ライフサイエンスコーパス: reaction time

1 /- 0.4 in AS solution in the first 60 min of reaction time.

2 mum signal increase between 20 and 60 min of reaction time.

3 m poor reactivity and selectivity and a long reaction time.

4 of target capture, perception span and hand reaction time.

5 h chemical yields (up to 97%) often in short reaction time.

6 and positively correlated with shortening in reaction time.

7 ound conditions in the brain with very short reaction time.

8 concentration of periodate and length of the reaction time.

9 mulates attention and vigilance, and reduces reaction time.

10 eaction conditions with good yields in short reaction time.

11 ISA kits at a substantially reduced cost and reaction time.

12 al synchrony during visual attention predict reaction time.

13 ine/diol, respectively, in a shorter span of reaction time.

14 8.2 (57.4%), and 10.0 (48.4%) after 24 h of reaction time.

15 ets after sensory cues and correlations with reaction time.

16 tory inhibition in each trial was related to reaction time.

17 F/MeOH, utilized hydroxide, temperature, and reaction time.

18 -evoked potentials predicted the stop signal reaction time.

19 y suffer from a lack of sensitivity and poor reaction time.

20 d using DLS, but particles formed after 24 h reaction time.

21 a short reaction time and AI-ETD with a long reaction time.

22 excellent enantioselectivity within a short reaction time.

23 entral composite designs reducing in 88% the reaction time.

24 ere related to slower switching behavior and reaction times.

25 s, regio- and stereoselectivities, and short reaction times.

26 he classification curve predicted individual reaction times.

27 nt yields under mild conditions and in short reaction times.

28 l SPEs over and above objective accuracy and reaction times.

29 verbal and visual design learning tests, and reaction times.

30 using a less coordinating solvent and short reaction times.

31 dence was associated with faster pain rating reaction times.

32 with a large excess of cyanamide over longer reaction times.

33 cid additive under mild conditions and short reaction times.

34 rated with good to excellent yields in short reaction times.

35 ccounts for subjects' perceptual reports and reaction times.

36 were borne out by behavioral performance and reaction times.

37 sedation, as evidenced by a 19% increase in reaction times.

38 ar flow crystallizer correspond to different reaction times.

39 as been linked with variations in perceptual reaction times.(1-5) Based on analytical methods to infe

40 ro)aryl chlorides, and significantly reduced reaction times (10 to 100 min).

41 an ultrasound irradiation condition in short reaction times (10-70 min).

42 e impressive accelerations (~400 ms(-2)) and reaction times (~12 ms) to escape approaching predators

43 ta-lactose powders were synthesized in short reaction time (2-16 h), with a moderate temperature (ref

44 t enantioselectivity (up to 98% ee) in short reaction times (30-75 min).

45 sing efficiency (+ 7.5%), executive function reaction time (- 4.8%) and fluid intelligence accuracy (

46 ved cognitive flexibility measured as faster reaction time [-51 ms (95% CI: -94, -7 ms)] in a complex

47 ons (100mM borate buffer at pH 8.5, labeling reaction time 60min, temperature 70 degrees C and NBD-Cl

48 working memory (+ 9.0%), fluid intelligence reaction time (- 7.7%), processing efficiency (+ 1.8%),

49 tic amounts of alkyl halides with very short reaction times (8.33-50 min) and excellent conversions.

50 These burst-rates predicted reaction time (a relationship that was absent in trial-a

51 milton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), and mean reaction time/accuracy rate (DeltaMRT) of emotional Stro

52 network exhibits post-error slowing (longer reaction times after error trials) and post-error improv

53 p between BBA and eventual behavior, such as reaction time, also dynamically changes depending on tas

54 fore, the new design allows a 30-fold longer reaction time and a 40-fold increase in pressure compare

55 show that trial-to-trial variability in the reaction time and accuracy of eye-movements during a mem

56 gnitive measures, including the N-back task (reaction time and accuracy), Reaction Time test, Flanker

57 ts generated using standard ETD with a short reaction time and AI-ETD with a long reaction time.

58 relationships between trialwise variation in reaction time and brain activity in the inferior and mid

59 ify precisely trialwise associations between reaction time and brain activity.

60 f organometallic reagent and needs a shorter reaction time and comparatively lower temperature as req

61 reward magnitude: movements exhibit shorter reaction time and increased velocity when they are direc

62 Reaction time and K values were below the lower limit of

63 pathway on the nanoplates with dependence on reaction time and plate thickness, which is governed by

64 reproducibility and the correlation between reaction time and position within the reactor, allow for

65 etal templating solution methods in terms of reaction time and product purity.

66 l modulation in cross-area activity predicts reaction time and reach duration.

67 nt when controlling for any influence of the reaction time and reach duration.

68 Reaction time and reagent concentration for these assays

69 ognitive ability was measured using tests of reaction time and reasoning.

70 ing allowing for a dramatic reduction in the reaction time and simple scale-up.

71 By tuning the reaction time and temperature, the obtained allenes rear

72 down the size of the precursors reduces the reaction time and temperature.

73 on and perception were tested using auditory reaction time and two speech-in-noise tasks.

74 extracts from grape pomace and sorghum bran, reaction time and washing with aqueous ethanol on the pa

75 lly take 6-8 h to complete, including setup, reaction time and workup.

76 ersed during associative memory recall, with reaction times and brain activity patterns now indicatin

77 Adjusting reaction times and concentrations was critical in achiev

78 Here, we used reaction times and EEG time-series decoding to test the

79 ical micro-/mesopore structures at different reaction times and enables the formation of heterometall

80 planation of behavior by optimally balancing reaction times and error rates.

81 Reaction times and errors suggest that both strategies a

82 ts faster, and had improved accuracy, faster reaction times and faster force production.

83 l monomers are employed, as they ensure fast reaction times and good final mechanical properties of t

84 Our results showed faster reaction times and larger target-congruency effects foll

85 ask, and the Emotional Test Battery in which reaction times and performance accuracy are measured dur

86 l how, during a sequence of decision trials, reaction times and performance depend on nonlinear dynam

87 ith more excitable motor pathways had faster reaction times and, paradoxically, higher concentrations

88 ing, 6 loci shared between schizophrenia and reaction time, and 14 loci shared between schizophrenia

89 rate molar ratio of tripalmitin to PG, 120 h reaction time, and 25% enzyme load relative to the total

90 The subjective task difficulty, reaction time, and completion time were well predicted b

91 ild and base-free reaction conditions, short reaction time, and high to excellent yields.

92 te scope, is operationally simple with short reaction time, and provides 11H-pyrido[2,1-b]quinazolin-

93 e ACET flow enhanced method is faster in its reaction time, and the detection limit can be reduced to

94 lexes have RFs in the compact state at 24 ms reaction time, and within 60 ms virtually all ribosome-b

95 four azides) with different volumes, ratios, reaction times, and temperatures, whereby the reagents a

96 Reactions were completed within shorter reaction times, and turnover numbers of up to 100 could

97 ns; the 2D COF layers isolated at very short reaction times are easily exfoliated, as observed in thi

98 lts advance the understanding of how and why reaction times are sensitive to the magnitude of rewards

99 The reaction times are significantly shorter (ca. 15 min) th

100 ntion, such as increased accuracy and faster reaction times, are generated by an increase in neural a

101 on-making neurons as well as the increase in reaction time as a function of the number of alternative

102 With an increase in reaction time at 145 degrees C, a change in product dist

103 toichiometric precursor quantities and short reaction times at room temperature in a wide range of so

104 This protocol proceeds with short reaction times, at mild temperatures, in an open flask,

105 ction of actions (pro- and antisaccades) and reaction times based on previously published models.

106 tions, patients showed a general increase in reaction time, but not a reduction in accuracy.

107 Both unexpectedness and noise slowed down reaction times, but propranolol augmented the interactio

108 At site 1, the difference in stop signal reaction time change between two rounding types was -39.

109 response inhibition, with longer stop-signal reaction times compared with controls.

110 than 2,000 were more likely to have shorter reaction times compared with those with D-dimer levels l

111 luorination strategy is highlighted by short reaction times, compatibility with multiple nucleofuges,

112 at is able to objectively measure alertness, reaction time, concentration, and eye-hand coordination,

113 riable time normalization analysis (VTNA) of reaction time courses and deuterium kinetic isotope effe

114 Reaction time-courses were followed spectrophotometrical

115 eling (drift-diffusion model) to trial-level reaction time data from a two-choice "dot-probe task"-th

116 The reaction time data showed that participants from both cu

117 model) that uses both response accuracy and reaction time data to estimate mechanistic physiological

118 his prediction runs counter to evidence that reaction times decrease with higher utility magnitude.

119 nic low back pain was associated with longer reaction times, delayed peak velocity and greater moveme

120 viduals with cLBP was associated with longer reaction times, delayed peak velocity and greater moveme

121 ing, the DDM makes the stark prediction that reaction times depend only on the relative utility diffe

122 a range of vibrotactile measures, including reaction time, detection threshold, amplitude and freque

123 for audiovisual inanimate objects predicted reaction time differences between multisensory and unise

124 wide substrate scope and exceptionally short reaction times (down to 1 min).

125 times lower than 96-well plate) and reduced reaction time due to increased surface volume ratio (2.5

126 We investigated whether eye fixations and reaction time during pain rating might serve as implicit

127 Control subjects had similarly shorter reaction times during a startle cue in all motor tasks.

128 as a transition-metal-free catalyst, a short reaction time, easy separation, an excellent yield, prac

129 The reaction time effect was not accompanied by modulations

130 , and the StartReact response (shortening in reaction time evoked by a startling stimulus) in the qua

131 ns, the StartReact response (a shortening in reaction time evoked by a startling stimulus), and the e

132 th decayed as a logistic function of elapsed reaction time, exhibiting direct dependence on the free

133 decision making are influenced by alertness, reaction time, eye-hand coordination, and concentration.

134 (3) The recurrent model's reaction time for an image predicts the human reaction t

135 eaction time for an image predicts the human reaction time for the same image better than several par

136 peak in the AST distribution of the saccadic reaction times for the inhibitory errors in comparison t

137 verall yield (from 34% to 64%), reduction of reaction time (from 60 to 5.5 h), limitation of the use

138 me, MTL and selective HC lesions impacted on reaction time generation but not on the subjective task

139 Reaction time had no significant effect on starch proper

140 olymerization strategies are limited by long reaction times, high light intensities, and/or large cat

141 Increasing the reaction time, however, resulted in the improvement of c

142 er degree, 6 mo later; while MoCA scores and reaction times improved for patients.

143 ge-detection paradigm, human performance and reaction times improved with longer pre-change exposure,

144 We recorded both response accuracy and reaction time in a two-choice temporal resolution/discri

145 ions result in deficits in both accuracy and reaction time in tasks involving the recognition of othe

146 PD patients had a longer reaction time in the Go condition and had a higher error

147 se-tracking metrics outperform participants' reaction times in predicting risk preferences; and 4) ma

148 ons, and (iii) quantitatively predicts human reaction times in probabilistic sequential motor tasks.

149 To improve reaction time, increase sensitivity and portability, a m

150 Hit rates were reduced, and reaction times increased for orientation changes in the

151 ive to standard batch conditions, with short reaction times, increased safety profile, and potential

152 intracortical microstimulation, we find that reaction time increases significantly when stimulation i

153 gyrus correlated inversely with stop-signal reaction time, indicating greater impulsivity in proport

154 rotein proportion and the protein proportion/reaction time interaction.

155 performed at room temperature, and the total reaction time is only 1.5 h.

156 s, e.g., a left key to report stimuli, their reaction time is shorter when stimuli appear to the left

157 reduced reaction temperatures; (iii) shorter reaction times; (iv) equimolar substrate stoichiometry;

158 erance to loud sounds and reduced behavioral reaction time latencies to high-intensity sounds.

159 gent not environmentally friendly, undefined reaction time, long sample pretreatment, and low precisi

160 tages over other treatments, including short reaction times, low cost, no requirement for specialized

161 t produce a visible readout suffer from long reaction times, low sensitivity, and narrow dynamic rang

162 These reactions occur under short reaction times (<2 h), provide high yields (77-99%), and

163 his novel plasmonic-TDD method include short reaction times (<30 s/200 mum), compatibility with MALDI

164 acy (RE<5%), reduced reagent consumption and reaction times (<6min), and excellent sample versatility

165 ay lack acceptable reproducibility, and long reaction times may preclude its adoption as a rapid scre

166 Benefiting from short reaction times, mild conditions, and broad scope of the

167 a minimal sample volume (20 muL) and with a reaction time of 1.5 h.

168 gent (0.2M NAC and 0.2M NaHCO3 in water) and reaction time of 1h at 50 degrees C.

169 ase PS-DI, a stirring rate of 200 rpm, and a reaction time of 4 h, at 45.8 degrees C, producing a con

170 evious reports, but also with a reduction in reaction time of 93%.

171 is of sulfoximines and sulfonimidamides in a reaction time of just 15 min.

172 We found that reaction time of the secondary saccade was affected in a

173 by six different techniques: Proton Transfer Reaction-Time of Flight-Mass Spectrometry (PTR-ToF-MS),

174 es were investigated using a proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-ToF-MS) a

175 re tentatively identified by Proton Transfer Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometric (PTR-(ToF)MS)

176 th multiple VOCs measured by proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-ToF-MS) a

177 setup coupled to PTR-ToF-MS (Proton Transfer Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry) for the autom

178 Using PTR-ToF-MS (Proton Transfer Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry), five paramet

179 und (VOC) concentrations via proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

180 ared-spectrometry (NIRS), by proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass-spectrometry for their vola

181 itionally requires harsh conditions and long reaction times, often causing non-selective sulphation a

182 within the motor network predicted decreased reaction time on behavioral tasks in pediatric brain tum

183 proved distractor accuracy and slowed target reaction time on our task.

184 erval intracortical inhibition and decreased reaction time on visuomotor task but not when controlled

185 under mild reaction conditions and in short reaction times, on a range of structurally diverse subst

186 neural circuit also correlate to behavioral reaction times only for stimuli from the category that c

187 are advantageous because they allow shorter reaction times, optimization and scale up, safer working

188 ions because it did not allow for sufficient reaction time or mixing with older urine in the urinal t

189 in beta were not related to measurements of reaction time or reach duration.

190 Current methods require lengthy reaction times or difficult synthetic strategies.

191 results could not be explained by changes in reaction times or response criteria, as determined throu

192 uscle strength, gait speed, dynamic balance, reaction time, or blood lipids, and there was no effect

193 can be controlled by adjusting temperature, reaction time, or introducing a capping agent.

194 h celiac disease had significant deficits in reaction time (P = .004), and significantly higher propo

195 hibitory control (i.e. increased Stop-signal reaction time; p = 0.031 and p = 0.053 respectively).

196 The effect of system parameters including reaction time, pH, dose, temperature as well as initial

197 the desulfuration reaction as a function of reaction time, pH, organic solvent, and chaotropic reage

198 educes the required reaction temperature and reaction time, prevents harmful H(2)S production, increa

199 primary outcome measure was change in choice reaction time produced by methylphenidate and its relati

200 ccession in better overall yield and shorter reaction times relative to their batch counterparts.

201 Adults' reaction times reliably reflected the agent's beliefs on

202 ty, that determined whether adult observers' reaction times reliably reflected the agent's beliefs.

203 Despite fast reaction times, responses are often highly regulated, re

204 Daily home-based choice reaction time results supported this: the low dopamine t

205 Modelling of performance values and reaction times revealed that video game players have a l

206 Reaction time (RT) and stop signal reaction time (SSRT)

207 xcitability, local cortical GABA levels, and reaction time (RT) in a group of 20 healthy human adults

208 The training was accompanied by reduced reaction time (RT) in subsequent cued movements, and the

209 et discrimination difficulty, fixations, and reaction time (RT) measures.

210 f 2 male rhesus macaques performing a visual reaction time (RT) reach discrimination task.

211 al origins of interindividual variability in reaction time (RT) remain unclear.

212 Using a cognitive model of reaction time (RT), we estimated the non-decision time,

213 cortex have also been associated with longer reaction times (RTs) in healthy participants.

214 towards specific actions, as shown by slowed reaction times (RTs).

215 me detection conditions (pH, temperature and reaction time), selection of appropriate substrate for t

216 The stop signal reaction time showed a main effect of cPAS condition whe

217 initiation by relating variations in saccade reaction time (SRT) to variations in such parameters as

218 ctivity to concomitant increases in saccadic reaction time (SRT).

219 Reaction time (RT) and stop signal reaction time (SSRT) measure the speed to initiate and s

220 ive to HCs, showed longer inhibitory control reaction time (standardized mean difference = 0.20, p =

221 that these measures were related to saccadic reaction times, suggesting that the population-level org

222 ntent and decreasing selective sorption with reaction time, support "zonal" assembly models.

223 were evaluated using the five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT) and delay discounting proce

224 In the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT), we found that chemogenetic

225 ated training system for the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT), a classic rodent task often

226 d twitch response or impulsivity in a serial reaction time task (SRTT), whereas ketamine increased re

227 w impulsive (LI) rats in the 1-choice serial reaction time task and employed a rat model of binge-lik

228 ses of effector selection during a multilimb reaction time task in a lifespan sample of healthy human

229 oung adults performed the Alternating Serial Reaction Time task in which they incidentally acquired s

230 urons during 1-choice versus 5-choice serial reaction time task performance.

231 In the stop-signal reaction time task test of impulsivity, PWSICdel mice sh

232 ideo game experience were tested on a visual reaction time task that has reliably shown superior perf

233 We used a 5-choice serial reaction time task to measure both impulsive action and

234 translation validity (the four-choice serial reaction time task, 4CSRTT) to assess 'waiting' impulsiv

235 emature responding on the five-choice serial reaction time task, combined with genome wide sequencing

236 In mice performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task, NAc FSIs showed sustained activity o

237 In a two-choice reaction time task, spatially assigned responses to non-

238 During the 5-choice serial reaction time task, we monitored FSI activity with fiber

239 ile assessing swallowing performance using a reaction time task.

240 icipants' behavioral performance in a simple reaction time task.

241 1 during the learning of an explicit, serial reaction time task.

242 oding and action initiation, during a simple reaction time task.

243 ry cell types in behaving zebrafish during a reaction-time task that reports alertness.

244 neurons during the warning period of various reaction time tasks.

245 the PS MPNPs is tailored by controlling the reaction time, temperature, and amount of surfactant and

246 The amount of MeIQ formed increased with reaction time, temperature, and oxygen content in the re

247 he N-back task (reaction time and accuracy), Reaction Time test, Flanker task (distraction avoidance)

248 exhibited more stochastic choices and longer reaction times than controls, possibly due to their fail

249 In addition, PG exhibited faster reaction times than CP following unrewarded decisions.

250 ADHD exhibited poorer accuracy and larger reaction times than non-ADHD on all conditions but espec

251 ating and benefits from considerably shorter reaction times than previous solution-based C-H methylat

252 For a standard deviation faster reaction time, the age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio (9

253 In addition to drastically shortening the reaction times, the use of microwaves resulted, in gener

254 hermodynamic control given sufficiently long reaction times, this is significantly longer than the ti

255 attention cue during visual-motor task; and reaction time to a response cue during the same task bet

256 It is well known that human reaction time to a visual cue is impaired following slee

257 ystem, which requires upward of 5x the total reaction time to obtain reaction progress data, this des

258 d for the first time that newborns' saccadic reaction times to a tactile stimulus simultaneous to sou

259 MPH also improved reaction times to make correct responses, indicating mor

260 struction can provide an insight on climatic reaction times to perturbations to the Atlantic Meridion

261 Reaction times to randomly timed auditory stimuli were c

262 e, we ask if and how it could be optimal for reaction times to show this observed pattern.

263 atterns, readily available substrates, short reaction time, transition metal-free, and gram-scale syn

264 hese observations contrast with the multiday reaction times typically employed under these conditions

265 microwave activation can drastically reduce reaction times; ultrasonic activation promotes chemical

266 roducts (up to 97% isolated yield), in short reaction times under mild experimental conditions using

267 RPA-Probe) was optimized for temperature and reaction time using purified cDNA and viral RNA as templ

268 by testing whether utility magnitude affects reaction times using a novel methodology that does not r

269 hat individual developmental trajectories of reaction time variability are related to individual traj

270 Reaction time variability was available in a subset of p

271 elf-reports of ADHD symptoms on the SDQ, and reaction time variability were each negatively associate

272 orrelated with the subjects' performance and reaction time variability, two vastly studied indicators

273 of ADHD symptomatology, brain structure, and reaction time variability-an index of lapses in attentio

274 d cuneus is a strong predictor of the slower reaction times via disruption of neural synchrony in vis

275 e issue of whether visually-mediated, simple reaction time (VRT) is faster in elite athletes is conte

276 , and at site 2, the performance stop signal reaction time was -15.6 ms (95% CI, -29.1 to -2.1 ms; p

277 The stop-signal reaction time was calculated using an ex-Gaussian Bayesi

278 sults demonstrated that shorter and stricter reaction time was critical to approach the initial rate

279 Reaction time was faster and slower by 6-9% with heating

280 id catalyst concentration, DDQ quantity, and reaction time was performed with monitoring by HPLC.

281 This improvement in reaction time was predicted after a single experiment us

282 e source, excellent reaction yields, a short reaction time, water as an environmentally benign solven

283 udies were mainly based on the evaluation of reaction times, we measured visual sensitivity before sa

284 p differences in intrasubject variability in reaction time were examined, and a sophisticated fMRI an

285 ates that require high temperatures and long reaction times were conducted.

286 As expected, reaction times were faster after a congruent-face previe

287 KSS and PVT mean reaction times were higher at the end of the first and s

288 [4] versus 29.5 [3], P = 0.005), and patient reaction times were increased.

289 variability in search performance, such that reaction times were longer when distractors had a higher

290 Reaction times were modulated by probabilistic expectati

291 We found that fast reaction times were preceded by enhanced STN spike-to-co

292 Reaction times were prolonged in SCI participants compar

293 Reaction times were shorter on trials with lower tonic,

294 Reaction times were shown to be the most reproducible (I

295 nses also showed greater variance and longer reaction times when responding to the bimodal conditions

296 igm, which typically refers to a decrease of reaction times when subjects perform an action (e.g., a

297 Initial attempts required long reaction times, which led to degradation and side produc

298 ading relative to protein concentration, and reaction time with late quenching were investigated.

299 Patients show delayed reaction time, WM compromise, and reduced phase synchron

300 llent chemo- and regioselectivity, (x) short reaction time, (xi) gram-scale synthesis, (xii) extensio