ライフサイエンスコーパス: recall

1 ing in a lower positive predictive value for recall.

2 vours cellular cooperation during storage or recall.

3 by several folds, in terms of precision and recall.

4 reasoning, cognitive flexibility and memory recall.

5 1 reverses the rescue effect of EE on memory recall.

6 r1 KO mice performing contextual fear memory recall.

7 ngrams function as indices to mediate memory recall.

8 precision while only slightly reduces their recall.

9 (P = 0.0036) and delayed (P = 0.0115) verbal recall.

10 ients (from 20) were available at the 9-year recall.

11 itions, hippocampal effects were specific to recall.

12 or spatial coding in navigation and episodic recall.

13 dietary composition was determined from diet recall.

14 odulating these responses and boosting T(H)1 recall.

15 ds the capacity to support detailed episodic recall.

16 ls over the lifespan of memory formation and recall.

17 performances to email-administered 24-h diet recalls.

18 for completing email-administered 24-h diet recalls.

19 m meal and three nonconsecutive 24-h dietary recalls.

20 etary intake was assessed using 24-h dietary recalls.

21 er curve (AUC) 0.814, precision score 0.833, recall 0.714) was constructed using a top-ranked set of

22 s concerning SCCs (AUC 1, precision score 1, recall 0.714).

23 human coders with a mean precision 0.918 and recall 0.946.

24 9 to 0.92), high precision (0.86-0.92), high recall (0.93-0.98), and high F1 scores (0.89-0.95) in di

25 0.97 [1 study]), memory tests (list delayed recall, 0.89 and 0.94 [5 studies]), and language tests (

26 This article recalls 1) how I got to be a biochemist; 2) my contribut

27 At the 1-year post-surgical recall, 1.23 +/- 1.48 mm CAL gain was observed (P < 0.05

28 east 95% for all algorithms at low levels of recall (10%).

29 At the 1-year post-surgical recall, 3.55 +/- 1.85 mm of CAL gain and 3.87 +/- 1.87 m

30 yc_Corpus, we obtained 84% precision and 41% recall (55% F1 score).

31 1], 93.6%) and Emory HIDE (precision, 96.6%; recall, 88.2%; F1, 92.2%)-but none exceeded 50% F1 on th

32 learning methods-NeuroNER (precision, 94.5%; recall, 92.6%; microaveraged F1 score [F1], 93.6%) and E

33 The ability to recall a detailed event from a simple reminder is suppor

34 y distortion in which observers consistently recall a scene with visual information beyond its bounda

35 The innate immune system recalls a challenge to adapt to a secondary challenge, a

36 In recall, a partial synchronization among the same subset

37 AlphaMPKalpha1 in B cells led to a weakened recall Ab response associated with a decline in the popu

38 nergy intake estimated from the 24-h dietary recalls (all P > 0.683).

39 gh a 90- to 120-min procedure that starts by recalling an example public dataset and its sample infor

40 This form recalls an accepted model of thermal damage to cells in

41 thods by more than 12.5% in accuracy, 18% in recall and 0.253 in Matthew's correlation coefficient, w

42 Activity associated with the recall and description of specific details was transient

43 vaccination status, which is subject to poor recall and low response rates.

44 Purpose To determine trends in recall and outcome of screen-detected microcalcification

45 al sparseness is required for dynamic memory recall and precise behavioral control.

46 recision, and F1 score (the harmonic mean of recall and precision) for each category of PHI.

47 Humans can vividly recall and re-experience events from their past, and the

48 Adjusted relative risk of recall and screen-detected breast cancer increased with

49 Neural activations during extinction recall and self-report data did however not predict ther

50 The recall and the F (1) score increase to 0.35 and 0.50, re

51 rom S1, wherein S2 persistently encodes cued recall and the stimulus category under passive condition

52 rone to avoid plasmacytic differentiation on recall and undergo systemic dissemination.

53 nt tracked the amount of detail subsequently recalled and were dissociable based on distinct remember

54 detection rate, positive predictive value of recalls and biopsies, and histopathologic tumor characte

55 Two 24-h dietary recalls and periodontal examination data from the cross-

56 he recollection of a previous stimulus (cued recall), and the stimulus category are distributed acros

57 n the CDR corpus yields 0.90 precision, 0.24 recall, and 0.38 F (1) score.

58 nnotated dataset yields 0.55 precision, 0.34 recall, and 0.42 F (1) score.

59 Rep performance, yields 0.69 precision, 0.42 recall, and 0.52 F (1) score.

60 ces, with 99.5 +/- 0.6% precision, 95 +/- 3% recall, and 97 +/- 2% F(1) score (n = 15 experiments fro

61 nd effector differentiation following memory recall, and can protect mice against a subsequent bacter

62 were the classification accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score of TMS in differentiating each neur

63 ssessing orientation, immediate- and delayed-recall, and numeracy (N = 4560), and the Oxford Cognitiv

64 sticity across cue-food learning, cue memory recall, and subsequent food motivation are unknown.

65 opkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised [delayed recall]) and processing speed (Trail Making Test and Dig

66 ied Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure [immediate recall], and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised [delay

67 On recall antigen recognition, M1-specific T cells rapidly

68 timulate human B cell responses to unrelated recall antigens in vitro.

69 on B cell responses to heterologous pathogen recall antigens.

70 We observed that after recall, appearance of the IgG-SCs within the spleen of i

71 lures, item recognition (IR) and associative recall (AR) in human participants of both sexes.

72 reening and the yield of these lesions after recall are unknown.

73 .64; p = 0.02) was significantly more in the recall-assisted reflection group when compared with the

74 s resulted in lower mean skill scores in the recall-assisted reflection group when compared with the

75 ndomized 1:1 to video-assisted reflection or recall-assisted reflection group.

76 hing involves reflection on recalled events (recall-assisted reflection).

77 onsidered suspicious but that did not prompt recall at radiologist double reading.

78 rately predict clinical trial successes (75% recall at rank 200) and distinguish likely failures (74%

79 nk 200) and distinguish likely failures (74% recall at rank 200).

80 The LB derived networks increased recall at the cost of precision, compared to the EP deri

81 9 years; interquartile range, 14 years) were recalled at mammography screening, 3556 of whom had susp

82 Mothers completed two 24-h dietary recalls at 1 and 6 postnatal months, and reported breast

83 as well as a cross-sex shift in gay men who recalled being gender nonconforming as children in the r

84 ) and the logical memory test with immediate recall (beta = -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]).

85 aphic scope, small sample size, and possible recall bias, which are typically associated with studies

86 orientation-dispersion was linked to better recall but only in non-e4s.

87 Immunological memory was rapidly recalled by booster vaccination, suggesting Ad26 booster

88 NA with exceptional cross-reactivity can be recalled by vaccination and highlights the importance of

89 emoving artefacts, and is a prerequisite for recall-by-genotype efforts.

90 e curation and prioritization of variants in recall-by-genotype studies.

91 h a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Delayed Recall (CERAD-DR) and Word Learning tests, and the Anima

92 with the exception of significantly worsened recall consistency of autobiographical information and s

93 Moreover, this "U-shape" recalls core-periphery structure, seen in a wide range o

94 es during extinction learning and extinction recall could specifically predict exposure therapy respo

95 UC higher than 94%, the area under precision-recall curve (AP) higher than 90%, and the accuracy high

96 rve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) by 17% and 44% at the gene-level, r

97 tic curve (AUC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) calculated on a held-out test set a

98 CRCNet achieves an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.882 (95% CI: 0.828-0.931), 0.8

99 c curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC).

100 characteristic curve (AUC) and the precision-recall curve (average precision [AP; average positive pr

101 been trained and tested (with >80% precision-recall curve metric), we explored the derived weights of

102 urve of 0.94 and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.63.

103 0.82, 0.96) and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.93, 0.9

104 operating characteristic curve and precision recall curve ranging from 0.926 to 0.996 and from 0.631

105 lanced accuracy and area under the precision-recall curve.

106 I prediction system as measured by precision-recall curves [measured by average precision (MAP): 0.28

107 n terms of both area under ROC and precision-recall curves in standard benchmark tests.

108 eiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves than PPI networks for both zebrafish and m

109 e and foot shock throughout the training and recall cycles.

110 We used 24-h dietary recall data, collected on a subset of participants, to e

111 ssessments of cognitive functions (immediate recall, delayed recall, verbal fluency) and depressive s

112 Several defibrillator leads have been recalled due to early lead failure leading to significan

113 on (in terms of relatively low precision and recall) due to the high sequencing error rates, especial

114 3% for the choice group, despite active call-recall efforts.

115 lation-based teaching involves reflection on recalled events (recall-assisted reflection).

116 However, 2% of patients do not recall ever receiving RSIs after 2011.

117 als 1-5 [F = 29.81; p < 0.001], CVLT delayed recall [F = 15.27; p < 0.001], and TMT-B [F = 6.64, p =

118 es in screening outcomes, including rates of recall, false-positive (FP) findings, biopsy, cancer det

119 participants with up to 5 web-based 24-hour-recall food frequency questionnaires (2009-2012), we eva

120 icipants (male and female) performed delayed recall for 2 oriented gratings that could appear in any

121 full-field digital mammography as it reduces recall for assessment and demonstrates persistently high

122 Model accuracy, precision and recall for endoleak diagnosis were 95%, 90% and 100% rel

123 ecrease in the positive predictive value for recall for suspicious microcalcifications from 51% to 33

124 proposed model can achieve 90% precision and recall for the spatial spread of the flooded roads at th

125 ences were observed for DM (relative risk of recall for VDG 2: 1.3; P = .06; VDG 3: 1.1; P = .41; VDG

126 nts were managed at clinician discretion and recalled for a 5-year visit.

127 was detected by the readers, the subject was recalled for retesting to confirm the abnormality and fo

128 y independent readers may reduce unnecessary recalls for further work-up.

129 probably benign findings first identified at recall from screening mammography in the National Mammog

130 hods This retrospective study included women recalled from screening mammography with BI-RADS categor

131 ectional investigation using 24-hour dietary recalls from youth aged 2 to 19 years from 9 National He

132 odel in which AMPKalpha1 in B cells supports recall function of the memory B cell compartment by prom

133 dered within-group variation attributable to recalled gender nonconformity (a developmental trait rel

134 Patients were then recalled (>=1 y after T1) for clinical and radiographic

135 The CNN approach gave a precision-recall harmonic mean of 94.5% +/- 6%, outperforming othe

136 were treated with doxycycline for 7 days and recalled if MG-positive.

137 late strongly with the spatial layout of the recalled image content and function as memory cues facil

138 ion of long-lived memory cells for effective recall immunity.

139 We obtained a fivefold recall improvement in the analysis results, demonstratin

140 intaining competitive variable precision and recall in identifying biomarkers' main effects and inter

141 ram reactivation efficacy and rescued memory recall in the Fmr1 KO mice.

142 across the lifespan of memory formation and recall in the hippocampal engram ensemble.

143 ing intake estimates from modified 24-h diet recalls in a subset of overlapping participants (n = 146

144 pleted an fMRI paradigm involving extinction recall, in which they rated their levels of fear evoked

145 sequences of neural activity and that memory recall involves reinstating this temporal order of activ

146 Closer to recall, it decreases in the HC and increases in the para

147 an medial temporal lobe (MTL) while subjects recall items experienced in a virtual environment, we es

148 ng-lived memory B cell responses that can be recalled later in life.

149 For recall levels >50%, the stacked ensemble performed best

150 f perceptual tasks, including the ability to recall locations using an egocentric (self-based) frame.

151 ex.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans can vividly recall memories of autobiographical episodes, a process

152 emory retrieval, irrespective of how old the recalled memories are.

153 MRI participants (N = 40) overtly (verbally) recalled memories for ~2 min periods.

154 , without retraining, the system dynamically recalls memories to detect relevant cues in complex sens

155 time and duration of responses to 24-h diet recalls (n = 123,035).

156 g Test, including measures of immediate free recall/new learning (List A Trials 1-3; List B) and dela

157 ntributes to early decline of immediate free recall/new learning at the preclinical stage, which is m

158 y remember dreams, while at other times they recall no experience?

159 work achieves overall precision of 0.936 and recall of 0.943 on 18 validation subjects, and its perfo

160 ing precision of at least 69% up to 100% and recall of 100%.

161 world setting, with a precision of 72% and a recall of 75%.

162 data, we show a high precision of 97% and a recall of 87% for detecting taxonomically misclassified

163 fficient, with an average accuracy of 93.7%, recall of 96.63% and Matthew's correlation coefficient o

164 nerated by fimbria-fornix stimulation during recall of a learned avoidance response naturally resista

165 n range from vague recognition to full-blown recall of associated details.

166 stencoding rest periods, correlates with the recall of detailed memories of preceding stimuli several

167 the signals responsible for acquisition and recall of direction learning in smooth pursuit eye movem

168 ty preceding awakenings with recalled vs. no recall of dreams using the EEG microstate approach.

169 extended network contribute to encoding and recall of episodic experiences.

170 e human MTL and how this reactivation guides recall of episodic information.

171 vidence that FAAH inhibition can improve the recall of fear extinction memories and attenuate the anx

172 This was associated with potentiated recall of fear extinction memory when tested 24 hours af

173 We found that neither acquisition nor recall of fear memories to tone and context were altered

174 dentify a PVT->NAc->LH circuit essential for recall of opioid experiences.

175 oss-react with circulating HCoVs, suggesting recall of preexisting memory B cells elicited by prior H

176 A recall of ready-to-eat processed meat products from this

177 induction of this patterned activity during recall of reconsolidation-resistant aversive memories re

178 fewer adult-born neurons were active during recall of the CS stimulus following PPS.

179 7 food groups shortlisted from 3-day dietary recalls of 435 MHD patients.

180 Recalls of spice containing products due to undeclared p

181 The recalls of suspicious microcalcifications from all radio

182 nnections and abolished acquisition, but not recall, of STFP memory without significantly affecting b

183 ojections and abolished acquisition, but not recall, of STFP memory.

184 system is customizable, can be optimized for recall or precision, and can generate variants for multi

185 It is thus conceivable that seeds recalled or renovated ancient programs of stress-induced

186 st that the generation of artificial hPAC at recall overcomes the boundary conditions of this process

187 ent when intakes were estimated by 24-h diet recalls (P < 0.05).

188 karyotes, represents a flexible mechanism to recall past infections while also adapting to a changing

189 of source information.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Recalling past events with detail and accuracy depends o

190 Recall performance did not differ by genotype.

191 ey data for international migrants, the long recall period for occupational and mental health risk me

192 ned effects associated with autobiographical recall periods (which are insensitive to the moment-to-m

193 A 4-item AECT with recall periods of 4 weeks and 3 months was developed bas

194 nited States and South Korea, which used 2-y recall periods.

195 elin contributes to memory consolidation and recall, possibly by increasing functional coupling betwe

196 ymphoid tissues, robust IL-2 production, and recall potential, greater than expected homeostatic fitn

197 women screened, positive predictive value of recall (PPV1) percentage, positive predictive value of b

198 tools were compared using metrics including recall, precision, and F1 score (the harmonic mean of re

199 prior studies have relied on covert (silent) recall procedures, current understanding may be hampered

200 military equipment: the Obama Administration recalled property under Executive Order 13688, which res

201 Recall rate (RR) percentage, cancer detection rate (CDR)

202 exceeds average endoscopists performance on recall rate across two test sets (91.3% versus 83.8%; tw

203 performed by using a chi(2) test to compare recall rate and cancer detection rates between FFDM and

204 the reliability of these tools and improves recall rate as sequencing depth is reduced.

205 ontrol group, there was no difference in the recall rate at repeat screening with both DBT+SM (3.71%

206 SM/DBT was associated with a slightly higher recall rate compared with DM/DBT (adjusted odds ratio [O

207 The recall rate for microcalcifications increased from 0.1%

208 Conclusion The recall rate for suspicious microcalcifications at mammog

209 odel1 achieves the whole accuracy of 0.8906, recall rate of 0.913, and precision rate of 0.8077 for T

210 s 83.8%; p = 0.02), while obtains comparable recall rate on one test set and precision on the other t

211 The recall rate was lower for women screened with DBT+SM ver

212 The unadjusted recall rate was lower with SM/DBT than with DM/DBT (7.0%

213 viation]; range, 49-75 years) were recalled (recall rate, 3.0% [14 142 of 466 647]): 14 057 after rad

214 Cancer detection rate (CDR), recall rate, and positive predictive value (PPV) were ca

215 The real-life CDR, recall rate, and PPV of outliers were compared against o

216 Recall rate, biopsy rate, false-negative rate, cancer de

217 s (DBT) improves breast cancer detection and recall rates compared with those obtained with digital m

218 BSIS real-life CDRs, recall rates, and PPVs showed positive correlations with

219 period after introduction of FFDM, including recall rates, cancer detection, and interval cancers.

220 nsitivity, specificity, cancer detection and recall rates, positive predictive values, tumor size, hi

221 tandard deviation]; range, 49-75 years) were recalled (recall rate, 3.0% [14 142 of 466 647]): 14 057

222 of the 15 participants interviewed could not recall receiving the video.Conclusions: A codesigned edu

223 aborted IgE production after activation of a recall response and skewed the cytokine response away fr

224 minate the earliest stages of the CD8(+)T(M) recall response because of expeditious synthesis/secreti

225 provided long-lasting suppression of the IgE recall response beyond antibody treatment and fully prot

226 ls had an impaired ability to mount a robust recall response but remained functional.

227 This recall response contributes to 'original antigenic sin'-

228 stigate the critical requirements for an IgE recall response in peanut allergy.

229 ious experimental readouts to assess the IgE recall response in the presence and absence of IL-4Ralph

230 aled tissue-defined and temporally regulated recall response programs.

231 tion, and their effective recruitment into a recall response relies, in part, on cues imparted by che

232 Nevertheless, recall responses and partial virus control in chronic in

233 ng heterologous boosters, demonstrating that recall responses are confined by preexisting clonal dive

234 their tissue confinement and contribution to recall responses is unclear.

235 o repair the DNA damage, facilitating robust recall responses on Ag re-encounter.

236 Children with asthma had lower recall responses than those without asthma while largely

237 rus infections and immunizations, we studied recall responses to envelope protein domain III (DIII).

238 In this study, we investigated human T cell recall responses to fully glycosylated spike trimer, rec

239 We determined that recall responses were inhibited by antibody feedback, po

240 tis, Zika, and dengue viruses did not affect recall responses.

241 MEKi-treated CD8(+) T cells showed stronger recall responses.

242 circulating effector and memory cells during recall responses.

243 d in the spleen during immunization or after recall revealed similarities but also significant differ

244 Next-day re-testing (delayed recall) revealed a brief but precise return-of-tuning to

245 Recall, screen-detected breast cancer, and positive pred

246 The recall (sensitivity) and precision (selectivity) were 0.

247 We find that the degree of sparseness of the recalled sequences can be controlled by nonlinearities i

248 Multiple temporal characteristics of the recalled sequential activity are consistent with experim

249 After learning, recalled sequential activity is reflected in the transie

250 (List A Trials 1-3; List B) and delayed free recall (short- and long-delay), and up to two brain scan

251 Behavioral tests of recognition and source recall showed that items allowing for prediction of what

252 Electroencephalography has shown that recall signals unfold a few hundred milliseconds after s

253 f neurons that are critical for encoding and recalling specific events(1-3).

254 using the Clopper-Pearson method (accuracy, recall, specificity, and precision) and the DeLong metho

255 hat our phenotypic analysis of IgG-SCs after recall strongly correlated with the different employed i

256 ity tracks distance in semantic space during recall supports the growing consensus of a domain-genera

257 levels with results from validated 24-h diet recall surveys and breast milk fatty acids.

258 vider education, inreach (e.g., reminder and recall systems), and population health outreach strategi

259 Poorer performance on a delayed face/name recall task was associated with depression.

260 sk, unlike in previous, simpler (egocentric) recall tasks.

261 Upon antigen recall, TBL1XR1 mutant MB cells fail to differentiate in

262 (2011-2013) using 3 tests: the Delayed Word Recall Test (DWRT), the Digit-Symbol Substitution Test (

263 Participants took a free recall test both immediately after learning the word lis

264 ing with odor, and its activation during the recall test can terminate the search behavior resulting

265 AN-i1 signals during training and during the recall test could be delivered to the Kenyon cells and t

266 nate learned search behavior in a subsequent recall test.

267 fects to show that NPDR has better precision-recall than standard Relief-based feature selection and

268 We perform a symmetry analysis that recalls that an individual Ising chain in this material

269 te-in the spatial memory task, during memory recall-that theta power increases in left medial tempora

270 Three days later, participants were asked to recall the activities.

271 mory task in which children were required to recall the location of hidden targets.

272 rable to the other four comparing methods on recall, the UH-DoG outperforms them on both precision an

273 [26 of 3156]) were detected after secondary recall through quality assurance sessions.

274 cision to 62% with only a four-point drop in recall to 37% (46% F1 score).

275 dle is the use of covert (silent) in-scanner recall to study autobiographical memory, which prevents

276 g to interesting insights into the precision/recall trade-off.

277 Avoidance memory reactivation at recall triggers theta-gamma hippocampal phase amplitude

278 phaIL-2 complex-expanded Treg cells could be recalled upon allergen challenge, which was associated w

279 ures) with high classification precision and recall using features alone, as well as with their stati

280 For DBT+SM, adjusted relative risk of recall (VDG 2: 1.8; P < .001; VDG 3: 2.4; P < .001; VDG

281 gnitive functions (immediate recall, delayed recall, verbal fluency) and depressive symptoms (EURO-D

282 When compared with recall, video-assisted reflection resulted in similar im

283 test the hypothesis that when compared with recall, video-assisted reflection results in higher acqu

284 Having a complete root coverage at the recall visit was also significantly associated with high

285 g the EEG activity preceding awakenings with recalled vs. no recall of dreams using the EEG microstat

286 Accuracy, precision and recall was 70/70/70% for generalist1, 50/50/90% for gene

287 nating radiologist decided whether secondary recall was indicated.

288 Learning Test (CVLT trials 1-5,CVLT delayed recall), Wechsler Digit Symbol, Trail-making Test parts

289 ol lunch, and had a reliable weekday dietary recall were included.

290 e expressed during periods followed by dream recall, whereas microstate 4 was less expressed.

291 h an average of over 99% correct information recall, which extrapolates to a half-life of over 15 yea

292 phenomenon that might be called sight-blind recall, which we discuss in the context of the current e

293 ts reliably associate autobiographical event recall with activity in a network of "default" or "core"

294 munization schemes for mice: shortly after a recall with pure Ag, we analyze the frequencies of IgG-s

295 ptive and can be improved or distorted after recall, with implications for basic memory theory, memor

296 diologic and pathologic outcome data for all recalled women were obtained.

297 radiology reports and pathologic outcome of recalled women with 2-year follow-up were analyzed.

298 The recalls yielding ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) increas

299 (e.g., for 9-year change in immediate verbal recall z score, marginal risk difference (RD) = -0.09 (9

300 rval (CI): -0.16, -0.03); for delayed verbal recall z score, RD = -0.10 (95% CI: -0.17, -0.03)) and o