ライフサイエンスコーパス: receptive field

1 trength of L, M, and S cone input across the receptive field.

2 were contained within or extended beyond the receptive field.

3 odulated by stimuli outside of the classical receptive field.

4 as the stimulus crosses the ganglion cell's receptive field.

5 ic stimulus attributes intersecting with the receptive field.

6 by stimuli that extend beyond the classical receptive field.

7 ptic inputs, which generate a color-opponent receptive field.

8 ample and the second on the spectro-temporal receptive field.

9 t can be modulated by stimuli outside of the receptive field.

10 he increase of preferred contrast inside the receptive field.

11 y a surprising bias in inhibition within the receptive field.

12 on emanating from the centre of the neuron's receptive field.

13 ion where test compounds were applied to the receptive field.

14 excitatory and suppressive components of RGC receptive fields.

15 V4 neural sites, even those with overlapping receptive fields.

16 ion, despite comparable stimulation of their receptive fields.

17 group tuning displayed view-point selective receptive fields.

18 et-specific contrast preferences and spatial receptive fields.

19 ching in the superficial epidermis and large receptive fields.

20 he spatial arrangement of current and future receptive fields.

21 the balance of inputs that generate neuronal receptive fields.

22 generate orientation-selective cue-invariant receptive fields.

23 are rapidly changing outside their classical receptive fields.

24 ction inhibition, on opposing sides of their receptive fields.

25 enerate orientation-selective, cue-invariant receptive fields.

26 ponses to auditory stimuli than the standard receptive fields.

27 fferent locations within and around neuronal receptive fields.

28 amatic context-dependent changes of neurons' receptive fields.

29 vides a first mechanistic model for flexible receptive fields.

30 in tonal (TRFs) and spectrotemporal (STRFs) receptive fields.

31 rive two neural populations with overlapping receptive fields.

32 stabilize the lateral inhibition that shapes receptive fields.

33 the classic center-surround model of retinal receptive fields.

34 ling is vital to the maintenance of cortical receptive fields [2]; however, it is unclear how this fi

35 Furthermore, the network receptive field, a parsimonious network consisting of 1-

36 Here, we investigated processing by receptive fields, a fundamental property of neurons in t

37 These cells exhibit center-surround receptive fields, a prototype of lateral inhibition betw

38 lly antagonistic surround to individual cone receptive fields, a signature inherited by downstream ne

39 non in which individual neurons change their receptive fields according to the metrics of each saccad

40 rly visual cortex despite the lack of direct receptive field activation.

41 neurons (TSDNs) with matching frontal visual receptive fields, anatomically and functionally homologo

42 simultaneously with one stimulus inside the receptive field and a second, competing stimulus outside

43 related modulation across both the classical receptive field and the surround.

44 lls (HCs) to cones generates center-surround receptive fields and color opponency in the retina.

45 he role of different circuits in shaping RGC receptive fields and establish a foundation for continue

46 Next we mapped receptive fields and found surprisingly precise micro-re

47 ragranular-layer neurons by sharpening their receptive fields and frequency tuning, as well as increa

48 etworks that consist of neurons with similar receptive fields and increased connectivity relative to

49 thermore, apical dendrite inputs have larger receptive fields and longer response latencies than basa

50 optimize response sensitivity across distant receptive fields and preclude any bias toward local ligh

51 Cortical neurons remap their receptive fields and rescale sensitivity to spared perip

52 rons and endow neural populations with broad receptive fields and sharp frequency tuning.

53 They have small receptive fields and strong antagonistic surrounds.

54 hought to preserve the spatial resolution of receptive fields and to enable connections for the ocula

55 Receptive fields and tuning curves of sensory neurons re

56 rsus dLGN had wider dendritic arbors, larger receptive fields, and fired with lower temporal precisio

57 CG neurons had simple, orientation-selective receptive fields, and generated sustained responses to s

58 and distinguished their distinct ON and OFF receptive fields, and it demonstrated a diversity of sup

59 ignal correlations, associated with neuronal receptive fields, and noise correlations, associated wit

60 nal cord and that their cutaneous and muscle receptive fields are found around the ears, occipital sk

61 s view was later challenged by evidence that receptive fields are modulated by stimuli outside of the

62 on of extra neurons, suggesting the neurons' receptive fields are not optimised for recognising abstr

63 can only reach healthy performance levels if receptive fields are still plastic, in line with finding

64 ain accomplishes this is by remapping visual receptive fields around the time of a saccade.

65 functional taxonomy of cells with vectorial receptive fields as reported in experiments and proposed

66 ion drove the eyes accurately to the site of receptive fields, as in normal animals.

67 We modeled each eye's receptive field at each cortical site using a difference

68 iven primarily by the visual stimulus in the receptive field, but by the broader context that stimulu

69 res in a region of visual space known as the receptive field, but can be modulated by stimuli outside

70 ell (RGC) is often summarized by its spatial receptive field, but in principle also depends on the re

71 prevents the normal development of binocular receptive fields by impairing the maturation of ipsilate

72 em, the response to a stimulus in a neuron's receptive field can be modulated by stimulus context, an

73 ze, where responses to stimuli exceeding the receptive field can be suppressed (surround suppression)

74 ng sensory cells in which stimulation of the receptive field center excites the cell whereas stimulat

75 evation along with a concomitant decrease in receptive field center size for OFF RGCs.

76 hree high-definition (HD) RGCs possess small receptive-field centers and strong surround suppression.

77 ginally viewed as a part of the fundamental "receptive field" characteristic of neurons.

78 optic lobe, particularly in ON-pathway (T4) receptive-field circuits, in concert with physiological

79 ecoding performance occurred for voxels with receptive fields closer to the fovea and overlapping wit

80 responses to mechanical stimulation of their receptive fields, compared to control animals.

81 acrine cell (AC), exhibits a spatially tuned receptive field, composed of an excitatory center and an

82 the S-OFF midget RGCs have a center-surround receptive field consistent with a role in spatial vision

83 ortical visual areas are enhanced when their receptive field contains a stimulus sharing target objec

84 y patterns presented over an unusually large receptive field: could this cell be a (de)focus detector

85 teraction between signals from the classical receptive field (CRF) and the extra-classical receptive

86 /-) OFF bipolar cells showed enlarged visual receptive fields, demonstrating that expanded dendritic

87 tudies show that such responses (i.e., their receptive fields) depend on context.

88 d orientation is decodable from voxels whose receptive fields do not overlap with the stimulus edges,

89 We thus confirm that a neuron's receptive field does not follow directly from the weight

90 shed within ~10 ms after response onset, and receptive fields dynamically sharpen while suppression s

91 eceptive field (CRF) and the extra-classical receptive field (eCRF) in primary visual cortex (V1) neu

92 patial separation across multiple peripheral receptive fields ensures the composite stimulus timecour

93 onses in these areas increases, and neuronal receptive fields expand and shift towards the remembered

94 The stimulation of this feedback receptive field (fbRF) elicits responses that are slower

95 rd pathways define the classical feedforward receptive field (ffRF), the area in space in which visua

96 es display topographic organization, whereby receptive fields follow a characteristic pattern, from t

97 nse rates, as adaptations of spectrotemporal receptive fields following stimulation by temporally coh

98 our findings and predicts a spatio-chromatic receptive field for fly photoreceptor outputs, with a co

99 hway and comprehensively identify inputs and receptive fields for T5.

100 neurons in Drosophila and to extract calcium receptive fields from cortical neurons in mammals.

101 vidual ring neurons inherit simple-cell-like receptive fields from their upstream partners.

102 Paradoxically, these highly variable receptive fields go alongside and are in fact required f

103 eading to a deep dynamic reshaping of neural receptive fields going far beyond simple surround suppre

104 gnificantly greater when the stimulus in the receptive field had been fixated previously in the trial

105 The receptive field has an excitatory ON center, flanked by

106 The temporal resolution of these receptive fields has traditionally been limited by image

107 Crucially, the neuron's receptive field (i.e., its response to presynaptic stimu

108 The most common receptive field in rodent thalamus, however, is center-s

109 reas DALcl2 neurons share a large excitatory receptive field in the contralateral hemifield.

110 ertebrate retina, the location of a neuron's receptive field in visual space closely corresponds to t

111 systems is typically addressed by measuring receptive fields in a fixed, sensor-based coordinate fra

112 Receptive fields in both cell types have a center-surrou

113 d space remains undefined: classical spatial receptive fields in head-fixed subjects can be explained

114 mporal area and to the estimated size of the receptive fields in human depth-sensitive cortical regio

115 elative to seen spatial frequencies and that receptive fields in imagined space are larger than in vi

116 Our results show that the diversity of receptive fields in L2/3 is likely due to diversity in t

117 regions, a structure similar to simple cell receptive fields in primary visual cortex.

118 ly moving subjects; here we recorded spatial receptive fields in the auditory cortex of freely moving

119 d it demonstrated a diversity of suppressive receptive fields in the RGC population.

120 We map voxel population receptive fields in V1 and evaluate orientation decoding

121 uencies, as well as the location and size of receptive fields in visual and imagined space.

122 al waves are critical for the development of receptive fields in visual thalamus (LGN) and cortex (VC

123 Consistent with spatially coarse receptive fields in vLGN, visually evoked changes in spi

124 from V1 to LL, along with the quality of the receptive fields inferred through reverse correlation.

125 ons may reduce their firing rates when their receptive field input can be predicted by spatial contex

126 ntre and surround components of bipolar cell receptive fields interact to decorrelate bipolar cell ou

127 nt linear functions enables a locally linear receptive field interpretation of the neural network.

128 e retina, estimated subunits partitioned the receptive field into compact regions, likely representin

129 the power and flexibility of our approach on receptive fields, ion channels, and Hodgkin-Huxley model

130 efinement, through which the size of sensory receptive field is reduced.

131 rons are suppressed by stimuli outside their receptive field, is an example of this integration takin

132 ility among neurons in macaque area V4 whose receptive-fields lie at the attended location.

133 a standard linear-nonlinear spectro-temporal receptive field (LN) model and variants that incorporate

134 cording to their response properties such as receptive field location and feature selectivity.

135 o measure BOLD activity at precisely defined receptive field locations in visual cortex (V1) of human

136 the dangers that uncorrected stimuli pose to receptive field mapping experiments.

137 Using functional neuroimaging and population receptive field mapping, we find that chromosome dosage

138 First, using single-cell receptive field mapping, we revealed the presence of coa

139 We used a novel population receptive field mapping-based approach to resolve the sp

140 The receptive field maps of hair cells undergoing efferent a

141 We present optical recordings, receptive field maps, and sensitivity curves that show a

142 Meanwhile, the VT2-3 cells have motion receptive fields matched to the lift axis.

143 sent novel cell types that have local motion receptive fields matched to translation self-motion, the

144 ry inputs onto a single neuron, to study how receptive fields may change on short and long time scale

145 A spectral receptive-field model incorporating broadband inhibition

146 nction of stimulus location using population receptive field modeling to isolate each voxel's overlap

147 l experimental task and nonlinear population receptive field modeling, we map and characterize the to

148 Population receptive field models have been successful in character

149 nventional single-layer linear and nonlinear receptive field networks that capture the overall featur

150 ction of neurons in early visual cortex with receptive fields not selective for orientation that have

151 rine cell type, in which the extra-classical receptive field of ON parasol cells is formed by recipro

152 Attention toward the stimulus in the receptive field of recorded neurons significantly facili

153 spatial cue deploying attention towards the receptive field of the recorded neural population.

154 Shifting spatial attention into the receptive field of visual neurons has been shown to diff

155 the temporal evolution of the spatiotemporal receptive field of visual neurons in the middle temporal

156 miR-132/212 deletion affects development of receptive fields of cortical neurons determining a speci

157 Our computational analyses reveal that the receptive fields of human midget and parasol ganglion ce

158 Here we assessed one-dimensional spatial receptive fields of individual dendritic spines within i

159 initial studies identifying the overlapping receptive fields of multisensory neurons, to subsequent

160 We recorded the receptive fields of multiunit clusters in male macaques

161 emory processes may underlie linear temporal receptive fields of neurons beyond 25 ms.

162 The spatial receptive fields of neurons in medial entorhinal cortex

163 Here, we measured the spatial receptive fields of neurons in primary auditory cortex (

164 R neurons (also known as ring neurons); the receptive fields of R neurons tile visual space(5).

165 been used as the canonical model to describe receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) for de

166 that inhibition is evoked broadly across the receptive fields of simple cells, and we identify a surp

167 velopmental changes in linear spatiotemporal receptive fields of simple cells, implying alterations i

168 Moreover, we show that the receptive fields of the newly discovered speed neurons c

169 Recently the receptive fields of these neurons have been mapped, allo

170 The anatomical receptive fields of these two mechanoreceptor subtypes h

171 a multicell model to explore the effects of receptive field offset on the precision of edge-location

172 connectivity of these RGCs can explain their receptive field offset, and we use a multicell model to

173 natural image statistics, and resembled the receptive field only when nearby, same-type cells were i

174 ells were spatially independent, with little receptive field overlap.

175 on due to synergistic interactions even when receptive fields overlap and shared noise between cells

176 bthreshold membrane responses induced by the receptive field plasticity and the increased input-outpu

177 Further, this receptive field plasticity was accompanied by increases

178 This contrasts with dragonfly TSDNs, where receptive fields possess a sharp midline boundary, confi

179 the visual system, using fMRI and population receptive field (pRF) mapping in 20 human females with m

180 reported in vivo We used fMRI and population receptive field (pRF) mapping to demonstrate that the fi

181 of these deficits using fMRI and population receptive field (pRF) mapping to infer properties of vis

182 esonance imaging (fMRI) and population-based receptive field (prf) mapping.

183 sage with an example application: population receptive field (pRF) methods for functional MRI data.

184 We used fMRI and population receptive field (pRF) modeling to measure the responses

185 d by less than 10 mum shared similar spatial receptive field properties and exhibited a distance-depe

186 al thalamus but are essential for sharpening receptive field properties and improving contrast-gain o

187 gulating experience-dependent plasticity and receptive field properties develop late, like their inhi

188 known about feature detectors, including how receptive field properties differ from the motion pathwa

189 pines defined by dimensionality reduction of receptive field properties exhibited non-random dendriti

190 Spatial receptive field properties of dendritic spines were stri

191 nce is necessary for the development of some receptive field properties of neurons in primary sensory

192 e primary auditory cortex (A1) can shape the receptive field properties of neurons in the ventral div

193 The non-canonical receptive field properties of the OND RGC-integration of

194 We investigated the receptive field properties of the S-OFF midget circuit w

195 s known about how feedforward pathways shape receptive field properties of visual neurons, relatively

196 We first modeled receptive field properties of voxels in SC, deriving a d

197 Their receptive field properties suggest that they could serve

198 mouse, called the ON delayed (OND) RGC, with receptive field properties that deviate from center-surr

199 t whether feedback circuits regulate spatial receptive field properties versus temporal responses amo

200 edforward pathways carry information such as receptive field properties via glutamatergic class 1 syn

201 ited for the transfer of information such as receptive field properties, suggesting the importance of

202 led stream differences in the development of receptive field properties.

203 ion in controlling both temporal and spatial receptive field properties.

204 e three "high-definition" RGCs share certain receptive-field properties, they also have distinct tuni

205 lassical surround suppression is a prominent receptive field property of neurons in the lateral genic

206 ion between V1 and SC.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Receptive field refinement in superior colliculus differ

207 stitute for visual experience in maintaining receptive field refinement into adulthood, and that this

208 city, TrkB signaling plays a crucial role in receptive field refinement.

209 It identified multiple receptive fields reflecting the main excitatory and supp

210 puts from higher visual areas have scattered receptive fields relative to their putative targets in t

211 neural mechanism to construct such versatile receptive fields remains unclear.

212 However, the relationship between these receptive fields remains unclear.

213 anges exhibit properties similar to those of receptive field remapping, a phenomenon in which individ

214 map in V4 matches many of the properties of receptive field remapping.

215 he course of functional recovery, we tracked receptive field reorganization, spontaneous activity, an

216 The development of sensory receptive fields requires the coordinated spatial patter

217 timuli lying in the null space of the linear receptive field, revealed stronger nonlinearities in OFF

218 ial spread can be estimated by measuring the receptive field (RF) and multiplying by the cortical mag

219 We found that RGC photopic receptive field (RF) center size and whole-field RGC fir

220 Further, we found that with maturation receptive field (RF) center sizes decrease, spike-trigge

221 for correlations among curvature preference, receptive field (RF) end-stopping, and RF eccentricity i

222 The noninvasive estimation of neuronal receptive field (RF) properties in vivo allows a detaile

223 Receptive field (RF) size and preferred spatial frequenc

224 FP) responses to stimuli detected inside the receptive field (RF) strengthen.

225 When light falls within a neuronal visual receptive field (RF) the resulting activity is referred

226 ity of stimuli in the surround of a neuron's receptive field (RF) to modulate (typically suppress) th

227 system, we use two-photon imaging to measure receptive fields (RFs) and size-tuning in primary visual

228 We map spatial receptive fields (RFs) for SCN neurons and find that onl

229 sufficient for spatial refinement of visual receptive fields (RFs) in superior colliculus (SC) and v

230 Spatial receptive fields (RFs) mapped using melanopsin-isolating

231 We mapped the visual receptive fields (RFs) of neurons recorded at the same e

232 city of thalamocortical connectivity and the receptive fields (RFs) of postsynaptic cortical neurons.

233 Receptive fields (RFs) of SDs are organized concentrical

234 cted LGN-V1 pairs were only found when their receptive fields (RFs) overlapped, and the probability o

235 C contains neurons with spatially-restricted receptive fields (RFs) that form an azimuthal topographi

236 are not influenced by stimuli outside their receptive fields (RFs), dynamics of the high-dimensional

237 s and integrating visual inputs across their receptive fields (RFs).

238 y altering the encoding properties of single receptive fields (RFs).

239 sign choice whereby neurons with overlapping receptive fields sample environmental stimuli to convey

240 nterpreted as a link between crowding zones, receptive field scaling, and our perceptual experience.

241 ion of inflammatory mediators to their dural receptive field, sensitize their responses to stimulatio

242 ased stimulus selectivity and expanded their receptive fields significantly.

243 We introduce a new method for estimating receptive fields simultaneously for a population of V1 n

244 ng-surround receptive field, which varied in receptive field size and degree of ON-OFF asymmetry with

245 ver, functional pairs exhibit asymmetries in receptive field size and response kinetics.

246 ural sampling by retinal ganglion cells with receptive field size and spacing that increases with ecc

247 Its population-receptive field size, however, suggests that this ventra

248 ghtly tuned than predictions based simply on receptive field size, indicating that correlated activit

249 The receptive field size, sensitivity to surround illuminati

250 pike-timing precision, and reduced classical receptive field size.

251 (1) dendritic field size, which approximate receptive field size; (2) dendritic complexity, which af

252 logical recordings of their light responses, receptive-field size and structure, and synaptic mechani

253 rences exist between the species in terms or receptive field sizes and orientation map organization,

254 pendent representations captured by neurons' receptive field sizes and sampling density that change w

255 Here the authors show that the receptive field sizes of reticular neurons are small eno

256 howed distinct light response properties and receptive field sizes.

257 whether cells in the reticular nucleus have receptive fields small enough to provide localized feedb

258 a span of time-delays in a spectro-temporal receptive field (STRF).

259 rse correlation to estimate spectro-temporal receptive fields (STRFs) implied by the learned GFs.

260 ave pronounced effects on the spatiotemporal receptive fields (STRFs) of neurons.

261 is more consistent with the S-OFF midget RGC receptive field structure and studies of hue perception.

262 revealed that these cells exhibit irregular receptive field structure composed of spatially segregat

263 For example, in rodent, thalamic receptive field structure is markedly diverse, and many

264 recordings of T5 neurons and found a similar receptive field structure: fast depolarization and persi

265 Yet how attention interacts with the receptive-field structure of cortical neurons remains un

266 er, although it is well established that the receptive field surround is strongest when ambient or ba

267 eld maps: estimated linear filters (temporal receptive fields) systematically differ across and withi

268 ouse primary visual cortex generate a second receptive field that is driven by stimuli outside the ff

269 rons in early visual cortex have specialized receptive fields that allow them to selectively respond

270 ntribute most to classifier performance have receptive fields that cluster in cortical regions corres

271 This data can be used to map receptive fields that describe neural associations with

272 a parsimonious network consisting of 1-7 sub-receptive fields that interact nonlinearly, consistently

273 cost function, AMA returns the filters (i.e. receptive fields) that extract the most useful stimulus

274 ll characterized RGC with a comparably small receptive field, the local edge detector, in response to

275 stimuli were spatially separated within the receptive fields, the contrast dominance was abolished.

276 hibition before or after reaching the cell's receptive field: the response is weaker in the former th

277 ance the selectivity and expand the range of receptive fields, therefore potentially sharpening the p

278 Thus, Wave neurons match their receptive field to appropriate motor programs by partici

279 ng, requiring scales at least as small as V1 receptive fields to generate metamers.

280 Longitudinal imaging of receptive field tuning (e.g., orientation selectivity) o

281 s in the primary visual cortex sharpen their receptive field tuning properties.

282 e use fMRI to relate changes in single voxel receptive fields (vRFs) to changes in population-level r

283 ble with past, qualitative descriptions, the receptive fields we quantified in vLGN were larger than

284 interactions of local stimulation across the receptive field, we found no amplifying responses, only

285 ay might be pooled to generate cue-invariant receptive fields, we recorded visual responses from sing

286 serine-treated animals, tectal neuron visual receptive fields were expanded, suggesting a failure to

287 Receptive fields were mapped in the superior colliculus

288 The data showed that receptive fields were offset in position by the ocular d

289 ns are stronger with multiple stimuli in the receptive field, whereas feature attention modulations a

290 e small ipsilateral, retinotopically ordered receptive fields, whereas DALcl2 neurons share a large e

291 presented at locations outside the neuron's receptive field, which suggests a contribution of multip

292 osities with a small-center, strong-surround receptive field, which varied in receptive field size an

293 and independently within individual neurons' receptive fields, which segregate sensitive and selectiv

294 nsory cortex (S1) sharing the same cutaneous receptive field while monkeys judged the presence or abs

295 rts visual input to different regions of its receptive field with distinct action potential waveforms

296 Accounting for this change in effective receptive field with spectrotemporal context improves pr

297 tream model when information was averaged in receptive fields with a scaling of about half their reti

298 frequency adaptation, to apparent changes in receptive fields with changes in stimulus statistics, to

299 mes completely fill available space in their receptive fields with evenly spaced dendrites to uniform

300 redicts that-after learning-the granule-cell receptive fields with respect to sensory and with respec

301 es the timing of neural measurements to find receptive fields with temporal resolutions higher than t