ライフサイエンスコーパス: recession

1 le KT dimensions and improve marginal tissue recession.

2 linical treatments in patients with gingival recession.

3 pratarsal location after levator aponeurosis recession.

4 ot adult mass and experience subsequent mass recession.

5 ns following initial bilateral medial rectus recession.

6 e 64 untreated sites experienced increase in recession.

7 in consumption volume triggered by economic recession.

8 nfluence the degree of mass overshooting and recession.

9 (73%) treated with lateral rectus muscle re-recession.

10 26 with unilateral lateral rectus muscle re-recession.

11 es has been in decline since the most recent recession.

12 r AHP was corrected by performing a bimedial recession.

13 n, radiographic bone fill (RBF), and mucosal recession.

14 blems before and during the current economic recession.

15 used significant crayfish mortality and gill recession.

16 DM-adjacent untreated sites without baseline recession.

17 mental health effects of the global economic recession.

18 hniques at reducing CDH in cases of gingival recession.

19 est was significantly greater for teeth with recession.

20 ed, and the ADM-adjacent sites with baseline recession.

21 No patients underwent medial rectus recession.

22 econstruction, without needing medial rectus recession.

23 sustained calving losses and more rapid ice recession.

24 ew and existing recipients of SNAP after the recession.

25 e effect against the negative impact of this recession.

26 flap (CAF) procedures in localized gingival recessions.

27 rioration in quality of care during economic recessions.

28 e treatment of Miller Class I or II gingival recessions.

29 ortality among older workers declines during recessions.

30 ia following bilateral lateral rectus muscle recessions.

31 zes the financial system and causes economic recessions.

32 topic increase during and immediately after recessions.

33 Changes in gingival recession (0.29 +/- 0.68 mm versus 0.15 +/- 0.55 mm, P =

34 Sixty RCTs with a total of 2,554 gingival recessions (1,864 patients) were included in the NMA.

35 ection or resection combined with antagonist recession (12 with esotropia and 19 with exotropia; mean

36 cation or plication combined with antagonist recession (13 with esotropia and 9 with exotropia; mean

37 g and after (compared with before) the Great Recession (2007-2009).

38 loyed in 2001 were reversed during the Great Recession (2008-2011).

39 of both elevators (bilateral superior rectus recession 5-8 mm, bilateral inferior oblique recession o

40 cession-resection (bilateral superior rectus recession 6-9 mm; bilateral inferior rectus resection 5-

41 has increased since the onset of the global recession, a trend that may have long-term health and so

42 dal behavior rise with the continuing global recession, additional suicide prevention efforts and lon

43 .3 to -1.6, while in cases that underwent MR recession, adduction declined from 0.4 to -0.3.

44 elected from 11 patients with Miller Class I recessions affecting canines or premolars in the maxilla

45 The lack of post-surgical recession after VMIS has not been reported with traditio

46 bilateral recession type 1 multiple gingival recessions after 6 months postoperatively.

47 tions that are too large for correction with recession alone.

48 l patients underwent bilateral medial rectus recession and a lateral rectus resection in the nondomin

49 Gingival recession and a thin or absent buccal plate occur freque

50 d to assess the association between economic recession and adult mortality in Brazil and to ascertain

51 t (CTG) is a popular means to treat gingival recession and augment keratinized tissue.

52 ters and other clinical findings to gingival recession and buccal bone conditions.

53 In an era of economic recession and budget cutbacks,Americans may be curious t

54 timepoints to assess the association between recession and changes in mortality.

55 The recession and contamination of damaged Pt electrodes are

56 eories were unable to foresee the last Great Recession and could neither predict its prolonged durati

57 ll patients had contralateral lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection.

58 Bilateral medial rectus muscle recession and one lateral rectus muscle resection surger

59 nteraction between previous glacier advance, recession and outburst flooding.

60 mals of extreme elevation respond to glacial recession and past harvest, we combined our fieldwork wi

61 r fluid (GCF) samples from sites of gingival recession and saliva; and 2) clinical outcomes of corona

62 association between the presence of gingival recession and the condition of radiographic buccal bone,

63 Depth of recession and width of GR below the cemento-enamel junct

64 ncisors and molars and with visible [>=2 mm] recession) and to calculate propensity scores (PSs); 2)

65 es were measured at every visit whereas IPD, recession, and bleeding on probing were assessed at 8, 1

66 measures, such as clinical attachment level, recession, and bleeding on probing.

67 bleeding on probing, probing depth, gingival recession, and clinical attachment level (CAL).

68 clinician-reported intercostal or subcostal recession, and clinician-reported wheeze on auscultation

69 o improve patient comfort, to prevent future recession, and in conjunction with restorative, orthodon

70 acing record-breaking unemployment, economic recession, and reduced wages, we can anticipate an incre

71 017 classification of phenotype and gingival recession, and to stress why it should be fully integrat

72 clinical attachment level (CAL); 3) gingival recession; and 4) percentage of sites with bleeding on p

73 previous orthodontic treatment; 4) gingival recession; and 5) band of keratinized gingiva for each o

74 h increased volatility and deep, short-lived recessions; and alternation of high- and low-output stat

75 riods of higher unemployment rates, that is, recessions, are associated with a moderate but significa

76 an recession depth (0.21 versus 0.39 mm) and recession area (0.31 versus 0.53 mm(2)) after 6 months w

77 ls, case series, and case reports evaluating recession areas that were treated by means of RC procedu

78 ent untreated sites which had presented with recession at baseline but were not treated showed a sign

79 The untreated adjacent sites with a recession at baseline, showed a higher apical displaceme

80 ated sites, and ADM-adjacent sites without a recession at baseline.

81 During the 12-month study period the mean recession at sites with PreGR >/=2 mm decreased signific

82 ators, included CAL, probing depth, gingival recession, bleeding on probing (BOP), visible plaque, su

83 the post-surgery increase in buccal gingival recession (bREC), effect of a connective tissue graft (C

84 ed to snow drought and earlier soil moisture recession, but summer precipitation changes remain highl

85 evaluate the treatment of localized gingival recessions by using gingival unit grafts (palatal tissue

86 Combined MR recession carries a risk of induced limitation of adduct

87 erent clinical attachment level and gingival recession changes by the end of the maintenance period.

88 nd narrow gingiva tend to have more gingival recession compared with those with thick and wide gingiv

89 MW, or CAL of Miller Class I and II gingival recessions compared with the other treatment modalities.

90 The Brazilian recession contributed to increases in mortality.

91 Percentages of average recession coverage (ARC) and complete recession coverage

92 verage recession coverage (ARC) and complete recession coverage (CRC) were evaluated 3 and 6 months a

93 ue grafting for soft tissue augmentation and recession coverage at teeth and dental implant sites.

94 ession defect treatment, to provide adequate recession coverage, the periodontal profession continues

95 er-decadal variability in growth cycles (the recession cycle), highlighting periods of large slow gro

96 Gingival recession defect (GRD) may be defined as an apical migra

97 CAF) have been deemed the gold standard for recession defect treatment, to provide adequate recessio

98 ngle maxillary anterior Miller Class I or II recession defect were enrolled.

99 s presenting with twenty-one Millers Class I recession defects (isolated or adjacent multiple) were s

100 st or control treatments for Miller Class II recession defects appear to lead to stable, clinically e

101 rformed on single tooth Miller Class I or II recession defects at either premolar or anterior sites i

102 Untreated recession defects in individuals with good oral hygiene

103 e (EMD) for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects in minipigs.

104 Overall, data from 325 single gingival recession defects revealed a statistically significant s

105 nths was 89.92+/-15.59% and 14 of 21 treated recession defects showed a100% root coverage.

106 aterial) influence root coverage outcomes in recession defects treated with a coronally advanced flap

107 y, 15 patients with 38 Miller Class I and II recession defects underwent CTG or GTR according to rand

108 d controlled trial, Miller Class II gingival recession defects were treated with either a connective

109 Management of gingival recession defects, a common periodontal condition, using

110 ngle-tooth recession defects, multiple-tooth recession defects, and additional focused questions on r

111 l comparison of matched-pair, within-patient recession defects, collagen matrix (CMX) + CAF therapy w

112 iew, which covered treatment of single-tooth recession defects, multiple-tooth recession defects, and

113 ss the treatment outcomes for multiple-tooth recession defects, oral sites other than maxillary canin

114 tion: For Miller Class I and II single-tooth recession defects, SCTG procedures provide the best outc

115 hat assessed single-tooth, Miller Class I/II recession defects, surgically treated by CAF.

116 possible for single-tooth and multiple-tooth recession defects, with SCTG procedures providing the be

117 depth, especially for Miller Class I and II recession defects.

118 eir ability to correct Miller Class I and II recession defects.

119 successfully to correct Miller Class I or II recession defects.

120 e method for the treatment of Miller Class I recession defects.

121 Mean recession depth (0.21 versus 0.39 mm) and recession area

122 eeding score (FMBS), probing depth (PD), and recession depth (RD) were recorded at baseline and 1, 3,

123 Plaque index, papilla bleeding index, recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), and root sur

124 mary outcomes were the changes in slopes for recession depth (REC), keratinized tissue width (KTW), a

125 cedures can provide significant reduction in recession depth and CAL gain for Miller Class I and II r

126 Both groups presented reduction of recession depth and recession width and gain of keratini

127 There was no difference in the midfacial recession depth and recession width at the test and cont

128 on probing depth, clinical attachment level, recession depth and width, amount of keratinized tissue,

129 The primary outcome parameter, change in recession depth at 5 years, demonstrated statistically s

130 ugh there were no significant changes in the recession depth between 3 and 240 +/- 12 months in both

131 lagen matrix led to the best improvements of recession depth, clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, a

132 procedures provide significant reduction in recession depth, especially for Miller Class I and II re

133 Clinical parameters (recession depth, mean root coverage [mRC], keratinized t

134 Outcomes examined were recession depth, probing depth, clinical attachment leve

135 Gingival thickness, recession depth, recession width, probing depth (PD), cl

136 dies) showed significantly increased odds of recession development long term, regarding either number

137 ncrease in existing recession or develop new recession during the 18- to 35-year follow-up.

138 The probability of recession during tooth movement in thin biotype is high

139 Considering looming fatality and economic recession, effective policy making based on ongoing COVI

140 The expansion of SNAP since the Great Recession enrolled a population that differed from the e

141 the development and progression of gingival recession, especially when restorative margins may inter

142 ented VRT with or without medial rectus (MR) recession from 2013 to 2016.

143 Although economic recessions generally tend to result in decreased health

144 es (control group), with or without gingival recession (GR) and with attached gingiva, were left untr

145 evaluate the 2-year term results of gingival recession (GR) associated with non-carious cervical lesi

146 of attached gingiva associated with gingival recession (GR) at baseline were treated with FGGs in a p

147 tcomes after treatment of localized gingival recession (GR) by a coronally advanced flap (CAF) combin

148 s presenting with 21 Miller Class I gingival recession (GR) defects (isolated or adjacent multiple) w

149 g-term outcomes of untreated buccal gingival recession (GR) defects and the associated reported esthe

150 roaches for the treatment of single gingival recession (GR) defects are documented in the literature.

151 he treatment of localized maxillary gingival recession (GR) defects, 1 and 5 years after surgical pro

152 iated with LLLT in the treatment of gingival recession (GR) defects.

153 n the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession (GR) defects.

154 and approximately 10% of teeth with gingival recession (GR) had DH.

155 Gingival recession (GR) is one of the most common esthetic concer

156 Gingival recession (GR) might be associated with patient discomfo

157 tached gingiva (AG) associated with gingival recession (GR) treated with FGG; and 2) contralateral si

158 clinical attachment level (CAL) and gingival recession (GR) were evaluated at 3 and 6 months and bone

159 ), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), and radiographic bone level (BL) were co

160 nt level (CAL), probing depth (PD), gingival recession (GR), bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index

161 en toothbrushing and development of gingival recession (GR), but relevant GR data for the multidirect

162 clinical attachment level (CAL) and gingival recession (GR).

163 est loss of periodontal support and gingival recession (GR).

164 he treatment of single and multiple gingival recessions (GR).

165 ], clinical attachment level [CAL], gingival recession [GR]) and radiographic (defect Bone level [(DB

166 linical attachment level [CAL], and gingival recession [GR]) and radiographic (defect bone level [DBL

167 CTG + CAF resulted in greater reductions in recession, greater percentage of root coverage, and incr

168 and 18.1 PD in the lateral rectus muscle re-recession group.

169 nd 2.9 years in the lateral rectus muscle re-recession group.

170 ea (AERSA) as a prognostic test for gingival recessions (GRs) and to compare the predictive value of

171 teen bilateral Miller Class I or II gingival recessions (GRs) were selected.

172 chment apparatus when used to treat gingival recessions (GRs).

173 ing to root coverage (3,539 treated gingival recessions [GRs]), and 10 for non-root coverage procedur

174 The recent economic recession has led to increases in suicide, but whether U

175 (ADM) for the treatment of isolated gingival recessions has not yet been evaluated.

176 th (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and recession height (GRH), recession width (GRW) and KGW me

177 Recession height (RECH), width of keratinized tissue (WK

178 depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), recession height (RH), width of keratinized gingiva (WKG

179 Recession height, probing depth, clinical attachment lev

180 Data on Class I, II, III, and IV gingival recessions, histologic attachment achieved after treatme

181 During the Great Recession, however, first-trimester unemployment was ass

182 , keratinized tissue width (KTW), horizontal recession (HR), mucogingival junction localization, and

183 nts to factors capable of amplifying glacier recession in addition to climatic change along the Himal

184 ), determinate growth patterns, such as mass recession in birds (weight loss prior to fledging, prece

185 Irreversible tissue recession in chronic inflammatory diseases is associated

186 trends in Spain before and during the Great Recession in different socioeconomic groups, quantifying

187 y rates in Spain before and during the Great Recession in these subgroups.

188 probing, clinical attachment level, gingival recession, interleukin-1beta, tumor necrosis factor (TNF

189 Rapid glacier recession is altering the physical conditions of headwat

190 rs confirmed again that the risk for mucosal recession is low with early implant placement.

191 dv), 89 underwent UMRadv with lateral rectus recession (LRc), and 34 underwent bilateral medial rectu

192 CAF) for treating multiple adjacent gingival recessions (MAGRs) remains to be determined.

193 A period of economic recession may be particularly difficult for people with

194 to esthetic challenges, including midfacial recession (MFR) and papillary height (PH) loss.

195 Economic recession might worsen health in low-income and middle-i

196 These results suggest that recessions might be protective in the absence of job los

197 D = -0.48, 95% CI = -0.70 to -0.27), mucosal recession (MR) (WMD = -0.60 mm, 95% CI = -0.85 to -0.36

198 ere included, with data on midfacial mucosal recession (MR) of immediately placed implants following

199 CI = 0.12 to 0.59 mm, P = 0.003) for mucosal recession (MR); a WMD of 0.13 mm (95% CI = -0.11 to 0.36

200 uccal (bREC) and interdental (iREC) gingival recession observed at 6 months after treatment of period

201 Some degree of mass recession occurred in 73% of all study chicks.

202 < 0.0001), and minimal increase in gingival recession of 0.23 +/- 0.62 mm (P = 0.168) were observed.

203 SNAP) expanded significantly after the Great Recession of 2008-2009, but no studies have characterize

204 he financial crisis of 2007 and the economic recession of 2008-2009.

205 The global economic recession of 2008-2010 severely depressed light-duty veh

206 the USSR-or short-term-e.g., the US economic recession of 2008/09.

207 read and temporal evolution of the onset and recession of floodwaters in urban road networks.

208 of the total glacier population (~10%), the recession of lake-terminating glaciers accounted for up

209 ides a principled rationale for the apparent recession of the ascending pathway in motor cortex.

210 Recent recession of the Larsen Ice Shelf C has revealed microbi

211 Unilateral re-recession of the lateral rectus muscle and medial rectus

212 at these differences corresponded to general recession of the midface and superior displacement of th

213 wever, NIPSA resulted in significantly lower recession of the tip of the interdental papilla compared

214 tissue graft (CTG) for treatment of multiple recessions of Miller Classes I and II over a short perio

215 The mean mucosal recessions of test and control group were unchanged, 0 a

216 ur understanding of the effects of the Great Recession on health and add to growing literature sugges

217 this study examined the effects of the Great Recession on maternal harsh parenting.

218 ates during and after the 1980 and 1981-1982 recessions, on rates of subsequent adolescent substance

219 es showed a tendency to increase in existing recession or develop new recession during the 18- to 35-

220 ng economic conditions linked with the Great Recession or food prices.

221 atch with prey such that the extent of range recession or local adaptation may appear as a geographic

222 gingival phenotype in sites without gingival recession or mucogingival deformity.

223 recession 5-8 mm, bilateral inferior oblique recession or myectomy) occurred in 11 cases.

224 ed statistically significant improvements in recession over baseline, although intergroup comparisons

225 e grafts (CTG) for the treatment of gingival recession, over a 3-month period.

226 many advantages, carries a risk of gingival recession, papilla loss, collapse of ridge contour, and

227 nt decreases were recorded in both groups of recession parameters compared with baseline measurements

228 For the recession period between 2008 and 2011, there were 11 si

229 solitarious phase of each subspecies during recession periods to understand whether both subspecies

230 ch from a harmless solitarious stage, during recession periods, to swarms of gregarious individuals t

231 xamination including probing depth, gingival recession, plaque index, and bleeding on probing was per

232 D, clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession, plaque index, GI, and bleeding on probing (BO

233 d that as unemployment rates increase during recessions, population mortality actually declines.

234 ntries, our analysis suggests that, although recessions pose risks to health, the interaction of fisc

235 plaque score), bleeding on probing, gingival recession, probing depth (PD), and vertical (VAL) and ho

236 Recession, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level

237 to describe the spatial-temporal spread and recession process of floodwaters in urban road networks.

238 ediment supply and rapid hydrograph rise and recession produced the conditions for these exceptional

239 tarious distributions and forecast potential recession range shifts under two extreme climate change

240 orthern clade could contract its solitarious recession range, while the southern clade is likely to e

241 e the southern clade is likely to expand its recession range.

242 of multiple Class III-IV Miller periodontal recession (REC) defects on mandibular anterior teeth.

243 D), clinical attachment loss (CAL), gingival recession (REC), and bleeding on probing (BoP) being mea

244 ation of this new classification of gingival recessions, recent articles still report data based on p

245 alone showed a similar tendency for gingival recession recurrence.

246 nd of T3, 83% of the 64 treated sites showed recession reduction (RecRed), whereas 48% of the 64 untr

247 ADM-treated sites displayed recession relapse from 1 to 9 years.

248 tion programmes, no significant increases in recession-related mortality were observed.

249 abismus who underwent surgical correction by recession, resection, advancement, or a combination of b

250 Recession-resection (bilateral superior rectus recession

251 Five patients were from the recession-resection group, namely 3 for induced V-patter

252 While recession-resection of the vertical recti and weakening

253 uated the relative effectiveness of combined recession-resection of vertical rectus muscles versus su

254 From 1 to 9 years, the ADM-treated isolated recessions showed a relapse from 77% to 62% mRC (P <0.05

255 017 classification of phenotype and gingival recession successfully incorporated the most relevant pr

256 s related to the 2016-2017 Nigerian economic recession that influenced care-seeking and hospital func

257 Following the onset of the recession, the gap in unemployment rates between individ

258 During the period encompassing the Great Recession, the magnitude of these associations doubled i

259 tions is unclear and the ability of gingival recession to predict underlying buccal bone deficiencies

260 e graft (CTG) + PRF in Miller Class I and II recession treatment compared to CAF + CTG.

261 advocate the true clinical effect of PRF on recession treatment with CAF + CTG, and additional trial

262 centered outcomes in patients with bilateral recession type 1 multiple gingival recessions after 6 mo

263 Data on Class I, II, III, and IV recessions, type of histologic attachment achieved with

264 indings on soft tissue root coverage (RC) of recession-type defects to daily clinical practice.

265 depth and CAL gain for Miller Class I and II recession-type defects.

266 h at least one Miller Class I or II gingival recession underwent a surgical root coverage procedure.

267 In 3 patients, an inferior rectus recession using an adjustable suture was performed to tr

268 Angle recession, uveitis, and aphakia increased the odds of a

269 Lower baseline IOP, angle recession, uveitis, and aphakia were associated with inc

270 tant, [Formula: see text], the ratio between recession velocity and distance.

271 rs of plaque index, gingival index, vertical recession (VR), probing depth, clinical attachment level

272 Clinical parameters including vertical recession (VR), probing depth, keratinized tissue (KT),

273 e WMD of CAL gain was 0.10 mm and the WMD of recession was -0.18 mm; again, no significant difference

274 The mean lateral rectus recession was 8.2 +/- 1.1 mm, and the mean medial rectus

275 Accordingly, gingival recession was a significant predictor for buccal bone th

276 The Great Recession was associated with small increases in caloric

277 Prevalence and severity of gingival recession was higher at the sites with thin gingiva comp

278 ooting adult mass followed by extensive mass recession was most prevalent at our freshwater colony, b

279 Gingival recession was present at 32.9% of maxillary anterior tee

280 mine if such trends continue during economic recessions, we analyzed mortality rates in Spain before

281 ry anterior teeth with pre-existing gingival recession were more likely to have thin (<1 mm) buccal b

282 st one site of Miller Class I or II gingival recession were treated by a coronally advanced flap with

283 o the test group (TG), and the contralateral recessions were assigned to the control group (CG).

284 Eight patients contributing 23 recessions were available at the 240 +/- 12 months follo

285 The recessions were treated and assigned randomly to the tes

286 Recessions were treated with gingival unit grafts in gro

287 ith lack of attached gingiva associated with recessions, were treated with marginal or submarginal fr

288 nsisting of short illness, temperature, age, recession, wheeze, asthma, and vomiting (mnemonic STARWA

289 lated to the presence or absence of gingival recession, while patient sex, age, and the apico-coronal

290 ment level (CAL) and recession height (GRH), recession width (GRW) and KGW measurements were recorded

291 apilla bleeding index, recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), and root surface area were evaluat

292 s presented reduction of recession depth and recession width and gain of keratinized tissue thickness

293 ference in the midfacial recession depth and recession width at the test and control sites at baselin

294 Gingival thickness, recession depth, recession width, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment

295 Post-restoration, clinical (probing depth, recession, width of keratinized mucosa, bleeding on prob

296 Recession with a non-inferiority margin of 0.4 mm (p = 0

297 emissions were largely a result of economic recession with changes in fuel mix (for example, substit

298 rtical rectus muscles versus superior rectus recession with inferior oblique weakening for patients w

299 ital, iris depigmentation and thinning, iris recession with retinal necrosis and hypotony, a filterin

300 onstrates the possibility of treating buccal recessions with gingival unit grafts as an alternative t