collected explicit ratings of conceptual brightness for 45 noun concepts an

85 The overall rating of confidence in the results according to a tool

86 NTX decreased overall subjective ratings of 'crave drug,' 'stimulated,' and 'would like d

87 inistration, but it did significantly reduce ratings of craving for COC and tobacco during COC sessio

88 Participants also completed subjective ratings of craving for cocaine before presentation of a

89 yopia (AOR = 2.36; 95%CI: 1.2-4.66) and self-rating of current vision as good (AOR = 3.5; 95%CI: 1.61

90 elations between observer (OSAD) and trainee rating of debriefing were obtained (median rho = 0.566,

91 n a graded way with participants' subjective ratings of decision confidence, as expressed on a 6-poin

92 Verubecestat did not improve clinical ratings of dementia among patients with prodromal Alzhei

93 e across both studies when equally weighting ratings of Democrats and Republicans.

94 negatively correlated with food pleasantness ratings of depressed participants with increased appetit

95 tionship to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ratings of depression severity.

96 RSD-24 score </=8), as well as self-assessed ratings of depression, global functioning, and quality o

97 ion the reliability and validity of observer ratings of depression.

98 e Clinical Global Impression Scale, and self-ratings of depression.

99 Valence ratings of different eye-contact conditions revealed tha

100 Ratings of difficulty with night vision correlated with

101 w this combined signal is transformed into a rating of discomfort or pupil response.

102 gnificantly increased the psychiatrists' CGI ratings of disease severity by 0.65 [0.27; 1.02] points.

103 idirectional associations between changes in ratings of doing worthwhile things in life and 32 factor

104 uring evening resting wakefulness, predicted ratings of dream anger.

105 ndition compared with the placebo condition, ratings of drug liking following 15 mg of oxycodone were

106 Personal caregivers' ratings of dyspnea had substantial agreement with patien

107 ated end point ratios for each participant's ratings of each nonfatal end point relative to death.

108 s for a median of 9.5 years to obtain weekly ratings of eating disorder symptoms, comorbidity, treatm

109 lenial cortex (RSC) correlated strongly with ratings of "ego-dissolution" and "altered meaning," impl

110 choice questionnaire and clinical confidence ratings of eight trauma scenarios, measured against cova

111 nly determines the presence of saponin via a rating of either 'acceptable' or 'unacceptable'.

112 Locations and ratings of emboli were compared with reference standard

113 Participants' ratings of emotion transitions predicted others' experie

114 h viewing of emotional and neutral faces and ratings of emotional responses.

115 h Parkinson's disease (PD) and the affective ratings of emotional valence and arousal performed subse

116 e during terminal hospitalization and family ratings of end-of-life care for patients who died in 106

117 ed with less beneficial change in subjective ratings of everyday functioning and quality of life (QOL

118 among hospitals receiving an overall safety rating of excellent from nurses (1.5%), compared with th

119 Family member-reported quality rating of "excellent" for end-of-life care.

120 A rating of "excellent" for the psychiatry clerkship (odds

121 tle work to determine whether attractiveness ratings of faces correspond to sexual or more general at

122 onstructs that are tapped via attractiveness ratings of faces, and support the development of methodo

123 wk follow-up period, patients recorded daily ratings of facial pain intensity and duration; the produ

124 a) responses during appraisal and subjective rating of fearful faces.

125 tion-evoked change in the explicit emotional ratings of fearful faces.

126 rtical tuning of social threat cues, whereas ratings of fearfulness showed generalization, linearly d

127 Secondary outcomes were ratings of feeling "high," drug "liking," and negative d

128 ce of eating, eating frequencies, and liking ratings of food pictures significantly decreased during

129 jectory modeling was applied to longitudinal ratings of four symptom domains (positive, negative, dis

130 Naltrexone had intrinsic effects: decreasing ratings of friendliness, food intake, and systolic blood

131 However, visual rating of FTD scans was challenging, with a higher rate

132 r ratings increased (both P = 0.02), whereas ratings of fullness decreased in the evening (P = 0.04).

133 e available option for increasing the octane ratings of gasoline and would provide additional engine

134 ers further caused substantial change in the ratings of gay men and lesbians more generally.

135 A third interviewer provided independent ratings of global adaptive functioning.

136 e decreased cannabis self-administration and ratings of 'good effect' in nontreatment-seeking daily c

137 fusiform gyri for angry faces and decreased ratings of happiness for all stimuli, but no significant

138 and cannabidiol, CBD), along with real-time ratings of health symptom severity levels, prior-to and

139 to test the hypothesized mediating effect of ratings of healthiness of foods on calorie estimates.

140 4 visits, subjective "liking" and "wanting" ratings of high- and low-calorie food images were acquir

141 ced significant, time-dependent increases in ratings of 'High', 'Good Effect', ratings of the cannabi

142 Only self-ratings of hirsutism were significantly associated with

143 Problem rating of hot flushes and subdomains of quality of life

144 and visual analog scales were used to assess ratings of hunger and fullness.

145 Ratings of hunger were decreased during nightshift days

146 Importance ratings of identified HCT outcomes rated on a Likert sca

147 s of vigor and slightly decreased positivity ratings of images with positive emotional content.

148 CAARS-INV ratings of inattention, memory problems, and emotional l

149 s region was also associated with subjective ratings of increased urge to perform habits.

150 r algorithm consistently predicted the panel ratings of individual tasks, and were more objective and

151 iscriminated between man-made versus natural ratings of individual trials was related to SC, but not

152 ary sleep outcomes were self-reported online ratings of insomnia severity (Insomnia Severity Index) a

153 level correlations between these effects and ratings of intense and positive subjective effects.

154 Objective: To compare ratings of internal medicine residents using the pre-201

155 affective aspects of social interactions as ratings of interpersonal closeness between two walking s

156 In study two, self ratings of leadership (using the MPS) from 15 senior cha

157 e) to 5 (strongly disagree) scale, explained ratings of less than 5, and optionally provided comments

158 The panel methodologist assigned ratings of level of evidence to each of the selected cit

159 : The late positive potential amplitudes and ratings of liking and wanting cocaine in response to coc

160 association with categorical and continuous ratings of lithium response.

161 Finally, there were no differences between ratings of lower-dose cigarettes, but the 0.763-mg cigar

162 the number of subjects with a mean efficacy rating of <2.5, was 100%.

163 om 105 expectant mothers, 80 underwent blind-rating of maternal sensitivity at 4-6 months postpartum

164 tion Examination scores, fellowship director ratings of medical knowledge, and demographic variables.

165 which conflicts with participants' own high rating of medication adherence.

166 ge of carrying the risk allele on subjective ratings of memory and objective memory test performance

167 (pupil diameter change) was correlated with ratings of men's facial attractiveness.

168 Main Outcomes and Measures: Annual teacher ratings of mental health problems and academic performan

169 Participants provided ratings of mind wandering frequency that were used to in

170 ant difference in the VCDQ associated with a rating of 'minimally better' on the GRCS was 4 points.

171 s assessed during nontreatment follow-up and ratings of mood, anxiety, and suicidal ideation or behav

172 d every 6 months during year 2, using weekly ratings of mood.

173 data-driven approach to automatically derive ratings of motor impairments.

174 Response was measured as a rating of "much improved" or "very much improved." RESUL

175 egions of interest, and participant-reported ratings of nicotine dependence, craving, and self-effica

176 e the aversive, pleasurable, and stimulatory ratings of nicotine's effects, cardiovascular reactivity

177 A rating of "not assessable" indicated insufficient inform

178 a reaction time task and provided perceptual ratings of noxious and tactile stimuli.

179 ormed by a thin-slicing study of participant ratings of officer utterances.

180 ings are preliminary, they suggest that peer rating of operative skill may be an effective strategy f

181 l fear and depression groups and compared on ratings of pain and state anxiety across time.

182 nce (1.98%; 20 mg), and decreased subjective ratings of pain intensity (1.98, 3.56%; 20 mg).

183 more pain than they originally report, with ratings of pain related to state anxiety and dental fear

184 Furthermore, mean subjective ratings of pain were lower in the active ibudilast condi

185 h dose groups had the greatest reductions in ratings of pain, suggesting that our lowest dose of exer

186 sed correlations were associated with parent ratings of participants' social impairments.

187 Ratings of pathological severity in 16 brain regions fro

188 in adaptive coping style of patients through ratings of patients or their close family members.

189 QOD was determined using validated caregiver ratings of patients' physical and mental distress in the

190 ith assessments of self-views and likability ratings of peers.

191 t rate, and larger changes in heart rate and rating of perceived exertion during the trial compared t

192 higher level of gaps during RALS and a lower rating of perceived exertion, also for the legs, after R

193 In addition to the subjective rating of perceived exertion, effort perception was esti

194 gnificant delay that well match experimental ratings of perceived taste intensity to a range of sweet

195 between objective performance and subjective ratings of performance.

196 red) roles were less likely to provide a top rating of physician communication (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.4

197 nd P=0.006, respectively), whereas patients' ratings of physicians, interactions with physicians, and

198 of picture-word associations and subjective ratings of pleasantness and arousal in response to the p

199 zed that MDMA, but not MA, would enhance the ratings of pleasantness and psychophysiological response

200 that MDMA, but not MA, selectively enhanced ratings of pleasantness of experienced affective touch.

201 One week later, cueing led to reduced ratings of pleasantness of negative information in SAD b

202 Neither drug altered the ratings of pleasantness of observed touch.

203 Ratings of population samples provide norms for syndrome

204 n tomography scan is to assign a dichotomous rating of positive or negative for the presence of amylo

205 ns for sleep disruption, 2) patient-reported ratings of potential factors affecting sleep quality, an

206 injustice and unfairness) predict behavioral ratings of praise and blame and how they modulate the on

207 Ratings of predisposing and exciting causes were mandate

208 higher EI but felt less full and had higher ratings of prospective food consumption than did the swe

209 these seeds were compared with reductions in ratings of psychotic symptoms.

210 Surrogates' subjective ratings of quality of communication have been used in ot

211 , ICU care was associated with higher family ratings of quality of end-of-life care than ward care.

212 e octane rating by increasing (i) the octane rating of refinery-produced hydrocarbon blendstocks for

213 Cohen kappa value comparing the consensus rating of ResNet-50 iterations from fivefold cross-valid

214 /day regimen also resulted in higher arousal ratings of sad stimuli.

215 Operating room administrator ratings of safety culture were not related to rates of c

216 The pattern was similar for ratings of salience, distress, personal relevance, globa

217 m Scenic-Or-Not, a website that crowdsources ratings of "scenicness" for geotagged photographs across

218 t injuries (medium severity), while the self ratings of SCNs indicated that Supporting behaviours wer

219 iscomfort, and anxiety or depression, plus a rating of self-assessed health).

220 with respect to the chemical composition and rating of sensory attributes.

221 m participants' verbal descriptions and self-ratings of sensory/motor/cognitive/spatiotemporal and em

222 differ in contingency knowledge or explicit ratings of shock expectancy following the habit test.

223 es of BNA were significantly correlated with ratings of smoking motivations of getting a 'rush', gett

224 plans and demographic factors influenced the rating of specific factors.

225 later in the analysis window, the subjective rating of stimuli correlated with the amplitude of the N

226 ices would parametrically reflect subjective ratings of stimulus awareness.

227 Quality ratings of studies were based on a modified version of t

228 Quality ratings of studies were based on a modified version of t

229 ent of Functioning (GAF) and other consensus ratings of study psychiatrists.

230 ity of reactivation, as determined by online ratings of subjective recollection, would increase subse

231 s. unpleasant) on emotional attribution (the rating of subtle emotional faces: fearful, neutral, or h

232 Their mean self-rating of successful aging was 8.2, and older age was as

233 asons for surgeon and hospital selection and ratings of surgeon and hospital.

234 Individual overall self-rating of surgical skill varied between 2.5 to 5.

235 rated that surgeons with lower peer-reviewed ratings of surgical skill had higher complication rates

236 Peer ratings of surgical skill varied from 2.6 to 4.8 on a 5-

237 cortisol were associated with more negative ratings of surprised faces, and with more direct respons

238 This proposal was tested using ratings of swallowing effort and measuring regional brai

239 Ratings of swallowing effort were correlated with activi

240 Multirater, blinded review and ratings of taped video recordings of elliptical excision

241 rmance (accuracy) and subjective experience (ratings of target visibility and choice confidence) over

242 Mean summary ratings of technical skill ranged from 2.6 to 4.8 across

243 A major innovation in this document is the rating of tests side by side for the same indication.

244 Surgeons' rating of the appropriateness of CPM and the patient's r

245 outcomes that matter to women and provided a rating of the certainty of evidence.

246 Single-blinded rating of the exenatide group suggested clinically relev

247 ly significant difference in the clinicians' rating of the importance of the study or the need to run

248 icating greater physical disability) and the rating of the intensity of leg pain (on a scale from 0 t

249 Blinded self-assessment rating of the overall stiffness for individual patients

250 melanopsin pulses and provided a structured rating of the perceptual experience.

251 rs do not agree with participants' conscious rating of the stimuli.

252 Increasing the octane rating of the U.S. gasoline pool (currently approximatel

253 Importantly, performers' ratings of the "goodness" of their performances were pos

254 one app, Mappiness, and second, crowdsourced ratings of the "scenicness" of photographs taken across

255 onal reactivity index (IRI) scores, explicit ratings of the advisers' helpfulness and the advisers' s

256 en CS- inducing a shift in the frequency for ratings of the ambiguous CS+ as either "green" or "blue,

257 Symptoms were obtained using parent and self-ratings of the Attention Problems Scale at ages 8 to 9,

258 creases in ratings of 'High', 'Good Effect', ratings of the cannabis cigarette (eg, strength, liking)

259 ealthy subjects, did not show habituation in ratings of the emotional intensity of the images.

260 High pleasantness ratings of the environment were linked to low physiologi

261 Healthiness ratings of the food were also assessed.

262 Nurses' ratings of the hospital-specific subscale (P = 0.002) an

263 ght amygdala and hippocampus correlated with ratings of the intensity of global subjective effects of

264 Surprisingly, ratings of the larger audience are predicted with greate

265 -specific subscale (P = 0.002) and surgeons' ratings of the operating room-specific subscale (P = 0.0

266 s' DSM-IV and prototype diagnoses with their ratings of the patients' adaptive functioning and patien

267 ere was no predictive utility of surrogates' ratings of the quality of communication about prognosis

268 Surrogates' subjective ratings of the quality of communication about prognosis

269 e care, family satisfaction, or nurse/family ratings of the quality of dying.

270 Surrogates' ratings of the quality of prognostic communication do no

271 to determine whether surrogates' subjective ratings of the quality of prognostic communication predi

272 experts joined them for two rounds of formal ratings of the recommendations.

273 mance, and usability and cognitive task load ratings of the standard and redesigned gowns.

274 FC activation also tracked normative valence ratings of the stimuli when participants were asked to e

275 sponses to the absolute distance between the ratings of the stranger and the familiar choice options.

276 Diplomates' comments and ratings of the usefulness of the activity in assisting t

277 ivation tracked participants' own subjective ratings of the valence of stimuli.

278 Health visitor ratings of the video clips were compared to the GRS rati

279 and their parents completed neurobehavioural ratings of their child (Behavior Rating Inventory of Exe

280 erventions have a positive impact on trainee ratings of their faculty intraoperative teaching perform

281 In study two, staff nurses' ratings of their SCNs' behaviours (Monitoring and Recogn

282 easons for physician selection and patients' ratings of their surgeon and hospital.

283 ture and kinematics and acquired behavioural ratings of these feature descriptors to investigate thei

284 Subjective ratings of thirst were significantly higher for imaginin

285 nterhospital variability in family and nurse ratings of this care.

286 In contrast, rTMS did not alter ratings of touch pleasantness.

287 ces were found between treatments on patient ratings of treatment credibility.

288 High pleasantness ratings of unpleasant stimuli correlated with left dorsa

289 ine (ABIM) certification examination scores; rating of unprofessional behavior using the 2 systems.

290 was a significant decrease in participants' ratings of urge-to-cough after the placebo antitussive a

291 nge management based on FSC results; overall rating of usefulness of FSCs was low.

292 tle emotional faces, such that participants' ratings of valenced faces (fearful and happy), compared

293 nal communication ability measured by masked ratings of video-recorded conversations, with the use of

294 l operative time, macular peel time, surgeon rating of viewing system ease of use, minimum required e

295 At the highest dose, the drug also increased ratings of vigor and slightly decreased positivity ratin

296 med a visual discrimination task followed by ratings of visibility and response confidence.

297 Food craving was indicated with subjective ratings of visual cues of high-calorie food.

298 This effect of migraine is selective for ratings of visual discomfort, in that an enhancement of

299 onnectivity profile correlated strongly with ratings of visual hallucinations, implying that intrinsi

300 Subjective ratings of wanting and liking were not modulated by eith